Advertisement

Regional Growth and Convergence Empirics

  • Julie Le Gallo
  • Bernard Fingleton
Reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter provides a selective survey of the main developments related to the study of regional convergence. We discuss the methodological issues at stake and show how a number of techniques applied in cross-country studies have been adapted to the study of regional convergence. In doing this, we focus on the two main strands of growth econometrics: the regression approach where predictions from formal neoclassical and other growth theories have been tested using cross-sectional and panel data and the distribution approach, which typically examines the entire distribution of output per capita across regions. In each case, we show how the analysis of regions rather than countries emphasizes the need to take proper account of spatial interaction effects.

Keywords

Spatial Dependence Effective Worker Regional Income Spatial Weight Matrix Convergence Club 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abreu M, De Groot HLF, Florax RJGM (2005) A meta-analysis of β-convergence: the legendary 2 %. J Econ Surv 19:389–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58:277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azariadis C, Drazen A (1990) Threshold externalities in economic development. Q J Econ 105:501–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barro RJ (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Q J Econ 106:407–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1995) Economic growth theory. McGraw-Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernard A, Durlauf S (1996) Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis. J Econ 71:161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond S, Hoeffler A, Temple J (2001) GMM estimation of empirical growth models. Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 3048Google Scholar
  8. Carree M, Klomp L (1997) Testing the convergence hypothesis: a comment. Rev Econ Stat 79:683–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Durlauf S, Jonhson P (1995) Multiple regimes and cross-country growth behavior. J Appl Econ 10:365–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Durlauf S, Johnson P, Temple J (2005) Growth econometrics. In: Aghion P, Durlauf S (eds) Handbook of economic growth. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Egger P, Pfaffermayr M (2009) On testing conditional sigma-convergence. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 71:453–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ertur C, Koch W (2007) Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: theory and evidence. J Appl Econom 22:1023–1062Google Scholar
  13. Ertur C, Le Gallo J, Baumont C (2006) The European regional convergence process, 1980–1995: do spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity matter? Int Reg Sci Rev 29:2–34Google Scholar
  14. Fernandez CE, Ley E, Steel M (2001) Model uncertainty in cross-country growth regressions. J Appl Econ 16:563–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fingleton B (1999) Estimates of time to economic convergence: an analysis of regions of the European Union. Int Reg Sci Rev 22:5–35Google Scholar
  16. Fingleton B (2008) A generalized method of moments estimator for a spatial panel model with an endogenous spatial lag and spatial moving average errors. Spat Econ Anal 3:27–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fingleton B, Lopez-Bazo E (2006) Empirical growth models with spatial effects. Pap Reg Sci 85:177–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischer MM, Stumpner P (2008) Income distribution dynamics and cross-region convergence in Europe. Spatial filtering and novel stochastic kernel representations. J Geogr Syst 10:109–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischer MM, Wang J (2011) Spatial data analysis: models, methods and techniques. Springer, Heidelberg/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henderson D, Parmeter C, Russell R (2008) Modes, weighted modes, and calibrated modes: evidence of clustering using modality tests. J Appl Econ 5:607–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Islam N (1995) Growth empirics: a panel data approach. Q J Econ 110:1127–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Le Gallo J, Fingleton B (2012) Measurement errors in a spatial context. Reg Sci Urban Econ 42:114–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. LeSage JP, Fischer MM (2008) Spatial growth regressions: model specification, estimation and interpretation. Spat Econ Anal 3:275–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. LeSage J, Pace K (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levine R, Revelt D (1992) A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. Am Econ Rev 82:942–963Google Scholar
  26. Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107:407–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nijkamp P, Poot J (1998) Spatial perspectives on new theories of economic growth. Ann Reg Sci 32:7–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pace R, LeSage J (2004) Spatial autoregressive local estimation. In: Getis A, Mur J, Zoller H (eds) Spatial econometrics and spatial statistics. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  29. Pirotte A (2011) Econometrics of panel data. Economica, ParisGoogle Scholar
  30. Quah D (1993) Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. Eur Econ Rev 37:426–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quah D (1996) Empirics for economic growth and convergence. Eur Econ Rev 40:1353–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rey SJ (2001) Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence. Geogr Anal 33:195–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rey SJ, Dev B (2006) σ-convergence in the presence of spatial effects. Pap Reg Sci 85:217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rey SJ, Le Gallo J (2009) Spatial analysis of economic convergence. In: Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbook of econometrics, vol 2, Applied econometrics. Palgrave MacMillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  35. Sala-i-Martin X, Doppelhofer G, Miller R (2004) Determinants of long-term growth: a Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach. Am Econ Rev 94:813–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Temple J (1998) Robustness tests of the augmented Solow model. J Appl Econ 13:361–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CRESEUniversité de Franche-ComtéBesançonFrance
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations