This entry focuses on the notion of perspective as it is used in philosophy and psychology. From a pragmatist standpoint, I conceptualize perspectives as action-based relations with the world and, in doing so, respond to both accusations of skepticism and relativism usually addressed to perspectival accounts of knowledge, truth, and reality. In fact, following Mead’s perspectival realism, I propose here that perspectives orient our thinking and action and, through this, help us discover new possibilities for both. After a brief introduction that discusses different meanings of the word perspective, I move on to describe an action-based account of perspectives and, with its help, review some important debates around perspectivism as a school of thought. In the end, the entry briefly outlines a perspectival theory of the possible that not only considers perspectives essential for our behavior and knowledge but also indispensable for becoming aware of and exploring new possibilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Boddy-Evans, M. (2019). What is perspective in art? Definition of a common artistic technique. https://www.liveabout.com/definition-of-perspective-2577690
Crosby, D. A. (2007). Two perspectives on metaphysical perspectivism: Nietzsche and Whitehead. The Pluralist, 2(3), 57–76.
Davey, N. (1990). “A world of hope and optimism despite present difficulties”: Gadamer’s critique of perspectivism. Man and World, 23(3), 273–294.
Gillespie, A. (2005). GH Mead: Theorist of the social act. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 35(1), 19–39.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). The possible as a field of inquiry. Editorial. Europe’s. Journal of Psychology, 14(3), 519–530.
Glăveanu, V. P. (in press). The possible: A theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jonas, M. E., & Nakazawa, Y. M. (2008). Finding truth in ‘lies’: Nietzsche’s perspectivism and its relation to education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(2), 269–285.
Kaipainen, M., & Hautamäki, A. (2015). A perspectivist approach to conceptual spaces. In F. Zenker & P. Gärdenfors (Eds.), Applications of geometric knowledge representation: The case for geometric knowledge representation (pp. 245–258). Cham: Springer.
Martin, J. (2005). Real perspectival selves. Theory & Psychology, 15(2), 207–224.
Martin, J. (2006). Reinterpreting internalization and agency through GH Mead’s perspectival realism. Human Development, 49(2), 65–86.
Martin, J. (2007). Educating communal agents: Building on the perspectivism of GH Mead. Educational Theory, 57(4), 435–452.
Martin, J., & Gillespie, A. (2010). A neo-Meadian approach to human agency: Relating the social and the psychological in the ontogenesis of perspective-coordinating persons. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44(3), 252–272.
Massimi, M. (2016). Bringing real realism back: A perspectival slant. In J. Pfeifer & M. Couch (Eds.), The philosophy of Philip Kitcher (pp. 98–120). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Massimi, M., & McCoy, C. D. (Eds.). (2020). Understanding perspectivism: Scientific challenges and methodological prospects. New York: Routledge.
Mead, G. H. (1938). In C. W. Morris et al. (Eds.), The philosophy of the act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nielsen, K. (1993). Perspectivism and the absolute conception of the world. Crítica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, 74, 105–116.
Nietzsche, F. (1956). The genealogy of morals. New York: Anchor Books.
Pearce, J. V. (2013). The potential of perspectivism for science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(5), 531–545.
Piaget, J. (2005). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge.
Raff, W. (2018). The perspectival nature of knowledge: Exploring different accounts of the theory of perspectivism. https://scholarship.tricolib.brynmawr.edu/bitstream/handle/10066/20544/2018RaffW.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Reginster, B. (2001). The paradox of perspectivism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62(1), 217–233.
Votsis, I. (2012). Putting realism in perspectivism. Philosophica, 84(1), 85–122.
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Glăveanu, V.P. (2020). Perspective. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_18-2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences
- 13 September 2022
- 28 May 2020
- 24 February 2020