Skip to main content

Utopia

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible
  • 95 Accesses

Abstract

In common vernacular, Utopia usually conjures up imaginations of an impossible place marked by its perfection and happiness. However, this represents but one of the many ways in which utopias can be understood. When studied closer, utopian studies scholars have found it hard to reach a consensus on what a utopia is, and what it is for. Broadly speaking, we can find four different ways of understanding utopia: as a literary text; as a blueprint for society; as a critical reflection of the present; and as a simple pursuit for a better life. Crucially, all these categories speak to the possibility of a different way of life, be it elsewhere in space as with early utopian texts, or elsewhere in time as is most common in contemporary utopias. Utopias which exists elsewhere in time speak most directly to what is possible, as placing them in our own future serves to incite us to work toward them, making changes in the present that might approximate this possible future. This is the aim of most living utopian movements today – from #Occupy Wallstreet to new gene editing technology – which not only presents us with a vision for a possible utopia future, but also tells us how to get there, making the possible increasingly tangible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bacon, F. (1627). New Atlantis. Auckland: The Floating Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, E. (1986). The principle of Hope. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, R., & Knight, D. M. (2019). The anthropology of the future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1790). Reflections on the revolution in France (p. 2001). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. C. (2010). Thomas More’s utopia: Sources, legacy and interpretation. In G. Claeys (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to utopian literature (Cambridge companions to literature) (pp. 3–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, P. K. (1962). The man in the high castle. London/New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, F. (1638). A discourse of a voyage thither. London: John Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B., & Taylor, K. (1982). The politics of utopia. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (2005). Archaeologies of the future: The desire called utopia and other science fictions. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, A. (2000). Instantiating critical utopia. Utopian Studies, 11(1), 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Guin, U. K. (1974). The dispossessed. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (1990). The concept of utopia. London: Allan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (2007). The imaginary reconstruction of society: Utopia as method. In T. Moylan & R. Baccolini (Eds.), Utopia method vision: The use value of social dreaming (pp. 47–68). Oxford/Berlin: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley, G. (2019). Scotland’s post-referenda futures. Anthropology Today, 35, 13–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • More, T. (1516). Utopia. London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moylan, T. (1986). Demand the impossible: Science fiction and the utopian imagination. London/New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moylan, T. (2007). Realizing Better futures, Strong Thoughts for Hard Times. In T. Moylan, R. Baccolini (Eds.), Utopia Method Vision: The Use Value of Social Dreaming (pp. 191–222). Oxford, Berlin: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moylan, T., & Baccolini, R. (2007). Utopia method vision: The use value of social dreaming. Oxford/Berlin: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, D. (2012). Commentary: Democracy, temporalities of capitalism, and dilemmas of inclusion in occupy movements. American Ethnologist, 39, 280–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. (1949). 1984. London: Secker and Wrburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plattes, G. (1641). A description of the famous Kingdome of Macaria. London: Francis Confiable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl, N. (2010). Utopianism after More: The renaissance and the enlightenment. In G. Claeys (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to utopian literature (Cambridge companions to literature) (pp. 3–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1962). The open society and its enemies. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, A. (2009). Eugenic utopias/dystopias, reprogenetics, and community genetics. Sociology of Health and Ilness, 31(4), 602–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razsa, M., & Kurnik, A. (2012). The occupy movement in Žižek’s hometown: Direct democracy and a politics of becoming. American Ethnologist, 39, 238–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. S. (1993–1996). Blue Mars. London: Harper Collins. – Green Mars. London: Harper Collins. – Red Mars. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, L. T., & Claeys, G. (1999). The utopia reader. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargisson, L. (2007). The curious relationship between politics and utopia. In T. Moylan & R. Baccolini (Eds.), Utopia method vision: The use value of social dreaming (pp. 26–46). Oxford/Berlin: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapiro, L. B. (1972). Totalitarianism. London: Pall Mall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmon, J. L. (1961). The origins of totalitarian democracy. London: Mercury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, F. (2010). The concept of utopia. In G. Claeys (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to utopian literature (Cambridge companions to literature) (pp. 3–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriela Manley .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Manley, G. (2021). Utopia. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_135-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_135-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics