The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible

Living Edition
| Editors: Vlad Petre Glăveanu (Editor-in-Chief), Vlad Petre Glăveanu

Mobility

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_165-1
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

This entry focuses on the relationship between mobility and possibility and postulates that movement – physical and psychological – underpins the possible and its exploration in individuals and in society. This basic argument is supported by a brief examination of objects and inventions on the move throughout prehistory, the circulation of ideas in past and present societies, the mobility of people within and between national boundaries, and the movements of the mind, expressed as episodes of daydreaming and imagination. In each case, potential and actualized forms of mobility support the expression of possibility-expanding phenomena such as creativity and innovation. But this relation is neither linear nor easy to unpack. Less mobile lives can be lived very creatively, just as constant travelling can be disempowering and reduce one’s agency. Final reflections are offered on the interplay between (im)possibility and (im)mobility and the way it shapes human existence.

Keywords

Movement New mobilities Creativity Imagination Innovation Migration Diffusion 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bartlett, F. C. (1923). Psychology and primitive culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2013). Meaning making in motion: Bodies and minds moving through institutional and semiotic structures. Culture & Psychology, 19(4), 518–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). The possible as a field of inquiry. Editorial. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(3), 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). Mobilities and human possibility. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  6. Glăveanu, V. P. (in press). The possible: A sociocultural theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Glăveanu, V. P., Karwowski, M., Jankowska, D. M., & de Saint-Laurent, C. (2017). Creative imagination. In T. Zittoun & V. P. Glăveanu (Eds.), The handbook of imagination and culture (pp. 61–86). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Heitz, C., & Stapfer, R. (2017). Mobility and pottery production, what for? Introductory remarks. Mobility and pottery production. In C. Heitz & R. B. Stapfer (Eds.), Archaeological and anthropological perspectives (pp. 11–38). Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kellerman, A. (2006). Personal mobilities. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Knappett, C., & Kiriatzi, E. (2016). Technological mobilities: Perspectives from the Eastern Mediterranean. An introduction. In E. Kiriatzi & C. Knappett (Eds.), Human mobility and technological transfer in the prehistoric Mediterranean (pp. 1–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kuhn, S. L. (2012). Emergent patterns of creativity and innovation in early technologies. Developments in Quaternary Science, 16, 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Macková, L., & Kysučan, L. (2016). The history and politics of human mobility. Development, Environment and Foresight, 2(1), 23–34.Google Scholar
  13. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Moscovici, S. (2001). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ohnmacht, T., Maksim, H., & Bergman, M. M. (Eds.). (2009). Mobilities and inequality. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence (M. Piercy & D.E. Berlyne, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Porter, M., & Poerwandari, K. (2008). How ideas migrate: Reflections from an international comparative project. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 14(3), 61–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Randell, R. (2018). No paradigm to mobilize: The new mobilities paradigm is not a paradigm. Applied Mobilities, 1–18.Google Scholar
  19. Richerson, P. J., Boyd, R., & Bettinger, R. L. (2009). Cultural innovations and demographic change. Human Biology, 81(3), 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  21. Salazar, N. B. (2011). The power of imagination in transnational mobilities. Identities, 18(6), 576–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schilling, H. (1983). Innovation through migration: The settlements of Calvinistic Netherlanders in sixteenth-and seventeenth-century central and Western Europe. Histoire Sociale/Social History, 16(31), 7–33.Google Scholar
  23. Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Tarde, G. (1962). The laws of imitation. Originally published in 1903. Clouchester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
  26. Trifanescu, L. (2015). Against patterns of domination: Migration as an act of empowerment and learning. In V. J. Ostrouch-Kamińska & C. C. Vieira (Eds.), Private world(s). Gender and informal learning of adults (pp. 91–102). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  27. Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  29. Womersley, G. (2020). (Un) imagination and (im) mobility: Exploring the past and constructing possible futures among refugee victims of torture in Greece. Culture & Psychology, online first.Google Scholar
  30. Zittoun, T., & Gillespie, A. (2015). Imagination in human and cultural development. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and CounselingWebster University GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Center for the Science of Learning and Technology (SLATE), University of BergenBergenNorway

Section editors and affiliations

  • Wendy Ross
    • 1
  1. 1.Kingston UniversityKingstonUnited Kingdom