Skip to main content

Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Psychopharmacology
  • 98 Accesses

Synonyms

Controlled clinical trials; Randomized clinical trials

Definition

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are studies in which people are allocated at random (by chance alone) to receive one of two or more treatments. People who take part in an RCT are called participants (or subjects). The Consolidated Statement of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) provides readers of RCTs with a list of criteria that will be useful to assess trial validity (for full details, visit www.consort-statement.org) (Altman 1996).

As quantitative, comparative studies, RCTs are one of the simplest and most powerful tools in clinical research. In the field of medicine, RCTs are recognized as the most rigorous method of assessing the efficacy of interventions and are designed to determine whether an association exists between treatment and outcome (Rees 1997). RCTs essentially provide evidence of causality. These clinical studies point to a link between events rather than an explanation of how or why these events...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altman DG (1996) Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. BMJ 313:370–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewin CR, Bradley C (1989) Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials. BMJ 299:313–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fairhurst K, Dowrick C (1996) Problems with recruitment in a randomised controlled trial of counselling in general practice: causes and implications. J Health Serv Res Policy 1:77–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbody SM, Song F (2000) Publication bias and the integrity of psychiatry research. Psychol Med 30:253–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huston D, Locher M (1996) Redundancy, disaggregation and the integrity of medical research. Lancet 347:1024–1026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pablos-Méndez A, Barr RG, Shea S (1998) Run-in periods in randomized trials implications for the application of results in clinical practice. JAMA 279:222–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rees WL (1997) The place of controlled trials in the development of psychopharmacology. Hist Psychiatry 8:1–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie D (1999) Fair conduct and fair reporting of clinical trials. JAMA 282:1766–1768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Haynes RJ, Altman DG (1995) Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 273:408–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Cipriani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Cipriani, A., Geddes, J. (2014). Randomized Controlled Trials. In: Stolerman, I., Price, L. (eds) Encyclopedia of Psychopharmacology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27772-6_375-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27772-6_375-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27772-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics