Definition
In many textbooks and articles about Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), “license to operate” is a frequently used concept used to indicate the limit of behavior established for a company to gain recognition and acceptance in its surroundings. More specifically, a “license to operate” may be defined as “Grant of permission to undertake a trade or carry out a business activity, subject to regulation or supervision by the licensing authority.” However, this definition does not take into account the numerous social aspects and the dynamics embedded in the concept from a theoretical and practical perspective. In the following text we get deeper into the meaning of the concept from an institutional and legitimate perspective.
Introduction
In most countries, business licenses are granted to companies by government authorities on the basis of their professional competence and abilities to meet certain...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References and Readings
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Towards the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(July/August), 39–48.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.
Gunningham, N., Kagan, R., & Thornton, D. (2003). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. London: Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.
Morsing, M., Schultz, M., & Nielsen, K. (2008). The ‘Catch 22’ of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 97–111.
Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2011). Sustainable development: The role of network communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18, 1–10.
Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71–88.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Nielsen, A.E. (2013). License to Operate. In: Idowu, S.O., Capaldi, N., Zu, L., Gupta, A.D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_502
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_502
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28035-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28036-8
eBook Packages: Business and Economics