In aversive learning an aversion is created toward a targeted behavior by pairing it with an unpleasant stimulus, such as a painful electric shock.
Traditional analyses of learning posited two general classes of conditioning (i) classical or Pavlovian conditioning and (ii) operant or instrumental conditioning. In these analyses, the former involved stimulus–stimulus associations, whereas the latter reflected associations between responses and reinforcers. These paradigms were applied to both appetitive and aversive conditioning situations, and involved reinforcement or punishment, respectively.
In traditional models of aversive classical conditioning, the paradigm further emphasized that the unconditioned stimulus (US; usually some type of rapid onset pain such as footshock) elicits an unconditioned response, the UR. As associative conditioning develops, a conditioned response (CR) emerges in response to the conditioned...
- 1.Mackintosh NJ (1983) Conditioning and associative learning. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bolles RC (1989) Acquired behaviors; aversive learning. In: Blanchard RJ et al. (eds) Ethoexpermental approaches to the study of behavior. Kluver Academic, Boston, pp 167–179Google Scholar
- 3.Blanchard DC (1997) Stimulus, environmental and pharmacological control of defensive behaviors. In: Bouton M, Fanselow MS (eds) Learning, motivation and cognition. The functional behaviorism of Robert C. Bolles. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp 283–305Google Scholar
- 6.Fanselow MS (1997) Species-specific defense reactions: retrospect and prospect. In: Bouton M, Fanselow MS (eds) Learning, motivation and cognition. The functional behaviorism of Robert C. Bolles. American Psychological Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar