Skip to main content

Operating Theatres and Avoidance of Surgical Sepsis

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
European Surgical Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Abstract

The Operating Room (OR) is the heart of any surgical hospital and it is the place where the most dangerous accidents can rarely occur either to the patients or to the operating team. Post-surgical infection is one of the most important complications, in particular in Orthopaedic surgery. A new aspect of the life in the OR is the personal protection of the staff: the OR is now under the severe regulation of the legislation regarding the safety in workplace.

The rule of the 5 D’s according to Joubert, the historical key-stone in the strategy of the fight against infection, can be still adopted in the more complex fight against OR errors for a good quality of life for patient and personnel: 1. Discipline, 2. Design, 3. Devices, 4. Defence mechanism of the patient, 5. Drugs. The first three of these are the subject of this article.

Discipline is a critical issue, as it has the capacity of decreasing the efficacy of other factors. It concerns the personnel and the patients, independently from the hierarchy, sex and job. Discipline must be considered a fundamental instrument for reducing the risk of infections related to surgery and for increasing the personal safety of each member of the operating team. Many points are discussed and the European directives mention: protocols and checklists, surgical team and risk management and the preparation of the personnel from the surgical hand washing to the clothing, gowns and masks.

Secondly, the building regulations for the ideal operating block and OR must be followed according to the actual regulations; the need to renovate old operating blocks and to adopt strategies, also in organisation, are discussed. The development of surgery, including Day and Week-End Surgeries, and of many new devices, and consequently of the need for more space, more instruments and more expert staff, are presented.

Thirdly, the ventilation and controlled-contamination air-conditioning systems (VCCAC) are presented, considering the classification of the level of air cleanliness, the risk of contamination due to chemical agents, the air changes, the thermal comfort conditions and technical aspects such as the pressure, noise and the recovery time.

The main difference from the past is that now a complete programme of risk management, checklists, protocols, group management and European directives have a role rather than the old “good sense” surgical practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. World Alliance for Patient Safety. WHO guidelines for safe surgery. Geneva: WHO; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:491–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallinaro P, Brach del Prever EM. The operating theatre. In EFORT surgical techniques in orthopaedics and traumatology, Tome 1: 55-010-A-10. Elsevier: Paris 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Joubert JD. Conception des blocs opératoires. 2nd ed. Lyon: Comimprim; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gallinaro P. Human factors and infection in THA. Hip Int. 2002;12:81–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smyth ET, Emmerson AM. Surgical site infection surveillance. J Hosp Infect. 2000;45(3):173–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Geubbels EL, Bakker HG, Houtman P, van Noort-Klaassen MA, Pelk MS, Sassen TM, Wille JC. Promoting quality through surveillance of surgical site infections: five prevention success stories. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32(7):424–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Laufman H. What’s happened to aseptic discipline in the OR? Todays OR Nurse. 1990;12(10):15–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beldi G, Bisch-Knaden S, Banz V, Muhlemann K, Candinas D. Impact of intraoperative behaviour on surgical site infections. Am J Surg. 2009;198(2):157–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Madhavan P, Blom A, Karagkevrakis B, Pradeep M, Huma H, Newman JH. Deterioration of theatre discipline during total joint replacement-have theatre protocols been abandoned? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81(4):262–5.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mackain-Bremner AA, Owens K, Wylde V, Bannister GC, Blom AW. Adherence to recommendations designed to decrease intra-operative wound contamination. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90(5):412–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Recommendations and Reports October 25, 2002, 51 - No. RR-16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings. Recommendations of the healthcare infection control practices.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singh VK, Kalairajah Y. Splash in elective primary knee and hip replacement: are we adequately protected? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(B-8):1074–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Amirfeyz R, Tasker A, Ali S, Bowker K, Blom A. Theatre shoes – a link in the common pathway of postoperative wound infection? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89:605–8. doi:10.1308/003588407X205440.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Maiyah M, Bajwa A, Mackenney P, Port A, Gregg PJ, Hill D, Finn P. Glove perforation and contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(4):556–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sexton JB, Thomas EJ, Helmreich RL. Error, stress and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ. 2000;320:745–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Undre S, Sevdalis N, Healey AN et al. Teamwork in the operating room: cohesion or confusion? J Eval Clin Prat. 2006;12(2):182–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paige J, Kozmenko V, Morgan B, Shannonhowell D, Chauvin S, Hilton C, Chon I, O’Leary P. From the flight deck to the operating room: an initial pilot study of the feasibility and potential impact of true interdisciplinary team training using high fidelity simulation. J Surg Educ. 2007;64(6):369–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reason J. Human error: models and management. BMJ. 2000;320:768–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grote G, Helmreich RL, Strater O, et al. Setting the stage: characteristics of organizations, teams and tasks influencing team process. In: Dietrich R, Childress TM, editors. Group interaction in high risk environments. Adelshort: Ashgate; 2004. p. 111–39.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ASHRAE – HVAC design guide for hospitals and clinics. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air conditioning Engineers; ASHRAE Head quartiers 1791 Tullie Circle NE Atlanta GA 30329; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  22. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air conditioning Engineers. Chapter 7 “Health care facilities”. In ASHRAE handbook – 2007 HVAC applications. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air conditioning Engineers; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Gallinaro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1 National and International Standards/Guidelines

Appendix 1 National and International Standards/Guidelines

  • EN-ISO 14644– Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments.

    • Part 1: Classification of air cleanliness. Ed. 01/05/99

    • Part 2: Specifications for testing and monitoring to prove continued compliance with ISO 14644-1.

    • Part 3: Metrology and test metods.

    • Part 4: Desing, constraction and “start-up”.

    • Part 5: Operations

  • France: Norme NF S 90-351:2003, Établissements de santé. Salles propres et environnements maîtrisés et apparentés. Exigences relatives pour la maîtrise de la contamination aéroportée.

  • Germany: DIN 1946-4, 2005:02 Ventilation and air conditioning - Part 4: Ventilation in hospitals

  • Switzerland: Swki 400/5/2003 R-99-3, Guidelines on Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning in Hospitals.

  • Austria: ÖNORM H 6021-1-2003 Lüftungstechnische Anlagen – Reinhaltung und Reinigung.

  • United Kingdom: Health Technical Memorandum HTM 2025: Ventilation in Healthcare Premises.

  • Italy: ISPESL – Dipartimento igiene del Lavoro – Linee guida per la definizione degli standard di sicurezza e di igiene ambientale dei reparti operatori, 1999.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 EFORT

About this entry

Cite this entry

Gallinaro, P., Brach del Prever, E.M., Bistolfi, A., Odasso, A., Bo, M., Masoero, C.M. (2014). Operating Theatres and Avoidance of Surgical Sepsis. In: Bentley, G. (eds) European Surgical Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34746-7_220

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34746-7_220

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34745-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34746-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics