Incorporating Space in the Theory of Endogenous Growth: Contributions from the New Economic Geography

  • Steven Bond-SmithEmail author
  • Philip McCann
Reference work entry


We describe how endogenous growth theory has now incorporated spatial factors. We also derive some of the policy implications of this new theory for growth and economic integration. We start by reviewing the product variety model of endogenous growth and discuss similarities with modeling techniques in the new economic geography. Both use Dixit-Stiglitz competition. Increasing returns provide an incentive for innovation in endogenous growth theory, and in combination with transport costs, increasing returns provide an incentive for firm location decisions in the new economic geography. Since innovation is the engine of growth in endogenous growth models and knowledge spillovers are a key input to innovation production, we also explore how innovation and knowledge have distinctly spatial characteristics. These modeling similarities and the spatial nature of knowledge spillovers have led to space being incorporated into the theory of endogenous growth. We guide the reader through how space is modeled in endogenous growth theory via the new economic geography. Growth by innovation is a force for agglomeration. When space is included, growth is enhanced by agglomeration because of the presence of localized technology spillovers. We consider the many other spatial factors included in models of space and growth. We explore the spatial effects on economic growth demonstrated by these theoretical models. Lastly, we consider policy implications for integration beyond lowering trade costs and discuss how lowering the cost of trading knowledge is a stabilizing force and is growth enhancing.


Transport Cost Real Wage Knowledge Spillover Endogenous Growth Unskilled Worker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to thank Jacques Poot for excellent comments on earlier drafts of this chapter. Steven Bond-Smith would also like to thank the Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund and the University of Waikato for financial support.


  1. Acs ZJ, Varga A (2002) Geography, endogenous growth, and innovation. Int Reg Sci Rev 25(1):132–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2):132–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev 86(3):630–640Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin RE, Forslid R (2000) The core-periphery model and endogenous growth: stabilizing and destabilizing integration. Economica 67(267):307–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin RE, Forslid R (2010) Trade liberalisation with heterogeneous firms. Rev Dev Econ 14(2):161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldwin R, Martin P (2004) Agglomeration and regional growth. In: Henderson JV, Thisse J-F (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics, vol 4, Cities and Geography. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2671–2711Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin RE, Martin P, Ottaviano GI (2001) Global income divergence, trade and industrialisation: the geography of growth take-offs. J Econ Growth 6(1):5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldwin R, Forslid R, Martin P, Ottaviano G, Robert-Nicoud R (2003) Economic geography and public policy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  9. Desmet K, Rossi-Hansberg E (2009) Spatial growth and industry age. J Econ Theory 144(6):2477–2502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dixit AK, Stiglitz J (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67(3):297–308Google Scholar
  11. Eaton J, Kortum S (1999) International technology diffusion: theory and measurement. Int Econ Rev 40(3):537–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faggian A, McCann P (2009) Human capital, graduate migration and innovation in British Regions. Camb J Econ 33(2):317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujita M, Thisse J-F (2003) Does geographical agglomeration foster economic growth? And who gains and loses from it? Jpn Econ Rev 54(2):121–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A (1999) The spatial economy; cities, regions and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Grossman G, Helpman E (1991a) Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. Grossman G, Helpman E (1991b) Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. Eur Econ Rev 35(2–3):517–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grossman G, Helpman E (1995) Technology and trade. In: Grossman G, Rogoff K (eds) The handbook of international economics, vol 3. Elsevier, North Holland, pp 1279–1337Google Scholar
  18. Kaldor N (1970) The case for regional policies. Scott J Polit Econ 17(3):337–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krugman P (1979) Increasing returns, monopolistic competition and international trade. J Int Econ 9(4):469–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3):483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krugman P, Venables A (1995) Globalisation and the inequality of nations. Q J Econ 110(4):857–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lucas R (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22(1):3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin P, Ottaviano G (1999) Growing locations: industry location in a model of endogenous growth. Eur Econ Rev 43(2):281–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCann P (2007) Sketching out a model of innovation, face-to-face interaction and economic geography. Spat Econ Anal 2(2):117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCann P (2009) Economic geography, globalization and New Zealand’s productivity paradox. N Z Econ Pap 43(3):279–314Google Scholar
  26. Nelson RR (ed) (1993) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Romer P (1990) Endogenous technical change. J Polit Econ 98(5):S71–S102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Venables A (1996) Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries. Int Econ Rev 37(2):341–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yamamoto K (2003) Agglomeration and growth with innovation in the intermediate goods sector. Reg Sci Urban Econ 33(3):335–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of Economic GeographyUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations