Simulated Annealing

  • Kathryn A. DowslandEmail author
  • Jonathan M. ThompsonEmail author


Since its introduction as a generic heuristic for discrete optimization in 1983, simulated annealing (SA) has become a popular tool for tackling both discrete and continuous problems across a broad range of application areas. This chapter provides an overview of the technique with the emphasis being on the use of simulated annealing in the solution of practical problems. A detailed statement of the algorithm is given, together with an explanation of its inspiration from the field of statistical thermodynamics. This is followed by a brief overview of the theory with emphasis on those results that are important to the decisions that need to be made for a practical implementation. It then goes on to look at some of the ways in which the basic algorithm has been modified in order to improve its performance in the solution of a variety of problems. It also includes a brief section on application areas and concludes with general observations and pointers to other sources of information such as survey articles and websites offering downloadable simulated annealing code.


Local Search Simulated Annealing Solution Space Travel Salesman Problem Combinatorial Optimization Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aarts EHL, Korst JHM (1989) Simulated annealing and Boltzmann machines. Wiley, ChichesterzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Aarts EHL, Van Laarhoven PJM (1985) Statistical cooling: a general approach to combinatorial optimisation problems. Philips J Res 40:193–226MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Aarts EHL, Korst JHM, Michiels W (2005) Simulated annealing. In: Burke EK, Kendall G (eds) Search methodologies. Springer, New York, pp 187–210Google Scholar
  4. Abramson D (1991) Constructing school timetables using simulated annealing: sequential and parallel algorithms. Manag Sci 37:98–113Google Scholar
  5. Alrefaei MH, Andradottir S (1999) A simulated annealing algorithm with constant temperature for discrete stochastic optimisation. Manag Sci 45:748–764zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Altiparmak F, Karaoglan I (2008) An adaptive tabu-simulated annealing for concave cost transportation problems. J Operational Res Soc 59:331–341zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Anagnostopoulos A, Michel L, Van Hentenryck P, Vergados YA (2006) Simulated annealing approach to the traveling tournament problem. J Scheduling 9:177–193zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Arai K, Sakakibara J (2006) Estimation of sea surface temperature, wind speed and water vapour with microwave radiometer data based on simulated annealing. Adv Space Res 37(12):2202–2207Google Scholar
  9. Azizi N, Zolfaghari S (2004) Adaptive temperature control for simulated annealing: a comparative study. Comput Operations Res 31(4):2439–2451MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Bai R, Burke EK, Kendall G, McCollum B (2006) A simulated annealing hyper-heuristic for university course timetabling. In: Burke EK, Rudova H (eds) In: Proceedings of PATAT 2006, Brno, Czech Republic, August–September 2006. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3867. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  11. Bianci L, Dorigo M, Gambardella LM, Gutjahr WJ (2008) A survey on metaheuristics for stochastic combinatorial optimisation. Nat Comput. DOI 101007, Online September 2008Google Scholar
  12. Boese KD, Kahng AB (1994) Best-so-far vs. where-you-are: implications for optimal finite time annealing. Syst Control Lett 22:71–78MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonomi E, Lutton JL (1984) The N-city travelling salesman problem: statistical mechanics and the Metropolis algorithm. SIAM Rev 26:551–568MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Brandimarte P, Conterno R, Laface P (1987) FMS production scheduling by simulated annealing. In: Micheletti GF (ed) Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on simulation in manufacturing, Turin, Italy, November 1987. Springer, Berlin, pp 235–245Google Scholar
  15. Bulgak AA, Sanders JL (1988) Integrating a modified simulated annealing algorithm with the simulation of a manufacturing system to optimise buffer sizes in automatic assembly systems. In: Abrams M, Haigh P, Comfort J (eds) Proceedings of the 1988 winter simulation conference, San Diego, CA, December 1998. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, pp 684–690Google Scholar
  16. Burke EK, Kendall G, Whitwell G (2008) A simulated annealing enhancement of the best-fit heuristic for the orthogonal stock cutting problem. INFORMS J Comput 21(3):505–516Google Scholar
  17. Černy V (1985) A thermodynamical approach to the travelling salesman problem: an efficient simulation algorithm. J Optimization Theory Appl 45:41–55zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Chams M, Hertz A, De Werra D (1987) Some experiments with simulated annealing for colouring graphs. Eur J Operational Res 32:260–266zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Chandy JA, Banerjee P (1996) Parallel simulated annealing strategies for VLSI cell placement. In: Proceedings of the 9th conference on VLSI design, Bangalore, India, January 1996. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp 37–42Google Scholar
  20. Chen YL, Ke YL (2004) Multi-objective VAr planning for large-scale power systems using projection-based two-layer simulated annealing algorithms. IEE Proc Generation, Transm Distribution 151(4):555–560Google Scholar
  21. Chen S-H, Yeh C-H (2001) Evolving traders and the business school with genetic programming: a new architecture of the agent based artificial stock market. J Econ Dyn Control 25 (3–4):363–393zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen C-H, Ting C-J, Chang P-C (2005) Applying a hybrid ant colony system to the vehicle routing problem. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3483:417–426Google Scholar
  23. Choi K-S, Sun H, Heng P-A (2004) An efficient and scalable deformable model for virtual reality-based medical applications. Artif Intell Med 32(1):51–69Google Scholar
  24. Connolly DT (1990) An improved annealing scheme for the QAP. Eur J Operational Res 46:93–100MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Cook SA (1971) The complexity of theorem procedures. In: Proceedings of 3rd ACM symposium on the theory of computing, Shaker Heights, OH, 1971. ACM, New York, pp 151–158Google Scholar
  26. Cook SA (1972) An overview of computational complexity. Commun ACM 26:400–408Google Scholar
  27. Cornish NJ, Porter EK (2007) The search for massive black hole binaries with LISA. Classical Quantum Gravity 24(23):5729–5755zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Crowe KA, Nelson JD (2005) An evaluation of the simulated annealing algorithm for solving the area-restricted harvest-scheduling model against optimal benchmarks. Can J Forest Res 35(10):2500–2509Google Scholar
  29. De Andrade MD, Nascimento MAC, Mundim KC, Sobrinho AMC, Malbouisson LAC (2008) Atomic basis sets optimization using the generalized simulated annealing approach: new basis sets for the first row elements. Int J Quantum Chem 108(13):2486–2498Google Scholar
  30. Degertekin SO (2007) A comparison of simulated annealing and genetic algorithm for optimum design of nonlinear steel space frames. Struct Multidisciplinary Optimization 34(4):347–359Google Scholar
  31. Dowsland KA (1993a) Some experiments with simulated annealing techniques for packing problems. Eur J Operational Res 68:389–399zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Dowsland KA (1993b) Using simulated annealing for efficient allocation of students to practical classes. In: Vidal RVV (ed) Applied simulated annealing. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 396. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  33. Dowsland KA, Thompson JM (1998) A robust simulated annealing based examination timetabling system. Comput Oper Res 25:637–648Google Scholar
  34. Dowsland KA, Soubeiga E, Burke EK (2007) A simulated annealing based hyperheuristic for determining shipper sizes for storage and transportation. Eur J Oper Res 179(3):759–774zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Dueck G, Sheuer T (1990) Threshold accepting: a general purpose optimization algorithm appearing superior to simulated annealing. J Comput Phys 90:161–175MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Edmonds J (1965) Paths, trees and flowers. Can J Maths 17:449–467MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Egeblad J, Pisinger D (2009) Heuristic approaches for the two and three dimensional knapsack packing problem. Comput Oper Res 36(4):1026–1049MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Eglese RW (1990) Simulated annealing: a general tool for operational research. Eur J Oper Res 46(3):271–281MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Erdemir ET, Batta R, Spielman S, Rogerson PA, Blatt A, Flanigan M (2008) Location coverage models with demand originating from nodes and paths: application to cellular network design. Eur J Oper Res 190(3):610–632MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Feo TA, Resende MGC, Smith SH (1994) A greedy randomised adaptive search procedure for maximum independent set. Oper Res 42:860–878zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Fleischer M, Jacobson SH (1999) Information theory and the finite time behavior of the simulated annealing algorithm: experimental results. INFORMS J Comput 11:35–43MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. Franz A, Hoffmann KH (2003) Threshold accepting as limit case for a modified Tsallis statistics. Appl Math Lett 16:27–31zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and intractability. WH Freeman, San Francisco, CAzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Ge H, Du W, Qian F (2007) A hybrid algorithm based on particle swarm optimisation and simulated annealing for job shop scheduling. In: Proceedings of ICNC 2007. Third International Conference on Natural Computation, vol 3, Haikou, China, August 2007. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp 715–719Google Scholar
  45. Gelfand SB, Mitter SK (1989) Simulated annealing with noisy or imprecise measurements. J Opt Theory Appl 69:49–62MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  46. Gendreau M, Potvin JY (2005) Tabu search. In: EK Burke, G Kendall (eds) Introductory tutorials in optimisation, decision support and search methodology. Springer, New York, pp 165–186Google Scholar
  47. Glover F (1989) Tabu search part 1. ORSA J Comput 1:190–206MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Glover F, Greenberg HJ (1989) New approaches for heuristic search: a bilateral link with artificial intelligence. Eur J Oper Res 39:119–130MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Gogos C, Alefragis P, Housos E (2008) A multi-staged algorithmic process for the solution of the examination timetabling problem. In: Burke EK, Gendreau M (eds) The 7th international conference on the practice and theory of automated timetabling, Montreal, Canada, August 2008Google Scholar
  50. Goldstein L, Waterman MS (1988) Neighbourhood size in the simulated annealing algorithm. Am J Math Manag Sci 8:409–423MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. Gomes AM, Oliveira JF (2006) Solving irregular strip packing problems by hybridising simulated annealing and linear programming. Eur J Oper Res 171(3):811–829zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. Greene JW, Supowit KJ (1986) Simulated annealing without rejected moves. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des CAD-5:221–228Google Scholar
  53. Guo XP, Yang GK, Zhiming W, Huang ZH (2006) A hybrid fine-tuned multi-objective memetic algorithm. IEICE Trans Fundam Electron Commun Comput Sci E89A(3):790–797Google Scholar
  54. Gutjahr WJ, Pflug GCh (1996) Simulated annealing for noisy cost functions. J Global Optimisation 8(1):1–13MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. Hajek B (1988) Cooling schedules for optimal annealing. Math Oper Res 13:311–329MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. Hamacher K (2006) Adaptation in stochastic tunnelling global optimisation of complex potential energy landscapes. Europhys Lett 74:944–950Google Scholar
  57. Hamacher K, Wenzel W (1999) Scaling behaviour of stochastic minimisation algorithms in a perfect funnel landscape. Phys Rev E 59:938–941Google Scholar
  58. Hansen P, Mladenovic N (2005) Variable neighbourhood search. In: Burke EK, Kendall G (eds) Search methodologies. Springer, New York, pp 211–238Google Scholar
  59. Henderson D, Jacobson SH, Johnson AW (2003) The theory and practice of simulated annealing. In: Glover F, Kochenberger GA (eds) The handbook of metaheuristics, International series in operations research and management science, vol 57. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Huang MD, Romeo F, Sangiovanni-Vincentelli AL (1986) An efficient general cooling schedule for simulated annealing. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on computer aided design, Santa Clara, CA, November 1986. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp 381–384Google Scholar
  61. Jacob D, Raben A, Sarkar A, Grimm J, Simpson L (2008) Anatomy-based inverse planning simulated annealing optimization in high-dose-rate prostrate brachytherapy significant dosimetric advantage over other optimization techniques. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72(3):820–827Google Scholar
  62. Johnson DS, Aragon CR, McGeoch LA, Schevon C (1989) Optimization by simulated annealing: an experimental evaluation; part I, graph partitioning. Oper Res 37:865–892zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. Johnson DS, Aragon CR, McGeoch LA, Schevon C (1991) Optimization by simulated annealing: an experimental evaluation; part II, graph coloring and number partitioning. Oper Res 39:378–406zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  64. Jwo W-S, Liu C-W, Liu C-C, Hsiao Y-Y (1995) Hybrid expert system and simulated annealing approach to optimal reactive power planning. IEE Proc Generation, Transm Distribution 142(4):381–385Google Scholar
  65. Kalivas JH (1992) Optimization using variations of simulated annealing. Chemometrics Intell Lab Syst 15(1):1–12Google Scholar
  66. Karp RM (1972) Reducibility amongst combinatorial problems. In: Miller RE, Thatcher JW (eds) Complexity of computer computations. Plenum Press, New York, pp 85–103Google Scholar
  67. Kern W (1986) On the depth of combinatorial optimisation problems. University of Koln Technical Report 8633Google Scholar
  68. Kirkpatrick CD, Gellat CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimisation by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  69. Kubicky CD, Yeh BM, Lessard E, Joe BN, Speight JL, Pouliot J, Hsu I-C (2008) Inverse planning simulated annealing for magnetic resonance imaging-based intracavitary high dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer. Bracytherapy 7(3):242–247Google Scholar
  70. Kostuch PA (2004) The university course timetabling problem with a 3-phase method. In: Burke EK, Trick M (eds) The practice and theory of automated timetabling V. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3616. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 109–125Google Scholar
  71. Lin S, Yu VF, Chou S-Y (2008) Solving the truck and trailer problem based on a simulated annealing heuristics. Comput Oper Res, Available online 17-4-2008 (corrected proof)Google Scholar
  72. Liu X, Pardalos PM, Rajasekaran S, Resende MGC (2000) A GRASP for frequency assignment in mobile radio networks. In: Badrinath BR, Hsu F, Pardalos PM, Rajasejaran S (eds) Mobile networks and computing. DIMACS series on discrete mathematics and theoretical computer science, vol 52. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, pp 195–201Google Scholar
  73. Lundy M, Mees A (1986) Convergence of an annealing algorithm. Math Programming 34:111–124MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. Marsh RE, Riauka TA, McQuarrie SA (2007) Use of a simulated annealing algorithm to fit compartmental models with an application to fractal pharmacokinetics. J Pharm Pharm Sci 10(2):167–178Google Scholar
  75. Merlot LTG, Boland N, Hughes BD, Stuckey PJ (2003) A hybrid algorithm for the examination timetabling problem. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2740:207–231Google Scholar
  76. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculation by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21:1087–1091Google Scholar
  77. Mitra D, Romeo F, Sangiovanni-Vincentelli AL (1986) Convergence and finite time behaviour of simulated annealing. Adv Appl Probability 18:747–771MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  78. Monem MJ, Namdarian R (2005) Application of simulated annealing (SA) techniques for optimal water distribution in irrigation canals. Irrigation Drainage 54(4):365–373Google Scholar
  79. Morgenstern C, Shapiro H (1989) Chromatic number approximation using simulated annealing. Technical Report CS86-1, Department of Computer Science, University of New MexicoGoogle Scholar
  80. Morton GC, Sangreacha R, Halina P, Loblaw A (2008) A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostrate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 7(1):12–16Google Scholar
  81. Moscato P, Fontanari JF (1990) Stochastic versus deterministic update in simulated annealing. Phys Lett A 146:204–208Google Scholar
  82. Nissen V (1995) An overview of evolutionary algorithms in management applications. In: Biethahn J, Nissen V (eds) Evolutionary algorithms in management applications. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 44–97Google Scholar
  83. Ogbu FA, Smith DK (1990) The application of the simulated annealing algorithm to the solution of the n/m/Cmax flowshop problem. Comput Oper Res 17:243–253MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  84. Osman IH (1993) Metastrategy simulated annealing and tabu search algorithms for the vehicle routing problem. Ann Oper Res 41:421–451zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  85. Outeiro MT, Chibante R, Carvalho AS, de Almeida AT (2008) A parameter optimized model of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell including temperature effects. J Power Sources 185(2):952–960Google Scholar
  86. Pakhira MK (2003) A hybrid genetic algorithm using probabilistic selection. J Inst Eng (India) 84:23–30Google Scholar
  87. Paya I, Yepes V, Gonzalez-Vidosa F, Hospitaler A (2008) Multiobjective optimization of concrete frames by simulated annealing. Comput Aided Civil Infrastructure Eng 23(8):596–610Google Scholar
  88. Pedamallu CS, Ozdamar L (2008) Comparison of simulated annealing, interval partitioning and hybrid algorithms in constrained global optimisation. In: Siarry P, Michalewicz Z (eds) Advances in metaheuristics for hard optimization 2008. Natural computing series. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  89. Penna TJP (2008) Travelling salesman problem and Tsallis statistics. Phys Rev E 51:R1–R3Google Scholar
  90. Perea C, Alcaca J, Yepes V, Gonzalez-Vidosa F, Hospitaler A (2008) Design of reinforced concrete bridge frames by heuristic optimization. Adv Eng Software 39(8):676–688Google Scholar
  91. Rodriguez-Tello E, Hao J-K, Torres-Jimenez J (2008) An effective two-stage simulated annealing algorithm for the minimum linear arrangement problem. Comput Oper Res 35:3331–3346zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  92. Ropke S, Pisinger D (2006) An adaptive large neighbourhood search heuristics for the pickup and delivery problem with time windows. Transportation Sci 40:455–472Google Scholar
  93. Salamon P, Suibani P, Frost R (2002) Facts, conjectures and improvements for simulated annealing. SIAM Monographs on Mathematical Modeling and Computation 7, Society for Industrial and Applied MathematicsGoogle Scholar
  94. Santé-Riveira I, Boullón-Magán M, Crecente-Maseda R, Miranda-Barrós D (2008) Algorithm based on simulated annealing for land-use allocation. Comput Geosci 34(3):259–268Google Scholar
  95. Sechen D, Braun D, Sangiovanni-Vincetelli A (1988) Thunderbird: a complete standard cell layout package. IEEE J Solid State Circuits 23:410–420Google Scholar
  96. Seçkiner SU, Kurt M (2007) A simulated annealing approach to the solution of job rotation scheduling problems. Appl Math Comput 188(1):31–45zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  97. Szu H, Hartley R (1987) Fast simulated annealing. Phys Lett A 122:157–162Google Scholar
  98. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Safaei N, Kah MMO, Rabbani M (2007) A new capacitated vehicle routing problem with split service for minimizing fleet cost by simulated annealing. J Franklin Inst 344(5):406–425MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  99. Teitz MB, Bart P (1968) Heuristics methods for estimating the generalised vertex median of a weighted graph. Oper Res 16:955–961zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  100. Tewari S, Arnold J, Bhandarkar SM (2008) Likelihood of a particular order of genetic markers and the construction of genetic maps. J Bioinform Comput Biol 6(1):125–162Google Scholar
  101. Thompson JM, Dowsland KA (1998) A robust simulated annealing based examination timetabling system. Comput Oper Res 25:637–648zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  102. Thompson JM, Dowsland KA (1996) General cooling schedules for a simulated annealing based timetabling system. In: Burke EK, Ross P (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1153. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  103. Tiourine S, Hurkens C, Lenstra JK (1995) An overview of algorithmic approaches to frequency assignment problems. Technical report, EUCLID CALMA project, Eindhoven University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  104. Tovey CA (1988) Simulated simulated annealing. Am J Math Manag Sci 8:389–407MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  105. Triki E, Collette Y, Siarry P (2005) A theoretical study on the behavior of simulated annealing leading to a new cooling schedule. Eur J OR 166:77–92MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  106. Tsallis C, Stariolo DA (1996) Generalized simulated annealing. Phys A 233:395–406Google Scholar
  107. Tuga M, Berretta R, Mendes A (2007) A hybrid simulated annealing with Kempe chain neighbourhood for the university timetabling problem. In: Lee R, Chowdhury M, Ray S, Lee T (eds) 6th IEEE/ACIS Conference Proceedings Computer and Information Science 2007, Melbourne, Australia, July 2007. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp 400–405Google Scholar
  108. Vakharia AJ, Chang Y-L (1990) A simulated annealing approach to scheduling a manufacturing cell. Naval Res Logistics 37:559–577MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  109. Van Breedam A (1995) Improvement heuristics for the vehicle routing problem based on simulated annealing. Eur J Operational Res 86(3):480–490zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  110. Van Hentenryck P, Vergados Y (2007) Population-based simulated annealing for traveling tournaments. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, Canada, AAAI Press, pp 267–271Google Scholar
  111. Van Laarhoven PJM, Aarts EHL (1987) Simulated annealing: theory and applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The NetherlandszbMATHGoogle Scholar
  112. Wales DJ, Scheraga HA (1999) Chemistry: global optimisation of clusters, crystals and biomolecules. Science 285:1368–1372Google Scholar
  113. Wishart JD, Dong Z, Secanell MM (2006) Optimization of a PEM fuel cell system for low-speed hybrid electric vehicles. In: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference 2006, Philadelphia, PA, September 2006Google Scholar
  114. Wong, DF, Leong HW, Liu HW (1998) Simulated annealing for VLSI design. The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol 42. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  115. Wright M (1991) Scheduling English cricket umpires. J OR Soc 42:447–452Google Scholar
  116. Wright M (1996) School timetabling using heuristic search. J OR Soc 47:347–357Google Scholar
  117. Wright M (2001) Subcost-guided search – experiments with timetabling problems. J Heuristics 7:251–260zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  118. Yu P, Dai M-G, Wang J-L, Wu J-S (2008) Joint inversion of gravity and seismic data based on common gridded model with random density and velocity distributions. Chinese J Geophys 51(3):845–852Google Scholar
  119. Zolfaghari S, Liang M (2002) Comparative study of simulated annealing, genetic algorithms and tabu search for solving binary and comprehensive machine-grouping problems. Int J Prod Res 40:2141–2158zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gower Optimal Algorithms, Ltd.SwanseaUK
  2. 2.School of MathematicsCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations