Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Steve Lerman

Technology Design in Mathematics Education

  • Viktor FreimanEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_155-3

Introduction and Historical Background

The role of the teacher, educational context, and design are three key factors, called by Drjvers (2012) decisive and crucial to promote or hinder the successful integration of digital technology in mathematics education. By using the term “design,” the author means not only the design of digital technology involved but also the design of corresponding tasks and activities and the design of lessons and teaching, in general.

An appropriate design, according to the author, refers explicitly to the instrumental genesis model which considers co-emergence of technical mastery to use technology for solving mathematical problems and the genesis of mental schemes leading to conceptual understanding (Drjvers 2012). As such, the model seeks a match between didactical and pedagogical functionality in which digital tool is incorporated with the tool’s characteristics and affordances. It also emphasizes a priority of pedagogical and didactical considerations...

Keywords

Technology design Microworlds Virtual communities Web design 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Borba MC, Villarreal ME (2005) Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Botzer G, Yerushalmy M (2007) Mobile applications for mobile learning. In: The proceedings to the cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age (CELDA), AlgarveGoogle Scholar
  3. Brousseau G (2002) Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  4. Carroll JM, Kellogg WA, Rosson MB (1991) The task-artifact cycle. In: Carroll JM (ed) Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Christou C, Jones K, Mousoulides N, Pittalis M (2006) Developing the 3D math dynamic geometry software: theoretical perspectives on design. Int J Technol Math Educ 13(4):168–174Google Scholar
  6. Clarke D, Strømskag H, Johnson HL, Bikner-Ahsbahs A, Gardner K (2014) Mathematical tasks and the student. In: Liljedahl P, Nicol C, Oesterle S, Allan D (eds) Proceedings of the 38th conference of the International Group for Psychology of mathematics education and the 36th conference of the north American chapter of the psychology of mathematics education, vol 1. PME, Vancouver, pp 117–143Google Scholar
  7. Confrey J, Hoyles C, Jones D, Kahn K, Maloney A, Nguyen KH, Noss R, Pratt D (2009) Designing software for mathematical engagement through modelling. In: Hoyles C, Lagrange JB (eds) Mathematics education and technology – rethinking the terrain, the 17th ICMI study. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Davydov VV (1982) Psychological characteristics of the formation of mathematical operations in children. In: Carpenter TP, Moser JM, Romberg TA (eds) Addition and subtraction: cognitive perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 225–238Google Scholar
  9. Design-Based Research Collective (2003) Design-based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educ Res 32(1):5–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drjvers P (2012) Digital technology in mathematics education: why it works (or doesn’t). Plenary talk at the ICME-12, Seoul, 8 July–15 July 2012. http://www.icme12.org/upload/submission/2017_F.pdf
  11. Freiman V, Lirette-Pitre N (2009) Building a virtual learning community of problem solvers: example of CASMI community. ZDM Int J Math Educ 41(1–2):245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freiman V, Robichaud X (2018, in Press) A short history of computing devices from Schickard to de Colmar: emergence and evolution of ingenious ideas and computational technologies as precursors of modern computer technology. In: Volkov A, Freiman V (eds) Computations and computing devices in mathematics education before the advent of electronic calculators. Springer. https://www.springer.com/la/book/9783319733944
  13. Freiman V, Polotskaia E, Savard A (2017) Using a computer-based learning task to promote work on mathematical relationships in the context of word problems in early grades. ZDM Math Educ: 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0883-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gadanidis G, Namukasa I (2013) New media and online mathematics learning for teachers. In: Martinovic D, Freiman V, Karadag Z (eds) Visual mathematics and cyberlearning. Mathematics education in the digital Era (MEDEra) book series, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 163–186Google Scholar
  15. Geiger VS (2017) Designing for mathematical applications and modelling tasks in technology rich environments. In: Leung A, Baccaglini-Frank A (eds) Digital technologies in designing mathematics education tasks. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 285–301. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43423-0_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gros B (2015) Integration of digital games in learning and E-learning environments: connecting experiences and context. In: Lowrie T, Jorgensen (Zevenbergen) R (eds) Digital games and mathematics learning. Mathematics education in the digital era, vol 4. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  17. Healy L, Kynigos C (2010) Charting the microworld territory over time: design and construction in learning, teaching and developing mathematics. ZDM Int J Math Educ 42(3):63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hegedus S et al (2017) Uses of technology in upper secondary mathematics education. In: Uses of technology in upper secondary mathematics education. ICME-13 topical surveys. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoyles C, Noss R (2009) The technological mediation of mathematics and its learning. Hum Dev 52:129–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hui CS (2009) Learning mathematics through computer games. http://atcm.mathandtech.org/EP2009/papers_full/2812009_17199.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2013
  21. Jackiw N (2002) The Geometer’s sketchpad (version 4). Key Curriculum Press, EmeryvilleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kafai YB (2006) Playing and making games for learning: instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Game Cult 1(1):36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaput JJ, Thompson PW (1994) Technology in mathematics education research: the first 25 years in JRME. J Res Math Educ 25(6):676–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaput J, Hegedus S, Lesh R (2007) Technology becoming infrastructural in mathematics education. In: Lesh R, Hamilton E, Kaput J (eds) Foundations for the future in mathematics education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 173–192Google Scholar
  25. Kelle S, Klemke R, Specht M (2011) Design patterns for learning games. Int J Technol Enhanc Learn 3(6):555–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kynigos C (2012) Constructionism: theory of learning or theory of design? Regular lecture. In: Proceedings of the 12th international congress on mathematical education, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  27. Ladel S, Kortenkamp U (2016) Artifact-centric activity theory – a framework for the analysis of the design and use of virtual manipulatives. In: Moyer-Packenham PS (ed) International perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics with virtual manipulatives. Springer, New York, pp 25–40Google Scholar
  28. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leontiev AN (1978) Activity, consciousness and personality. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  30. Leung A (2011) An epistemic model of task design in dynamic geometry environment. ZDM Int J Math Educ 43:325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levy P (1998) Becoming virtual: reality in the digital age, 1st edn. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Martinovic D, Freiman V, Karadag Z (2013) Visual mathematics and cyberlearning in view of affordance and activity theories. In: Martinovic D, Freiman V, Karadag Z (eds) Visual mathematics and cyberlearning. Mathematics education in the digital Era (MEDEra) book series, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 209–238Google Scholar
  33. Maschietto M, Soury-Lavergne S (2017) The duo “Pascaline and e-Pascaline”: an example of using material and digital artefacts at primary school. In: Faggiano E, Ferrara F, Montone A (eds) Innovation and technology enhancing mathematics education. Springer, Cham, pp 137–160Google Scholar
  34. Papert S (1980) Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Rabardel P (2002) People and technology: a cognitive approach to contemporary instruments. Université Paris 8, pp 188, 2002Google Scholar
  36. Renninger KA, Shumar W (2004) The centrality of culture and community to participant learning at and with the math forum. In: Barab SA, Kling R, Gray JH (eds) Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 181–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rezat S, Sträßer R (2012) From the didactical triangle to the socio-didactical tetrahedron: artifacts as fundamental constituents of the didactical situation. ZDM Int J Math Educ 44(5):641–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sinclair M (2006) Designing tasks with interactive geometry applets for use in research – some methodological issues. Int J Technol Math Educ 13(1):31–36Google Scholar
  39. Stahl G (2012) Designing a learning environment to promote math discourse. A paper presented at the ICME-12, Seoul, 8 July–15 July, 2012. http://gerrystahl.net/pub/icme_design.pdf
  40. Temam D (2009) La pascaline, la “machine qui relève du défaut de la mémoire.” Bibnum. Retrieved from. http://bibnum.revues.org/548
  41. Tricot A, Plégat-Soutjis F, Camps J-F, Amiel A, Lutz G, Morcillo A (2003) Utilité, utilisabilité, acceptabilité: interpréter les relations entre trois dimensions de l’évaluation des EIAH. In Desmoulins C, Marquet P, Bouhineau D (eds) Environnements informatiques pour l’apprentissage humain. ATIEF - INRP, Paris, pp 391–402Google Scholar
  42. Vygotsky LS (1997) The instrumental method in psychology. In: Rieber RW, Wollock J (eds) The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 3: Problems of the theory and history of psychology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 85–90Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculté des sciences de l’éducationUniversité de MonctonMonctonCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Bharath Sriraman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesThe University of MontanaMissoulaUSA