Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

Living Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Mourning Superego

  • Nathalie Pilard
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_9360-1

Religious Answers to Mourning

Religion does not supply mourners with a single solution to their feeling of guilt vis-à-vis the dead parent, to their superego guilt. Yet nearly all of them offer answers. “As one surveys the Jewish tradition,” writes Barry D. Cytron, “one discovers that [one of the two] overriding values at the heart of its orientation to death is … the obligation to comfort the mourners” (Cytron 1993, p. 115). Christians also have directions that divert the mourners from their internalized parental voices. According to Hosea L. Perry, for instance, “African American mourning practices exemplify some of the most organized and elaborate efforts to aid mourners” (Perry 1993, p. 39). The common feature here is the importance of the group that shares the guilt for it not to take the form of a superego tyrannical command. We will see the exact opposite with Freud.

Sigmund Freud’s Standard Model of Mourning

Freud’s 1915 “Mourning and Melancholia” is still referred to today as...


Dead Person Active Rejection Collective Trauma Psychical Pain Dead Father 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Cytron, B. D. (1993). Jewish orientations to death and mourning. In D. P. Irish, K. F. Lundquist, & V. J. Nelsen (Eds.), Ethnic variations in dying, death and grief: Diversity in universality (pp. 113–122). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  2. Freud, S. (1917). Mourning and melancholia, standard edition 14 (pp. 243–258). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  3. Freud, S., & Breuer, J. (1896). Studies in hysteria, standard edition 2 (pp. 135–182). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  4. Gaines, R. (1977). Detachment and continuity: The two tasks of mourning. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 33(4), 549–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hagman, G. (1999). Beyond decathexis: Towards a new psychoanalytic understanding and treatment of mourning. In R. Neimeyer (Ed.), (2001) Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss (pp. 1–25). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
  6. Loewald, H. W. ([1962] 2007). Internalization, separation, mourning, and the superego. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 76(4), 1113–1133.Google Scholar
  7. Loewald, H. W. ([1978] 2000). The waning of the Oedipus complex. The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 9(4), 239–249.Google Scholar
  8. Perry, H. L. (1993). Mourning and funeral customs of African Americans. In D. P. Irish, K. F. Lundquist, & V. J. Nelsen (Eds.), Ethnic variations in dying, death and grief: Diversity in universality (pp. 51–66). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  9. Volkan, V. (2009). Is quoted in the introduction. In L. G. Fiorini, T. Bokanowski, & S. Lewkowicz (Eds.), On Freud’s mourning and melancholia. London: Karnac.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AberdeenAberdeenScotland