The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible

Living Edition
| Editors: Vlad Petre Glăveanu (Editor-in-Chief)

Constructive Memory

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_38-1
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Constructive or reconstructive memory describes the process by which we update our memories in light of new experiences, situations, and challenges. Although the literature on the topic is far too vast to cover in a short review, we can identity two broad research approaches to it. One conceives “constructive” as a vice of memory and aims to identity the factors that increase “errors” and “inaccuracies” in memory. In contrast, for the other “constructive” is a virtue in that it is indicative of the creativity and adaptability of memory to meet a changing world and is closely connected to imagination. The former approach tends to employ an experimental methodology, whereas the later tends to study so-called “natural” contexts of remembering. This chapter begins with a reflection on the inherent ambiguity of the past and the dilemmas and possibilities this creates in human life. It proceeds to shed further light on the two meanings of construction through a review of some key studies. This is followed by an explanation of the schema concept, which is widely used in both research approaches. The chapter then explores the long discussed relationship between imagination and memory. It concludes with a look at the intertwining between individual and collective forces in remembering from the perspective of sociocultural psychology.

Keywords

Schema Imagination Inaccuracy Sociocultural 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett, F. C. (1941). Fatigue following highly skilled work. Nature, 147, 717–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergman, E. T., & Roediger, H. L. (1999). Can Bartlett’s repeated reproduction experiments be replicated? Memory & Cognition, 27, 937–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergson, H. (1911/2004). Matter and memory. Mineola, N.Y: Dover.Google Scholar
  5. Bransford, J. D., McCarrell, N. S., Franks, J. J., & Nitsch, K. E. (1977). Toward unexplaining memory. In R. E. Shaw & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 431–466). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C. (1981) Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, S. D., & Reavey, P. (2015). Vital memory and affect: Ethics, agency and self. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, S. D., & Reavey, P. (2018). Rethinking function, self and culture in ‘difficult’ autobiographical memories. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Handbook of culture and memory (pp. 159–181). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carruthers, M. (2008). The book of memory: A study of memory in medieval culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  11. Ericsson, K. A., & Polson, P. G. (1988). An experimental analysis of the mechanisms of a memory skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(2), 305–316.Google Scholar
  12. Gauld, A., & Stephenson, G. M. (1967). Some experiments related to Bartlett’s theory of remembering. British Journal of Psychology, 58, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibson, J. J. (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  14. Glaveanu, V. (2012). Habitual creativity: Revising habit, reconceptualizing creativity. Review of General Psychology, 16, 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaveanu, V., & Wagoner, B. (2016). Memory and creativity: Historical and conceptual intersections. In J. Valsiner, G. Marsico, N. Chaudhary, T. Sato, & V. Dazzani (Eds.), Psychology as a science of human being (pp. 67–85). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halbwachs, M. (1992) On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (original publication 1925).Google Scholar
  17. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(2), 167–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning and Memory, 12, 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loftus, E. F., & Ketcham, K. (1994). The myth of repressed memory. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  20. Motzkau, J. F. (2009). Exploring the transdisciplinary trajectory of suggestibility. Subjectivity, 27, 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  22. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  23. Neisser, U. (1982). John Dean’s memory: A case study. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts (pp. 139–159). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  24. Perrin, D., & Michaelian, K. (2017). Memory as mental time travel. In S. Bernecker & K. Michaelian (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of memory (pp. 228–240). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckley, R. L. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 657–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wagoner, B. (2013). Bartlett’s concept of schema in reconstruction. Theory & Psychology, 23(5), 553–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wagoner, B. (2017). The constructive mind: Bartlett’s psychology in reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wagoner, B., & Gillespie, A. (2014). Sociocultural mediators of remembering: An extension of Bartlett’s method of repeated reproduction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 622–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yates, F. (1966). The art of memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Zittoun, T., & Gillespie, A. (2018). Imagination in human and cultural development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Cultural Psychology, Department of Communication and PsychologyAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ramiro Tau
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculté de psychologie et des sciences de l’éducationUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland