The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible

Living Edition
| Editors: Vlad Petre Glăveanu (Editor-in-Chief)


Living reference work entry


Avatars are virtual characters that now belong to the popular culture around video games, social networks, and digital applications in general. However, using an avatar may not be as insignificant as it seems, because avatars, by providing us with a fresh new appearance, may impact the very perception of our own identity. The aim of this entry is to offer an overview of the sociocognitive processes influenced by the use of avatars and illustrate them with empirical findings from the literature, including examples related to the Proteus effect. Finally, we will open avenues as to what could become possible through avatars, in particular in the field of avatar-mediated creativity.


Avatar Proteus effect Virtual world Self-perception Deindividuation Creativity 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Adams, F. M., & Osgood, C. E. (1973). A cross-cultural study of the affective meanings of color. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4(2), 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ash, E. (2016). Priming or Proteus effect? Examining the effects of avatar race on in-game behavior and post-play aggressive cognition and affect in video games. Games and Culture, 11(4), 422–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bem, D. (1972). Self perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Bessière, K., Seay, A. F., & Kiesler, S. (2007). The ideal elf: Identity exploration in World of Warcraft. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10(4), 530–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buisine, S., & Guegan, J. (2020). Proteus vs. social identity effects on virtual brainstorming. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39, 594–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buisine, S., Guegan, J., Barré, J., Segonds, F., & Aoussat, A. (2016). Using avatars to tailor ideation process to innovation strategy. Cognition, Technology & Work, 18, 583–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ducheneaut, N., Wen, M. H., Yee, N., & Wadley, G. (2009, April). Body and mind: A study of avatar personalization in three virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1151–1160). ACM Press.Google Scholar
  9. Eastin, M. S., Appiah, O., & Cicchirllo, V. (2009). Identification and the influence of cultural stereotyping on postvideogame play hostility. Human Communication Research, 35(3), 337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fox, J., Bailenson, J. N., & Tricase, L. (2013). The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: The Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 930–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guegan, J., Moliner, P., & Buisine, S. (2015). Why are online games so self-involving: A social identity analysis of massively multiplayer online role-playing games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guegan, J., Buisine, S., Mantelet, F., Maranzana, N., & Segonds, F. (2016). Avatar-mediated creativity: When embodying inventors makes engineers more creative. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guegan, J., Segonds, F., Barré, J., Maranzana, N., Mantelet, F., & Buisine, S. (2017). Social identity cues to improve creativity and identification in face-to-face and virtual groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Happ, C., Melzer, A., & Steffgen, G. (2013). Superman vs. BAD man? The effects of empathy and game character in violent video games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(10), 774–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Jaruzelski, B., Staack, V., & Goehle, B. (2014). Proven paths to innovation success. Strategy + Business, 77, 2–16.Google Scholar
  17. Mantelet, F., Segonds, F., Maranzana, N., Guegan, J., & Buisine, S. (2016). Virtual environment in the early design phases: How to be more creative? International virtual concept workshop on “major trends in product design”.Google Scholar
  18. Meadows, M. S. (2008). I, Avatar: The culture and consequences of having a second life. Berkley: New Riders.Google Scholar
  19. Michinov, N. (2012). Is electronic brainstorming or brainwriting the best way to improve creative performance in groups? An overlooked comparison of two idea-generation techniques. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(S1), E222–E243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2007). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive-social-motivational perspective of brainstorming. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 248–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peña, J., & Kim, E. (2014). Increasing exergame physical activity through self and opponent avatar appearance. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 262–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peña, J., Hancock, J. T., & Merola, N. A. (2009). The priming effects of avatars in virtual settings. Communication Research, 36(6), 838–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peña, J., Khan, S., & Alexopoulos, C. (2016). I am what I see: How avatar and opponent agent body size affects physical activity among men playing exergames. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(3), 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and anti-normative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ratan, R., Beyea, D., Li, B. J., & Graciano, L. (2019). Avatar characteristics induce users’ behavioral conformity with small-to-medium effect sizes: A meta-analysis of the proteus effect. Media Psychology, 23(5), 651–675.Google Scholar
  26. Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomenon. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenberg, R. S., Baughman, S. L., & Bailenson, J. (2013). Virtual superheroes: Using superpowers in virtual reality to encourage prosocial behavior. PLoS One, 8(1), e55003.Google Scholar
  28. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30–65). London: HarvesterWheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  29. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or Panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spivey, C. B., & Prentice-Dunn, S. (1990). Assessing the directionality of deindividuated behavior: Effects of deindividuation, modeling, and private self-consciousness on aggressive and prosocial responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11(4), 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stendal, K., Molka-Danielsen, J., Munkvold, B. E., & Balandin, S. (2012). Virtual worlds and people with lifelong disability: exploring the relationship with virtual self and others. In ECIS (pp. 156–179).Google Scholar
  32. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relation. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  33. Tanis, M., & Postmes, T. (2008). Cues to identity in online dyads: Effects of interpersonal versus intragroup perceptions on performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12(2), 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Waddell, T. F., & Ivory, J. D. (2015). It’s not easy trying to be one of the guys: The effect of avatar attractiveness, avatar sex, and user sex on the success of help-seeking requests in an online game. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 59(1), 112–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The Proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33, 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2009). The difference between being and seeing: The relative contribution of self-perception and priming to behavioral changes via digital self-representation. Media Psychology, 12(2), 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yee, N., Bailenson, J., & Ducheneaut, N. (2009). The Proteus effect: Implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Communication Research, 36(2), 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yoon, G., & Vargas, P. T. (2014). Know thy avatar the unintended effect of virtual-self representation on behavior. Psychological Science, 25(4), 1043–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CESINanterreFrance
  2. 2.University de ParisParisFrance

Section editors and affiliations

  • Samira Bourgeois-Bougrine

There are no affiliations available