Introduction
Historically, patients who had undergone a surgical procedure were followed up by the surgeon postoperatively for a variable time. Most surgeons, their patients, and other health-care professionals would describe review by the surgeon, following a surgical procedure, as standard practice. There is a perception that this may reduce the risk of legal medicine claims for negligence, as surgeons do not want to be found deficient by not following up their patients. What is the purpose of this follow-up? Particularly in public hospitals, without setting limits on outpatient clinic numbers, clinics can quickly become overburdened. For most public hospitals, there is a waiting period between the time of referral and the time of being seen in a specialist clinic. As health economics and streamlining of health systems expand, there is ever-increasing pressure toward more effective utilization of resources with attached demands for improved performance. One easy performance measure...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gurjar SV, Kulkarni D, Khawaja HT. Outpatient general surgical follow-up: are we using this resource effectively. Int J Surg. 2009;7(1):62–5.
Gnanalingham KK, Willams GT. The usefulness of surgical outpatient follow up from the perspective of the patient, their general practitioner and surgeon. Int J Surg. 2004;2(1):19–21.
Kosmider S, Shedda S, Jones I, McLaughlin S, Gibbs P. Predictors of clinic non-attendance – opportunities to improve patient outcomes in colorectal cancer. Intern Med J. 2010;40(11):757–63. doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01986.x.
Kontos M, Allen D, Trafalis DT, Jones G, Garmo H, Holmberg L, Hamed H. Follow-up may not be beneficial after treatment of grade 1 breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96(9):999–1004.
Wheeler T, Stenning S, Negus S, Picken S, Metcalfe S. Evidence to support a change in follow-up policy for patients with breast cancer: time to first relapse and hazard rate analysis. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1999;11(3):169–73.
Smit DJH, Maass AH, Van den Heuvel AF, et al. The value and limitations of a wound inspection clinic after cardiac device implantation. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009;8(4):288–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Walker, S.R. (2013). Follow Up of Surgical Patients and Legal Medicine. In: Beran, R. (eds) Legal and Forensic Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_72
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_72
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32337-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32338-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences