Evolutionary Economic Geography and Relational Geography

Reference work entry

Abstract

In the past decade, economic geography has encountered increasing interest and debates about evolutionary and relational thinking in regional development. Rather than comparing the two approaches, this chapter investigates how they can complement one another and be applied to specific research fields in economic geography. A comparison would be difficult because the approaches address different levels of the research process and are in a relatively early stage of their development. To demonstrate the potential of combining the two approaches, this chapter aims to conceptualize cluster dynamics in an integrated relational-evolutionary perspective. In recent years, research on clusters has experienced a paradigmatic shift from understanding their network structure to analyzing dynamic changes. Within this context, inspired by relational and evolutionary thinking, a comprehensive tripolar analytical framework of cluster evolution is developed that combines the three concepts of context, network, and action, allowing each to evolve in interaction with the others. Through this, the chapter argues that, rather than viewing relational and evolutionary accounts as competitive approaches to economic geography, they can, in an integrated form, become fundamental guides to economic geography research.

Keywords

Evolutionary Approach Economic Geography Path Dependence Local Agent Cluster Dynamic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter, to which both authors have contributed equally, is based on a more extensive conceptual and empirical study (Li et al. 2012). We would like to thank Andres Rodríguez-Pose for his encouragement and Manfred Fischer and Peter Maskell for thoughtful comments.

References

  1. Bathelt H, Glückler J (2011) The relational economy: geographies of knowing and learning. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P (2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog Hum Geogr 28(1):31–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boggs JS, Rantisi NM (2003) The ‘relational’ turn in economic geography. J Econ Geogr 3(2):109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boschma R, Iammarino S (2009) Related variety, trade linkages and regional growth in Italy. Econ Geogr 85(3):289–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bresnahan T, Gambardella A, Saxenian A (2001) ‘Old economy’ inputs for ‘new economy’ outcomes: cluster formation in the new Silicon Valleys. Ind Corp Change 10(4):835–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen M, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fitjar RD, Rodríguez-Pose A (2011) Innovating in the periphery: firms, values and innovation in Southwest Norway. Eur Plann Stud 19(4):555–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frenken K, van Oort FG, Verburg T (2007) Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Reg Stud 41(5):685–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gertler M (2004) Manufacturing culture: the institutional geography of industrial practice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Grabher G (1993) The weakness of strong ties: the ‘lock-in’ of regional development in the Ruhr area. In: Grabher G (ed) The embedded firm: on the socio-economics of industrial networks. Routledge, London, pp 255–278Google Scholar
  12. Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91(3):481–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hadjimichalis C (2006) The end of third Italy as we knew it? Antipode 38(1):82–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hassink R, Klaerding C (2009) Relational and evolutionary economic geography: competing or complementary paradigms? Papers in evolutionary economic geography # 09.11, Urban & Regional Research Centre, Utrecht University, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  15. Iammarino S, McCann P (2006) The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Res Policy 35(7):1018–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klepper S (1997) Industry life cycles. Ind Corp Change 6(1):145–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Li P-F, Bathelt H, Wang J (2012) Network dynamics and cluster evolution: changing trajectories of the aluminium extrusion industry in Dali, China. J Econ Geogr 12(1):127–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MacKinnon D, Cumbers A, Pike A, Birch K, McMaster R (2010) Evolution in economic geography: institutions, political economy, and adaptation. Econ Geogr 85(2):129–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Malmberg A, Maskell P (2002) The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering. Environ Plann A 34(3):429–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin R, Sunley P (2006) Path dependence and regional economic evolution. J Econ Geogr 6(4):395–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin R (2010) Rethinking regional path dependence: beyond lock-in to evolution. Econ Geogr 86(1):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin R, Sunley P (2011) Conceptualizing cluster evolution: beyond the life cycle model? Reg Stud 45(10):1299–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maskell P, Malmberg A (2007) Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution. J Econ Geogr 7(5):603–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Menzel M-P, Fornahl D (2009) Cluster life cycles – dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution. Ind Corp Change 19(1):205–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nohria N (1992) Introduction: is a network perspective a useful way of studying organizations. In: Nohria N, Eccles RG (eds) Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  27. Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ Sci 15(1):2–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saxenian A (2006) The new argonauts: regional advantage in a global economy. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Scott AJ (2006) Origins and growth of the Hollywood motion-picture industry: the first three decades. In: Braunerhjelm P, Feldman M (eds) Cluster genesis: technology-based industrial development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Storper M (2009) Regional context and global trade. Econ Geogr 85(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Storper M, Salais R (1997) Worlds of production: the action framework of the economy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  32. Storper M, Venables AJ (2004) Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. J Econ Geogr 4(4):351–370Google Scholar
  33. Sydow J, Lerch F, Staber U (2010) Planning for path dependence? The case of a network in the Berlin-Brandenburg optics cluster. Econ Geogr 86(2):173–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and Department of Geography & Program in PlanningUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Urban & Regional Economy and Institute of China InnovationEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations