The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible

Living Edition
| Editors: Vlad Petre Glăveanu (Editor-in-Chief)

Creating the Future

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_172-1
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

“Creating the future” is a notion introduced by Alfred North Whitehead to define the task of universities and the function of philosophy. Implicitly, it is a rejection of the idea that the future is already determined and, in some sense, already exists as part of a block universe, with the appearance of temporal becoming an illusion. “Creation” originally meant “the action of causing to exist” or “a coming into being.” The “future” is not normally considered to be what can be created. Originally, it meant “yet to be.” It now tends to be defined in relation to time, as “the time to come,” where “time” is assumed to be an independent existent along with space as the “containers” of material beings, with the future in some sense preexisting its becoming present. The quantity of “matter” or “mass-energy” is assumed to be constant and to change its position and configurations in predictable ways over time. To refer to the future as being created is to reject this view of the universe and the basic concepts that define it, replacing these with concepts that can make intelligible the freedom of and creativity of people, the future as in process of being created, and humans as partially responsible for what future is created. It is to recognize that there are real possibilities that can be envisioned, understood, chosen, and brought into existence, with some of Whitehead’s followers claiming that new possibilities can also be created.

Keywords

Creation Future Universities Philosophy Ecological civilization 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bergson, H. (1983 [1911]). Creative evolution (trans: Mitchell, A.). Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  2. Code, M. (2002). Whitehead’s almost comprehensive naturalism. Process Studies, 31(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daly, H. E., & Cobb, J. B., Jr. (1994). For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future (2nd ed.). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Gare, A. (2002). Process philosophy and the emergent theory of mind. Concrescence, 3, 1–12.Google Scholar
  5. Gare, A. (2010). Toward an ecological civilization: The science, ethics, and politics of eco-poiesis. Process Studies, 39(1), 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hobbes, T. (1982 [1651]). Leviathan. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  7. Lao Tzu. (n.d.). Lao Tzu quotes, sayings and words of wisdom. Retrieved July 22, 2020, from SuccessConsciousness at https://www.successconsciousness.com/blog/quotes/lao-tzu-quotes/
  8. Whitehead, A. N. (1932 [1926]). Science and the modern world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Whitehead, A. N. (1933). Adventures of ideas. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Whitehead, A. N. (1938). Modes of thought. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Whitehead, A. N. (1978 [1929]). Process and reality (corrected edition). London: Free Press.Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy and Cultural InquirySwinburne UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Alice Chirico
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly