Introduction and Historical Background
The role of the teacher, educational context, and design are three key factors, called by Drjvers (2012) decisive and crucial to promote or hinder the successful integration of digital technology in mathematics education. By using the term “design,” the author means not only the design of digital technology involved but also the design of corresponding tasks and activities and the design of lessons and teaching, in general.
An appropriate design, according to the author, refers explicitly to the instrumental genesis model which considers co-emergence of technical mastery to use technology for solving mathematical problems and the genesis of mental schemes leading to conceptual understanding (Drjvers 2012). As such, the model seeks a match between didactical and pedagogical functionality in which digital tool is incorporated with the tool’s characteristics and affordances. It also emphasizes a priority of pedagogical and didactical considerations...
References
Borba MC, Villarreal ME (2005) Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking. Springer, New York
Botzer G, Yerushalmy M (2007) Mobile applications for mobile learning. In: The proceedings to the cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age (CELDA), Algarve
Brousseau G (2002) Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Carroll JM, Kellogg WA, Rosson MB (1991) The task-artifact cycle. In: Carroll JM (ed) Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Christou C, Jones K, Mousoulides N, Pittalis M (2006) Developing the 3D math dynamic geometry software: theoretical perspectives on design. Int J Technol Math Educ 13(4):168–174
Clarke D, Strømskag H, Johnson HL, Bikner-Ahsbahs A, Gardner K (2014) Mathematical tasks and the student. In: Liljedahl P, Nicol C, Oesterle S, Allan D (eds) Proceedings of the 38th conference of the International Group for Psychology of mathematics education and the 36th conference of the north American chapter of the psychology of mathematics education, vol 1. PME, Vancouver, pp 117–143
Confrey J, Hoyles C, Jones D, Kahn K, Maloney A, Nguyen KH, Noss R, Pratt D (2009) Designing software for mathematical engagement through modelling. In: Hoyles C, Lagrange JB (eds) Mathematics education and technology – rethinking the terrain, the 17th ICMI study. Springer, New York
Davydov VV (1982) Psychological characteristics of the formation of mathematical operations in children. In: Carpenter TP, Moser JM, Romberg TA (eds) Addition and subtraction: cognitive perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 225–238
Design-Based Research Collective (2003) Design-based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educ Res 32(1):5–8
Drjvers P (2012) Digital technology in mathematics education: why it works (or doesn’t). Plenary talk at the ICME-12, Seoul, 8 July–15 July 2012. http://www.icme12.org/upload/submission/2017_F.pdf
Freiman V, Lirette-Pitre N (2009) Building a virtual learning community of problem solvers: example of CASMI community. ZDM Int J Math Educ 41(1–2):245–256
Freiman V, Robichaud X (2018, in Press) A short history of computing devices from Schickard to de Colmar: emergence and evolution of ingenious ideas and computational technologies as precursors of modern computer technology. In: Volkov A, Freiman V (eds) Computations and computing devices in mathematics education before the advent of electronic calculators. Springer. https://www.springer.com/la/book/9783319733944
Freiman V, Polotskaia E, Savard A (2017) Using a computer-based learning task to promote work on mathematical relationships in the context of word problems in early grades. ZDM Math Educ: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0883-3
Gadanidis G, Namukasa I (2013) New media and online mathematics learning for teachers. In: Martinovic D, Freiman V, Karadag Z (eds) Visual mathematics and cyberlearning. Mathematics education in the digital Era (MEDEra) book series, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 163–186
Geiger VS (2017) Designing for mathematical applications and modelling tasks in technology rich environments. In: Leung A, Baccaglini-Frank A (eds) Digital technologies in designing mathematics education tasks. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 285–301. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43423-0_14
Gros B (2015) Integration of digital games in learning and E-learning environments: connecting experiences and context. In: Lowrie T, Jorgensen (Zevenbergen) R (eds) Digital games and mathematics learning. Mathematics education in the digital era, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht
Healy L, Kynigos C (2010) Charting the microworld territory over time: design and construction in learning, teaching and developing mathematics. ZDM Int J Math Educ 42(3):63–76
Hegedus S et al (2017) Uses of technology in upper secondary mathematics education. In: Uses of technology in upper secondary mathematics education. ICME-13 topical surveys. Springer, Cham
Hoyles C, Noss R (2009) The technological mediation of mathematics and its learning. Hum Dev 52:129–147
Hui CS (2009) Learning mathematics through computer games. http://atcm.mathandtech.org/EP2009/papers_full/2812009_17199.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2013
Jackiw N (2002) The Geometer’s sketchpad (version 4). Key Curriculum Press, Emeryville
Kafai YB (2006) Playing and making games for learning: instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Game Cult 1(1):36–40
Kaput JJ, Thompson PW (1994) Technology in mathematics education research: the first 25 years in JRME. J Res Math Educ 25(6):676–684
Kaput J, Hegedus S, Lesh R (2007) Technology becoming infrastructural in mathematics education. In: Lesh R, Hamilton E, Kaput J (eds) Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 173–192
Kelle S, Klemke R, Specht M (2011) Design patterns for learning games. Int J Technol Enhanc Learn 3(6):555–569
Kynigos C (2012) Constructionism: theory of learning or theory of design? Regular lecture. In: Proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education, Seoul
Ladel S, Kortenkamp U (2016) Artifact-centric activity theory – a framework for the analysis of the design and use of virtual manipulatives. In: Moyer-Packenham PS (ed) International perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics with virtual manipulatives. Springer, New York, pp 25–40
Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Leontiev AN (1978) Activity, consciousness and personality. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Leung A (2011) An epistemic model of task design in dynamic geometry environment. ZDM Int J Math Educ 43:325–336
Levy P (1998) Becoming virtual: reality in the digital age, 1st edn. Plenum Press, New York
Martinovic D, Freiman V, Karadag Z (2013) Visual mathematics and cyberlearning in view of affordance and activity theories. In: Martinovic D, Freiman V, Karadag Z (eds) Visual mathematics and cyberlearning. Mathematics education in the digital Era (MEDEra) book series, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 209–238
Maschietto M, Soury-Lavergne S (2017) The duo “Pascaline and e-Pascaline”: an example of using material and digital artefacts at primary school. In: Faggiano E, Ferrara F, Montone A (eds) Innovation and technology enhancing mathematics education. Springer, Cham, pp 137–160
Papert S (1980) Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, New York
Rabardel P (2002) People and technology: a cognitive approach to contemporary instruments. Université Paris 8, pp 188, 2002
Renninger KA, Shumar W (2004) The centrality of culture and community to participant learning at and with the math forum. In: Barab SA, Kling R, Gray JH (eds) Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 181–209
Rezat S, Sträßer R (2012) From the didactical triangle to the socio-didactical tetrahedron: artifacts as fundamental constituents of the didactical situation. ZDM Int J Math Educ 44(5):641–651
Sinclair M (2006) Designing tasks with interactive geometry applets for use in research – some methodological issues. Int J Technol Math Educ 13(1):31–36
Stahl G (2012) Designing a learning environment to promote math discourse. A paper presented at the ICME-12, Seoul, 8 July–15 July, 2012. http://gerrystahl.net/pub/icme_design.pdf
Temam D (2009) La pascaline, la “machine qui relève du défaut de la mémoire.” Bibnum. Retrieved from. http://bibnum.revues.org/548
Tricot A, Plégat-Soutjis F, Camps J-F, Amiel A, Lutz G, Morcillo A (2003) Utilité, utilisabilité, acceptabilité: interpréter les relations entre trois dimensions de l’évaluation des EIAH. In Desmoulins C, Marquet P, Bouhineau D (eds) Environnements informatiques pour l’apprentissage humain. ATIEF - INRP, Paris, pp 391–402
Vygotsky LS (1997) The instrumental method in psychology. In: Rieber RW, Wollock J (eds) The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 3: Problems of the theory and history of psychology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 85–90
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Freiman, V. (2019). Technology Design in Mathematics Education. In: Lerman, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_155-3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_155-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77487-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77487-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education