Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

8 Defining the Genus Homo

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Paleoanthropology

Abstract

The definition of the genus Homo is an important but under-researched topic. In this chapter, we show that interpretations of Homo have changed greatly over the last 150 years as a result of the incorporation of new fossil species, the discovery of fossil evidence that changed our perceptions of its component species, and reassessments of the functional capabilities of species previously allocated to Homo. We also show that these changes have been made in an ad hoc fashion. Criteria for recognizing fossil specimens of Homo have been outlined on a number of occasions, but these criteria have generally not been explicitly derived from a genus concept. Rather, the course of action followed by most researchers has been to assign new specimens to Homo on the basis of a subset of the diagnostic traits that are considered to be key, and to then redefine the other traits of the genus in the light of the morphological and functional attributes of the new specimens. With a view to moving beyond this approach, in the next section of the chapter we outline six competing proposals for how genera should be defined and consider their impact on the species assigned to the genus Homo. Subsequently, we consider the pros and cons of the six genus concepts. We argue that three of them are impractical and/or internally inconsistent and the other three are useful. We go on to suggest that, while there is little to choose between the latter three concepts on theoretical grounds, the one put forward by Wood and Collard (1999) has practical advantages. In the last part of the chapter, we update Wood and Collard's (1999) review of genus Homo in the light of research published since their study appeared. We find that, on balance, the available evidence still supports their suggestion that Homo should be reconfigured such that it includes H. ergaster, H. erectus, H. heidelbergensis, H. neanderthalensis, and H. sapiens but excludes H. habilis and H. rudolfensis. We also find that the proposed inclusion of the collection of Late Pleistocene specimens from the site of Liang Bua, Flores, in the genus Homo as a new species, H. floresiensis, is not compatible with Wood and Collard's (1999) definition of the genus Homo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 999.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aiello LC, Collard M, Thackeray JF, Wood BA (2000) Assessing exact randomization methods for determining the taxonomic significance of variability in the hominin fossil record. S Afr J Sci 96: 179–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Asfaw B, White TD, Lovejoy CO, Latimer B, Simpson S, Suwa G (1999) Australopithecus garhi: A new species of hominid from Ethiopia. Science 284: 629–635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beals KL, Smith CL, Dodd SM (1984) Brain size, cranial morphology, climate and time machines. Curr Anthropol 25: 301–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bermudez de Castro JM, Rosas A (2001) Dental development in Lower and Middle Pleistocene hominids from Atapuerca (Spain). Am J Phys Anthropol Suppl 32: 39

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermudez de Castro JM, Martinon-Torres M, Sarmiento S, Lozano M, Arsuaga JL, Carbonell E (2003) Rates of anterior tooth wear in Middle Pleistocene hominins from Sima de los Huesos (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 11992–11996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bilsborough A, Wood BA (1988) Cranial morphometry of early hominids. I Facial region. Am J Phys Anthropol 76: 61–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boaz NT, Howell FC (1977) A gracile hominid cranium from upper member G of the Shungura formation, Ethiopia. Am J Phys Anthropol 46: 93–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown P, Sutikna T, Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Jatmiko, Wayhu Saptomo E, Rokus Awe Due (2004) A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 431: 1055–1061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Busk G (1865) On a very ancient human cranium from Gibraltar. Report of the 34th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (Bath 1864), pp 91–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron DW, Groves CP (2004) Bones, stones and molecules: “Out of Africa” and human origins. Elsevier, Burlington MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cela-Conde CJ, Altaba CR (2002) Multiplying genera versus moving species: A new taxonomic proposal for the family Hominidae. S Afr J Sci 98: 229–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Cela-Conde CJ, Ayala FJ (2003) Genera of the human lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 7684–7689

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain AT (1987) A taxonomic review and phylogenetic analysis of Homo habilis. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain AT, Wood BA (1987) Early hominid phylogeny. J Hum Evol 16: 119–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke RJ (1985) Australopithecus and early Homo in Southern Africa. In: Delson E (ed) Ancestors: The hard evidence. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke RJ, Howell FC (1972) Affinities of the Swartkrans 847 Hominid cranium. Am J Phys Anthropol 37: 319–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coppens Y (1980) The differences between Australopithecus and Homo; preliminary conclusions from the Omo research expeditions studies. In: Königsson KL (ed) Current argument on early man. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 207–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Coqueugniot H, Hublin J-J, Veillon F, Houët F, Jacob T (2004) Early brain growth in Homo erectus and implications for cognitive ability. Nature 431: 299–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crowson RA (1970) Classification and biology. Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Curnoe D (2001) Early Homo from southern Africa: A cladistic perspective. S Afr J Sci 97: 186–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Curnoe D, Thorne A (2003) Number of ancestral human species: A molecular perspective. Homo 53: 201–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis PR (1964) Hominid fossils from Bed I, Olduvai Gorge, Tanganyika: A tibia and fibula. Nature 201: 967

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day MH, Napier JR (1964) Hominid fossils from Bed I, Olduvai Gorge, Tanganyika: Fossil foot bones. Nature 201: 968–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean MC, Stringer CB, Bromage TG (1986) A new age at death for the Neanderthal child from Devil's Tower, Gibraltar and the implications for studies of general growth and development in Neanderthals. Am J Phys Anthropol 70: 301–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dean MC, Leakey MG, Reid D, Schrenk F, Schwartz GT, Stringer CB, Walker A (2001) Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins. Nature 414: 628–631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois A (1988) The genus in zoology: A contribution to the theory of evolutionary systematics. Mémoires du Muséum National D'Histoire Naturelle, Sér A 140: 1–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk D, Hildebolt C, Smith K, Morwood MJ, Sutikna T, Brown P, Jatmiko, Saptomo EW, Brunsden B, Prior F (2005) The Brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis. Science 308: 242–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flourens P (1856) Cours de Physiologie Comparée: de l'Ontologie ou étude des êtres. Baillière, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Franciscus RG (1999) Neanderthal nasal structures and upper respiratory tract “specializations”. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 1805–1809

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman M, Porter CA, Czelusniak J, Page SL, Schneider H, Shoshani J, Gunnell G, Groves CP (1998) Toward a phylogenetic classification of primates based on DNA evidence complemented by fossil evidence. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9: 585–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman M, Czelusniak J, Page SL, Meireles CM (2001) Where DNA sequences place Homo sapiens in a phylogenetic classification of primates. In: Tobias PV, Raath MA, Moggi-Cecchi J, Doyle GA (eds) Humanity from African Naissance to coming Millennia: Colloquia in human biology and palaeoanthropology. Firenze University Press, Firenze; Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg, pp 279–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Grine FE, Strait DS (1994) New hominid fossils from Member 1 “Hanging Remnant”, Swartkrans, Formation, South Africa. J Hum Evol 26: 57–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grine FE, Demes B, Jungers WL, Cole TM (1993) Taxonomic affinity of the early Homo cranium from Swartkrans, South Africa. Am J Phys Anthropol 92: 411–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grine FE, Jungers WL, Schultz J (1996) Phenetic affinities among early Homo crania from East and South Africa. J Hum Evol 30: 189–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves CP (2001a) Primate taxonomy. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves CP (2001b) Towards a taxonomy of the Hominidae. In: Tobias PV, Raath MA, Moggi-Cecchi J, Doyle GA (eds) Humanity from African Naissance to coming Millennia: Colloquia in human biology and palaeoanthropology. Firenze University Press, Firenze; Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg, pp 291–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison T (1993) Cladistic concepts and the species problem in hominoid evolution. In: Kimbel WH, Martin LB (eds) Species, species concepts and primate evolution. Plenum Press, New York, pp 345–371

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig-Scherer S, Martin RD (1991) Was “Lucy” more human than her “child”? Observations on early hominid post-cranial skeletons. J Hum Evol 21: 439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1966) Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42: 182–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell FC (1978) Hominidae. In: Maglio VJ, Cooke HBS (eds) Evolution of African mammals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp 154–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell FC, Coppens Y (1976) An overview of the Hominidae from the Omo succession, Ethiopia. In: Coppens Y, Howell FC, Isaac GL, Leakey REF (eds) Earliest man and environments in the lake Rudolf Basin. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 522–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs C, Drewry GE (1959) Survival of F(1) hybrids between cyprinodont fishes, with a discussion of the correlation between hybridization and phylogenetic relationship. Publ Inst Mar Sci 6: 81–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AR, Tobias PV (1977) A fossil skull probably of the genus Homo from Sterkfontein, Transvaal. Nature 265: 310–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson DC, Masao FT, Eck GG, White TD, Walter RC, Kimbel WH, Asfaw B, Manega P, Ndessokia P, Suwa G (1987) New partial skeleton of Homo habilis from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Nature 327: 205–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kappelman J (1996) The evolution of body mass and relative brain size in fossil hominids. J Hum Evol 30: 243–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd RS, O'Higgins P, Oxnard CE (1996) The OH8 foot: A reappraisal of the functional morphology of the hind foot utilizing a multivariate analysis. J Hum Evol 31: 269–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel WH (1991) Species, species concepts and hominid evolution. J Hum Evol 20: 355–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King W (1864) The reputed fossil man of the Neanderthal. QJ Sci 1: 88–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahr MM, Foley RA (2004) Human evolution writ small. Nature 431: 1043–1044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert DM, Paterson HE (1993) Morphological resemblance and its relationship to genetic distance measures. In: McEvey S (ed) The recognition concept of species. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 63–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Gros Clark WE (1955) The fossil evidence for human evolution, 1st edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Gros Clark WE (1964) The fossil evidence for human evolution: An introduction to the study of palaeoanthropology, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Leakey LSB, Tobias PV, Napier JR (1964) A new species of the genus Homo from Olduvai Gorge. Nature 202: 7–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leakey MG, Spoor F, Brown FH, Gathogo PN, Kiarie C, Leakey LN, McDougall I (2001) New hominin genus from Eastern Africa shows diverse middle Pliocene lineages. Nature 410: 433–440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leakey REF (1973) Evidence for an advanced Plio-Pleistocene hominid from East Rudolf, Kenya. Nature 242: 447–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis OJ (1972) The evolution of the hallucial tarsometatarsal joint in the anthropoidea. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 37: 13–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis OJ (1983) The joints of the evolving foot. Part III: The fossil evidence. J Anat 131: 275–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis OJ (1989) Functional morphology of the evolving hand and foot. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman DE, Pilbeam DR, Wood BA (1988) A probablistic approach to the problem of sexual dimorphism in Homo habilis: A comparison of KNM-ER 1470 and KNM-ER 1813. Journal of Human Evolution 17: 503–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman DE, Wood BA, Pilbeam DE (1996) Homoplasy and early Homo: An analysis of the evolutionary relationships of H. habilis sensu stricto and H. rudolfensis. J Hum Evol 30: 97–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus C (1758) Systema Naturae. Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel WH, Martin LB (1993) Species, species concepts, and primate evolution. Plenum, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marzke MW (1997) Precision grips, hand morphology, and tools. Am J Phys Anthropol 102: 91–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1944) On the concepts and terminology of vertical subspecies and species. Natl Res Council Committee Common Probl Genet Paleontol Syst Bull 2: 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1950) Taxonomic categories in fossil hominids. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 15: 109–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E, Linsley EG, Usinger RL (1953) Methods and principles of systematic zoology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry HM (1991) Femoral length and stature in Plio-Pleistocene hominids. Am J Phys Anthropol 85: 149–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McHenry HM, Coffing K (2000) Australopithecus to Homo: Transformations in body and mind. Annu Rev Anthropol 29: 125–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Roberts RG, Sutikna T, Turney CSM, Westaway KE, Rink WJ, Zhao J-x, Bergh van den GD, Rokus Awe Due, Hobbs DR, Moore MW, Bird MI, Fifield LK (2004) Archaeology and age of a new hominin from Flores in eastern Indonesia. Nature 431: 1087–1091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morwood MJ, Brown P, Jatmiko, Sutikna T, Wahyu Saptomo E, Westaway KE, Rokus Awe Due, Roberts RG, Maeda T, Wasisto S, Djubiantono T (2005) Further evidence for small-bodied hominins from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 437: 1012–1017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Napier JR (1964) The evolution of bipedal walking in the hominids. Arch Biol (Liège) 75(Suppl.): 673–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Openoorth WFF (1932) Homo (Javanthropus) soloensis, een pleistoceene mensch van Java. Wetesch Mededee. Dienst Mijnbauw Nederl Indie 20: 49–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Panchen AL (1992) Classification, evolution and the nature of biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson OM (2000) Postcranial remains and the origin of modern humans. Evol Anthropol 9: 229–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prat S (2002) Anatomical study of the skull of the Kenyan specimen KNM-ER 1805: A re-evaluation of its taxonomic allocation? CR Palevol 1: 27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rak Y (1987) The unusual face of KNM-ER 1470. Second International Congress of Hominid Paleontology, pp 90–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez Rozzi F, Bermudez de Castro J-M (2004) Surprisingly rapid growth in Neanderthals. Nature 428: 936–939

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reno PL, De Gusta D, Serrat MA, Meindl RS, White TD, Eckhardt RB, Kuperavage AJ, Galik K, Lovejoy CO (2005) Plio-Pleistocene hominid limb proportions: Evolutionary reversals or estimation errors? Curr Anthropol 46: 575–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond B, Aiello LC, Wood BA (2002) Early hominin limb proportions. J Hum Evol 43: 529–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rightmire GP (1993) Variation among early Homo crania from Olduvai Gorge and the Koobi Fora region. Am J Phys Anthropol 90: 1–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rightmire GP (1996) The human cranium from Bodo, Ethiopia: Evidence for speciation in the middle Pleistocene. J Hum Evol 31: 21–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rightmire GP (1998) Human evolution in the Middle Pleistocene: The role of Homo heidelbergensis. Evol Anthropol 6: 218–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rightmire GP (2004) Brain size and encephalization in Early to Mid-Pleistocene Homo. Am J Phys Anthropol 124: 109–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JT (1961) The australopithecines and their bearing on the origin of man and of stone tool-making. S Afr J Sci 57: 3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruvolo M (1997) Molecular phylogeny of the hominoids: Inferences from multiple independent DNA data sets. Mol Biol Evol 14: 248–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz JH, Tattersall I (1996) Significance of some previously unrecognized apomorphies in the nasal region of Homo neanderthalensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 10852–10854

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoetensack O (1908) Der Unterkierfer des Homo heidelbergensis aus den Sanden von Mauer bei Heidelberg. W Engelmann, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson GG (1963) The meaning of taxonomic statements. In: Washburn SL (ed) Classification and human evolution. Aldine, Chicago, pp 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BH (1994) Patterns of dental development in Homo compared to Australopithecus, Pan, and Gorilla. Am J Phys Anthropol 94: 307–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spoor F, Wood BA, Zonnefeld F (1994) Implications of early hominid labyrinthine morphology for evolution of human bipedal locomotion. Nature 369: 645–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford C, Allen JS, Antón SC (2005) Biological anthropology: The natural history of humankind. Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Strait DS, Grine FE (2004) Inferring hominoid and early hominid phylogeny using craniodental characters: The role of fossil taxa. J Hum Evol 47: 399–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strait DS, Grine FE, Moniz MA (1997) A reappraisal of early hominid phylogeny. J Hum Evol 32: 17–82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Susman RL (1998) Hand function and tool behavior in early hominids. J Hum Evol 35: 23–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Susman RL, Creel N (1979) Functional and morphological affinities of the subadult hand (OH 7) from Olduvai Gorge. Am J Phys Anthropol 51: 311–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Susman RL, Stern JT (1982) Functional morphology of Homo habilis. Science 217: 931–934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall I (1986) Species recognition in human paleontology. J Hum Evol 15: 165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall I (1992) Species concepts and species identification in human evolution. J Hum Evol 22: 341–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JL, Nelson AJ (2000) The place of Neandertals in the evolution of hominid patterns of growth and development. J Hum Evol 38: 475–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias PV (1991) Olduvai Gorge. Vol 4: The skulls, endocasts and teeth of Homo habilis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner A, Chamberlain AT (1989) Speciation, morphological change and the status of African Homo erectus. J Hum Evol 18: 115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelder RG (1977) Mammalian hybrids and generic limits. Am Mus Novit 2635: 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gelder RG (1978) A review of canid classification. Am Mus Novit 2646: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Vekua A, Lordkipanidze D, Rightmire GP, Agusti J, Ferring R, Maisuradze G, Mouskhelishvili A, Nioradze M, Ponce de Leon M, Tappen M, Tvalchredlidze M, Zollikofer C (2002) A new skull of early Homo from Dmanisi, Georgia. Science 297: 85–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker A (1976) Remains attributable to Australopithecus in the East Rudolf succession. In: Coppens Y, Howell FC, Isaac GL, Leakey RE (eds) Earliest man and environments in the lake Rudolf Basin. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 484–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson EE, Easteal S, Penny D (2001) Homo genus: A review of the classification of humans and the great apes. In: Tobias PV, Raath MA, Moggi-Cecchi J, Doyle GA (eds) Humanity from African Naissance to coming Millennia: Colloquia in human biology and palaeoanthropology. Firenze University Press, Firenze, pp 307–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidenreich F (1940) Some problems dealing with ancient man. Am Anthropol 42: 375–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildman DE, Uddin M, Liu G, Grossman LI, Goodman M (2003) Implications of natural selection in shaping 99.4% nonsynonymous DNA identity between humans and chimpanzees: Enlarging genus Homo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 7181–7188

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood BA (1974) Olduvai Bed I post-cranial fossils: A reassessment. J Hum Evol 3: 373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood BA (1991) Koobi Fora research project. Vol 4: Hominid cranial remains, Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood BA (1992) Origin and evolution of the genus Homo. Nature 355: 783–790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood BA, Collard M (1999) The human genus. Science 284: 65–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood BA, Richmond BG (2000) Human evolution: Taxonomy and paleobiology. J Anat 196: 19–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood BA, Yu L, Willoughby C (1991) Intraspecific variation and sexual dimorphism in cranial and dental variables among higher primates and their bearing on the hominid fossil record. J Anat 174: 185–205

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood BA, Aiello LC, Wood C, Key C (1998) A technique for establishing the identity of ‘isolated’ fossil hominin limb bones. J Anat 193: 61–72

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward AS (1921) A new cave man from Rhodesia, South Africa. Nature 108: 371–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Nicole Collard, Alan Cross, Stephen Lycett, and Daniele Serdoz for providing helpful comments on earlier drafts of this chapter.

Authors
  1. Mark Collard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernard Wood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Collard, M., Wood, B. (2007). 8 Defining the Genus Homo . In: Handbook of Paleoanthropology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-33761-4_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation