Abstract
In general, psychology does not pay a lot of attention to the realm of what people can possibly do as the focus is on explaining what people actually do. A notable exception to this is Positioning Theory, a perspective on psychology developed by Rom Harré and collaborators. Positioning Theory stresses that understanding what people do and what they don’t do requires to look at what is permissible to do according to the local moral order that is followed and to the positions that people take in that order. “Positions” are clusters of beliefs that people have with respect to the rights and duties to act in certain ways. “Positioning” refers to the processes of assigning, appropriating, or rejecting positions. Every position both opens and closes possible actions. What people possibly can do is a function of three determinants: the capacities of people to do certain things, the restrictions imposed upon people to do certain things, and the intentions that people have to do certain things. One of the basic functions of society is to both stimulate and contain the possibilities of human agency. The study of the possible thus deals with the understanding of how a category of what might be possible in any given context has the chance of succeeding, yet might be denied due to a range of impermissible positions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Notes
- 1.
It was Hume who first described the nature of such causality.
References
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–65.
Harré. (2011). The discursive turn in social psychology. In D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 688–701). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Harré. (2012). Positioning theory. In D. J. Christie (Ed.), The encyclopedia of peace psychology.
Harré. (2015). Positioning theory. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman, & K. L. Slaney (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology: Methods, approaches, and new directions for social sciences. Chichester: Wiley.
Harré, R., & Secord, P. (1974). The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21(4), 393–407.
Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (1999). Positioning theory. Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Searle, J. R. (2009). Making the social world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Langenhove, L. (1995). The theoretical foundations of experimental psychology and its alternatives. In J. Smith, R. Harré, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology. London: Sage.
Van Langenhove, L. (2011). People and societies. Rom Harré and the designing of the social sciences. London: Routledge.
Van Langenhove, L. (2017). Varieties of moral orders. Frontiers in Sociology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2017.00009.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Van Langenhove, L. (2021). Positioning Theory. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_155-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_155-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences