Advertisement

Ecological Inferences and Multilevel Studies

  • Mariana Arcaya
  • S. V. Subramanian
Reference work entry

Abstract

Describing area-based differences in health outcomes has a long history (Kawachi and Berkman Neighborhoods and health. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003), and evidence of ecologic variations in health sparks interest from multiple perspectives. In particular, researchers investigate these ecologic variations for surveillance and monitoring of health disparities (Krieger et al. Am J Public Health 95:312–323, 2005) and to understand the impacts contexts have on individuals. In the latter category, causal questions motivated by evidence of area-based differences in health include the following: How much do contexts, such as neighborhoods, impact health? What is the impact of a specific contextual exposure on health? How do contexts mediate the effects of individual-level health risk factors? Ecologic factors may have tremendous importance for population health (Kawachi and Berkman Neighborhoods and health. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003), underscoring the value of recognizing opportunities and methodological challenges for causal inference when ecological variations in health are present. We address these issues as follows: we begin by identifying what constitutes a multilevel data analysis and present a discussion on how a range of data structures that are observed in the real world, or due to sampling design, can be accommodated within a multilevel framework. We discuss the types of research questions that typically motivate multilevel analyses and contrast the application of multilevel methods against other approaches for answering such questions with an emphasis on causal inference. After laying down the substantive motivation to utilize multilevel methods, key statistical models are specified with a description of the properties of each model. We close by presenting extensions to the basic multilevel model that allow us to incorporate realistic complexity in our analyses.

Keywords

Contextual Effect Multilevel Model Health Score Spatial Weight Matrix Multilevel Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aitkin M, Anderson D, Hinde J (1981) Statistical modelling of data on teaching styles (with discussion). J R Stat Soc 144:148–161Google Scholar
  2. Apparicio P, Abdelmajid M, Riva M, Shearmur R (2008) Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: distance types and aggregation-error issues. Int J Health Geogr 7(1):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett N (1976) Teaching styles and pupil progress. Open Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkman LF, Kawachi I (2000) Social epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Best N, Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Brayne C (1996) Bayesian analysis of realistically complex models. J R Stat Soc A Stat Soc 159:323–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blakely T, Subramanian SV (2006) Multilevel studies. In: Oakes JM, Kaufman JS (eds) Methods in social epidemiology, vol 7. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  7. Blakely TA, Woodward AJ (2000) Ecological effects in multi-level studies. J Epidemiol Community Health 54(5):367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braumoeller BF (2006) Explaining variance; or, stuck in a moment we can’t get out of. Polit Anal 14(3):268–290. doi:10.1093/pan/mpj009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne WJ, Subramanian SV, Jones K, Goldstein H (2005) Variance partitioning in multilevel logistic models that exhibit overdispersion. J Roy Stat Soc: Ser A (Stat Soc) 168(3):599–613. doi:10.1111/j.1467-985X.2004.00365.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diez Roux AV (2002) A glossary for multilevel analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 56(8):588–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer MM, Getis A (2010) Handbook of applied spatial analysis: software tools, methods and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldstein H (2003) Multilevel statistical models. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldstein H, Browne W, Rasbash J (2002) Partitioning variation in multilevel models. Underst Stat 1(4):223–231. doi:10.1207/S15328031US0104_02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones K, Bullen N (1994) Contextual models of urban house prices: a comparison of fixed-and random-coefficient models developed by expansion. Econ Geogr 70:252–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones K, Moon G (1993) Medical geography: taking space seriously. Prog Hum Geogr 17(4):515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Katz LF, Kling JR, Liebman JB (2000) Moving to opportunity in Boston: early results of a randomized mobility experiment. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  17. Kawachi I, Berkman LF (2003) Neighborhoods and health. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Rehkopf DH, Subramanian SV (2005) Painting a truer picture of US socioeconomic and racial/ethnic health inequalities: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Public Health 95(2):312–323. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2003.032482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Larsen K, Merlo J (2005) Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression. Am J Epidemiol 161(1):81–88. doi:10.1093/aje/kwi017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. LeSage JP, Pace RK (2004) Spatial and spatiotemporal econometrics. Emerald Group Publishing, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  21. Ludwig J, Sanbonmatsu L, Gennetian L, Adam E, Duncan GJ, Katz LF, Kessler RC et al (2011) Neighborhoods, obesity, and diabetes–a randomized social experiment. N Engl J Med 365(16):1509–1519. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1103216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merlo J, Asplund K, Lynch J, Råstam L, Dobson A, World Health Organization MONICA Project (2004) Population effects on individual systolic blood pressure: a multilevel analysis of the World Health Organization MONICA project. Am J Epidemiol 159(12):1168–1179. doi:10.1093/aje/kwh160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moon G, Subramanian S, Jones K, Duncan C, Twigg L (2005) Area-based studies and the evaluation of multilevel influences on health outcomes. In: Bowling A, Ebrahim S (eds) Handbook of health research methods: investigation, measurement and analysis. Open University Press, Berkshire, pp 266–292Google Scholar
  24. Oakes JM (2004) The (mis)estimation of neighborhood effects: causal inference for a practicable social epidemiology. Soc Sci Med 58(10):1929–1952. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods, vol 1. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenbaum JE (1995) Changing the geography of opportunity by expanding residential choice: lessons from the Gautreaux program. Hous Policy Debate 6(1):231–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roux AVD (2008) Next steps in understanding the multilevel determinants of health. J Epidemiol Community Health 62(11):957–959. doi:10.1136/jech.2007.064311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Gannon-Rowley T (2002) Assessing“neighborhood effects”: social processes and new directions in research. Annu Rev Sociol 28:443–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Subramanian SV (2004a) Multilevel methods, theory and analysis. In: Encyclopedia of health and behavior, vol 2. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 602–608Google Scholar
  30. Subramanian SV (2004b) The relevance of multilevel statistical methods for identifying causal neighborhood effects. Soc Sci Med 58(10):1961–1967. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00415-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Subramanian SV, Glymour MM, Kawachi I (2007) Identifying causal ecologic effects on health: a methodological assessment. In: Macrosocial determinants of population health. Springer Media, New York, pp 301–331, Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/content/p3777604031n2513/
  32. Subramanian SV, O’Malley AJ (2010) Modeling neighborhood effects: the futility of comparing mixed and marginal approaches. Epidemiol (Cambridge, MA) 21(4):475–478. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181d74a71, discussion 479–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Subramanian SV, Jones K, Kaddour A, Krieger N (2009) Revisiting Robinson: the perils of individualistic and ecologic fallacy. Int J Epidemiol 38(2):342–360. doi:10.1093/ije/dyn359, author reply 370–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Society, Human Development and HealthHarvard School of Public Health, Harvard UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations