Computer Technology in Medical Practice and Its Impact on the Delivery of Health Care

Reference work entry

Abstract

The complexity of medical care is increasing rapidly, with a vast array of information required to be managed. Information technology (IT; computer systems to manage such information) is now accepted as the solution to this complexity and other knowledge management issues. It is also hailed as the solution to the medical systems hyperinflation, through the economic efficiencies it promises.

However, IT has its own drawbacks, with substantial concern about possible inappropriate access to information and difficulty in software design, which hinder the ability to achieve its primary purpose, namely to facilitate the medical care of patients in the health-care system, including from the perspective of the caregiver. The implementation of such extraordinarily expensive systems on an enormous scale is yet to be proven beneficial in substantial ways. However, the successful implementation of such systems is a necessity for modern medicine.

The legal and regulatory framework for such IT systems is also struggling to maintain pace with the evolution of technology.

Keywords

Electronic Medical Record Medical Error Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support Clinical Decision Support System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Stiller AD. Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Workshop on Health Informatics and Knowledge Management (HIKM 2010); Brisbane, Australia, 2010.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, Overhage JM, Shabot MM, Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8(4):299–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ash JS, et al. Studying the vendor perspective on clinical decision support. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:80–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casalino LP, Dunham D, Chin MH, et al. Frequency of failure to inform patients of clinically significant outpatient test results. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1123–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh H, Thomas E, Mani S, Sittig D, Arora H, Espadas D, et al. Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1578–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hysong SJ, Sawhney M, Wilson L, Sittig DF, Espadas D, Davis T, et al. Provider management strategies of abnormal test result alerts: a cognitive task analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17:71–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hysong SJ, Sawhney MK, Wilson L, Sittig DF, Esquivel A, Singh S, Singh H. Understanding the management of electronic test result notifications in the outpatient setting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011;11:22–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schiff GD, Bates DW. Can electronic clinical documentation help prevent diagnostic errors. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1066–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poissant L, Pereira J, Tamblyn R, Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(5):505–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ge X, Paige R, McDermid J. Domain analysis on an electronic health records system. FOSD’09, October 6, 2009; 49–54.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bjering H, Mcgregor C. Volume 108 in the Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series. Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Workshop on Health Informatics and Knowledge Management (HIKM 2010); Brisbane, Australia, 2010.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Phillips W, Gong Y. Developing a nomenclature for EMR errors. Proceedings of the Human-Computer Interaction, LNCS 5613, 2009, p. 587–96.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS, McKay T, Pike KC. To err is human. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith MF. The electronic patient record and computer safety. In AMICE 95. Proceedings Strategic Alliances between Patient Documentation and Medical Informatics. Rotterdam, Netherlands. 1995, p 325–31.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Botti M, Bucknall T. Medical error and error in healthcare. In: Kattan MW, Cowen ME, editors. Encyclopaedia of medical decision making. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2009. p. 56–60.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leonard M, Graham S, Bonacum D. The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(Suppl 1):i85–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koppel R, Kreda D. Health care information technology vendors’ “hold harmless” clause: implications for patients and clinicians. JAMA. 2009;301(12):1276–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Williams JB, Weber-Jahnke JH. Regulation of patient management software. Health Law Journal. 2010; 18. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1729275
  19. 19.
    Labre MP, et al. Public health interventions for asthma: an umbrella review, 1990–2010. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(4):403–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moullec G. et al. Respirology. 2012 Mar 8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02168Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bui AL, Fonarow GC. Home monitoring for heart failure management. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(2):97–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Higgins R, et al. Supporting chronic disease self-management: translating policies and principles into clinical practice. Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18(1):80–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.East Neurology, Prince of Wales HospitalUniversity of NSWBondi JunctionAustralia

Personalised recommendations