Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

Living Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming


  • Kate M. Loewenthal
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_540-7

What is psychology? There is little dispute about the broad definition of psychology as the study and understanding of human behavior, cognitive processes, experience, and emotion. However, the history of psychology has been colorful, peppered with disputes about how such understanding and study should be done. The different views on the “how” of psychology have impacted on the psychological study of religion.

This entry will highlight some important features of the history of psychology and suggest how these features may have impacted on the psychological understanding of religion.

Psychology and the Early Study of Religion

In its early days, in the nineteenth and very early twentieth centuries, psychologists had no problems with asking people to introspect or report on their “inner” experiences. Two often-cited examples are (1) the Wurzburg school (Wundt 1902), who asked for detailed introspective reports on what went through people’s minds when they saw a picture, for example, or...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access


  1. Allport, G. W. (1966). The religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 448–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andresen, J. (Ed.). (2001). Religion in mind: Cognitive perspectives on religious ritual, belief and experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Argyle, M. (2000). Psychology and religion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Argyle, M., & Beit-Hallahmi, B. (1975). The social psychology of religion. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  5. Azari, N. P., Missimer, J., & Seitz, R. J. (2005). Religious experience and emotion: Evidence for distinctive cognitive neural patterns. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belzen, J. A. (2010). Towards cultural psychology of religion: Principles, approaches, applications. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Francis, L., Pearson, O. R., Carter, M., & Kay, W. K. (1981). Are introverts more religious? The British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freud, S. (1927). The future of an illusion. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  9. Freud, S. (1964). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  10. Granqvist, P., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2008). Attachment and religious representations and behaviour. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hay, D., & Morisy, A. (1978). Reports of ecstatic, paranormal, or religious experience in great Britain and the United States: A comparison of trends. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 17, 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Intergroup attributions and affective consequences in majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 936–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
  14. Loewenthal, K. M. (2000). A short introduction to the psychology of religion. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
  15. McNamara, P. (2014). The neuroscience of religious experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Nelson, J. M. (2009). Psychology, religion and spirituality. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. (2005). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  18. Pargament, K. I., Exline, J., Jones, J., Mahoney, A., & Shafranske, E. (2013). APA handbook of psychology, religion and spirituality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  19. Pyssiainen, I., & Anttonen, V. (Eds.). (2002). Current approaches in the cognitive science of religion. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  20. Tacey, D. T. (2004). The spirituality revolution: The emergence of contemporary spirituality. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Watson, J. B. (1919). Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia: Lippincott.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wundt, W. (1902). Outlines of psychology (trans: Judd, W. H.). Leipzig: Engelman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate M. Loewenthal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyRoyal Holloway, University of LondonEghamUK