Skip to main content

Fukushima Catastrophe: The Challenge of Complexity (Collective Reflexivity, Adaptive Knowledge, Political Innovation)

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Fukushima: A Systemic Event, a “Black Swan”

More than 3 years after the catastrophe, the initial shock is integrated in our daily lives, memories, and practices. Nothing is forgotten, but a collective and adaptive learning process is at work. From the beginning, the experience of this event opened an intense collective inquiry and learning process. This wave keeps growing. As an event, Fukushima is constantly evolving, reshaping our bodies, minds, and societies, even when we behave as if nothing had happened. In this collective learning process, the time has come to debate Fukushima’s historical meaning. This disaster cannot be reduced to an unpredictable earthquake and tsunami. Because of the size of the disaster, it is impossible to take the full measure of the event. The world has changed. Fukushima is the name of a turning point in world history: relations between technology, politics, industry, society, and ecology are forever transformed. Its long-term impact is unpredictable and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Bibliography

  • Arimoto T (2006) Innovation policy for Japan in a new era. In: Whittaker H, Cole R (eds) Recovering from success: innovation and technology management in Japan. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 237–254

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arimoto T (2011) Japan’s new science and innovation policy in a changing world. In: Conference of Japan Science and Technology Agency, Washington, DC. 12 Jan 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1986) Risikogesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Francfort

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S (1994) Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon M, Lascoumes P, Barthe Y (2001) Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique. Seuil/MIT Press, Paris/Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowell T (2011) The roots of Fukushima. Asia Sentinel, 24 March

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWit A (2012a) Japan: building a Galapagos of power? The Asia-Pacific Journal 10(47):3

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • DeWit A (2012b) Distributed power and incentives in post-Fukushima Japan. The Asia-Pacific Journal 10(49):2

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • DeWit A, Iida T (2011) The ‘power elite’ and environmental-energy policy in Japan. The Asia-Pacific Journal 9(4):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (1976) La volonté de savoir. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (2004) Naissance de la biopolitique. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (1995) Trust. The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard O, Henry C, Lagadec P, Michel-Kerjan E (2002) Traité des nouveaux risques. Gallimard “Folio”, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1977) The question of technology (1950). In: The question of technology and other essays (trans: W. Lovitt). Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindmarsh R (2013) Nuclear disaster at Fukushima Daiichi. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Iida T (2012) What is required for a new society and politics: the potential of Japanese civil society. The Asia-Pacific Journal 10(46):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Focus (2013) http://japanfocus.org/Japans-3.11-Earthquake-Tsunami-Atomic-Meltdown

  • Johnson C (1995) Japan: who governs? Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamisato T (2012) How to formulate a strategy for energy supply. Nippon.com, Sept 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston J (2012a) Japan nuclear village. The Asia-Pacific Journal 10(37):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston J (2012b) Power politics: Japan’s resilient nuclear village. The Asia-Pacific Journal 10(43):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi T (2012) The reality of Japan’s National Debate: Citizen participation and the nuclear energy issue. Asteion (Hankyu-Communications) 77:192–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Koide H (2011) The truth about nuclear power: Japanese nuclear engineer calls for abolition. The Asia-Pacific Journal 9(31):5

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan J (1966) Le séminaire sur la lettre volée (1956) In: Ecrits, Le seuil, Paris, pp 11–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishioka N (2011) Toward a peaceful society without nuclear energy: understanding the power structures behind the 3.11 Fukushima nuclear disaster. The Asia-Pacific Journal 9(52):2

    Google Scholar 

  • Official report of the Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission (2012) The National Diet of Japan. http://naiic.go.jp/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/NAIIC_report_lo_res.pdf

  • Rawls J (1972) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieu A-M (1996) Japan as a techno-scientific society: the new role of research & development. National Institute for Research Advancement Review, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieu A-M (2005) What is knowledge society?, STS Nexus, Santa Clara University, Center for Science, Technology and Society, San Jose, Sept. http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00552293/fr/

  • Rieu A-M (2011) Beyond neo-liberalism: research policies and society. The case of Japan. Copenhagen J Asian Stud 29(2):58–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieu A-M (2012) Penser après Fukushima. Technologie souveraine et contrôle démocratique, Tokyo, revue Ebisu no 47, Spring-Summer 2012, pp 69–78. http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00701743

  • Rieu A-M (2013) Japanese translation Sonoyama Chiaki. Akashi Shoten, Tokyo, Avril

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakaiya T (1985) The knowledge-value revolution or the history of the future. PHP kenkyujo, Kyoto. English translation (1991) Kodansha International Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels R (2013) Disaster and change in Japan. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • ScienceWise (2011) International comparison of public dialogue. http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/sciencewise-erc-resource-library/>

  • Shiokura Y (2011) Asahi Shimbun, 18 Aug 2011. Comment un pays irradié est devenu pronucléaire, translation Courrier international, Paris, 23 Aug

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi Y (2004). What is modernity? (1959). In: Calichman R (ed) What is modernity. Columbia University Press, New York, p 75

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wolferen K (1989) The enigma of Japanese power. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain-Marc Rieu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Rieu, AM. (2014). Fukushima Catastrophe: The Challenge of Complexity (Collective Reflexivity, Adaptive Knowledge, Political Innovation). In: Meyers, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_621-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_621-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27737-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Physics and AstronomyReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics