Skip to main content

Emergentism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible

Abstract

Emergentism is the view that there are certain real-world entities necessarily generated from and constituted by other entities but not fully reducible to them ontologically and/or epistemically. Emergence is thus a relation in which an entity (the “emergent”) is partially dependent on and partially independent of the entities with respect to which it is said to be emergent (the “emergence base”). The emergence bases provide the necessary but not sufficient conditions for the emergents’ existence or identity. Ontological emergence occurs when some real-world entity, such as an object, process, property, causal power, or law, is not fully (pre)determined or generated by its respective base entities. Epistemological emergence occurs when some real-world entity cannot be represented, predicted from, or explained by concepts, theories, law-statements, or models referring to its respective base entities. The emergence relation can be further conceived diachronically, as a process, and synchronically, as a distinctive ontic status. In the first case, emergence refers to the relation between a newly formed entity and its original emergence base, or to the relative independence of certain macro-properties of a system relative to many changes in its parts’ properties. In the second case, emergence refers to the emergent status of a system in virtue of its qualitative difference and relative causal autonomy, at any time of its development, vis-à-vis the properties and causal profiles of its contemporary parts. Finally, some emergentists also claim that ontologically emergent systems causally affect, constrain, control, or condition their own parts’ identities or behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, S. (1920). Space, time, and deity: The Gifford lectures at Glasgow 1916–1918, 2 volumes. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Atlan, H. (2011). Noise as a principle of self-organization. In H. Atlan (Ed.), Selected writings. On self-organization, philosophy, bioethics, and judaism (pp. 95–113). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auyang, S. (1999). Foundations of Complex-System Theories – In economics, evolutionary biology, and statistical physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. (2010). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R., & Silberstein, M. (2019). Complexity and feedback. In R. F. Hendry, S. Gibb, & T. Lancaster (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of emergence (pp. 145–156). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Broad, C. D. (1925). The mind and its place in nature. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganeri, J. (2011). Emergence, ancient and modern. Mind, 120, 671–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, C. (2016). Reduction and emergence in science and philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guay, A., & Sartenaer, O. (2016). A new look at emergence. Or when after is different. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6(2), 297–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. (1997). How properties emerge. Philosophy of Science, 64(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P. (2016). Emergence. A philosophical account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewes, G. H. (1875). Problems of life and mind (Vol. 2). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Turbner.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, B. (1992). The rise and fall of British Emergentism. In A. Beckerman et al. (Eds.), Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects of nonreductive physicalism (pp. 49–93). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1843). System of logic. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer. (8th ed., 1872).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. L. (1923). Emergent evolution. London: Williams & Norgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, T., & Wong, H. Y. (2005). The metaphysics of emergence. Noûs, 39(4), 658–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, G. (2015). Ontological emergence: How is that possible? Towards a new relational ontology. Foundations of Science, 20(4), 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, G. (2020). Integrated-structure emergence and its mechanistic explanation. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02594-3.

  • Sartenaer, O. (2018). Flat emergence. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 99(1), 225–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S. (2002). Kim on emergence. Philosophical Studies, 108, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberstein, M. (2017). Strong emergence no, contextual emergence yes. Philosophica, 91, 145–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2021). Metaphysical emergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, W. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Bedau, M., & Humphreys, P. (Eds.). (2008). Emergence: Contemporary readings in philosophy and science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corradini, A., & O’Connor, T. (Eds.). (2010). Emergence in science and philosophy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, R. F., Gibb, S., & Lancaster, T. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge handbook of emergence. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, T. (2020). Emergent Properties, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/properties-emergent.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I acknowledge the financial support of FCT, ‘Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P.’ (Stimulus of Scientific Employment, Individual Support 2017: CEECIND/03316/2017). This work is part of the FCT Project ‘Emergence in the Natural Sciences: Towards a New Paradigm’ (PTDC/FERHFC/30665/2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Santos, G. (2021). Emergentism. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_167-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_167-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics