Abstract
Medical liability is liability for damage inflicted to a patient by a health service provider. In comparison to criminal responsibility of physicians, civil law liability of health service providers (medical liability) is more important because of the number of cases and financial impact of damages on the health-care systems throughout the world. Medical liability attracts attention of both physicians and lawyers because of the amount of damages paid to patients, not only by health service providers but also by insurance companies. A health service provider will be held liable only if conditions of civil law liability are met. This is the consequence of the fact that, in most jurisdictions in the world, medical liability is not a special form of liability. A health service provider will be liable under same conditions as any other tortfeasor. Damage inflicted to the patient is the condition of liability which triggers liability, but it is not sufficient to produce liability. Medical liability will arise only if there is causal connection between the act or omission of a health service provider on one side and damage inflicted to a patient on the other. The act or omission of the health service provider must be wrongful, meaning contrary to either rules of medical science or statutory provisions of law (such as provisions on the written form of the patient’s consent, if such provision exists in the particular jurisdiction). As a matter of principle, medical liability is based on fault by a health service provider. In exceptional cases, strict liability rules may be applicable. Apart from “standard” medical liability, there are other ways to compensate for damage inflicted to the patient (e.g., no-fault compensation).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Heckendorn L. Die Haftung freier Berufe zwischen Vertrag und Delikt. Bern: Stämpfli; 2006. p. 283.
Škrobonja A, Muzur A, Rotschild V. Povijest medicine za praktičare (The history of medicine for practitioners). Rijeka: Adamić; 2003. p. 22.
Hondius E. Comparative medical liability in Europe. In: Hohloch G, Frank R, Schlechtriem P, editors. Festschrift für Hans Stoll zum 75. Geburstag. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck; 2001. p. 186.
Powell JL, Stewart R. Jackson & Powell on professional negligence. 5th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2002. p. 747–927.
Nys H. Medical law in Belgium. Alphen aad den Rijn: Kluwer Law International; 2010. p. 41–2.
Nys H. Medical law in Belgium. Alphen aad den Rijn: Kluwer Law International; 2010. p. 41.
Martin EA. A dictionary of law. 4th ed. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press; 1997. p. 76.
Moréteau O. France. In: Koziol H, Steininger BC, editors. European Tort law 2008. Wien/New York: Springer; 2009. p. 282–3.
Grubb A, Laing J, McHale J. Principles of medical law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 136.
Galand-Caraval S. France. In: Faure M, Koziol H, editors. Cases on medical malpractice in a comparative perspective. Wien/New York: Springer; 2001. p. 102.
Martín-Casals M, Ribot Igualada J, Solé Feliu J. Medical malpractice liability in Spain: cases, trends and developments. Eur J Health Law. 2003;10:153.
Mécs AT. Medical liability and the burden of proof. McGill Law Journal. 1970;16:164.
Baudouin J-L, Linden AM. Tort law in Canada. Kluwer Law International: Alphen aan den Rijn; 2010. p. 44.
Giesen D. International medical malpractice law. Tübingen Dordrecht Boston London: J.C.B. Mohr Martinus Nijhoff Publisher; 1988. p. 74–5.
van Gerven W, Lever J, Larouche P. Tort law. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing; 2000. p. 18.
Mulheron R. Medical negligence: non-patient and third party claims. Surrey: Ashgate; 2010. p. 296.
van Gerven W, Lever J, Larouche P. Tort law. Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing; 2000. p. 475.
Note (unsigned), Fixing medical malpractice through health insurer enterprise liability. Harv Law Rev. 2008;121:1197
Jones MA. Medical negligence. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 1991. p. 277.
Martin EA. A dictionary of law. 4th ed. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press; 1997. p. 124.
Magnus U. Comparative report on the law of damages. In: Magnus U, editor. Unification of Tort law: damages. The Hague London Boston: Kluwer Law International; 1996. p. 190–191.
Stolker CJJM. WGBO en aansprakelijkheid. In: Legematte J, De WGBO, editors. van tekst naar toepassing. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum; 1995. p. 117.
Galand-Caraval S. France. In: Spier J, editor. Unification of Tort law: causation. The Hague/London/Boston: Kluwer Law International; 1996. p. 60.
Martin EA. A dictionary of law. 4th ed. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press; 1997. p. 467.
Baez III HB. United States. In: Colucci M, editor. International encyclopedia of laws, Tort law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International; 2010. p. 39.
Martin EA. A dictionary of law. 4th ed. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press; 1997. p. 305.
Markesinis BS, Unberath H. The German law of torts, a comparative treatise. 4th ed. Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing; 2002. p. 79.
Galand-Caraval S. Fault under French law. In: Widmer P, editor. Unification of Tort law: fault. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 2005. p. 91.
Cosy H, Droshout D. Fault under Belgian law. In: Widmer P, editor. Unification of tort law: fault. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 2005. p. 35.
Widmer P. Comparative report on fault as a basis of liability and criterion of imputation. In: Widmer P, editor. Unification of tort law: fault. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 2005. p. 337.
Taylor S. Clinical negligence reform: lessons from France? The International and Comparative Law Quarterly.. 2003;52:742–3.
Baez III HB. United States. In: Colucci M, editor. International encyclopedia of laws, Tort law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International; 2010. p. 57.
de Lousanoff O. Facilitations of proof in medical malpractice cases. Frankfurt am Main Bern: Peter Lang GmbH; 1982. p. 30–7.
de Lousanoff O. Facilitations of proof in medical malpractice cases. Frankfurt am Main Bern: Peter Lang GmbH; 1982. p. 24–30.
Kennedy I, Grubb A. Medical law. London/Edinburgh/Dublin: Butterworths; 2000. p. 445.
Honsell H. Die Aufklärung des Patienten über therapeutische Alternativen. Schweiz Juristen Ztg Rev Suisse Jurisprud. 2006;102:403.
Harder S. Measuring damages in the law of obligations. The search for harmonised principles. Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing; 2010. p. 298.
Kelly CN. Are medical malpractice damages caps constitutional? J Law Med Ethics. 2005;33:517.
Dute J. The debate on no-fault compensation in the Netherlands. Med Law. 2005;24:695.
Further Reading
Grubb A, Laing J, McHale J. Principles of medical law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
Herbots JH. International encyclopedia of laws: contracts. Alphen aad den Rijn: Kluwer Law International; 1993.
Katzenmeier C. Arzthaftung. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck); 2002.
Nys H. International encyclopedia of laws: medical law. Alphen aad den Rijn: Kluwer Law International; 2003.
Stijns S. International encyclopedia of laws: Tort law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Nikšić, S. (2013). Understanding Medical Liability. In: Beran, R. (eds) Legal and Forensic Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_53
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_53
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32337-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32338-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences