Encyclopedia of Psychopharmacology

Living Edition
| Editors: Ian P. Stolerman, Lawrence H. Price

Behavioral Flexibility: Attentional Shifting, Rule Switching, and Response Reversal

  • Verity J. BrownEmail author
  • David S. Tait
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27772-6_340-2

Synonyms

Adaptability; Cognitive flexibility; Responsiveness

Definition

Behavioral flexibility refers to the adaptive change in the behavior of an animal, in response to changes in the external or internal environment. Ongoing behavior (which might include inactivity) is stopped or modified and new behavior is initiated. Adaptive changes in behavior can vary by degree, ranging from changes that are little more than reflexes or tropic reactions (i.e., reflecting a change in environmental conditions but without the involvement of cognitive processes) to behavioral changes that are anticipatory of environmental changes. Unlike impulsivity, which is responding without inhibitory control and can be maladaptive (see “Impulse Control Disorders”), behavioral flexibility reflects a change in cognitive state in response to the perceived environmental contingencies.

Given that there is a wide range of adaptive responses, it is important to be clear about terminology, particularly if the intention...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arnsten AF, Li BM (2005) Neurobiology of executive functions: catecholamine influences on prefrontal cortical functions. Biol Psychiatry 57:1377–1384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berg EA (1948) A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. J Gen Psychol 39:15–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibson JJ (1941) A critical review of the concept of set in contemporary experimental psychology. Psychol Bull 38:781–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lawrence DH (1949) The acquired distinctiveness of cues: I. Transfer between discriminations on the basis of familiarity with the stimulus. J Exp Psychol 39:770–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Luchins AS (1942) Mechanization in problem solving. The effect of “Einstellung”. Psychol Monogr 54:248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Robbins TW, Roberts AC (2007) Differential regulation of fronto-executive function by the monoamines and acetylcholine. Cereb Cortex 17:i151–i160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Psychology and NeuroscienceUniversity of St AndrewsScotlandUK