This entry focuses on the relationship between mobility and possibility and postulates that movement – physical and psychological – underpins the possible and its exploration in individuals and in society. This basic argument is supported by a brief examination of objects and inventions on the move throughout prehistory, the circulation of ideas in past and present societies, the mobility of people within and between national boundaries, and the movements of the mind, expressed as episodes of daydreaming and imagination. In each case, potential and actualized forms of mobility support the expression of possibility-expanding phenomena such as creativity and innovation. But this relation is neither linear nor easy to unpack. Less mobile lives can be lived very creatively, just as constant travelling can be disempowering and reduce one’s agency. Final reflections are offered on the interplay between (im)possibility and (im)mobility and the way it shapes human existence.
- New mobilities
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Bartlett, F. C. (1923). Psychology and primitive culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2013). Meaning making in motion: Bodies and minds moving through institutional and semiotic structures. Culture & Psychology, 19(4), 518–532.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). The possible as a field of inquiry. Editorial. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(3), 519–530.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). Mobilities and human possibility. London: Palgrave.
Glăveanu, V. P. (in press). The possible: A sociocultural theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Glăveanu, V. P., Karwowski, M., Jankowska, D. M., & de Saint-Laurent, C. (2017). Creative imagination. In T. Zittoun & V. P. Glăveanu (Eds.), The handbook of imagination and culture (pp. 61–86). New York: Oxford University Press.
Heitz, C., & Stapfer, R. (2017). Mobility and pottery production, what for? Introductory remarks. Mobility and pottery production. In C. Heitz & R. B. Stapfer (Eds.), Archaeological and anthropological perspectives (pp. 11–38). Leiden: Sidestone Press.
Kellerman, A. (2006). Personal mobilities. London: Routledge.
Knappett, C., & Kiriatzi, E. (2016). Technological mobilities: Perspectives from the Eastern Mediterranean. An introduction. In E. Kiriatzi & C. Knappett (Eds.), Human mobility and technological transfer in the prehistoric Mediterranean (pp. 1–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, S. L. (2012). Emergent patterns of creativity and innovation in early technologies. Developments in Quaternary Science, 16, 69–87.
Macková, L., & Kysučan, L. (2016). The history and politics of human mobility. Development, Environment and Foresight, 2(1), 23–34.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moscovici, S. (2001). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. New York: New York University Press.
Ohnmacht, T., Maksim, H., & Bergman, M. M. (Eds.). (2009). Mobilities and inequality. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence (M. Piercy & D.E. Berlyne, Trans.). London: Routledge.
Porter, M., & Poerwandari, K. (2008). How ideas migrate: Reflections from an international comparative project. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 14(3), 61–96.
Randell, R. (2018). No paradigm to mobilize: The new mobilities paradigm is not a paradigm. Applied Mobilities, 1–18.
Richerson, P. J., Boyd, R., & Bettinger, R. L. (2009). Cultural innovations and demographic change. Human Biology, 81(3), 211–235.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Salazar, N. B. (2011). The power of imagination in transnational mobilities. Identities, 18(6), 576–598.
Schilling, H. (1983). Innovation through migration: The settlements of Calvinistic Netherlanders in sixteenth-and seventeenth-century central and Western Europe. Histoire Sociale/Social History, 16(31), 7–33.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226.
Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tarde, G. (1962). The laws of imitation. Originally published in 1903. Clouchester, MA: Peter Smith.
Trifanescu, L. (2015). Against patterns of domination: Migration as an act of empowerment and learning. In V. J. Ostrouch-Kamińska & C. C. Vieira (Eds.), Private world(s). Gender and informal learning of adults (pp. 91–102). Rotterdam: Sense.
Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. London: Routledge.
Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
Womersley, G. (2020). (Un) imagination and (im) mobility: Exploring the past and constructing possible futures among refugee victims of torture in Greece. Culture & Psychology, online first.
Zittoun, T., & Gillespie, A. (2015). Imagination in human and cultural development. London: Routledge.
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Glăveanu, V.P. (2020). Mobility. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_165-1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences