Skip to main content

System Dynamics in the Evolution of the Systems Approach

  • 59 Accesses

Glossary

Cybernetics:

The science of communication and control in complex, dynamic systems. The core objects of study are information, communication, feedback, adaptation, and control or governance. In the newer versions of cybernetics, the emphasis is on observation, self-organization, self-reference, and learning.

Dynamical system:

The dynamical system concept is a mathematical formalization of time-dependent processes. Examples include the mathematical models that describe the swinging of a clock pendulum, the flow of water in a river, or the evolution of a population of fish in a lake.

Law of requisite variety:

Ashby’s law of requisite variety says “Only variety can destroy variety.” It implies that the varieties of two interacting systems must be in balance, if stability is to be achieved.

Organizational cybernetics:

The science which applies cybernetic principles to organization. Synonyms are management cybernetics and managerial cybernetics.

System dynamics (SD):
...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  • Ackoff RL (1981) Creating the corporate future. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen DF, Richardson GP (1997) Scripts for group model building. Syst Dyn Rev 13(2):107–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby WR (1956) An introduction to cybernetics. Chapman & Hall, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barlas Y (1996) Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 12(3):183–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlas Y, Carpenter S (1990) Philosophical roots of model validity: two paradigms. Syst Dyn Rev 6(2):148–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1959) Cybernetics and management. English Universities Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1966) Decision and control. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1979) The heart of enterprise. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1981) Brain of the firm, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer S (1994) Towards the cybernetic factory. In: Harnden R, Leonard A (eds) How many grapes went into the wine. Stafford Beer on the art and science of holistic management. Wiley, Chichester, pp 163–225 (reprint, originally published in 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch OJH, Nguyen NC, Maeno T, Yasui T (2013) Managing complex issues through evolutionary learning laboratories. Syst Res Behav Sci 30(2):116–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brailsford S (2014) Theoretical comparison of discrete-event simulation and system dynamics. In: Brailsford S, Churilov L, Dangerfield B (eds) Discrete-event simulation and system dynamics for management decision making. Wiley, Chichester, pp 105–124

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brailsford S, Churilov L, Dangerfield B (eds) (2014) Discrete-event simulation and system dynamics for management decision making. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocklesby J (1993) Methodological complementarism or separate paradigm development – examining the options for enhanced operational research. Aust J Manag 18(2):133–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell G, Morgan G (1979) Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Gower, Hants

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland PB, Poulter J (2006) Learning for action: a short definitive account of soft systems methodology, and its use practitioners, teachers and students. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1968a) Challenge to reason. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1968b) The systems approach. Delacorte Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1979) The systems approach and its enemies. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan J (2007) Modelling agent-based systems using system dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 2007 international conference of the system dynamics society. The System Dynamics Society, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (2002) published under: http://www.eolss.net/

  • Espejo R, Reyes A (2011) Organizational systems. Managing complexity with the viable system model. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL, Jackson MC (1991) Creative problem solving. Total systems intervention. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1968) Principles of systems. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1969) Urban dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1971) World dynamics. Pegasus Communications, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1993a) System dynamics and the lessons of 35 years. In: KB DG (ed) Systems-based approach to policy making. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1993b) System dynamics as an organizing framework for pre-college education. Syst Dyn Rev 9(2):183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1997) System dynamics and K-12 teachers. A lecture at the University of Virginia School of Education, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. System Dynamics Group Paper D-4665-4

    Google Scholar 

  • François C (2004) International encyclopedia of systems and cybernetics, 2nd edn. Saur, München

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gharajedaghi J (1999) Systems thinking. Managing chaos and complexity. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnden RJ (1989) Technology for enabling: the implications for management science of a hermeneutics of distinction. The University of Aston, Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1995) Hidden order: how adaption builds complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (2006) Studying complex adaptive systems. J Syst Sci Complex 19(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-006-0001-z. ISSN 1009-6124

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (1991) Systems methodology for the management sciences. Plenum Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2000) Systems approaches to management. Kluwer/Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (1993) The origins of order. Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kineman JJ (2017) Modeling and simulation. In: Edson MD, Buckle Henning P, Sankaran S (eds) A guide to systems research: philosophy, processes and practice. Springer, Singapore, pp 81–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ (1969) An approach to general systems theory. Nostrand, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunc M (2019) Strategic Analytics: integrating management science and strategy. Wiley, Hoboken/Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • La Roche U, Simon M (2000) Geschäftsprozesse simulieren: flexibel und zielorientiert führen mit Fliessmodellen. Orell Füssli, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC (1994a) Modeling as learning: a consultancy methodology for enhancing learning in management in management teams. In: Morecroft J, Sterman JD (eds) Modeling for learning organizations. Productivity Press, Portland, pp 205–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC (1994b) With a little help from our friends: how system dynamics and soft OR can learn from each other. Syst Dyn Rev 10(2–3):101–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC (2006) IFORS’ operational research hall of fame. Jay Wright Forrester. Int Trans Oper Res 13:483–492

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC, Oliva R (1998) The greater whole: towards a synthesis of system dynamics and soft system methodology. Eur J Oper Res 107(1):214–235

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Malik F (2016) Strategy for managing complex systems: a contribution to management cybernetics for evolutionary systems. Campus, Frankfurt/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R, Schlüter M (2015) Combining system dynamics and agent-based modeling to analyze social-ecological interactions – an example from modeling restoration of a shallow lake. Front Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00066. 29 Aug 2017

  • McCulloch WS (1965) Embodiments of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH (1980) The unavoidable a priori. In: Randers J (ed) Elements of the system dynamics method. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 23–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW III (1972) Limits to growth. Universe Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesarovic MD, Takahara Y (1985) Abstract systems theory. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (2000) Systemic intervention. Philosophy, methodology, and practice. Kluwer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JG (1978) Living systems. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JH, Page SE (2007) Complex adaptive systems: an introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1997) Multi-paradigm multimethodology. In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft J (2007) Strategic modelling and business dynamics: a feedback systems approach. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan DL (2014) Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: a pragmatic approach. Sage, Los Angeles

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nava Guerrero G, Schwarz P, Slinger JH (2016) A recent overview of the integration of system dynamics and agent-based modelling and simulation. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, July 17-21, 2016 Delft, Netherlands [p1153]

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT, Odum EC (2000) Modeling for all scales: an introduction to system simulation. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask G (1961) An approach to cybernetics. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Ríos J (2012) Design and diagnosis for sustainable organizations: the viable system method. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pichler F (1975) Mathematische Systemtheorie. de Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport A (1953) Operational philosophy: integrating knowledge and action. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport A (1986) General system theory. Essential concepts and applications. Abacus Press, Turnbridge Wells

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson GP (1999) Feedback thought in social science and systems theory. Pegasus communications, Waltham. (Originally published in 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond B (1997) The “thinking” in systems thinking: how can we make it easier to master? Syst Think 8(2):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelli H (2005) Bios: a study of creation. World Scientific, Hackensack

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger M (1997) Integrative systems methodology: heuristic for requisite variety. Int Trans Oper Res 4(4):109–123

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger M (2004) Methodologies in conflict: achieving synergies between system dynamics and organizational cybernetics. Syst Res Behav Sci 21(4):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger M (2006) Theories of viability. A comparison. Syst Res Behav Sci 23:337–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger M, Groesser S (2008) System dynamics as model-based theory building. Syst Res Behav Sci 25:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger M, Groesser S (2009) Model validation: the quest for quality in system dynamics modeling. Encyclopaedia of complexity and systems science. Springer, New York, pp 9000–9014. Reprinted in: Complex System in Finance and econometrics. Springer New York, 2011: 767–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger M, Pérez Ríos J (2008) System dynamics and cybernetics: a synergetic pair. Syst Dyn Rev 24(2):145–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger M, Janovjak M, Ambroz K (2006) Second-order intervention: enhancing organizational competence and performance. Syst Res Behav Sci 23:529–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seawright J (2016) Multi-method social science: combining qualitative and quantitative tools. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro M, Mandel T, Schwaninger M et al (1996) The primer toolbox. International Society for the Systems Sciences. http://www.isss.org/primer/toolbox.htm

  • Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (1994) Learning in and about complex systems. Syst Dyn Rev 10(2–3):291–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics. Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1983) Critical heuristics of social planning. Haupt, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1996) A primer to critical systems heuristics for action researchers. The centre of systems studies. University of Hull, Hull

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix JAM (1996) Group model building. Facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Vester F, Von Hesler A (1980) Sensitivitätsmodell. Regionale Planungsgemeinschaft Untermain, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy L (1949) Zu einer allgemeinen Systemlehre. Bl Dtsch Philos 18(3/4) (Excerpts: in Biol Gen 19(1):114–129 and in General System Theory, 1968, Chapter III)

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy L (1950) An outline of general system theory. Br J Philos Sci 1:139–164

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory. Braziller, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Foerster H (1984) Observing systems, 2nd edn. Intersystems Publications, Seaside

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Foerster H (ed) (1995) Cybernetics of cybernetics, 2nd edn. Future Systems, Minneapolis. Originally published in 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Foerster H, Zopf GW (eds) (1962) Principles of self-organization. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vriens D, Achtenbergh J (2006) The social dimension of system dynamics-based modelling. Syst Res Behav Sci 23(4):553–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warfield JN (1994) A science of generic design: managing complexity through systems design, 2nd edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren K (2002) Competitive strategy dynamics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren K (2008) Strategic management dynamics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener N (1948) Cybernetics: control and communication in the animal and in the machine. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme E (2003) Towards the definition and use of a core set of archetypal structures in system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 19(1):7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yolles MA (1998) Cybernetic exploration of methodological complement. Kybern 27(5):527–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

Books and Reviews

  • Dangerfield B (2014) System thinking and system dynamic a premier. In: Brailsford S, Churilov L, Dangerfield B (eds) Discrete – event simulation and system dynamics for management decision making. Wiley, Chichester, pp 26–51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MC (2003) Systems thinking: creative holism for managers. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ (2001) Facets of systems science, 2nd edn. Kluwer/Plenum, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (ed) (2003) Systems thinking, vol 4. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragsdell G, Wilby J (eds) (2001) Understanding complexity. Kluwer/Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahmandad H, Oliva R, Osgood ND (eds) (2015) Analytical methods for dynamic modelers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramage M, Shipp K (2009) Systems thinkers. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson GP (ed) (1996) Modelling for management. Simulation in support of systems thinking, 2 vols. Dartmouth, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson GP (2011) Reflections on the foundations of system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 27(3):219–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger M (2009) Intelligent organizations. Powerful model for systemic management, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Seawright J (2016) Multi-method social science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gigch JP (2003) Metadecisions. Rehabilitating epistemology. Kluwer/Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Schwaninger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Appendix A – Milestones in the Evolution of the Systems Approach in General and System Dynamics in Particular

The following table gives an overview of the systems movement’s evolution, as shown in its main literature. This overview is not exhaustive.

Foundations of general systems theory

Von Bertalanffy

Zu einer allgemeinen Systemlehre

1945

 

An Outline of General System Theory

1950

 

General System Theory

1968

Bertalanffy, Boulding, Gerard, Rapoport

Foundation of the Society for General Systems Research

1953

Klir

An Approach to General Systems Theory

1968

Simon

The Sciences of the Artificial

1969

Pichler

Mathematische Systemtheorie

1975

Miller

Living Systems

1978

Mesarovic and Takahara

Abstract Systems Theory

1985

Rapoport

General System Theory

1986

Foundations of cybernetics

Macy Conferences (Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation)

Cybernetics, Circular Causal, and Feedback Mechanisms in Biological and Social Systems

1946–1951

Wiener

Cybernetics or Control and Communication in the Animal and in the Machine

1948

Ashby

An Introduction to Cybernetics

1956

Pask

An Approach to Cybernetics

1961

Von Foerster, Zopf

Principles of Self-organization

1962

McCulloch

Embodiments of Mind

1965

Foundations of organizational cybernetics

Beer

Cybernetics and Management

1959

 

Towards the Cybernetic Factory

1962

 

Decision and Control

1966

 

Brain of the Firm

1972

Von Foerster

Cybernetics of Cybernetics

1974

Foundations of system dynamics

Forrester

Industrial Dynamics

1961

 

Principles of Systems

1968

 

Urban Dynamics

1969

 

World Dynamics

1971

Meadows et al.

Limits to Growth

1972

Richardson

Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory

1991

Systems methodology

Churchman

Challenge to Reason

1968

 

The Systems Approach

1968

Vester and von Hesler

Sensitivitätsmodell

1980

Checkland

Systems Thinking, Systems Practice

1981

Ackoff

Creating the Corporate Future

1981

Ulrich

Critical Heuristics of Social Planning

1983

Warfield

A Science of Generic Design

1994

Schwaninger

Integrative Systems Methodology

1997

Gharajedaghi

Systems Thinking

1999

Sabelli

Bios: A Study of Creation

2005

Selected recent works in system dynamics

Senge

The Fifth Discipline

1990

Barlas and Carpenter

Model Validity

1990

Vennix

Group Model Building

1996

Lane and Oliva

Synthesis of System Dynamics and Soft Systems Methodology

1998

Sterman

Business Dynamics

2000

Warren

Strategy Dynamics

2002, 2008

Wolstenholme

Archetypal Structures

2003

Morecroft

Strategic Modeling

2007

Schwaninger and Grösser

Theory-Building with System Dynamics and Model Validation

2008, 2009

Rahmandad, Oliva, Osgood

Analytical Methods for Dynamic Modelers

2015

Kunc

Strategic Analytics

2019

Appendix B – Systems Approaches: An Overview

The following diagram is not a complete representation but the result of an attempt to map the major threads of the systems movement and some of their interrelations. Hence, the schema does not cover all schools or protagonists of the movement. Why does the diagram show a dynamic and evolutionary systems thread and a cybernetics thread, if cybernetics is about dynamic systems? The latter embraces all the approaches that are explicitly grounded in cybernetics. The former relate to all other approaches concerned with dynamic or evolutionary systems. The streamlining made it necessary to somewhat curtail logical perfection for the sake of conveying a synoptic view of the different systems approaches, in a language that uses the categories common in current scientific and professional discourse. Overlaps exist, e.g., between dynamic systems and chaos theory, cellular automata and agent-based modeling, etc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Schwaninger, M. (2018). System Dynamics in the Evolution of the Systems Approach. In: Meyers, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_537-4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_537-4

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27737-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27737-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Physics and AstronomyReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    System Dynamics in the Evolution of the Systems Approach
    Published:
    11 July 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_537-5

  2. System Dynamics in the Evolution of the Systems Approach
    Published:
    20 September 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_537-4

  3. Original

    System Dynamics in the Evolution of the Systems Approach
    Published:
    01 December 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_537-3