Skip to main content

Spatial Models Using Laplace Approximation Methods

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Regional Science

Abstract

Bayesian inference has been at the center of the development of spatial statistics in recent years. In particular, Bayesian hierarchical models including several fixed and random effects have become very popular in many different fields. Given that inference on these models is seldom available in closed form, model fitting is usually based on simulation methods such as Markov chain Monte Carlo.

However, these methods are often very computationally expensive and a number of approximations have been developed. The integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) provides a general approach to computing the posterior marginals of the parameters in the model. INLA focuses on latent Gaussian models, but this is a class of methods wide enough to tackle a large number of problems in spatial statistics.

In this chapter, we describe the main advantages of the integrated nested Laplace approximation. Applications to many different problems in spatial statistics will be discussed as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baddeley A, Rubak E, Turner R (2015) Spatial point patterns: methodology and applications with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, London. http://www.crcpress.com/Spatial-Point-Patterns-Methodology-and-Applications-with-R/Baddeley-Rubak-Turner/9781482210200/

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bakka H, Rue H, Fuglstad GA, Riebler A, Bolin D, Krainski E, Simpson D, Lindgren F (2018) Spatial modelling with R-INLA: a review. WIREs Comput Stat 10(6):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Gelfand AE, Carlin BP (2004) Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Besag J, York J, Mollie A (1991) Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics. Ann Inst Stat Math 43(1):1–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PJ, Menezes R, Su T (2010) Geostatistical inference under preferential sampling. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 59(2):191–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrmeir L, Kneib T (2011) Bayesian smoothing and regression for longitudinal. Spatial and event history data. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geisser S (1993) Predictive inference: an introduction. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2003) Bayesian data analysis, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammann EE, Wand MP (2003) Geoadditive models. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 52(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang S, Brezger A (2004) Bayesian P-splines. J Comput Graph Stat 13(1):183–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DJ, Durbán M (2009) Smooth-car mixed models for spatial count data. Comput Stat Data Anal 53(8):2968–2979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren F, Rue H, Lindström J (2011) An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the SPDE approach (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 73(4):423–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martino S, Rue H (2010) Case studies in Bayesian computation using INLA. In: Mantovan P, Secchi P (eds) Complex data modeling and computationally intensive statistical methods, contributions to statistics. Springer, New York, pp 99–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit LI (1990) The conditional predictive ordinate for the normal distribution. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 52(1):175–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos M, Held L (2011) Sensitivity analysis in Bayesian generalized linear mixed models for binary data. Bayesian Anal 6(2):259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rue H, Held L (2005) Gaussian Markov random fields. Theory and applications. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rue H, Martino S, Chopin N (2009) Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J R Stat Soc Ser B 71(Part 2):319–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rue H, Riebler AI, Sørbye SH, Illian JB, Simpson DP, Lindgren FK (2017) Bayesian computing with INLA: a review. Ann Rev Stat Appl 4:395–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson D, Illian J, Lindgren F, Sørbye SH, Rue H (2016) Going off grid: computationally efficient inference for log-gaussian cox processes. Biometrika 103(1):49–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

V. Gómez-Rubio has been supported by grants PPIC-2014-001-P and SBPLY/17/180501/000491, funded by Consejería de Educación, Cultura y Deportes (JCCM, Spain) and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, and grants MTM2008-03085 and MTM2016-77501-P, funded by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spain).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virgilio Gómez-Rubio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Gómez-Rubio, V., Bivand, R.S., Rue, H. (2019). Spatial Models Using Laplace Approximation Methods. In: Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_104-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_104-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics