Urban and Regional Sustainability

Reference work entry

Abstract

Sustainability has become a key concept in the quest to define a normative framework for urban and regional development. This chapter presents an overview of what is meant by sustainability first from the regional and then from the city level. Both scales have a long history in the planning domain, but the notion of a sustainable city is key to both realms and is the main focus of this chapter. While there is widespread agreement on broad parameters and principles about urban and regional sustainability, there are entrenched debates over implementation. On one level, there are debates over implementation methods, especially the degree to which partial success in implementation is better or worse than doing nothing. More fundamental debates about sustainability involve the distinction between process vs. form and the integration of city versus nature.

Keywords

Ecological Footprint Urban Form Green Infrastructure Green Building Social Sustainability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ancell S, Thompson-Fawcett M (2008) The social sustainability of medium density housing: a conceptual model and christchurch case study. Hous Stud 23(3):423–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batty SE (2006) Planning for sustainable development in Britain: a pragmatic approach. Town Plan Rev 77(1):29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berke P (2002) Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty first century. J Plan Lit 17(1):22–36Google Scholar
  4. Berke P, Manta-Conroy M (2000) Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. J Am Plan Assoc 66(1):21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berke P, McDonald J, White N, Holmes M, Oury K, Ryznar R (2003) Greening development for watershed protection: does new urbanism make a difference? J Am Plan Assoc 69(4):397–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berke PR (2008) The evolution of green community planning, scholarship, and practice. J Am Plan Assoc 74(4):393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown DF (2006) Back to basics: the influence of sustainable development on urban planning with special reference to montreal. Can J Urban Res 15(1 Suppl):99–117Google Scholar
  8. Calthorpe P, Fulton W (2001) The regional city: planning for the end of Sprawl. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell S (1996) Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. J Am Plan Assoc 62(3):296–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins J et al (2000) The new urban ecology. Am Sci 88:5Google Scholar
  11. Cronon W (ed) (1996) Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. W.W. Norton and Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Daniels TL (2009) A trail across time: American environmental planning from city beautiful to sustainability. J Am Plan Assoc 75(2):178–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Souza Briggs X (ed) (2005) The geography of opportunity. race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Ewing R, Keith B, Steve W, Jerry W, and Don C (2008) Growing cooler: the Evidence on urban development and climate change. Washington, DC: Urban Land InstituteGoogle Scholar
  15. Farr D (2008) Sustainable urbanism: urban design with nature. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  16. Frey H (1999) Designing the city: towards a more sustainable urban form. Taylor and Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenberg M (1995) The poetics of cities: designing neighborhoods that work. Ohio State University Press, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall P (2002) Cities of tomorrow: an intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century, 3rd edn. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Leinberger C (2008) The option of urbanism. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Lynch K (1981) Good city form. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. MacKaye B (1928) The new exploration: a philosophy of regional planning. Harcourt, Brace and Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Merchant C (1996) Reinventing Eden: western culture as a recovery narrative. In: Cronon W (ed) Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. W.W. Norton, New York, pp 132–170Google Scholar
  24. Montgomery J (1998) Making a city: urbanity, vitality and urban design. J Urban Des 3(1):93–116 (p. 98)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moore SA (2007) Alternative routes to the sustainable city: Austin, Curitiba and Frankfurt. Rowman and Littlefield, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  26. Mouzon SA (2009) The original green: unlocking the mystery of true sustainability. The New Urban Guild Foundation, MiamiGoogle Scholar
  27. Newman PWG, Kenworthy JR (1996) The land use–transport connection: an overview. Land Use Policy 13(1):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Newman PWG, Kenworthy JR (2006) Urban design to reduce automobile dependence. Opolis: Int J Suburb Metrop Stud 2(1):35–52Google Scholar
  29. Owen D (2009) Green metropolis: why living smaller, living closer, and driving less are the keys to sustainability. Riverhead Hardcover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Romaya S, Rakodi C (2002) Building sustainable urban settlements: approaches and case studies in the developing world. ITDG Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Talen E (2008) Design for diversity. exploring socially mixed neighborhoods. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Union of Concerned Scientists (1992) World scientists’ warning to humanity. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA. Available at: http://www.ucsusa.org/
  33. Van der Ryn S, Calthorpe P (1991) Sustainable communities: a new design synthesis for cities, suburbs and towns. Sierra Club Books, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  34. Van der Ryn S, Cowan S (1995) Ecological design. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  35. World Commission on Environment and Development (the Brundtland Commission) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations