Incorporating Space in the Theory of Endogenous Growth: Contributions from the New Economic Geography
We describe how endogenous growth theory has now incorporated spatial factors. We also derive some of the policy implications of this new theory for growth and economic integration. We start by reviewing the product variety model of endogenous growth and discuss similarities with modeling techniques in the new economic geography. Both use Dixit-Stiglitz competition. Increasing returns provide an incentive for innovation in endogenous growth theory, and in combination with transport costs, increasing returns provide an incentive for firm location decisions in the new economic geography. Since innovation is the engine of growth in endogenous growth models and knowledge spillovers are a key input to innovation production, we also explore how innovation and knowledge have distinctly spatial characteristics. These modeling similarities and the spatial nature of knowledge spillovers have led to space being incorporated into the theory of endogenous growth. We guide the reader through how space is modeled in endogenous growth theory via the new economic geography. Growth by innovation is a force for agglomeration. When space is included, growth is enhanced by agglomeration because of the presence of localized technology spillovers. We consider the many other spatial factors included in models of space and growth. We explore the spatial effects on economic growth demonstrated by these theoretical models. Lastly, we consider policy implications for integration beyond lowering trade costs and discuss how lowering the cost of trading knowledge is a stabilizing force and is growth enhancing.
KeywordsTransport cost Real wage Knowledge spillover Endogenous growth Unskilled worker
We would like to thank Jacques Poot for excellent comments on earlier drafts of this chapter. Steven Bond-Smith would also like to thank the Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund and the University of Waikato for financial support.
- Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev 86(3):630–640Google Scholar
- Baldwin R, Martin P (2004) Agglomeration and regional growth. In: Henderson JV, Thisse J-F (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics. Cities and geography, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2671–2711Google Scholar
- Baldwin R, Forslid R, Martin P, Ottaviano G, Robert-Nicoud R (2003) Economic geography and public policy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Dixit AK, Stiglitz J (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67(3):297–308Google Scholar
- Grossman G, Helpman E (1991a) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Grossman G, Helpman E (1995) Technology and trade. In: Grossman G, Rogoff K (eds) The handbook of international economics, vol 3. Elsevier/North Holland, Amsterdam/New York, pp 1279–1337Google Scholar
- McCann P (2009) Economic geography, globalization and New Zealand’s productivity paradox. N Z Econ Pap 43(3):279–314Google Scholar
- Nelson RR (ed) (1993) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar