Skip to main content

Time History Seismic Analysis

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering

Synonyms

Artificial accelerograms; Direct integration methods; Inertia and damping forces; Linear and nonlinear analysis; Natural records; Seismic loading

Introduction

Most of the current seismic design codes belong to the category of prescriptive design procedures (or limit-state design procedures), where if a number of checks are satisfied, then the structure is considered safe since it fulfills the safety criterion against collapse. A typical limit-state-based design can be viewed as one- (i.e., ultimate strength) or two-limit-state approach (i.e., serviceability and ultimate strength). Existing seismic design procedures are based on the principle that a structure will avoid collapse if it is designed to absorb and dissipate the kinetic energy that is induced during a seismic excitation. Most of the modern seismic norms express the ability of the structure to absorb energy through inelastic deformation using a reduction or behavior factor that depends on the material and the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 2,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anastassiadis K, Avramidis I, Panetsos P (2002) Concurrent design forces in structures under three-component orthotropic seismic excitation. Earthq Spectra 18:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (2007) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI Standard 41-06. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE/SEI (2010) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI Standard 07-10. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanatopoulou AM (2005) Critical orientation of three correlated seismic components. Eng Struct 27(2):301–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. EN 1998. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK, Goel RK (2002) A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(3):561–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 16(3):573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA (2003) HAZUS-MH MR1, Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology earthquake model. National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fib (2012) Probabilistic performance-based seismic design. Bulletin 68. International Federation of Structural Concrete, Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragiadakis M, Papadrakakis M (2008) Modelling, analysis and reliability of seismically excited structures: computational issues. Int J Comput Methods 5(4):483–511

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gasparini DA, Vanmarke EH (1976) Simulated earthquake motions compatible with prescribed response spectra. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Civil Engineering, Publication No. R76-4, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghersi A, Rossi PP (2001) Influence of bi-directional ground motions on the inelastic response of one-storey in-plan irregular systems. Eng Struct 23(6):579–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobarah A, Abou-Elfath H, Biddah A (1999) Response-based damage assessment of structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28(1):79–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovenale P, Cornell CA, Esteva L (2004) Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(8):951–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houbolt JC (1950) A recurrence matrix solution for the dynamic response of elastic aircraft. J Aeronaut Sci 17:540–550

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kent DC, Park R (1971) Flexural members with confined concrete. J Struct Div 97(7):1969–1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagaros ND (2010) Multicomponent incremental dynamic analysis considering variable incident angle. J Struct Infrastruct Eng 6(1–2):77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez OA, Torres R (1997) The critical angle of seismic incidence and the maximum structural response. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:881–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez OA, Chopra AK, Hernandez JJ (2000) Critical response of structures to multicomponent earthquake excitation. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 29:1759–1778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacRae GA, Mattheis J (2000) Three-dimensional steel building response to near-fault motions. J Struct Eng 126(1):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacRae GA, Tagawa H (2001) Seismic behaviour of 3D steel moment frame with biaxial columns. J Struct Eng 127(5):490–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menegotto M, Pinto PE (1973) Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending. In: Proceedings, IABSE symposium on resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well defined repeated loads, Zurich, Switzerland, pp 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Menun C, Der Kiureghian A (1998) A replacement for the 30 %, 40 % and SRSS rules for multicomponent seismic analysis. Earthq Spectra 14(1):153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menun C, Der Kiureghian A (2000) Envelopes for seismic response vectors. I: theory. J Struct Eng 126:467–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitropoulou Ch Ch, Lagaros ND, Papadrakakis M (2010) Economic building design based on energy dissipation: a critical assessment. Bull Earthq Eng 8(6):1375–1396

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. ASCE J Eng Mech Div 85:67–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) (2012) http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/search.html/. Accessed Nov 2012

  • Penzien J, Watabe M (1975) Characteristics of 3-dimensional earthquake ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 3(4):365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigato AB, Medina RA (2007) Influence of angle of incidence on seismic demands for inelastic single-storey structures subjected to bi-directional ground motions. Eng Struct 29(10):2593–2601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(3):491–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EL, Farhoomand I, Bathe KJ (1973) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of complex structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EL, Suharwardy A, Habibullah A (1995) A clarification of the orthogonal effects in a three-dimensional seismic analysis. Earthq Spectra 11(4):659–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikos D. Lagaros .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lagaros, N.D., Mitropoulou, C.C., Papadrakakis, M. (2015). Time History Seismic Analysis. In: Beer, M., Kougioumtzoglou, I.A., Patelli, E., Au, SK. (eds) Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35344-4_134

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics