The Importance of Testing for Normality
Many statistical procedures such as estimation and hypothesis testing have the underlying assumption that the sampled data come from a normal distribution. This requires either an effective test of whether the assumption of normality holds or a valid argument showing that non-normality does not invalidate the procedure. Tests of normality are used to formally assess the assumption of the underlying distribution.
Much statistical research has been concerned with evaluating the magnitude of the effect of violations of the normality assumption on the true significance level of a test or the efficiency of a parameter estimate. Geary (1947) showed that for comparing two variances, having a symmetric non-normal underlying distribution can seriously affect the true significance level of the test. For a value of 1.5 for the kurtosis of the alternative distribution, the actual significance level of the test is 0.000089, as compared to the nominal level...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References and Further Reading
Anderson TW, Darling DA (1954) A test of goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc 49:765–769
Box GEP (1953) Non-normality and tests on variances. Biometrika 40:318–335
D’Agostino RB, Lee AFS (1977) Robustness of location estimators under changes of population kurtosis. J Am Stat Assoc 72:393–396
D’Agostino RB, Stephens MA (eds) (1986) Goodness-of-fit techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York
David HA, Hartley HO, Pearson ES (1954) The distribution of the ratio, in a single normal sample, of the range to the standard deviation. Biometrika 41:482–493
Franck WE (1981) The most powerful invariant test of normal versus Cauchy with applications to stable alternatives. J Am Stat Assoc 76:1002–1005
Geary RC (1936) Moments of the ratio of the mean deviation to the standard deviation for normal samples. Biometrika 28:295–305
Geary RC (1947) Testing for normality. Biometrika, 34:209–242
Jarque C, Bera A (1980) Efficient tests for normality, homoskedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Econ Lett 6:255–259
Jarque C, Bera A (1987) A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. Int Stat Rev 55:163–172
Johnson ME, Tietjen GL, Beckman RJ (1980) A new family of probability distributions with application to Monte Carlo studies. J Am Stat Assoc 75:276–279
Pearson ES, Please NW (1975) Relation between the shape of population distribution and the robustness of four simple test statistics. Biometrika 62:223–241
Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591–611
Subrahmaniam K, Subrahmaniam K, Messeri JY (1975) On the robustness of some tests of significance in sampling from a compound normal distribution. J Am Stat Assoc 70:435–438
Thode HC Jr (2002) Testing for normality. Marcel-Dekker, New York
Tukey JW (1960) A survey of sampling from contaminated distributions. In: Olkin I, Ghurye SG, Hoeffding W, Madow WG, Mann HB (eds) Contributions to probability and statistics. Stanford University Press, CA, pp 448–485
Uthoff VA (1970) An optimum test property of two well-known statistics. J Am Stat Assoc 65:1597–1600
Uthoff VA (1973) The most powerful scale and location invariant test of the normal versus the double exponential. Ann Stat 1:170–174
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Thode, H.C. (2011). Normality Tests. In: Lovric, M. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_423
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_423
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04897-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04898-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering