Advertisement

Endogenous Growth Theory and Regional Extensions

  • Zoltan Acs
  • Mark SandersEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

In this chapter, we outline the basic mechanisms in endogenous growth theory that identify knowledge creation and diffusion as the core driver of economic growth. Then we discuss how new economic geography, urban economics, organizational science, and entrepreneurship theory have “regionalized” the mechanisms involved. Knowledge creation, however, has been dubbed a “proximate cause” of growth, and the quest for “fundamental causes” has continued. We discuss this recent development in macroeconomic growth theory and argue that the new “institutional approach to growth” opens up a lot of new avenues for future research. Once again, the importance of cities, organizations, and entrepreneurship is largely ignored in macro growth theory. Yet economic geography, urban economics, organizational science, and entrepreneurship theory have a lot to contribute to growth theory by both empirically and theoretically developing our understanding of local institutions and linking these to regional economic development and growth.

Keywords

Growth Entrepreneurship Economic geography Region Urban economics Organizational science 

References

  1. Acemoglu D (2009) Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am Econ Rev 91(5):1369–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acs Z, Sanders M (2011) Patents, knowledge spillovers and entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 34(1).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9322-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Acs Z, Audretsch D, Braunerhjelm P, Carlsson B (2009) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 32(1):15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aghion P, Howitt P (1991) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2):323–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aghion P, Caroli E, Garcia-Penalosa C (1999) Inequality and economic growth: the perspective of new growth theories. J Econ Lit 37(4):1615–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z (1997) Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. J Urban Econ 42(3):422–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch D, Lehmann E (2005) Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Res Policy 34(8):1191–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch D, Sanders M (2011) Technological innovation, entrepreneurship and development. In: Szirmai E, Naude W, Goedhuys M (eds) Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 35–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baldwin R, Forslid R (2000) The core-periphery model and endogenous growth: stabilizing and destabilizing integration. Economica 67(267):307–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barro R (1996) Democracy and growth. J Econ Growth 1(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barro R, Sala-I-Martin X (2004) Economic growth, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Baumol W (1990) Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive and destructive. J Polit Econ 98(5):893–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Becker G (1964) Human capital. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. de Groot H, Poot J, Smit M (2009) Agglomeration externalities, innovation and regional growth: theoretical perspectives and meta-analysis. In: Capello R, Nijkamp P (eds) Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 256–281Google Scholar
  16. Desai S, Acs ZJ, Weitzel U (2013) A model of destructive entrepreneurship: insight for conflict and postconflict recovery. J Confl Resolut 57(1):20–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellison G, Glaeser E (1999) The geographic concentration of industry: does natural advantage explain agglomeration? Am Econ Assoc Papers Proc 89(2):311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feldman M, Audretsch D (1999) Innovation in cities: science based diversity, specialization and localized competition. Eur Econ Rev 43(2):409–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Florida R (2005) Cities and the creative class. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giesen C, Südekum J (2011) Zipf’s law for cities in the regions and the country. J Econ Geogr 11(4):667–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glaeser E, Kallal H, Scheinkman J, Schleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100(6):1126–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grossman G, Helpman E (1991a) Innovation and growth in the global economy. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Grossman G, Helpman E (1991b) Endogenous product cycles. Econ J 101(409):1214–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henderson V (2006) In: Aghion P, Durlauf S (eds) Urbanization and growth. Handbook of economic growth. Elsevier-NorthHolland, New York, pp 1543–1591Google Scholar
  25. Jones CI (1995) R & D-based models of economic growth. J Polit Econ 103(4):759–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3):483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lucas R (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22(1):3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):S71–S102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sanders M, Weitzel U (2013) Misallocation of entrepreneurial talent in postconflict environments. J Confl Resolut 57(1):41–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Solow R (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39(3):312–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Temple J (1999) The new growth evidence. J Econ Lit 37(1):112–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Schar School of Policy and GovernmentGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Utrecht School of EconomicsUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations