Skip to main content

Follow Up of Surgical Patients and Legal Medicine

  • Reference work entry
Legal and Forensic Medicine

Introduction

Historically, patients who had undergone a surgical procedure were followed up by the surgeon postoperatively for a variable time. Most surgeons, their patients, and other health-care professionals would describe review by the surgeon, following a surgical procedure, as standard practice. There is a perception that this may reduce the risk of legal medicine claims for negligence, as surgeons do not want to be found deficient by not following up their patients. What is the purpose of this follow-up? Particularly in public hospitals, without setting limits on outpatient clinic numbers, clinics can quickly become overburdened. For most public hospitals, there is a waiting period between the time of referral and the time of being seen in a specialist clinic. As health economics and streamlining of health systems expand, there is ever-increasing pressure toward more effective utilization of resources with attached demands for improved performance. One easy performance measure...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gurjar SV, Kulkarni D, Khawaja HT. Outpatient general surgical follow-up: are we using this resource effectively. Int J Surg. 2009;7(1):62–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gnanalingham KK, Willams GT. The usefulness of surgical outpatient follow up from the perspective of the patient, their general practitioner and surgeon. Int J Surg. 2004;2(1):19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kosmider S, Shedda S, Jones I, McLaughlin S, Gibbs P. Predictors of clinic non-attendance – opportunities to improve patient outcomes in colorectal cancer. Intern Med J. 2010;40(11):757–63. doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01986.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kontos M, Allen D, Trafalis DT, Jones G, Garmo H, Holmberg L, Hamed H. Follow-up may not be beneficial after treatment of grade 1 breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96(9):999–1004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wheeler T, Stenning S, Negus S, Picken S, Metcalfe S. Evidence to support a change in follow-up policy for patients with breast cancer: time to first relapse and hazard rate analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1999;11(3):169–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smit DJH, Maass AH, Van den Heuvel AF, et al. The value and limitations of a wound inspection clinic after cardiac device implantation. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009;8(4):288–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart R. Walker MBBS DM FRCS (Gen Surg) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Walker, S.R. (2013). Follow Up of Surgical Patients and Legal Medicine. In: Beran, R. (eds) Legal and Forensic Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_72

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics