Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering

2015 Edition
| Editors: Michael Beer, Ioannis A. Kougioumtzoglou, Edoardo Patelli, Siu-Kui Au

Land Use Planning Following an Earthquake Disaster

  • Wendy SaundersEmail author
  • Suzanne Vallance
  • Ljubica Mamula-Seadon
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35344-4_358

Synonyms

Canterbury; Governance; Post-earthquake; Pre-event; Recovery

Introduction

The term “land use planning” covers many aspects of planning: spatial, urban design, heritage, transportation, recreation, access to education, health facilities, natural hazards, landscape, biodiversity, air and water quality, affordable housing, cultural values, sustainability, etc., and this is not a complete list of the many aspects and parts to land use planning. A planner may specialize in one of these aspects, e.g., a transportation planner, or be a generalist ― knowing a little about many aspects of planning.

There are many definitions of land use planning; however, March and Henry ( 2007, p. 17) provide a concise discussion on what planning, and more specifically land use planning, is. They state:

Land-use planning … is focussed upon establishing the best spatial arrangements of land use, development, and management … To do this, land-use planning is confronted with the task of establishing which...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson V (2011) Tuesday quake ‘no aftershock’. The Press, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker JS, Saunders WSA et al (2011) Preplanning for recovery. In: Miller DS, Rivera JD (eds) Community disaster recovery and resiliency: exploring global opportunities and challenges. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 525―550Google Scholar
  3. Britton NR, Clark GJ (2000). Non regulatory approaches to earthquake risk reduction: the New Zealand experience. In: 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, AucklandGoogle Scholar
  4. Brookie R (2012) Governing the recovery from the Canterbury Earthquakes 2010―11: the debate over institutional design. Institute for Governance and Policy Studies, Victoria University, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (2012) Recovery strategy for Greater Christchurch Mahere Haumanutanga o Waitaha. Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  6. Central City Development Unit (2012) The plan. http://ccdu.govt.nz/the-plan. Retrieved Dec 2015
  7. Christchurch City Council (2015a) Share an idea. http://www.ccc.govt.nz/homeliving/civildefence/chchearthquake/ShareAnIdea.aspx. Retrieved 15 Dec 2015
  8. Christchurch City Council (2015b) Central city. http://www.ccc.govt.nz/homeliving/civildefence/chchearthquake/centralcityplan.aspx. Retrieved 15 Dec 2015
  9. Emerson K, Nabatchi T et al (2012) An integrated framework for collaborative governance. J Public Adm Res Theory 22(1):1―29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greater Christchurch (2015) The greater Christchurch urban development strategy. http://www.greaterchristchurch.org.nz/. Retrieved 1 Dec 2015
  11. IAP2 (2014) Public participation spectrum. http://www.iap2.org.au/documents/item/84. Retrieved 7 Jan 2014
  12. Johnson L, Mamula-Seadon L (2014) Transforming governance: organizing for and managing disaster recovery following the September 4, 2010 and February 22, 2011 Canterbury earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra (Special Edition ― Canterbury Earthquakes) Vol 30, No 1, pp 577―605Google Scholar
  13. Johnson LA, Olshansky RB (2015) The road to recovery: governing post-disaster reconstruction. Land Lines (July), The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, https://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/2259_The-Road-to-Recovery―Governing-PostDisaster-Reconstruction, p 8
  14. Johnston D, Dolan L et al (2009) Disposal of debris following urban earthquakes: guiding the development of comprehensive pre-event plans, GNS science report 2009/33. GNS Science, Lower Hutt, p 27Google Scholar
  15. Kweit M, Kweit R (2004) Citizen participation and citizen evaluation in disaster recovery. Am Rev Public Adm 34(4):354―373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mamula-Seadon L (2009) CDEM, integrated planning and resilience: what is the connection? Tephra Commun Resil: Res, Plan Civ Def Emerg Manag 22:3―8Google Scholar
  17. March A, Henry S (2007) A better future from imagining the worst: land use planning and training responses to natural disaster. Aust J Emerg Manag 22(3):17―22Google Scholar
  18. Markham S (2015) The Waimakariri District Council’s recover approach and programme. Otago CDEM Recovery Workshop, AlexandraGoogle Scholar
  19. May PJ, Williams W (1986) Disaster policy implementation: managing programs under shared governance. Plenum, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MCDEM (2008) National civil defence emergency management strategy 2007. Department of Internal Affairs, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. McDonald L (2015) Call for action on mall impasse. The Press, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  22. Multi-national Resilience Policy Group (2015) The New Zealand discussion ― notes from meeting, Wellington/ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  23. Sachdeva S (2011) ‘I’m off’, says council identity Williams. The Press, ChristchurchGoogle Scholar
  24. Saunders WSA, Beban JG (2012) Putting R(isk) in the RMA: technical advisory group recommendations on the resource management act 1991 and implications for natural hazards planning, GNS science miscellaneous series 48. GNS Science, Lower Hutt, p 52Google Scholar
  25. Saunders WSA, Forsyth J et al (2007) Strengthening linkages between land-use planning and emergency management in New Zealand. Aust J Emerg Manag 22(1):36―43Google Scholar
  26. Smith G (2011) Planning for post-disaster recovery: a review of the United States disaster assistance framework. Public Entity Risk Institute, FairfaxGoogle Scholar
  27. Vallance S (2012) Urban resilience: Bouncing back, coping, thriving. A paper presented at the Australian & New Zealand Disaster and Emergency Management Conference, Brisbane ― 16 ― 18, April 2012Google Scholar
  28. Vallance S (2015) The Waimakariri District Council’s Integrated Community-based Recovery Framework. Department of Environmental Management, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, 85084Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendy Saunders
    • 1
    Email author
  • Suzanne Vallance
    • 2
  • Ljubica Mamula-Seadon
    • 3
  1. 1.GNS ScienceLower HuttNew Zealand
  2. 2.Lincoln UniversityChristchurchNew Zealand
  3. 3.Centre for Infrastructure Research at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand