General Principles of Evolutionary Morphology

Living reference work entry

Abstract

Anthropologists analyzing morphology for phylogenetic, functional, or behavioral purposes are confronted by a plethora of obstacles. Morphology is not free to vary but is subject to a number of constraints, which may be historical, developmental, and/or functional, while equivalency in function can be achieved by different means. This, together with the fact that the fossil record is scant, confounds meaningful interpretation of phylogenetic pathways and the reconstruction of function and behavior from fossilized remains. To overcome these difficulties, paleoanthropology is becoming increasingly inter- and multidisciplinary, whereby researchers draw on, and incorporate, approaches and findings obtained in other, sometimes very diverse, disciplines. This contribution briefly reviews the constraints acting on morphology, the limitations faced when interpreting form/function and behavior from morphology, and the different approaches currently explored in paleoanthropology to obtain a better understanding of hominin paleobiology. While offering exciting new possibilities, researchers should however be mindful of the limitations inherent in new technologies.

Keywords

Functional Adaptation Cortical Bone Thickness Fossil Remains Enamel Thickness Enamel Prism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Winfried Henke and Ian Tattersall for the invitation to contribute to the Handbook of Paleoanthropology, and John Skedros and Tim Bromage for permission to reproduce their figures. This chapter is the result of various research projects, funded mainly by the Natural Environment Research Council (UK), The Leverhulme Trust (UK) and the Ministerio de EconomÚa y Competitividad (Spain).

References

  1. Abel RA, Macho GA (2011) Ontogenetic changes in the internal and external morphology of the ilium in modern humans. J Anat 218:324–335PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackermann RR (2009) Morphological integration and the interpretation of fossil hominin diversity. Evol Biol 36:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthony MRL, Kay RF (1993) Tooth form and diet in Ateline and Alouattine primates: reflections on the comparative method. Am J Sci 293A:356–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bechtle S, Ang SF, Schneider GA (2010) On the mechanical properties of hierarchically structured biological materials. Biomaterials 63:6378–6385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger LR, de Ruiter DJ, Churchill SE, Schmid P, Carlson KJ, Dirks PHGM, Kibii JM (2010) Australopithecus sediba: a new species of Homo-like australopith from South Africa. Science 328:195–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biewener AA, Fazzalari NL, Konieczynski DD, Baudinette RV (1996) Adaptive changes in trabecular architecture in relation to functional strain patterns and disuse. Bone 19:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bookstein FL (1991) Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyde A (1989) Enamel. In: Oksche A, Vollrath L (eds) Handbook of microscopic anatomy, vol V/6, Teeth. Springer, Berlin, pp 309–473Google Scholar
  9. Bromage TG, Schrenk F (1999) Human biography, climate change & human evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Bromage TG, Goldman HM, McFarlin SC, Warshaw J, Boyde A, Riggs CM (2003) Circularly polarized light standards for investigations of collagen fiber orientation in bone. Anat Rec 274B:157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown P, Sutikna T, Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Jatmiko, Saptomo EW, Due RA (2004) A new small-bodied hominin from the late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 431:1055–1061, doi:10.1038/nature02999PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryant PJ, Simpson P (1984) Intrinsic and extrinsic control of growth in developing organs. Quart Rev Biol 59:387–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlson KJ, Patel BA (2006) Habitual use of the primate forelimb is reflected in the material properties of subchondral bone in the distal radius. J Anat 208:659–670PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheverud JM, Wagner GP, Dow MM (1989) Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns. Syst Zool 38:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Currey JD (2002) Bones: structure and mechanics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Dainton M, Macho GA (1999a) Did knuckle-walking evolve twice? J Hum Evol 36:171–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dainton M, Macho GA (1999b) Heterochrony: somatic, skeletal and dental development in Gorilla, Homo and Pan. In: Hoppa RD, FitzGerald CM (eds) Human growth in the past. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 32–64Google Scholar
  18. Davis JL, Dumont ER, Strait DS, Grosse IR (2011) An efficient method of modeling material properties using a thermal diffusion analogy: an example based on craniofacial bone. PLoS ONE 6(2):e17004. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017004PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeSilva JM, Holt KG, Churchill SE, Carlson KJ, Walker CS, Zipfel B, Berger LR (2013) The lower limb and mechanics of walking in Australopithecus sediba. Science 340:1232999-1–1232999-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Felsenstein J (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fortelius M, Eronen J, Jernvall J, Liu L, Pushkina D, Rinne J, Tesakov A, Vislobokova I, Zhang Z, Zhou L (2002) Fossil mammals resolve regional patterns of Eurasian climate change over 20 million years. Evol Ecol Res 4:1006–1016Google Scholar
  22. Frost HM (1990) Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff’s law: the bone modeling problem. Anat Rec 226:403–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ge J, Cui FZ, Wang XM, Feng HL (2005) Property variations in the prism and the organic sheath within enamel by nanoindentation. Biomaterials 26:3333–3339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC (1979) The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:581–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gould SJ, Vrba ES (1982) Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4–15Google Scholar
  26. Grabowski MW, Polk JD, Roseman CC (2011) Divergent patterns of integration and reduced constraint in the human hip and the origins of bipedalism. Evolution 65:1336–1356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Green RE, Krause J, Briggs AW, Maricic T, Stenzel U, Kircher M, Patterson N, Li H, Zhai W, Fritz MH-Y, Hansen NF, Durand EY, Malaspinas A-S, Jensen JD, Marques-Bonet T, Alkan C, Prüfer K, Meyer M, Burbano HA, Good JM, Schultz R, Aximu-Petri A, Butthof A, Höber B, Höffner B, Siegemund M, Weihmann A, Nusbaum C, Lander ES, Russ C, Novod N, Affourtit J, Egholm M, Verna C, Rudan P, Brajkovic D, Kucan Z, Gusic I, Doronichev VB, Golovanova LV, Lalueza-Fox C, de la Rasilla M, Fortea J, Rosas A, Schmitz RW, Johnson PLF, Eichler EE, Falush D, Birney E, Mullikin JC, Slatkin M, Nielsen R, Kelso J, Lachmann M, Reich D, Pääbo A (2010) A draft sequence of the neandertal genome. Science 328:710–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haeckel E (1866) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen: Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformierte Descendenz-Theorie. Georg Reimer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall BK (1992) Evolutionary developmental biology. Chapman & Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hall BK (1994) Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  31. Hall BK (2007) Homoplasy and homology: dichotomy or continuum? J Hum Evol 52:473–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hanaizumi Y, Kawano Y, Ohshima H, Hoshino M, Takeuchi K, Maeda T (1998) Three-dimensional direction and interrelationship of prisms in cuspal and cervical enamel of dog tooth. Anat Rec 252:355–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harvey PH, Pagel MD (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Hennig W (1966) Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. Hlusko LJ, Suwa G, Kono RT, Mahaney MC (2004) Genetics and the evolution of primate enamel thickness: a baboon model. Am J Phys Anthropol 124:233–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huiskes R (2000) If bone is the answer, then what is the question? J Anat 197:145–156PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hunter JP, Jernvall J (1995) The hypocone as a key innovation in mammalian evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 92:10718–10722PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Janis CM, Fortelius M (1988) On the means whereby mammals achieve increased functional durability of their dentitions, with special reference to limiting factors. Biol Rev 63:197–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jiang Y, Spears IR, Macho GA (2003) An investigation into fractured surfaces of enamel of modern human teeth: a combined SEM and computer visualisation study. Arch Oral Biol 48:449–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johanson DC, Lovejoy CO, Kimbel WH, White TD, Ward SC, Bush ME, Latimer BM, Coppens Y (1982) Morphology of the Pliocene partial hominid skeleton (A.L. 288-1) from the Hadar Formation, Ethiopia. Am J Phys Anthropol 57:403–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johanson DC, Masao FT, Eck GG, White TD, Walter RC, Kimbel WH, Asfaw B, Manega P, Ndessokia P, Suwa G (1987) New partial skeleton of Homo habilis from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Nature 327:205–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kobayashi S, Takahashi HE, Ito A, Saito N, Nawata M, Horiuchi H, Ohta H, Ito A, Iorio R, Yamamoto N, Takaoka K (2003) Trabecular minimodeling in human iliac bones. Bone 32:163–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Koolstra JH (2002) Dynamics of the human masticatory system. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 13:366–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Koolstra JH, van Eijden TMGJ (2001) A method to predict muscle control in the kinematically and mechanically indeterminate human masticatory system. J Biomech 34:1179–1188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kubo D, Kono RT, Kaify Y (2013) Brain size of Homo floresiensis and its evolutionary implications. Proc R Soc B 280: published online 17 Apr 2013Google Scholar
  46. Kuroda S, Nishihara T, Suzuki S, Oko RA (1996) Sympatric chimpanzees and gorillas in the Ndoki Forest, Congo. In: McGrew WC, Marchant LF, Nishida T (eds) Great ape societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lauder GV (1982) Historical biology and the problem of design. J Theor Biol 97:57–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lauder GV (1997) On the inference of function from structure. In: Thomason JJ (ed) Functional morphology in vertebrate paleontology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  49. Lewton KL (2012) Evolvability of the primate pelvic girdle. Evol Biol 39:126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lieberman DE (1996) How and why humans grow thin skulls: experimental evidence for systemic cortical robusticity. Am J Phys Anthropol 101:217–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lieberman DE, Ross CF, Ravosa MJ (2000) The primate cranial base: ontogeny, function, and integration. Am J Phys Anthropol 31(Suppl):117–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lieberman DE, Krovitz GE, McBratney-Owen B (2004) Testing hypotheses about tinkering in the fossil record: the case of the human skull. J Exp Zool 302B:284–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Macho GA (2004) On the scaling relationship between enamel prism length and enamel thickness in primate molars: a comment. Ann Anat 186:413–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Macho GA, Shimizu D (2009) Dietary niches of South African australopiths: inference from enamel prism attitude. J Hum Evol 57:241–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Macho GA, Shimizu D (2010) Kinematic parameters inferred from enamel microstructure: new insights into the diet of Australopithecus anamensis. J Hum Evol 58:23–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Macho GA, Spears IR (1999) The effects of loading on the biomechanical behaviour of molars of Homo, Pan and Pongo. Am J Phys Anthropol 109:211–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Macho GA, Jiang Y, Spears IR (2003) Enamel microstructure: a truly three-dimensional structure. J Hum Evol 45:821–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Macho GA, Shimizu D, Jiang Y, Speers IR (2005) Australopithecus anamensis: a finite element approach to studying the functional adaptations of extinct hominins. Anat Rec Part A 283A:310–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Macho GA, Spears IR, Leakey MG, McColl DG, Jiang Y, Abel R, Nakatsukasa M, Kunimatsu Y (2011) An assessment of the combined effects of external and internal morphology on load dissipation in primate capitates: possible implications for an understanding of the behavioural repertoire of early hominins. Folia Primatol 81:292–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Marroig G, Shirai LT, Porto A, de Oliveira FB, de Conto V (2009) The evolution of modularity in the mammalian skull II: evolutionary consequences. Evol Biol 36:136–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Maynard Smith J, Burian R, Kauffman S, Alberch P, Campbell J, Goodwin B, Lande R, Raup D, Wolpert L (1985) Developmental constraints and evolution. Quart Rev Biol 60:265–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McFarlin S, Terranova CJ, Zihlman AL, Enlow DH, Bromage TG (2008) Regional variability in secondary remodeling within long bone cortices of catarrhine primates: the influence of bone growth history. J Anat 213:308–324PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nowak MG, Carlson KJ, Patel BA (2010) Apparent density of the primate calcaneo-cuboid joint and its association with locomotor mode, foot posture, and the “midtarsal break”. Am J Phys Anthropol 142:180–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Olson ME (2012) The developmental renaissance in adaptationism. TREE 27:278–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Osborn JW (1968) Evaluation of previous assessments of prism directions in human enamel. J Dent Res 47:217–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Osborn JW (1981) Dental anatomy and embryology. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  67. Osborn JW (1996) Features of the human jaw design which maximise the bite force. J Biomech 29:589–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Parr WCH, Chatterjee HJ, Soligo C (2011) Inter- and intra-specific scaling of articular surface areas in the hominoid talus. J Anat 218:386–401PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pearson OB, Lieberman DE (2004) The aging of Wolff’s “Law”: ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone. Yearb Phys Anthropol 47:63–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ravosa MJ, Johnson KR, Hylander WL (2000) Strain in the galago facial skull. J Morphol 245:51–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rayfield EJ (2007) Finite element analysis and understanding the biomechanics and evolution of living and fossil organisms. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 35:541–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rensberger JM (2000) Pathways to functional differentiation in mammalian enamel. In: Teaford MF, Smith MM, Ferguson MWJ (eds) Development, function and evolution of teeth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 252–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rolian C, Lieberman DE, Hallgrimsson B (2010) The coevolution of human hands and feet. Evolution 64:1558–1568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rose MR, Lauder GV (1996) Adaptation. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  75. Ross CF (ed) (2005) Finite element analysis in vertebrate biomechanics. Special issue of the anatomical record, Mar 2005Google Scholar
  76. Ruff CB, Walker A, Trinkaus E (1994) Postcranial robusticity in Homo III: ontogeny. Am J Phys Anthropol 93:35–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ruff C, Holt B, Trinkaus E (2006) Who’s afraid of the big bad Wolff?: “Wolff’s law” and bone functional adaptation. Am J Phys Anthropol 129:484–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shimizu D, Macho GA (2007) Functional significance of the micro-structural detail of the primate dentino-enamel junction: a possible example of exaptation. J Hum Evol 52:103–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shimizu D, Macho GA (2008) The effect of chemical composition and enamel prism decussation on the biomechanical behaviour of dental tissue: a theoretical approach to determine the loading conditions to which modern human teeth are adapted. Anat Rec 291:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shimizu D, Macho GA, Spears IR (2005) The effect of prism orientation and loading direction on contact stresses in prismatic enamel: implications for interpreting wear patterns. Am J Phys Anthropol 126:427–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Skedros JG, Kiser CJ, Keenan KE, Thomas SC (2011) Analysis of osteon morphotype scoring schemes for interpreting load history: evaluation in the chimpanzee femur. J Anat 218:480–499PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Spears IR, Macho GA (1998) Biomechanical behaviour of modern human molars: implications for interpreting the fossil record. Am J Phys Anthropol 106:467–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Stock JT (2006) Hunter-gatherer postcranial robusticity relative to patterns of mobility, climatic adaptation, and selection for tissue economy. Am J Phys Anthropol 131:194–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Strait SG (1997) Tooth use and the physical properties of food. Evol Anthropol 5:199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Strait DS, Grosse IR, Dechow PC, Smith AL, Wang Q, Weber GW, Neubauer S, Slice DE, Chalk J, Richmond BG, Lucas PW, Spencer MA, Schrein C, Wright BW, Byron C, Ross CF (2010) The structural rigidity of the cranium of Australopithecus africanus: implications for diet, dietary adaptations, and the allometry of feeding biomechanics. Anat Rec 293:583–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tafforeau P, Zermeno JP, Smith TM (2012) Tracking cellular-level enamel growth and structure in 4D with synchrotron imaging. J Hum Evol 62:424–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tanck E, Homminga J, van Lenthe GH, Huiskes R (2001) Increase in bone volume fraction precedes architectural adaptation in growing bone. Bone 28:650–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tocheri MW, Orr CM, Larson SG, Sutikna T, Jatmiko, Saptomo EW, Due RA, Djubiantono T, Morwood MJ, Jungers WL (2007) The Primitive Wrist of Homo floresiensis and its implications for hominin evolution. Science 317:1743–1745, doi:10.1126/science.1147143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Toussaint M, Macho GA, Tobias PV, Partridge TC, Hughes AR (2003) The third partial skeleton of a late Pliocene hominin (Stw431) from Sterkfontein, South Africa. S Afr J Sci 99:215–223Google Scholar
  90. Vogl C, Atchley WR, Cowley DE, Crenshaw P, Murray JD, Pomp D (1993) The epigenetic influence of growth hormone on skeletal development. Growth Dev Ageing 57:163–182Google Scholar
  91. von Koenigswald W, Rensberger JM, Pfretzschner H-U (1987) Changes in the tooth enamel of early Paleocene mammals allowing increased diet diversity. Nature 328:150–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Vrba ES, Denton GH, Partridge TC, Burckle LH (1995) Paleoclimate and evolution, with emphasis on human origins. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  93. Wainwright PC, Alfaro ME, Bolnick DI, Hulsey CD (2005) Many-to-one mapping of form to function: a general principle in organismal design. Integr Comp Biol 45:256–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Walker A, Leakey R (1993) The Nariokotome Homo erectus skeleton. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ward CV, Leakey MG, Walker A (2001) Morphology of Australopithecus anamensis from Kanapoi and Allia Bay, Kenya. J Hum Evol 41:255–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. White TD, Asfaw B, Beyene Y, Haile-Selassie Y, Lovejoy O, Suwa G, WoldeGabriel G (2009) Ardipithecus ramidus and the paleobiology of early hominins. Science 326:75–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Woda A, Foster K, Mishellany A, Peyron MA (2006) Adaptation of healthy mastication to factors pertaining to the individual or to the food. Physiol Behav 89:28–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wolff J (1892) Das Gesetz der transformation der Knochen. A. Hirschwald, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  99. Young NM, Wagner GP, Hallgrímsson B (2010) Development and the evolvability of human limbs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:3400–3405PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zelditch ML, Wood AR, Swiderski DL (2009) Building developmental integration into functional systems: function-induced integration of mandibular shape. Evol Biol 36:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Laboratory for Archaeology (RLAHA)University of OxfordOxfordEngland

Personalised recommendations