Advertisement

The Geography of Innovation

  • Edward J. Malecki
Reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter surveys the topic of the geography of innovation – not the economics of innovation – and asks several questions: What is innovation? Who innovates? Where do they learn to innovate? The research focus has shifted from innovation and technology to the broader issues of knowledge and innovative capability. The empirical literature has been much narrower in scope, previously focusing on research and development (R&D) and now rarely looking beyond patents. The chapter surveys a broader set of innovation indicators – inputs, outputs, and hidden innovation, much of which is uncovered in large-scale surveys. Empirically, there is a global shift in innovative capability toward Asia, primarily in R&D (but less so in basic research) and in process innovation related to manufacturing. The overall pattern is one of persistent spatial concentration. As a result, a thriving business has emerged to craft policies to enhance innovation and to “construct advantage” in an uncertain competitive landscape. Finally, the actors in innovation include not only individual scientists and inventors but also the organizations that employ them, such as universities and firms. It is entrepreneurs who largely determine how innovation is exploited. The fruitful concept of the knowledge filter and the role of entrepreneurship and the geography of entrepreneurship provide clues to the patterns seen.

Keywords

European Union Innovation System Tacit Knowledge Absorptive Capacity Patent Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

Thanks to Arnoud Lagendijk for his comments on an earlier version of this chapter.

References

  1. Acs ZJ, Braunerhjelm P, Audretsch DB, Carlsson B (2009) The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 32(1):15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archibugi D, Denni M, Filippetti A (2009) The technological capabilities of nations: the state of the art of synthetic indicators. Technol Forecast Social Change 76(7):917–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arundel A, Hollanders H (2008) Innovation scoreboards: indicators and policy use. In: Nauwelaers C, Wintjes R (eds) Innovation policy in Europe: measurement and strategy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 29–52Google Scholar
  4. Asheim B, Gertler MS (2005) The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR (eds) The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 291–317Google Scholar
  5. Asheim BT, Boschma R, Cooke P (2011) Constructing regional advantage: platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Reg Stud 45(7):893–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch DB, Keilbach M (2007) The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. J Manag Stud 44(7):1242–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camagni R (2009) Territorial capital and regional development. In: Capello R, Nijkamp P (eds) Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 118–132Google Scholar
  8. Caraça J, Lundvall B-Å, Mendonça S (2009) The changing role of science in the innovation process: from queen to Cinderella? Technol Forecast Social Change 76:861–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Econ J 99:569–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooke P (2005) Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation: exploring ‘globalisation 2’ – a new model of industry organization. Res Policy 34:1128–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooke P, Asheim B, Boschma R, Martin R, Schwarz D, Tödtling F (eds) (2011) Handbook of regional innovation and growth. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  12. Crevoisier O, Jeannerat H (2009) Territorial knowledge dynamics: from the proximity paradigm to multi-location milieus. Eur Plan Stud 17:1223–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dankbaar B (2007) Global sourcing and innovation: the consequences of losing both organizational and geographical proximity. Eur Plan Stud 15(2):271–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ernst D (2002) Global production networks and the changing geography of innovation systems: implications for developing countries. Econ Innovat New Technol 11(6):497–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fagerberg J, Srholec M, Verspagen B (2010) Innovation and economic development. In: Hall BH, Rosenberg N (eds) Handbook of the economics of innovation, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 833–872Google Scholar
  16. Feldman MP, Kogler DF (2010) Stylized facts in the geography of innovation. In: Hall BH, Rosenberg N (eds) Handbook of the economics of innovation, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 381–410Google Scholar
  17. Fischer MM, Revilla Diez J, Snickars F (2001) Metropolitan innovation systems: theory and evidence from three metropolitan regions in Europe. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman RB (2010) Globalization of scientific and engineering talent: international mobility of students, workers, and ideas and the world economy. Econ Innovat New Technol 19:393–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Lit 28(4):1661–1707Google Scholar
  20. Lawton Smith H (2008) Inter-firm networks in high-tech clusters. In: Karlsson C (ed) Handbook of research on innovation and clusters. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 107–123Google Scholar
  21. Martin R, Moodysson J, Zukauskaite E (2011) Regional innovation policy beyond ‘best practice’: lessons from Sweden. J Knowl Econ 2(4):550–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mason C (2008) Entrepreneurial dynamics and the origin and growth of high-tech clusters. In: Karlsson C (ed) Handbook of research on innovation and clusters. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 33–53Google Scholar
  23. Moodysson J, Jonsson O (2007) Knowledge collaboration and proximity: the spatial organization of biotech innovation projects. Eur Urban Reg Stud 14(2):115–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mytelka LK, Smith K (2002) Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co-evolving process. Res Policy 31(8–9):1467–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nagaoka S, Motohashi K, Goto A (2010) Patent statistics as an innovation indicator. In: Hall BH, Rosenberg N (eds) Handbook of the economics of innovation, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1083–1127Google Scholar
  26. Nauwelaers C (2011) Intermediaries in regional innovation systems: role and challenges for policy. In Cooke P, Asheim BT, Boschma R, Martin R, Schwartz D, Tödtling F (eds) Handbook of Regional Innovation and Growth. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 467–481Google Scholar
  27. Soete L, Verspagen B, Tel Weel B (2010) Systems of innovation. In: Hall BH, Rosenberg N (eds) Handbook of the economics of innovation, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1159–1180Google Scholar
  28. Steinmueller WE (2010) Economics of technology policy. In: Hall BH, Rosenberg N (eds) Handbook of the economics of innovation, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1181–1218Google Scholar
  29. Stoneman P (2010) Soft innovation: economics, product aesthetics, and the creative industries. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tura T, Harmaakorpi V, Pekkola S (2008) Breaking inside the black box: towards a dynamic evaluation framework for regional innovative capability. Sci Public Policy 35(10):733–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Uyarra E, Flanagan K (2010) From regional systems of innovation to regions as innovation policy spaces. Environ Plan C Govern Policy 28(4):681–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vale M (2011) Innovation networks and local and regional development policy. In: Pike A, Rodriguez-Pose A, Tomaney J (eds) Handbook of local and regional development. Routledge, London, pp 413–424Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyOhio State University 1036 Derby HallColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations