Advertisement

25 Modeling the Past: The Linguistic Approach

  • Bernard Comrie
Reference work entry

Abstract

First, traditional methods of comparative-historical linguistics are discussed as a means of reconstructing aspects of the past through linguistic means, with particular regard to the comparative method, the Neogrammarian hypothesis of the regularity of sound change, the construction of family trees of genealogically related languages, and linguistic paleontology as a means of reconstructing the physical and cultural environment in which the ancestor language was spoken. More detailed consideration is given to the reliability of different kinds of evidence in the application of these methods, especially problems arising from language contact and resulting horizontal rather than vertical transmission of innovations, and from the gradual splitting of an ancestor language into its descendants and the proposed wave theory model of this process. Emphasis is placed on the need for detailed and painstaking investigation in order to apply these methods. A critical discussion is then given of some more recently proposed methods, in particular mass comparison (with its lack of emphasis on the need to rely on the regularity of sound change), glottochronology (with its assumption of a constant rate of replacement for basic vocabulary), and typological comparison.

Keywords

Common Ancestor Noun Phrase Family Tree Language Family Sound Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bakker P (1997) A language of our own: The genesis of Michif, the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Métis. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell L (1998) Historical linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  3. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Piazza A, Menozzi P, Mountain J (1988) Reconstruction of human evolution: Bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 6002–6006PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Comrie B (2000) Language contact, lexical borrowing, and semantic fields. In: Gilbers D, Nerbonne J, Schaeken J (eds) Languages in contact. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 73–86Google Scholar
  5. Garrett A (1999) A new model of Indo-European subgrouping and dispersal. In: Chang SC, Liaw L, Ruppenhofer J (eds) Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, pp 146–156Google Scholar
  6. Greenberg JH (1987) Language in the Americas. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Haspelmath M, Dryer MS, Gil D, ComrieB (2005) The world atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Mallory JP, Adams DQ (1997) Encyclopedia of Indo-European culture. Fitzroy Dearborn, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Nasidze I, Ling EYS, Quinque D, Dupanloup I, Cordaux R, Rychkov R, Naumova O, Zhukova O, Sarraf-Zadegan N, Naderi GA, Asgary S, Sardas S, Farhud DD, Sarkisian T, Asadov C, Kerimov A, Stoneking M (2004) Mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome variation in the Caucasus. Ann Hum Genet 68: 205–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nichols, J (1992) Linguistic diversity in space and time. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ringe D (1999) Language classification: Scientific and unscientific methods. In: Sykes B (ed) The human inheritance: Genes, language, and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 45–73Google Scholar
  12. Saussure F (1879) Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européennes. Teubner, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  13. Starostin SA (2000) Comparative-historical linguistics and lexicostatistics. In: Renfrew C, McMahon A, Trask L (eds) Time depth in historical linguistics. The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, pp 223–259Google Scholar
  14. Thomason DG, Kaufman T (1988) Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard Comrie

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations