Skip to main content

Shareholder Theory

  • Reference work entry

Synonyms

Shareholder primacy theory; Shareholder value theory

Definition

Shareholder theory equates to an influential view on the role of business in society which pushes the idea that the only responsibility of managers is to serve in the best possible way the interests of shareholders, using the resources of the corporation to increase the wealth of the latter by seeking profits. According to this theory, such behavior, done within the constraints of law and without deception or fraud, would be beneficial for society as a whole. Within this theory corporate social responsibility is defined in purely economic profit making terms.

Introduction

The many different ways according to which corporate social responsibility is conceptualized are related to differing views regarding the role of business in society. Within the literature there exist several points of view on the role of business in society which lead to different views on corporate social responsibility. Among the most...

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_31
  • Chapter length: 6 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   1,600.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-28036-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References and Readings

  • Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2007). Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 12(1), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. Z. (1968). Is business bluffing ethical. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 143–146, 148–149, 152–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In L. B. Pincus (Ed.), Perspectives in business ethics (pp. 246–251). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(3), 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1958). The dangers of social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36(5), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcwilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. J. (2003). The shareholders vs. stakeholders debate. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneirson, J. F. (2007). Article, doing well by doing good: Leveraging due care for better, more socially responsible corporate decision making. Corporate Governance Law Review, 3, 438–482.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Branco Manuel Castelo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Castelo, B.M. (2013). Shareholder Theory. In: Idowu, S.O., Capaldi, N., Zu, L., Gupta, A.D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_31

Download citation