Skip to main content

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson, J. O. (1976). Studies in the theory of unequal exchange. Åbo: Stiftelsens för Åbo Akademi Forskningsinsititut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, J. O. (2010). International Trade in a Full and Unequal World. In Hornborg, Alf and Andrew K. Jorgensen (eds) (2010) International Trade andEnvironmental Justice. Toward a Global Political Ecology. Nova Science Publishers, New York. 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, J. O., & Lindroth M. (2001). Ecologically unsustainable trade. Ecological Economics, 37(1), 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, S. G. (1984). Modes of extraction, unequal exchange, and the progressive underdevelopment of an extreme periphery: The Brazilian Amazon, 1600–1980. American Journal of Sociology, 89(5), 1017–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, S. G. (1985). Underdeveloping the Amazon. Extraction, unequal exchange, and the failure of the modern state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., & Chen, G. Q. (2007). Modified ecological footprint accounting and analysis based on embodied exergy – A case study of Chinese society 1981–2001. Ecological Economics, 61, 355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dam, T. A., Pasche, M., & Werlich, N. (2017). Trade patterns and the ecological footprint – A theory-based empirical approach. Jena Economic Research Papers 2017 – 005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorninger, C., & Hornborg, A. (2015). Can EEMRIO analyses establish the occurrence of ecologically unequal exchange? Ecological Economics, 119, 414–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmanuel, A. (1969). L’échange inégal: Essais sur les antagonismes dans les rapports économiques internationaux. Paris: François Maspero. In English: Unequal Exchange: A Study of the Imperialism of Trade. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2018). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Physical_imports_and_exports

  • Ferng, Jiun-Jiun (2003) Allocating the responsibility of CO2 over-emissions from the perspectives of benefit principle and ecological deficit. Ecological Economics, 46(1), 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M. (1998). Society’s metabolism – the intellectual history of materials flow analysis. Part I: 1860–1970. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., & Hüttler, W. (1999). Society’s metabolism. The intellectual history of materials flow analysis, part II, 1970–1998. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(4), 107–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. B. & Auerbach D. (2016). The Political Economy of the Water Footprint: A Cross-National Analysis of Ecologically Unequal Exchange Sustainability, 8(12), 1263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, F. (2000). Economic specialization versus ecological diversification: the trade policy implications of taking the ecosystem approach seriously. Ecological Economics, 34(3), 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1971). A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research. 1971, 8, 81–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network. (2018). https://www.footprintnetwork.org/our-work/ecological-footprint/

  • Hornborg, A. (2001). The power of the machine. Global inequalities of economy, technology, and environment. Oxford: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornborg, A., & Jorgensen, A. K. (Eds.). (2010). International trade and environmental justice. Toward a global political ecology. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jit Sing, S., & Ramanujam, V. (2010). Exploring ecologically unequal exchange using land and labor appropriation: Trade in the Nicobar Islands, 1880–2000. In A. Hornborg, & A. K. Jorgensen (Eds.), International trade and environmental justice. Toward a global political ecology. New York: Nova Science Publishers, (pp. 19–48).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jit Singh, S., & Eisenmenger, N. (2010). How unequal is international trade? An ecological perspective using material flow accounting (MFA). Journal für Entwicklungspolitik, XXVI(4), 57–88. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286026852_How_unequal_is_international_trade_An_ecological_perspective_using_Material_Flow_Accounting_MFA

  • Jorgensen, A. K. (2010). The Sociology of Unequal Ecological Exchange and Environmental Degradation: A Cross-National Study of Deforestation in Less-Developed Countries. In Hornborg, Alf and Andrew K. Jorgensen (eds) (2010) International Trade and Environmental Justice. Toward a Global Political Ecology. Nova Science Publishers, New York. 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, A. K. (2016a). The sociology of ecologically unequal exchange, foreign investment dependence and environmental load displacement: Summary of the literature and implications for sustainability. Journal of Political Ecology, 23(1), 19–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, A. K. (2016b). Environment, development, and ecologically unequal exchange. Sustainability, 8(3), 227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanemoto, K., Moran, D., Lenzen, M., & Geschke, A. (2014). International trade undermines national emission reduction targets: New evidence from air pollution. Global Environmental Change, 24, 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KTH, the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. (2018). https://www.kth.se/en/om/miljo-hallbar-utveckling/utbildning-miljo-hallbar-utveckling/verktygslada/sustainable-development/ekologisk-hallbarhet-1.432074

  • MacDonald, S. B. (2017). Suriname’s economic crisis. Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/surinames-economic-crisis

  • Mäenpää, I., Heikkinen, M., Piñero, P., Mattila, T., Koskela, S., & Kivinen, M. (2017). MFAfin – Finnish material flow accounts. Main results. Academy of Finland Sustainable Use of Resources and the Finnish economy (SURE), Oulu. www.oulu.fi/sites/default/files/content/MFAfin%20-%20Main%20results.pdf

  • Martinez-Alier, J. (1987). Ecological economics: Energy, environment and society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, D. D., Lenzen, M., Kanemoto, K., & Geschke, A. (2013). Does ecologically unequal exchange occur? Ecological Economics, 89(C), 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muradian, R., O’Connor, M., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2002). Embodied pollution in trade: Estimating the ‘environmental load displacement’ of industrialised countries. Ecological Economics, 41, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijdam, D.S., Wilting, H.C., Goedkoop, M.J. & Madsen, J. (2005). Environmental load from Dutch private consumption: How much pollution is exported? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1–2), 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, Howard, T. (1995). Environmental accounting: EMERGY and environmental decision making. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, S., Zhang, W., & Sun, C. (2016). ‘Environmental load displacement’ from the North to the South: A consumption-based perspective with a focus on China. Ecological Economics, 128(C), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prell, C. (2016). Wealth and pollution inequalities of global trade: A network and input-output approach. The Social Science Journal, 53, 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J. (2007). Ecological unequal exchange: International trade and uneven utilization of environmental space in the world system. Social Forces, 85(3), 1369–1392. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røpke, I. (1994). Trade, development and sustainability: A critical assessment of the “free trade dogma” Ecological Economics, 9(1),13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydberg, T. (2010). Emergy and trade: Exploring a measure of equitable exchange. In A. Hornborg, & A. K. Jorgensen (Eds.), International trade and environmental justice. Toward a global political ecology. New York: Nova Science Publishers, (pp. 49–62).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siche, R., Pereira, L., Agostinho, F., Ortega, E. (2010). Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as case study. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 15(10), 3182–3192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sideri, S. (1970). Trade and power. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (2016). Imperialism in the twenty-first century. Globalization, super-exploitation, and capitalism’s final crisis. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2018, October 27–November 2). Special report: Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torregrosa-López, J. I., Bellver Navarro, C. G., & Lo Iacono-Ferreira, V. G. (2007). Experiences in the use of Ecological Footprint as a sustainability indicator. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292739718_Experiences_in_the_use_of_Ecological_Footprint_as_a_sustainability_indicator

  • Venables, A. J. (2016). Using natural resources for development: Why has it proven so difficult? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(1), 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing human impact on the Earth. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Tian, Rui Wu, Yong Geng, Raimund Bleischwitz (2017) Environmental and resources footprints between China and EU countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 322–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Otto Andersson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Andersson, J.O. (2019). Ecological Unequal Exchange. In: Ness, I., Cope, Z. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91206-6_27-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91206-6_27-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91206-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91206-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference HistoryReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Ecological Unequal Exchange
    Published:
    23 May 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91206-6_27-2

  2. Original

    Ecological Unequal Exchange
    Published:
    07 May 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91206-6_27-1