Definition of the Subject
The von Neumann–Morgenstern stable set (hereafter stable set) is the first solution concept in cooperative game theory defined by J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern. Though it was defined cooperative games in characteristic function form, von Neumann and Morgenstern gave a more general definition of a stable set in abstract games. Later, J. Greenberg and M. Chwe cleared a way to apply the stable set concept to the analysis of noncooperative games in strategic and extensive forms. Stable sets in a characteristic function form game may not exist, as was shown by W. F. Lucas for a ten-person game that does not admit a stable set. On the other hand, stable sets exist in many important games. In voting games, for example, stable sets exist, and they indicate what coalitions can be formed in detail. The core, on the other hand, can be empty in voting games, though it is one of the best known solution concepts in cooperative game theory. The analysis of stable sets is...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Abbreviations
- Abstract game:
-
An abstract game consists of a set of outcomes and a binary relation, called domination, on the outcomes. Von Neumann and Morgenstern presented this game form for general applications of stable sets.
- Characteristic function form game:
-
A characteristic function form game consists of a set of players and a characteristic function that gives each group of players, called a coalition, a value or a set of payoff vectors that they can gain by themselves. It is a typical representation of cooperative games. For characteristic function form games, several solution concepts are defined such as von Neumann–Morgenstern stable set, core, bargaining set, kernel, nucleolus, and Shapley value.
- Domination:
-
Domination is a binary relation defined on the set of imputations, outcomes, or strategy combinations, depending on the form of a given game. In characteristic function form games, an imputation is said to dominate another imputation if there is a coalition of players such that they can realize their payoffs in the former imputation by themselves and make each of them better off than in the latter. Domination given a priori in abstract games can be also interpreted in the same way. In strategic form games, domination is defined on the basis of commonly beneficial changes of strategies by coalitions.
- External stability:
-
A set of imputations (outcomes, strategy combinations) satisfies external stability if any imputation outside the set is dominated by some imputation inside the set.
- Farsighted stable set:
-
A farsighted stable set is a von Neumann–Morgenstern stable set defined by indirect domination. That is, a farsighted stable set satisfies internal stability and external stability with respect to indirect domination.
- Imputation:
-
An imputation is a payoff vector in a characteristic function form game that satisfies group rationality and individual rationality. The former means that the players divide the amount that the grand coalition of all players can gain, and the latter says that each player is assigned at least the amount that he/she can gain by him/herself.
- Indirect domination:
-
Indirect domination is a domination relation that takes into account the farsightedness of the players. Intuitively, an outcome is indirectly dominated by another if the latter can be reached through a sequence of deviations, and the coalitions when making their moves in the deviations are made better off at the final outcome than at the outcome when they deviate.
- Internal stability:
-
A set of imputations (outcomes, strategy combinations) satisfies internal stability if there is no domination between any two imputations in the set.
- Strategic form game:
-
A strategic form game consists of a player set, each player’s strategy set, and each player’s payoff function. It is usually used to represent noncooperative games.
- Von Neumann– Morgenstern stable set:
-
A set of imputations (outcomes, strategy combinations) is a von Neumann–Morgenstern stable set if it satisfies both internal and external stability.
Bibliography
Aumann R, Peleg B (1960) Von Neumann-Morgenstern solutions to cooperative games without side payments. Bull Am Math Soc 66:173–179
Bala V, Goyal S (2000) A noncooperative model of network formation. Econometric 638:1181–1229
Baneijee S, Konishi H, Sonmez T (2001) Core in a simple coalition formation game. Soc Choice Welf 18:135–153
Barberà S, Gerber A (2003) On coalition formation: durable coalition structures. Math Soc Sci 45:185–203
Beal S, Durieu J, Solal P (2008) Farsighted coalitional stability in TU-games. Math Soc Sci 56:303–313
Bemheim D, Peleg B, Whinston M (1987) Coalition-proof Nash equilibria. J Econ Theory 42:1–12
Bhattacharya A, Brosi V (2011) An existence result for farsighted stable sets of games in characteristic function form. Int J Game Theory 40:393–401
Bogomolnaia A, Jackson MO (2002) The stability of hedonic coalition structures. Games Econ Behav 38:201–230
Bott R (1953) Symmetric solutions to majority games. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker AW (eds) Contribution to the theory of games, vol II. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol 28. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 319–323
Chwe MS-Y (1994) Farsighted coalitional stability. J Econ Theory 63:299–325
Diamantoudi E (2005) Stable cartels revisited. Econ Theory 26:907–921
Diamantoudi E, Xue L (2003) Farsighted stability in hedonic games. Soc Choice Welf 21:39–61
Diamantoudi E, Xue L (2007) Coalitions, agreements and efficiency. J Econ Theory 136:105–125
Ehlers L (2007) Von Neumann-Morgenstem stable sets in matching problems. J Econ Theory 134:537–547
Einy E, Shitovitz B (1996) Convex games and stable sets. Games Econ Behav 16:192–201
Einy E, Holzman R, Monderer D, Shitovitz B (1996) Core and stable sets of large games arising in economics. J Econ Theory 68:200–211
Funaki Y, Yamato T (2014) Stable coalition structures under restricted coalitional changes. Int Game Theory Rev 16 doi: 10.1142/S0219198914500066
Gale D, Shapley LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am Math Mon 69:9–15
Greenberg J (1990) The theory of social situations: an alternative game theoretic approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Greenberg J, Monderer D, Shitovitz B (1996) Multistage situations. Econometrica 64:1415–1437
Greenberg J, Luo X, Oladi R, Shitovitz B (2002) (Sophisticated) stable sets in exchange economies. Games Econ Behav 39:54–70
Griesmer JH (1959) Extreme games with three values. In: Tucker AW, Luce RD (eds) Contribution to the theory of games, vol IV. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol 40. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 189–212
Gusfield D, Irving R (1989) The stable marriage problem: structure and algorithms. MIT Press, Boston
Harsanyi J (1974) An equilibrium-point interpretation of stable sets and a proposed alternative definition. Manag Sci 20:1472–1495
Hart S (1973) Symmetric solutions of some production economies. Int J Game Theory 2:53–62
Hart S (1974) Formation of cartels in large markets. J Econ Theory 7:453–466
Heijmans J (1991) Discriminatory von Neumann-Morgenstem solutions. Games Econ Behav 3:438–452
Herings JJ, Mauleon A, Vannetelbosch V (2009) Farsightedly stable networks. Games Econ Behav 67:526–541
Herings JJ, Mauleon A, Vannetelbosch V (2010) Coalition formation among farsighted agents. Games 1:286–298
Jackson MO, van den Nouweland A (2005) Strongly stable networks. Games Econ Behav 51:420–444
Jackson MO, Wolinsky A (1996) A strategic model of social and economic networks. J Econ Theory 71:44–74
Kamijo Y, Muto S (2010) Farsighted coalitional stability of a price leadership cartel. Jpn Econ Rev 61:455–465
Kaneko M (1987) The conventionally stable sets in noncooperative games with limited observations I: definition and introductory argument. Math Soc Sci 13:93–128
Kawasaki R (2010) Farsighted stability of the competitive allocations in an exchange economy with indivisible goods. Math Soc Sci 59:46–52
Kawasaki R, Muto S (2009) Farsighted stability in provision of perfectly “lumpy” public goods. Math Soc Sci 58:98–109
Klaus B, Klijn F, Walzl M (2010) Farsighted house allocation. J Math Econ 46:817–824
Klaus B, Klijn F, Walzl M (2011) Farsighted stability for roommate markets. J Pub Econ Theory 13:921–933
Lucas WF (1968) A game with no solution. Bull Am Math Soc 74:237–239
Lucas WF (1990) Developments in stable set theory. In: Ichiishi T et al (eds) Game theory and applications. Academic, New York, pp 300–316
Lucas WF, Rabie M (1982) Games with no solutions and empty cores. Math Oper Res 7:491–500
Lucas WF, Michaelis K, Muto S, Rabie M (1982) A new family of finite solutions. Int J Game Theory 11:117–127
Luo X (2001) General systems and cp-stable sets: a formal analysis of socioeconomic environments. J Math Econ 36:95–109
Luo X (2009) On the foundation of stability. Econ Theory 40:185–201
Manlove D (2013) Algorithmics of matching under preferences. World Scientific, Singapore
Mariotti M (1997) A model of agreements in strategic form games. J Econ Theory 74:196–217
Masuda T (2002) Farsighted stability in average return games. Math Soc Sci 44:169–181
Mauleon A, Vannetelbosch V, Vergote W (2011) VonNeumann -Morgenstem farsightedly stable sets in two-sided matching. Theoretical Econ 6:499–521
Moulin H (1995) Cooperative microeconomics: a game-theoretic introduction. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Muto S (1979) Symmetric solutions for symmetric constant-sum extreme games with four values. Int J Game Theory 8:115–123
Muto S (1982a) On Hart production games. Math Oper Res 7:319–333
Muto S (1982b) Symmetric solutions for (n, k) games. Int J Game Theory 11:195–201
Muto S, Okada D (1996) Von Neumann-Morgenstem stable sets in a price-setting duopoly. Econ Econ 81:1–14
Muto S, Okada D (1998) Von Neumann-Morgenstem stable sets in Cournot competition. Econ Econ 85:37–57
Nakanishi N (1999) Reexamination of the international export quota game through the theory of social situations. Games Econ Behav 27:132–152
Nakanishi N (2001) On the existence and efficiency of the von Neumann-Morgenstem stable set in an n-player prisoner’s dilemma. Int J Game Theory 30:291–307
Nakanishi N (2009) Noncooperative farsighted stable set in an n-player prisoners’ dilemma. Int J Game Theory 38:249–261
Núñez M, Rafels C (2013) Von Neumann-Morgenstem solutions in the assignment market. J Econ Theory 148:1282–1291
Oladi R (2005) Stable tariffs and retaliation. Rev Int Econ 13:205–215
Owen G (1965) A class of discriminatory solutions to simple n-person games. Duke Math J 32:545–553
Owen G (1968) n-Person games with only l, n-l, and n-person coalitions. Proc Am Math Soc 19:1258–1261
Owen G (1995) Game theory, 3rd edn. Academic, New York
Page FH, Wooders M (2009) Strategic basins of attraction, the path dominance core, and network formation games. Games Econ Behav 66:462–487
Page FH, Wooders MH, Kamat S (2005) Networks and farsighted stability. J Econ Theory 120:257–269
Peleg B (1986) A proof that the core of an ordinal convex game is a von Neumann-Morgenstem solution. Math Soc Sci 11:83–87
Quint T, Wako J (2004) On house swapping, the strict core, segmentation, and linear programming. Math Oper Res 29:861–877
Ray D, Vohra R (1997) Equilibrium binding agreements. J Econ Theory 73:30–78
Rosenmüller J (1977) Extreme games and their solutions. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 145. Springer, Berlin
Rosenmüller J, Shitovitz B (2000) A characterization of vNM-stable sets for linear production games. Int J Game Theory 29(3):9–61
Roth AE, Postlewaite A (1977) Weak versus strong domination in a market with indivisible goods. J Math Econ 4:131–137
Roth AE, Sotomayor MO (1990) Two-sided matching: a study in game-theoretic modeling and analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Roth AE, Vande Vate JH (1990) Random paths to stability in two-sided matching. Econometrica 58:1475–1480
Serrano R, Volij O (2008) Mistakes in cooperation: the stochastic stability of Edgeworth’s recontracting. Econ J 118:1719–1741
Shapley LS (1953) Quota solutions of n-person games. In: Kuhn HW, Tucker TW (eds) Contribution to the theory of games, vol II. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol 28. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 343–359
Shapley LS (1959) The solutions of a symmetric market game. In: Tucker AW, Luce RD (eds) Contribution to the theory of games, vol IV. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol 40. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 145–162
Shapley LS (1962) Simple games: an outline of the descriptive theory. Behav Sci 7:59–66
Shapley LS (1964) Solutions of compound simple games. In: Tucker AW et al (eds) Advances in game theory. Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol 52. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 267–305
Shapley LS (1971) Cores of convex games. Int J Game Theory 1:11–26
Shapley LS, Scarf H (1974) On cores and indivisibilities. J Math Econ 1:23–37
Shapley LS, Shubik M (1972) The assignment game I: the core. Int J Game Theory 1:111–130
Shino J, Kawasaki R (2012) Farsighted stable sets in Hotelling’s location games. Math Soc Sci 63:23–30
Shitovitz B, Weber S (1997) The graph of Lindahl correspondence as the unique von Neumann-Morgenstem abstract stable set. J Math Econ 27:375–387
Shubik M (1985) A game-theoretic approach to political economy. MIT Press, Boston
Simonnard M (1966) Linear programming. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
Solymosi T, Raghavan TES (2001) Assignment games with stable core. Int J Game Theory 30:177–185
Sung SC, Dimitrov D (2007) On myopic stability concepts for hedonic games. Theory Dec 62:31–45
Suzuki A, Muto S (2000) Farsighted stability in prisoner’s dilemma. J Oper Res Soc Jpn 43:249–265
Suzuki A, Muto S (2005) Farsighted stability in n-person prisoner’s dilemma. Int J Game Theory 33:431–445
Suzuki A, Muto S (2006) Farsighted behavior leads to efficiency in duopoly markets. In: Haurie A et al (eds) Advances in dynamic games. Birkhauser, Boston, pp 379–395
Toda M (1997) Implementation and characterizations of the competitive solution with indivisibility. Mimeo
von Neumann J, Morgenstem O (1953) Theory of games and economic behavior, 3rd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wako J (1984) A note on the strong core of a market with indivisible goods. J Math Econ 13:189–194
Wako J (1991) Some properties of weak domination in an exchange market with indivisible goods. Jpn Econ Rev 42:303–314
Wako J (1999) Coalitional-proofness of the competitive allocations in an indivisible goods market. Fields Inst Commun 23:277–283
Wako J (2010) A polynomial-time algorithm to find von Neumann-Morgenstem stable matchings in marriage games. Algorithmica 58:188–220
Xue L (1997) Nonemptiness of the largest consistent set. J Econ Theory 73:453–459
Xue L (1998) Coalitional stability under perfect foresight. Econ Theory 11:603–627
Books and Reviews
Lucas WF (1992) Von Neumann-Morgenstem stable sets. In: Aumann RJ, Hart S (eds) Handbook of game theory with economic applications, vol 1. North-Holland, pp 543–590
Shubik M (1982) Game theory in the social sciences: concepts and solutions. MIT Press, Boston
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kawasaki, R., Wako, J., Muto, S. (2015). Cooperative Games (von Neumann–Morgenstern Stable Sets). In: Meyers, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_99-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_99-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27737-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Physics and AstronomyReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Cooperative Games (Von Neumann-Morgenstern Stable Sets)- Published:
- 10 April 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_99-3
-
Original
Cooperative Games (von Neumann–Morgenstern Stable Sets)- Published:
- 30 November 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_99-2