Advertisement

2 Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus

  • Philippe Huneman
Reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter surveys the philosophical problems raised by the two Darwinian claims of the existence of Tree of Life and the explanatory power of natural selection. It explores the specificity of explanations by natural selection, emphasizing the high context dependency of any process of selection. Some consequences are drawn about the difficulty of those explanations to fit a nomological model of explanation, and the irreducibility of their historic-narrative dimension. The paper introduces debates about units of selection, stating the compelling force of genic selectionism but highlighting some critiques. It then addresses the limitations of selectionist explanations: the compared status of selection, drift, and phylogenetic inertia are investigated, and the debates over adaptationism are presented, with the aim of defining the varieties of adaptationisms as research programs. In order to assess the scope of natural selection, the chapter addresses weak and strong challenges to the Synthetic theory of evolution both from paleontology (punctuated equilibria, Gould's contingency thesis) and the evolutionary theory of development. We finally sketch some consequences of evolutionary theory concerning philosophical questions about human nature, on the basis of the hypothesis of the universality of selectionist explanations: this part deals mostly with epistemology and psychology.

Keywords

Natural Selection Evolutionary Theory Group Selection Genic Selectionism Cultural Trait 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amundson R (1994) Two concepts of constraint: adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology. Philos Sci 61: 556–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amundson R (1995) Historical development of the concept of adaptation. In: Rose MR, Lauder GV (eds) Adaptation. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 11–53Google Scholar
  3. Amundson R (2001) Adaptation and development: on the lack of common ground. In: Orzack SH, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 303–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonovics J, Bradshaw AD, Turner RG (1971) Heavy metal tolerance in plants. Adv Ecol Res 7: 1–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ariew A (1999) Ernst Mayr's ‘ultimate/proximate’ distinction reconsidered and reconstructed. Biol Philos 18(4): 553–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ariew A (2004) The confusions of fitness. Br J Philos Sci 55: 347–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ariew A, Matthen M (2002) Two ways of thinking about fitness and natural selection. J Philos 49(2): 55–83Google Scholar
  8. Ariew A, Lewens T, Walsh D (2003) Trials of life: natural selection and random drift. Philos Sci 69: 58–83Google Scholar
  9. Arthur W (1997) The origin of animal body plans. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ayer A (1956) What is a law of nature? Revue Internationale de Philosophie 10: 144–165Google Scholar
  11. Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) (1992) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Basalla G (1988) The evolution of technology. Cambridge University Pres, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Beatty J (1997) Why do biologists argue like they do? Philos Sci 64: S432–S443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beatty J, Mills S (1979) The propensity interpretation of fitness. Philos Sci 46: 263–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bock W, Von Wahlert G (1963) Two evolutionary theories—a discussion. Br J Philos Sci 14: 140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bowler PJ (1989) Evolution: the history of an idea, berkeley, University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  17. Boyd R, Richerson P (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  18. Bradie M (1984) Epistemology from an evolutionary point of view. In: Sober E (ed) (1994b) Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 453–476Google Scholar
  19. Brandon R (1988) The levels of selection: a hierarchy of interactors. In: Plotkin (ed) The role of behavior in evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 51–71Google Scholar
  20. Brandon R (1990). Adaptation and environment. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  21. Brandon R (1996) Concepts and methods in evolutionary biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  22. Brandon R (1997) Does biology have laws? The experimental evidence. Philos Sci 64(Suppl.): S444–S457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Buller D (ed) (1999) Function, selection, and design. Suny Press, Series in Philosophy and Biology, Albany NYGoogle Scholar
  24. Campbell D (1990) Epistemological roles for selection theory. In: Rescher N (ed) Evolution, cognition and realism. Studies in evolutionary biology. University Press of America, New York, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  25. Cavalli- Sforza L, Feldman M (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution. A quantitative approach. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJGoogle Scholar
  26. Chisholm JS (2003) Uncertainty, contingency and attachment: a life history theory of theory of mind. In: Sterelny K, Fitness J (eds) From mating to mentality. Psychology Press, Macquarie, pp 125–154Google Scholar
  27. Conway- Morris S (1998) The crucible of creation: the Burgess shale and the rise of animals. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  28. Cosmides L, Tooby J (1989) Evolutionary theory and the generation of culture. Part II Case study: a computational theory of social exchange. Ethol Socio-biol 10: 51–97Google Scholar
  29. Cosmides L, Tooby J (1992) Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In: Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) (1992) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–227Google Scholar
  30. Coyne R, Barton NH, Turelli M (1997) Perspective: A critique of Sewall Wright's shifting balance theory of evolution. Evolution 51, 643–671Google Scholar
  31. Darden L, Cain J (1989). Selection type theories. Philos Sci 56(1): 106–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Darwin C (1859) The origin of species. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. DeBeer G (1958) Embryos and ancestors. Oxford. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Dennett D (1995) Darwin's dangerous idea. Simons & Shuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Dretske F (1977) Laws of nature. Philos Sci 44: 248–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dupré J (ed) (1987) The latest on the best. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  39. Dupré J (2003) On human nature, human affairs. Jour Slov Ac Sci 13: 109–122Google Scholar
  40. Eigen M (1983) Self replication and molecular evolution. In: Bendall DS (ed) From molecules to man. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA, pp 105–130Google Scholar
  41. Eldredge N, Gould SJ (1972) Punctuated equlibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf TJ (ed) Models of paleobiology. Freeman Cooper, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  42. Gayon J (1998) Darwinism's struggle for survival: heredity and the hypothesis of natural selection. Tr. M. Cobb. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  43. Gehring W (1998) Master control genes in development and evolution. The homeobox story. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  44. Ghiselin M (1969) The triumph of the Darwinian method. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  45. Ghiselin M (1980) The failure of morphology to assimilate Darwinism. In: Mayr E, Provine W (1980) The evolutionary synthesis. Perspectives on the unification of biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp 180–193Google Scholar
  46. Giere R (1990) Evolutionary models of science. In: Rescher N (ed) Evolution, cognition and realism. Studies in evolutionary biology. University Press of America, New York, pp 21–32Google Scholar
  47. Giere R (2001) Critical hypothetical evolutionary naturalism. In: Heyes C, Hull D (eds) Selection theory and social construction. State University of New York Press, Albany NY, pp 53–70Google Scholar
  48. Gilbert S, Opitz G, Raff R (1996) Resynthetizing evolutionary and developmental biology. Dev Evol 173: 357–372Google Scholar
  49. Gayon J (1993) La biologie entre loi et histoire. Philosophie 38: 30–37Google Scholar
  50. Gilchrist G, Kingsolver J (2001) Is optimality over the hill. In: Orzack SH, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and Optimality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 219–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Godfrey- Smith P (2000a) The replicator in retrospect. Biol Philos 15: 403–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Godfrey- Smith P (2000b) Information, arbitrariness and selection: a comment on Maynard-Smith. Philos Sci 67: 202–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Godfrey- Smith P (2001a) On the status and explanatory structure of DST. In: Oyama S, Griffiths P, Gray R (eds) Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press, 2001, pp 283–297Google Scholar
  54. Godfrey- Smith P (2001b). Three kinds of adaptationism. In: Orzack SH, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 335–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Godfrey- Smith P, Lewontin R (1993) The dimensions of selection. Philos Sci 60: 373–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Goldschmidt R (1940) The material basis of evolution. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  57. Gould SJ (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  58. Gould SJ (1980) The panda's thumb. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Gould SJ (1989) Wonderful life. The Burgess shale and the nature of history. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Gould SJ, Lewontin R (1978) The spandrels of san Marco and the panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond B 205: 581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gould SJ, Vrba E (1982) Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8: 4–15Google Scholar
  62. Gould SJ, Conway Morris S (1999) Showdown on the Burgess shale. Nat Hist Mag 107(10): 48–55Google Scholar
  63. Gray R, Griffiths P, Oyama S (2001) Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  64. Gray R, Heaney M, Fairhall S (2003) Evolutionary psychology and the challenge of adaptive explanation. In: Sterelny K, Fitness J (eds) From mating to mentality. Psychology Press, Macquarie, pp 247–268Google Scholar
  65. Gray RD (2001) Selfish genes or developmental systems? In: Singh R, Krimbas K, Paul D, Beatty J (eds) Thinking about evolution: historical, philosophical and political perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 184–207Google Scholar
  66. Griffiths P (1996) The historical turn in the study of adaptation. Br J Philos Sci 47: 511–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Griffiths P, Gray R (1994) Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation. J Philos 91: 277–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Griffiths P, Knight R (1998) What is the developmentalist challenge? Philos Sci 253–258Google Scholar
  69. Griffiths P, Sterelny K (1999) Sex and death: an introduction to the philosophy of biology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  70. Hempel E (1965) Aspects of scientific explanation. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  71. Hull D (1980) Individuality and selection. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11: 311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hull D (1988) Science as a process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hull D, Ruse M (eds) (1998) The philosophy of biology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  74. Hull D, Langmann R, Glenn S (2001) A general account of selection: Biology, immunology and behaviour. Behav Brain Sci 24(2)Google Scholar
  75. Jablonka E (2001) The systems of inheritance. In: Oyama S, Griffith P, Gray R (eds) Cycles of contingency. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 99–116Google Scholar
  76. Keller EF, Lloyd E (1992) Keywords in evolutionary biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  77. Keller L (ed) (1999) Levels of selection in evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  78. Keller L, Reeve HK (1999) Levels of selection: burying the units-of-selection debate and unearthing the crucial new issues. In: Keller L (ed) Levels of selection in evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 3–15Google Scholar
  79. Kenneth Waters C (1990) Confession of a creationist. In: Rescher N (ed) Evolution, cognition and realism. Studies in evolutionary biology. University Press of America, New York, pp 79–89Google Scholar
  80. Kenneth Waters C (1991) Tempered realism about forces of selection. Philos Sci 58: 553–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kettlewell (1955) Selection experiments in industrial melanism in lepidoptera. Heredity 9(3): 323–342Google Scholar
  82. Kingsolver JG, Koehl M (1989) Selective factors in the evolution of insect wings. Can J Zool 67: 785–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Kitcher P (2003) Infectious ideas. In: Kitcher P (ed) In: Mendel's mirror. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  84. Kitcher P (2004) Evolutionary theory and the social uses of biology. Biol Philos 19: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kitcher P, Vickers L (2003) Pop socio-biology reborn: the evolutionary psychology of rape and violence. In: Kitcher P (ed) In: Mendel's mirror. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  86. Lauder G (1996) The argument from design. In: Rose MR, Lauder G Adaptation. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 55–91Google Scholar
  87. Leigh EG (1999) Levels of selection, potential conflicts and their resolution: the role of the “common good”. In: Keller L (ed) Levels of selection in evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 15–31Google Scholar
  88. Lewens T (2004) Organisms and artefacts. Design in nature and elsewhere. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  89. Lewens T (forthcoming) Seven types of adaptationism in Walsh (in press)Google Scholar
  90. Lumsden C, Wilson EO (1981) Genes, minds and culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  91. Maynard- Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  92. Maynard- Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Maynard- Smith J (1984) Optimization theory in evolution. Ann Rev Eco Syst 9: 31–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Maynard- Smith J (1989) Did Darwin get it right? Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  95. Maynard-Smith J (2000) The concept of information in biology. Philos Sci 67: 177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Maynard-Smith J, Szathmary E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  97. Mayr E (1959a) The emergence of evolutionary novelties. In: Mayr E (ed) (1976) Evolution and the diversity of life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp 88–113Google Scholar
  98. Mayr E (1959b) Typological versus population thinking. In: Mayr E (ed) (1976) Evolution and the diversity of life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp 26–29Google Scholar
  99. Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134: 1501–1506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Mayr E (1965a) Sexual selection and natural selection. In: Mayr E (ed) (1976) Evolution and the diversity of life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp 73–87Google Scholar
  101. Mayr E (1965b) Selection and directional evolution. In: Mayr E (ed) (1976) Evolution and the diversity of life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp 44–52Google Scholar
  102. Mayr E (1970) Population species and evolution. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  103. Mayr E, Provine W (1980) The evolutionary synthesis. Perspectives on the unification of biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Michod R (1981) Positive heuristics in evolutionary biology. Br J Philos Sci 32: 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Michod R (1999) Darwinian dynamics. Evolutionary transitions in fitness and individuality. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  106. Millstein R (2002) Are random drift and natural selection conceptually distinct? Biol Philos 17(1): 33–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Neander K (1995) Pruning the Tree of Life. Br J Philos Sci 46: 59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Neumann- Held EM (2001) Let's talk about genes: the process molecular gene concept and its context. In: Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD (eds) Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 69–84Google Scholar
  109. Nitecki MH (ed) (1988) Evolutionary progress. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  110. Nunney L (1999) Lineage selection: natural selection for long-term benefit. In: Keller L (ed) Levels of selection in evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 238–252Google Scholar
  111. Ospovat D (1981) The development of Darwin's theory: natural history, natural theology and natural selection, 1839–1859. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  112. Oyama S (1985) The ontogeny of information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  113. Oyama S (2000) Causal democracy and causal contributions in DST. Philos Sci 67(Proc.): S332–S347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Pinker S, Bloom A (1992) Language and natural selection. In: Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) (1992) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  115. Provine M (1986) Sewall Wright and evolutionary biology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  116. Raff R (1996) The shape of life. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  117. Reeve HK, Sherman P (1993) Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research. Q Rev Biol 68: 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Reeve HK, Sherman P (2001) Optimality and phylogeny. In: Orzack SH, Sober E Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 64–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Richards R (1988) The moral foundations of the idea of evolutionary progess: Darwin, Spencer and the Neo-Darwinians. In: Nitecki MH (ed) (1988) Evolutionary progress. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 129–147Google Scholar
  120. Richards R (1992) The structure of narrative explanation in history and science. In: Nitecki M, Nitecki D (eds). History and evolution. State University of New York Press, New York, pp 19–54Google Scholar
  121. Rose MR, Lauder G (1996) Adaptation. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  122. Rosenberg A (1978) The supervenience of biological concepts. Philos Sci 45(3): 368–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Rosenberg A (1982) On the propensity definition of fitness. Philos Sci 49(2): 268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Rosenberg A (1983) Coefficients, effects and genic selection. Philos Sci 50(2): 332–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Rosenberg A (1985) The structure of biological science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Rosenberg A (1995) Instrumental biology, or the disunity of science. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  127. Rosenberg A (2001) How is biological explanation possible. Br J Philos Sci 52: 735–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Rosenberg A (2003) Darwinism in moral philosophy and social theory. In: Hodges J, Raddick G (eds) The Cambridge companion to Darwin, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 310–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Ruse M (1986) Taking Darwin seriously. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  130. Shapere D (1980) Interpretative issues in the evolutionary synthesis. In: Mayr E, Provine W (1980) The evolutionary synthesis. Perspectives on the unification of biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp 387–398Google Scholar
  131. Simpson GG (1944) Tempo and mode in evolution. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  132. Smart JJC (1963) Philosophy and scientific realism. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  133. Sober E (1980) Evolution, population thinking and essentialism. Philos Sci 3(47): 350–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Sober E (1981) The principle of parsimony. Br J Philos Sci 32: 145–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Sober E (1984) The nature of selection. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  136. Sober E (1986) Explanatory presupposition. Aust J Philos 64: 143–149 Reprinted in: Sober E (1994) From a biological point of view: essays in evolutionary philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Sober E (1988a) What is evolutionary altruism? Can J Philos 14(Suppl.): 75–99Google Scholar
  138. Sober E (1988b) Reconstructing the past: parsimony, evolution and inference. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  139. Sober E (1990) The poverty of pluralism: a reply to Sterelny and Kitcher. Philos Sci 87(3): 151–158Google Scholar
  140. Sober E (1992) Screening-off and the units of selection. Philos Sci 59(1): 142–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Sober E (1993) Philosophy of biology. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  142. Sober E (1994a) From a biological point of view: essays in evolutionary philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Sober E (ed) (1994b) Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology. MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  144. Sober E (1994c) Six sayings about adaptationism. In: Hull D, Ruse M (eds) Philosophy of biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 71–85Google Scholar
  145. Sober E (1997) Two outbreaks of lawlessness in recent philosophy of biology. Philos Sci 64: S458–S467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Sober E (2001) The two faces of fitness. In: Singh R, Krimbas K, Paul D, Beatty J (eds) Thinking about evolution: historical, philosophical and political perspectives. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 309–321Google Scholar
  147. Sober E (2003) Metaphysical and epistemological issues in modern Darwinian theory. In: Hodges J, Radick G (eds) The Cambridge companion to Darwin, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 267–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Sober E, Lewontin R (1982) Artifact, cause and genic selection. Philos Sci 44: 157–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Sober E, Orzack SH (1994) How (not) to test an optimality model. Trends Ecol Evol 9: 265–267Google Scholar
  150. Sober E, Orzack SH (2001) Adaptation, phylogenetic inertia and the method of controlled comparisons. In: Sober E, Orzack SH (2001) Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA, pp 45–63Google Scholar
  151. Sober E, Wilson DS (1994) A critical review of philosophical works on units of selection. Philos Sci 61: 534–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Sober E, Wilson DS (1998) Unto others: the evolution of altruism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  153. Sperber D, Girotto V (2003) Does the selection task detect cheater-detection? In: Sterelny K, Fitness J (eds) From mating to mentality. Psychology Press, MacquarieGoogle Scholar
  154. Sterelny K (1995) Understanding life: recent works in philosophy of biology. Br J Philos Sci 64: 155–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Sterelny K (1996) The return of the group. Philos Sci 63: 562–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Sterelny K (2000) Development, evolution and adaptation. Philos Sci (supplementary volume), 67(Proceedings): S369–S387Google Scholar
  157. Sterelny K (2000) Gould vs Dawkins: Survival of the fittest. London: Icon booksGoogle Scholar
  158. Sterelny K (2003) Darwinian concepts in the philosophy of mind. In: Hodges J, Radick G (eds) The Cambridge companion to Darwin, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 288–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Sterelny K (2004) Symbiosis, evolvability and modularity. In: Wagner G, Schlosser G (eds) Modularity in development and evolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  160. Sterelny K, Kitcher P (1988) The return of the gene. J Philos 85: 339–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Taddei F, Matic I, Radman M (1995) Cyclic AMP-dependent SOS induction and mutagenesis in resting bacterial populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 11736–11740PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Tattersall I (1998) Becoming human: evolution and human uniqueness. Harcourt Brace, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  163. Trivers R (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46: 35–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Wagner G (1995) The biological role of homologues. A building block hypothesis. Neue Jahrbuch Geologie und Paleontologie 195: 279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Walsh D (2000) Chasing shadows – natural selection and adaptation. Stud Hist Phi Bio Biomed Sci 31: 135–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Walsh D (forthcoming) 25 years of spandrelsGoogle Scholar
  167. Wake D (1991) Homoplasy: the result of natural selection, or evidence of design limitations? Am Nat 138: 543–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJGoogle Scholar
  169. Williams MB (1970) Deducing the consequences of evolution. J Th Bio 29: 343–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Williams GC (1975) Sex and evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJGoogle Scholar
  171. Williams GC (1992) Natural selection: domains, levels and challenges. Oxford Unversity Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  172. Wilson DS (1992) On the relationships between evolutionary and psychological definitions of altruism and selfishness. Biol Philos 7: 61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Wilson DS, Dietrich E, Clark A (2003) On the inappropriate use of the naturalistic fallacy in evolutionary psychology. Biol Philos 18: 669–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Wimsatt WC, Schank JC (1988) Two constraints on the evolution of complex adaptations and the means for their avoidance. In: Nitecki M (ed) Progress in evolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 213–273Google Scholar
  175. Woodward J (2001) Laws and explanation in biology: invariance is the kind of stability that matters. Philos Sci 68: 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Wright S (1932) The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the sixth annual congress of genetics 1: 356–366Google Scholar
  177. Wynne- Edwards VC (1962) Animal dispersion in relation to social behaviour. Oliver & Boyd, EdinburghGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Huneman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations