Cellulose-Based Hydrogel for Industrial Applications

  • Shah M. Reduwan BillahEmail author
  • Md. Ibrahim H. Mondal
  • Sazzad H. Somoal
  • M. Nahid Pervez
Living reference work entry
Part of the Polymers and Polymeric Composites: A Reference Series book series (POPOC)


Cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels can absorb and retain huge amounts of water or aqueous solutions. They have a wide range of industrial applications including (a) hygienic and bio-related uses (more specifically in disposable diapers); (b) agricultural uses (such as water reserving in soil, soil conditioning, and controlled release of agrochemicals); (c) pharmaceutical dosage forms; (d) separation technology; (e) textile, leather, and paper industries (such as in wastewater treatment); (f) water-swelling rubbers; (g) soft actuators/valves; (h) electrical applications; (i) construction, packaging, and artificial snow; (j) sludge/coal dewatering; and (k) fire extinguishing gels. Many new advanced technologies are evolving by the day to cope with rigorous industrial-scale applications to ensure improved technical feasibilities. This chapter will briefly cover some of the selected aspects of cellulose-based hydrogels and their industrial applications.


Cellulose Hydrogels Superabsorbent hydrogels Composite Stimuli-responsive hydrogels Carboxymethylcellulose 

1 Introduction

Hydrogels have three-dimensional structure with elastic network that can span the volume in aqueous media. Hydrogels can be both natural and man-made [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Natural hydrogels are important components of different complex organisms that include (a) the bodies of jellyfish, (b) connective tissues in joints, (c) cornea in the eye, and (d) nuclear pore complexes inside cells. Synthetic or man-made hydrogels have a wide range of applications in different areas of life sciences including biomedical applications, where some of the important uses are (i) contact lenses, (ii) drug delivery, and (iii) tissue engineering [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. Hydrogels are mostly polymer-based, and their networks usually contain covalently cross-linked natural or synthetic polymers, whereas the supramolecular hydrogels use nanofibers to form the self-assembly of small molecules (such as hydrogelators), which have many promising applications [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. In this context, natural polymers such as cellulose are very popular and frequently used for a variety of applications in hydrogel formulations apart from their numerous other uses in different areas of science and technology. One of the many practical aspects of the use of cellulose in hydrogel formulations is its abundant availability (as a natural biomaterial) in the form of a living terrestrial biomass suitable for a wide range of industrial applications [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27].

Cellulose molecules have three alcoholic hydroxyl groups in each of its anhydro-glucopyranose units where practical chemical modifications can be carried out on these hydroxyl groups of cellulose structure (Scheme 1). At first in 1838, the existence of cellulose as the common material of plant cell walls was recognized [17, 18]. It has a long-chain polymer with repeating units of D-glucose (like a simple sugar). For example, this repeating unit occurs in almost pure form in cotton fiber, whereas in wood, plant leaves, and stalks, it is found in combination with other materials (for instance, lignin and hemicelluloses). In addition, some bacteria also produce cellulose. Natural cellulosic polymer has a long chain which links smaller units (such as β-D-glucose-type sugar unit) in the cellulose chain [19], and the sugar units are linked by the elimination of a water molecule. In addition, when two of these sugars are linked, it produces a disaccharide called cellobiose [20]; however, it gives pyranoses (with six-membered rings) when this chain contains the glucose units. In addition, cellulose is a linear chain of anhydro-D-glucopyranose (AGU) units in a chair conformation with hydroxyl groups in equatorial positions, and every other AGU is rotated to preserve the thermodynamically favored acetal bond angle of the β-1,4-glucosidic bonds [21, 22]. In the plant cell wall, the cellulose chains have a degree of polymerization of 2,000–15,000 AGUs, depending on the type of plant and cell wall (primary or secondary) [23]. A single cellulose chain usually passes through both crystalline and amorphous regions and in crystalline regions; 30–36 cellulose chains associate laterally through hydrogen bonding [24]. The extensive, regular hydrogen bonding of the cellulose chains contributes to make the crystal impermeable and increases the difficulty of extracting and degrading the cellulose [25]. Additionally, elementary cellulose fibers have diameters of around 5 nm, and several of these elementary fibers will bundle together with hemicelluloses to form cellulose microfibers with diameters of 10–30 nm and lengths of around 7 μm [21, 26]. These cellulose microfibrils form an open matrix in the cell wall, and the pores of these microfibrils are filled with hemicelluloses and pectin (primary cell wall) or lignin (secondary cell wall) [27]. In this chapter, different aspects of certain types of cellulose-based hydrogels are briefly presented, and these selected groups are (a) cellulose- and cellulose derivative-based hydrogels, (b) cellulose composite- and cellulose nanocomposite-based hydrogel systems, (c) functionalized cellulose-based hydrogels, and (d) hybrid cellulose-based hydrogels.
Scheme 1

Molecular structure of cellulose

2 Cellulose-Based Hydrogels

Nature is the main source of cellulose. It is a carbohydrate-type natural polymer, and it also has other attractive properties which include (a) biocompatibility, (b) biodegradability, (c) environmentally benign, and (d) cheap and renewable. In addition, cellulose contains hydroxyl groups in its structure that provide a unique suitability to produce superabsorbent hydrogels with attractive structures and desired characters. Since the advent of superabsorbent polymers in 1950, notable progress has been achieved within the last few decades in the field of superabsorbent hydrogels. One of the main driving forces behind this is the main concern of continuously increasing customer demands for high-quality superabsorbent materials for industrial applications primarily in the sanitary industry. Superabsorbent hydrogels have hydrophilic networks that provide higher capacity in water uptake and facilitate the capacity for water absorption and swelling. A good quality superabsorbent hydrogel can retain aqueous solutions up to hundreds of times compared to the weight of dry hydrogel [1, 2, 3]. Usually superabsorbent hydrogels are produced from synthetic polymers; however, there is a current trend to replace these polymers using environmentally benign and sustainable green alternatives such as natural polymers like cellulose and their products [4]. Cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels have been successful to attract current active research interest due to their many practical and potential industrial applications. For example, when celluloses or their derivatives are used in the synthesis of superabsorbent hydrogels, they provide the opportunity to overcome different demerits associated with synthetic-based superabsorbent hydrogels and also contribute to meet many requirements relating to environmental issues and other desired set criteria for specific applications [5]. In addition, it is possible to add multifunctional character on hydrogels by incorporating functional molecules into the structure of the hydrogels. Additionally, cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels typically show higher properties in comparison to properties observed from synthetic superabsorbent hydrogels; these properties include (a) absorbency, (b) strength, (c) biodegradation capability, (d) biocompatibility, and (e) good salt resistance [28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39].

2.1 The Emergence of Hydrogels as Biomaterials

Hydrogels are one of the few ever-evolving biomaterials which have been rigorously studied due to their wide range of application potentials in different areas of science and technologies including biomedical, therapeutic, and diagnostic application purposes. Hydrogels provide many unique feasibilities to incorporate vivid range of materials (such as biopolymers, synthetic polymers, nanoparticles, hybrid materials, composites, and nanocomposites) to form their tailor-oriented suitable structural morphologies using different techniques in order to serve specific desired uses. Besides these wider advantages, there are also some factors (such as proper and stable dispersion of hydrogels and nanoparticulate systems) that limit their uses in different areas. From a comprehensive study on the recent development trends on different hydrogel systems, it is quite transparent to observe that the incorporation of nanostructured fillers into hydrogels has been systematically enhanced using novel techniques to synthesize novel hydrogels that can successfully retain different functionalities to address different challenges. This chapter concentrates on the applications of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)-based hydrogels along with other related hydrogel systems such as CMC-based composite, nanocomposite, hybrid, and functional hydrogel systems and their general method of fabrications as well as their applications. In addition, it also shed some light on the fundamentals of hydrogels and nanoparticles (NPs) along with recent advances in the field of design, synthesis, functionalization, and application of nanocomposite hydrogels with improved characters (such as mechanical, biological, and physicochemical behaviors). Besides this, it also briefly states the current challenges and future opportunities for the successful applications of hydrogels (including composite- and nanocomposite-based hydrogel systems) in particular areas (such as industrial applications of cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels) [35, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65].

3 Cellulose Composite-Based Hydrogels

Cellulose, the most abundant natural biomass, possesses very promising properties, some of which include mechanical robustness, hydrophilicity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. Cellulose-based composites have many applications, for example, in drug delivery systems, hydrogels, electronic active papers, sensors, shape memory materials, and smart membranes. It also offers interesting potential improved properties and new functionalities when used in hydrogel formulations using appropriate methods. For example, cellulose-based stimuli-responsive smart materials can be used for hydrogel synthesis, and the hydrogels produced from these materials have many advantages, some of the most important ones include regulation of stimuli-responsive behaviors during the reactions with the environmental stimuli and wide application potentials of these smart materials in different fields (for instance, as biomaterials). Different methods can be used to incorporate different stimuli- responsive materials into the structures of cellulose composites in order to regulate different properties of the bulk composite structures which can be tailored to make them suitable properties for their use in composite-based hydrogel systems [66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132]. Environmentally stimuli-responsive cellulose composite-based hydrogels have many conventional and high-tech applications, but there are quite a lot of challenges in order to produce high-quality stimuli-responsive cellulose composite-based hydrogels that meet desired criteria and mitigate challenges. This chapter discusses different selective aspects of environmentally stimuli-responsive cellulose composites and their uses in hydrogel productions and their potential industrial applications.

3.1 Cellulose-Based Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels

The abundance of hydrophilic groups on the chains and slightly cross-linked structure hydrogels allows them to absorb large amounts of water which they can release at dry conditions. Hydrogels are also widely used in food, biomaterials, agriculture, and other industrial applications [6, 10, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247]. The syntheses and uses of hydrogels based on cellulose have been reviewed by other researchers [6, 10, 247], so some selective studies on stimuli-responsive hydrogels based on cellulose are briefly discussed. The superabsorbent nanocomposites based on CMC and rectorite also exhibited saline, pH, and organic solvent-responsive behaviors. Stimuli-responsive smart hydrogels based on cellulose nanocrystals contributed to improve the swell capacity and the mechanical strength of the hydrogels [133, 224]. Based on titanium dioxide-based coated, native nanocellulose aerogel networks, a novel photo-controlled switching between the water superabsorbent and water-repellent states has been reported [204]. In the stable state, titanium dioxide-based coated aerogels did not show any water absorption; however, the original absorption and wetting properties slowly recovered when stored in the dark. Besides this photo-induced absorption and wetting behavior, titanium oxide coated nanocellulose aerogels also exhibited photocatalytic activity and capability to decompose an organic material (such as methylene blue). Electrospinning or coating techniques have been used to prepare pH-responsive hydrogel fibers from cellulose which have potential applications in the fields of cotton knitwear and biomaterials [134, 156].

3.2 Applications of Environmental Stimuli-Responsive Cellulose Composites in Combination with Cellulose-Based Hydrogels

Cellulose-based biocomposites and nanocomposites have a very wide range of potential applications. For example, nanocellulose-based materials are extensively used in various applications including in the manufacture of paper and packaging products as well as in construction, automotive, furniture, electronics, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and biomedical applications. Additionally, they have very useful properties (e.g., the higher strength and stiffness, the higher surface reactivity due to the presence of numerous hydroxyl groups, the specific organization of the small dimensions of nanocellulose) suitable for reinforcement with nanofibers to enhance desired mechanical and physical properties for high-tech applications. Cellulose-based hydrogels can be used for coating and pretreatment on cellulose composite product for their various applications in different areas including (a) pharmaceutical products and packing, (b) specific high-quality papers for electronic and sensoric applications, (c) cellulose-based diagnostic chips for biomedical applications, and (d) cellulose-based specialty product for high-quality printing and packaging. Additionally, cellulose-based hydrogels produced from stimuli-responsive cellulose-based nanocomposites (responsive to pH, temperature, redox potential, light, magnetic field, and electrical field) have many potential applications in drug delivery systems, some of which include (a) promotion in controlled drug release and (b) controlled delivery in specific intracellular locations or to targeted tissues. Stimuli-responsive smart drug delivery systems have been intensively investigated and reviewed in recent years [237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245]. Additionally, when hydrogels produced from cellulose-based nanocomposites with capability to show responsive behaviors have unique properties, for example, (a) biocompatibility, (b) biodegradability, and (c) biological functions. This type of products has been successful to draw the attentions of many researchers all around the world to explore these materials for practical industrial-scale exploitations because of their attractive uses including drug delivery systems, tissue engineering, and related biomedical applications. For example, stimuli-induced self-assembly and post-assembly triggering strategies can be used as an alternative approach to manipulate self-assembled architectures of synthetic polymeric aggregates in drug delivery systems. The assembly of polymeric aggregates contributes to transmit and change hydrodynamic radius changes, so drugs loaded in the assembled polymeric aggregates can be used for a controlled release when they disassemble after they are exposed to particular environmental stimuli (such as temperature and pH). For example, Sui et al. studied the temperature- and pH-sensitive characteristic of cellulose-g-PDMAEMA by using UV detection and dynamic light scattering technique [158]. The lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of aqueous cellulose-g-PDMAEMA solution was measured to be 42 °C, and when the thermal environment was below this temperature, the solution was transparent, and the value of hydrodynamic radius increased slightly with temperature increase (25–40 °C). On the contrary, when the temperature was raised to the range of 42–55 °C, the solution became opaque, and the value of hydrodynamic radius increased abruptly. At a low temperature in the surrounding environment, the cellulose-g-PDMAEMA copolymer chains exhibited random coil conformation because of the hydrogen-bonding interactions between the copolymer and water molecules. However, when the temperature was raised to LCST, polymer chains showed a shrinking into a globular structure due to the hydrophobic interactions between N,N-dimethylaminoethyl groups. In addition, the cellulose-g-PDMAEMA was dissolved in aqueous hydrochloric acid (with pH 2.0 at room temperature) and was precipitated in an aqueous alkaline condition (pH 12.0). Moreover, at lower acidic pH, due to the geometrical constraint and the electrostatic repulsion between polymer chains, the PDMAEMA chains were entirely protonated and highly stretched along the radial direction. Yuan et al. reported the synthesis of amphiphilic ethyl cellulose brush polymers with mono and dual side chains, which showed promising properties with dual temperature and pH response [154].

Stimuli-responsive cellulose-based hydrogels or similar types of other hydrogel-based products with the capability to exhibit swelling or shrinking when exposed to external stimuli (such as pH, temperature, light, magnetic field, etc.) have many potential biomedical applications because of their unique characteristic properties (e.g., biocompatibility, biodegradability, and biological functionality) [10, 247]. The swelling and shrinking mechanism of hydrogels is similar to that of aggregate assembly usually observed during stimulus-induced intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen-bonding changes. Targeted drugs can be released controllably from drug-loaded hydrogel carriers when hydrogels swell to more loose structures when exposed to environmental stimuli (with a proper control on this stimulus). Similarly, redox-responsive hydrogels have many application potentials for controlled drug release [150]. In addition, stimuli-responsive cellulose-based hydrogels incorporated with functional microcapsules and nanoparticles materials have many practical application potentials in pharmaceutical industry. For example, magnetic-responsive systems are widely used to trigger drug release at target sites and can also be applied to concentrate the drug-specific-responsive carriers. Magnetic cores encapsulated with ethyl cellulose have the potential to improve the biocompatibility and 5-fluorouracil loaded in the nanoparticles for a controlled release on specific sites during treatment of cancer [236]. Magnetic particles coated with hydroxy propyl cellulose exhibited response to thermal and magnetic environments which have many potentials for nanomedical applications (e.g., remote-controlled drug carriers) [174]. This type of products has been investigated to functionalize hydrogels for advanced life science applications. Lastly, controllable pore size of stimuli-responsive membranes is highly used in drug delivery. For example, cellulose-based membranes produced by incorporating stimuli-responsive materials can change their pore size according to the environmental conditions [6, 155]. So, drug delivery systems based on smart stimuli-responsive membranes can be used for a controllable drug release by an effective control on the stimulus that control the nature of diffusion through the membranes. For example, when CMC ethers mixed with aspirin were pressed to the tablet membrane, they showed zero-order release of the drug based on pH-responsive properties. This reversible glucose responsiveness was attributed to the reversibility of swelling and shrinking of the nanoparticles in response to changes of pH [199]. They can also be used in cellulose-based stimuli-responsive hydrogel fabrications. Cellulose derivative-based membranes embedded with liquid crystal molecules also showed temperature-responsive drug permeation characteristics [183, 184]. Suedee et al. prepared an MIP incorporated cellulose membrane for enantioselective-controlled delivery of racemic drugs with pH-responsive characters where (S)-omeprazole was used as an imprinting molecule conferring stereoselectivity upon the polymers [185]. Cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels have the potentials to be incorporated with this type of advanced systems to offer higher functionality suitable for high-tech applications in different areas of biomedical and life sciences [6, 10, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 205, 206, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264]. Generally, different environmental stimuli (such as light, temperature, pH, and ionic strength) can be used as triggers for the formation of supramolecular hydrogels. Additionally, inherent biological processes can be used to synthesize supramolecular hydrogels that are useful for biomedical applications. Biomimicking biomacromolecular self-assembly (e.g., formation of collagen fibrils, the integration of enzymatic reactions with self-assembly of small molecules) is an important technique for formation of nanofiber networks that can be used to produce hydrogels under various conditions. Enzymatic reaction can be used to initiate the self-assembly of a derivative of Taxol in aqueous solution to form nanofibers for producing supramolecular hydrogel. Cellulose derivatives can also be used for producing composite-type biomimetic hydrogels [253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270].

4 Cellulose-Based Functional Hydrogels

Composite hydrogels are produced using a variety of ways where some principle techniques include the incorporation of a range of suitable compatible materials into hydrogel structure or the assembly of hydrogels with other suitable structures (such as electrospun nanofibers) for serving specific purposes. This type of composite hydrogels can be used in various uses in everyday life (e.g., superabsorbers, contact lenses, drug delivery) [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181]. This type of composite hydrogels can be further functionalized by incorporating additional functionalities to produce functionalized hydrogels for many conventional and high-tech applications. For example, some particular type of hydrogels can be easily functionalized by introducing responsive characters which can respond to external stimuli. Some cross-linked polymers are responsive to various stimuli including light, temperature, pH, pressure, chemical (certain), electrical field, magnetic field, enzyme, and biological agent. By the careful and controlled use of responsive characters of the hydrogels produced by using these responsive polymers, they (hydrogels) can be applied in many fields like drug delivery, tissue engineering, and purification and implementation as actuators and biosensors or for medical coatings. In addition, cellulose can be used in combination with other suitable polymers to produce composites which can be used for hydrogel preparations [6, 10, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 205, 206, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264].

4.1 CMC-Based Analyte-Sensitive Hydrogels

Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and their derivatives have the potentials for producing analyte-sensitive hydrogels that incorporate optical structures, and this type of hydrogels is particularly attractive for many emerging applications including their uses as sensing platforms for point-of-care diagnostics. In this case, the optical properties of the hydrogel sensors need to be rationally designed and fabricated using different techniques including (a) self-assembly, (b) microfabrication, and (c) laser writing. Main merits of CMC-based or similar other polymer-based photonic hydrogel sensors over the typically used conventional assay formats include (a) reusability, (b) free from labeling, and (c) quantitative as well as continuous measurement capability with potential for integration to equipment-free text or image display applications [253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264]. Here in this section of this chapter, we briefly explain different aspects of photonic hydrogels and their applications as sensors; we also present different important ways for the syntheses of CMC and other celluloses or polymers as well as quantum dot-doped composite hydrogel systems and their industrial applications. When photonic structures (such as quantum dots or functional molecules that can be modulated for photonic uses) are incorporated into CMC, cellulose, or other polymer-based hydrogel structures, this embedding or introduction causes certain level of change that contributes to alter the water contents and volumes of hydrogels and also changes the level of interactions with specific analyses. This phenomenon offers a potential new platform to fabricate different biomedical diagnostic devices (such as IVD devices). In general consideration, hydrogels are 3D polymer networks that can be used for variable volume changes by controlling the variations of Donnan osmotic pressures applied on the hydrogel systems [254, 255]. By careful design to incorporate different suitable materials (such as quantum dot and responsive polymers) into hydrogel structures, sensitive hydrogels can be prepared that will be responsive to a range of stimuli as well as clinically relevant analytes [255, 256]. When functional molecules (such as bioactive recognition molecules and stimuli-responsive polymers) are incorporated into hydrogels to provide bioactive functional properties, the produced hydrogels show responsive characters on exposure to external stimuli by changing their physical and chemical characters to certain extent [255, 257]. For example, functional materials like quantum dot-doped hydrogels are useful for the fabrication of optical signal transduction and reporting within one device. Different reports that deal with bottom-up or top-down nano-/microfabrication methods are available that studied the feasibility of fabrication techniques for the miniaturization and multiplexing hydrogel-based photonic structures [258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265]. By the interaction of a target analyte and modulating reflection, diffraction, refraction, surface plasmon resonance, or emission [266] characteristics, the volumetric change in the hydrogel structure can be monitored, and the change in optical properties can be used to work as transducers that provide the opportunity for spectroscopic analysis (such as the concentration of the analyte, when this type of hydrogels are used for quantitative analysis). Besides this, CMC- or similar other polymer-based photonic hydrogels have the potentials to be used as sensors for tuning and reporting visually distinguishable color changes with a scope for semiquantitative determination without the use of an equipment. CMC- or their derivative-based photonic hydrogel sensors can be used for different biomedical applications. These photonic hydrogels may also have optically active elements with capabilities in displaying 3D images or writing [267, 268, 269]. Hence, the development of photonic hydrogel sensors has immense potential for both equipment-free semiquantitative diagnostics and quantitative analyzers that are compatible with mobile spectrophotometers and smartphone readers [270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278]. The potential applications of photonic hydrogel sensors are not limited to medical diagnostics but also include veterinary testing, pharmaceutical bioassays, and biohazard and environmental monitoring. However, the main focus area of hydrogel sensors has been in the detection and/or quantification of chemicals and cells in medical diagnostics. For example, their potential applications in biochemistry and biology are monitoring enzyme activity and metabolites [279] and serum albumin ligand binding [280, 281, 282]. Another potential area of application of photonic hydrogel sensors includes the detection of biocontaminants, heavy metals, and nanoparticles in water or air. The development of environmental sensors is aligned with the strict regulations imposed by the European Union and the United States. Reusable hydrogel-based sensing of environmental contaminants is an emerging area that can significantly reduce the costs and turnaround time at resource-limited settings.

4.2 Quantum Dot (QD)-Doped Cellulose-Based Hydrogels

Quantum dots are often used for the functionalization of hydrogels including cellulose-based hydrogels. For example, Baruah et al. reported the synthesis of functionalized graphene oxide quantum dots (GOQDs)-poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) hybrid hydrogels by using a simple, facile, and cost-effective strategy [283]. They introduced GOQDs bearing different surface functional groups as the cross-linking agent into the PVA matrix for gelation. They synthesized four different types of hybrid hydrogels by using graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide, ester functionalized graphene oxide, and amine functionalized GOQDs as cross-linking agents. They found that the hybrid hydrogel prepared with amine functionalized GOQDs exhibited the highest stability compared to other hydrogels prepared by using other cross-linking agents. They used this stable hydrogel to explore the feasibility for an easy, simple, effective, and sensitive method for optical detection of M2+ (Fe2+, Co2+, and Cu2+) in aqueous media involving colorimetric detection. They observed that when the amine functionalized GOQD-PVA hybrid hydrogel was exposed to the corresponding solution of Fe2+, Co2+, and Cu2+, it showed, respectively, brown, orange, and blue color changes of the solutions and contributed to detect the presence of Fe2+, Co2+, and Cu2+ ions in the solutions. They also noted that this system can also be applied for sensing a mixture of coexisting ions in solution. It is possible that this piece of work can be extended to produce cellulose- and PVA-based composite systems for hydrogel formulations for detecting metal ions from solutions. El-Salmawi synthesized polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)-based hydrogel using three different techniques (freezing and thawing, electron beam irradiation or combined freezing and thawing, and electron beam irradiation) and then applied the hydrogel for particular applications [284]. Then she carried out a comparative study between the three techniques in terms of gel fraction (%) and swelling (%). She observed that the physical properties of the hydrogel showed improved results when the combination of freezing and thawing and irradiation was applied rather than just freezing and thawing or irradiation only. She examined the effects of temperature and soil fertilizers on swelling (%) in order to evaluate the usefulness of the hydrogel as a superabsorbent material for its applications in the soil. She also observed that the swelling ratio increased as the composition of CMC increased in the blend. During the study, she used the blend having the composition 80/20 (CMC/PVA) and examined its behaviors as a superabsorbent in the soil for agricultural applications. She also noticed that the water retention increased in the soil containing this hydrogel. Thus, this type of hydrogel can be used to increase water retention in desert regions [284].

4.3 Cellulose Nanocrystal (CNC)-Based Hydrogels

Cellulose-based nanocrystals are also used for the formulation of different types of hydrogels due to many advantages that include (a) low cost, (b) biocompatibility, (c) biodegradability, and (d) good mechanical properties and chemically reactive surfaces. In addition, cellulose nanocrystals are a promising class of nanomaterials that have a wide range of application potentials for a variety of industrial uses. Some of the main industrial uses include (a) food packaging, (b) personal care, (c) biomedical devices, (d) textiles, (e) separation technologies, (f) construction materials, and (g) paper and similar paper-based product industries [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264]. Cellulose nanocrystals have some significantly important characters (such as large aspect ratio, high strength, and lightweight) and also have the required capability to be chemical cross-linked in order to modify that chemical and physical properties. All these attractive features make cellulose nanocrystals attractive for their use in hydrogel formulations using different strategies including the injection of these materials into the structure of hydrogels and aerogels to produce desired technical characters (such as robust mechanical properties). Thus, it is a popular trend to use chemically cross-linkable cellulose nanocrystals as nanofillers to reinforce injectable hydrogels and also to use them in the production of nanofibers for all-cellulose nanocrystal-based hydrogels and aerogels for a wide range of conventional and high-tech applications. In addition, it is possible to produce a wide range of cellulose nanocrystal reinforced nanocomposites based on injectable polysaccharide hydrogels filled with aldehyde and functionalized cellulose nanocrystals that can simultaneously work both as nanofillers and cross-linkers to provide required level of technical performances to hydrogels produced by using these systems that have many industrial application potentials [161]. For example, in one investigation, hydrogels were produced using this theme that showed highly enhanced elastic moduli (>140% increase at peak strength) along with improved dimensional stability during swelling experimentations and also exhibited strong coherence, while unfilled hydrogels showed degradation over the same time period during experimentations. Besides this, hydrogels produced in this way were also suitable for cell culture and tissue engineering applications [161, 285].

4.4 Cellulose- and Other Polymer-Based Supramolecular Hybrid Hydrogels

Cellulose- and other polymer-based supramolecular hybrid hydrogels have been successful to draw active current research interests for a plethora of potential industrial applications. For example, functional materials like quantum dot (such as CdSe, CdSe/Zns, and CdTe)-doped hydrogels produced by using cellulose or other types of polymers have been actively investigated for different applications including biosensing or bio-labeling. Xie et al. fabricated a fluorescent supramolecular hydrogel by doping with CdTe [286]. In this study, they used mercaptan-ended poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(ε-caprolactone)-based synthetic amphiphilic block copolymer to stabilize colloidal QDs and studied the stability and fluorescent properties of the resultant colloidal QDs. Using a host-guest self-assembly technique between the amphiphilic block copolymers on the QD surface with the addition of cyclic oligosaccharide host molecule (α-cyclodextrin or α-CD), they fabricated a fluorescent supramolecular hydrogel and investigated its physical and chemical characters (such as spectral properties, rheological characters, gelation kinetics, and mechanical strength). This study showed new prospects to develop biocompatible optical materials with tunable fluorescent properties and mechanical properties suitable for various potential industrial applications [286]. For the first time, Chang et al. successfully fabricated strongly fluorescent hydrogels with quantum dots (CdSe/ZnS nanoparticles) using a mild chemical cross-linking method where CdSe/ZnS nanoparticles were embedded firmly in the cellulose matrices due to strong interactions between the CdSe/ZnS nanoparticles and cellulose after the hydrolysis of QD ligands. The cellulose networks in the hydrogels had a significant contribution to protect the structural integrity and photoluminescent properties of CdSe/ZnS in the hydrogel network. These composite hydrogels (QD-doped cellulose matrix-based hydrogels) showed strong photoluminescent properties that demonstrated different color changes depending on the size of the QDs. In addition, the hybrid hydrogels were transparent and had good compressive strength with a scope to fabricate safe and biocompatible biopolymer-quantum dot-based hydrogels with high level of photoluminescence for different potential applications [287].

4.5 Cellulose Hydrogels for Enzyme Sensing

Palomero et al. fabricated fluorescent nanocellulosic hydrogels based on graphene quantum dots for sensing enzymes (such as laccase) [288]. They developed a novel low-cost fluorimetric platform into the nanocellulosic hydrogel (using sulfur and nitrogen-codoped graphene quantum dots immersed into hydrogels) structure and applied it for the detection of the laccase enzyme. It is novel in the sense that usually used methods generally use catalytic activities for the detection of laccase that depend on surrounding environmental parameters. However, they used the fluorescence response of hydrogels that have graphene quantum dots (or GQDs) which worked as a luminophore for laccase. This type of hydrogels can be easily prepared, and they have enhanced fluorescence signal of GQDs that can avoid their self-quenching with stabilized fluorescence signals with relatively higher level of sensitivity toward laccase. They attributed this behavior to the noncovalent interactions between the sensor and the analyte that caused this significant quenching without peak shifts of GQD fluorescence through energy transfer. It is a simple cost-effective method that can be used to detect and stabilize laccase with a value addition to store and recycle enzymes [289].

5 Hybrid Cellulose Composites and Hydrogels

Both cellulose-based composites and nanocomposites are suitable candidates for different types of advanced composite hydrogel formulations for many potential industrial applications. This type of composite hydrogels provides a very good opportunity to functionalize them using many advanced materials (such as quantum dot, carbon nanotube, cyclodextrin, 2D layered materials, and biomaterials) for both conventional and high-tech applications. A composite or nanocomposite-based hydrogel has the beauty of the material often derived from the combination of dissimilar entities [131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289]. Different other techniques also can be used for the preparation of functionalized composite- and nanocomposite-based hydrogels, for example, (a) composite hydrogel systems doped with functional materials and (b) the functionalized composite or nanocomposite systems for the preparation of hydrogels. In this context, different aspects of quantum dot-doped cellulose nanocomposite systems and their potentials for hydrogel formulations along with their applications are briefly discussed here. Different ways are usually used to produce QD-doped cellulose-based nanocomposites for different industrial applications. For example, Hassan et al. investigated the preparation of new dendronized cellulose derivatives, which were used in the preparation of cadmium sulfide quantum dots/cellulose nanocomposites [106]. In addition, Ruan et al. investigated the preparation and properties of CdS nanocrystals/regenerated cellulose nanocomposites by using in situ synthesizing method during cellulose dissolution in NaOH/thiourea system [107]. Small et al. investigated the preparation of ZnS-doped nanocrystals and mechanical and optical properties of cellulose-ZnS: Cu and cellulose-ZnS: Mn nanocomposites [108]. In addition, Hasan et al. also reported CdS, ZnS, CdS/ZnS, ZnS/CdS (core/shell nanostructures), CdS/ZnS/CdS, and ZnS/CdS/ZnS multilayered nanostructures which were prepared at low temperature using cadmium chloride, zinc chloride, and sodium sulfide in the presence of hyperbranched polyethyleneimine (PEI) polymer. They also reported the method of the preparation of PEI-stabilized nanoparticle-doped functional cellulosic materials which could be used in different optical and electrical applications [109]. From these studies, it was reported that cellulose fibers/semiconductor nanocomposites made from impregnating bagasse pulp fibers and the prepared semiconductor nanostructures exhibited lower-strength properties than blank cellulose fiber sheets despite of the very low fiber loading with the nanoparticles. In addition, the optical properties of different cellulose/semiconductor nanocomposites were close to each other. Loading of cellulosic fiber with the prepared nanostructured semiconductors has no significant impact on the degradation onset temperature but increases the rate of thermal degradation. This kind of nanocomposite and the properties of the interphases have strong influence on the dielectric properties and interfacial polarization of cellulose fiber/semiconductor nanocomposites. All these nanocomposite systems have the potentials to be processed in suitable way to use them in composite- and nanocomposite-based hydrogel formulations for various applications [35, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185].

5.1 Modification of Hydrogel Properties by the Incorporations of Nanomaterials or Cellulose Nanocrystals into the Structures of Cellulose Composite or Nanocomposites

An important opportunity for the modification of hydrogel properties is simply by the incorporations of different functional materials (such as nanomaterials and cellulose nanocrystals) into the structures of cellulose composite or nanocomposites that are finally used in the hydrogel formulations using particular techniques. For example, different research groups used cellulose and cellulose polymers as a matrix for nanoparticles for a variety of reasons, including the natural abundance and biodegradability of cellulose. The application of cellulose as a polymeric matrix usually requires either the dispersion or the dissolution of cellulose and the concurrent or subsequent addition of nanoparticles/nanoparticle precursors. As, for example, clay particles have been added to NMMO-based solutions of cellulose, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites were synthesized by using a microwave assisted, one-step reaction where CaCl2, NaH2PO4, and MCC were added to N,N-dimethylacetamide solvent. CdS particles were prepared in NaOH/urea cellulose solutions and the regenerated cellulose films cast from the dispersion which showed the optical properties of CdS. In addition, all-cellulose nanocomposites were prepared by the selective surface dissolution of bacterial cellulose sheets and by the electrospinning of core-shell fibrous mats in which CNCs were sheathed by a shell composed of regenerated cellulose. There are a number of reports on the in situ synthesis of nanoparticles within solid cellulose scaffold, for example, (a) the preparation of superparamagnetic nanocomposite films by synthesizing iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticles within the pores of regenerated cellulose films; (b) the production of wet spun cellulose fibers from solution in NaOH/urea/H2O, followed by treatment in FeCl3 and NaOH in order to generate iron oxide particles using in situ technique; and (c) the preparation of CaCO3 cellulose nanocomposites by synthesizing CaCO3 nanoparticles in the presence of hardwood bleached Kraft pulp and carboxymethylated cellulose fibers [106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126]. The limited solubility of the cellulose curbs the applicability of cellulose nanocomposites, despite the successes achieved from using cellulose to prepare interesting and functional nanocomposites.

In this context, cellulose derivatives, which are soluble in solvents ranging from water to nonpolar organics, are more versatile and have the potential for improved compatibility with nanoparticles. Cellulose acetate has interesting properties, such as (a) transparency, (b) flexibility, and (c) easy processability. It has been used for the production of cellulose-based nanocomposites, for example, (a) melt intercalation of polymer, (b) extrusion followed by either injection or compression molding to create cellulose acetate-clay nanocomposites, and (c) incorporation of TiO2 particles into CA films in order to promote the enzymatic biodegradation of CA by cellulose. Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), a water-soluble cellulose derivative, has been reported to stabilize ZnO nanoparticle dispersions in glycerol plasticized-pea starch. CMC has also been used as the matrix in pH-sensitive superabsorbent nanocomposites containing attapulgites, in nanocomposites containing metals (Cu, Ag, In, and Fe), and in hydrogels cross-linked with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) which contained clay [110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 125, 126]. So, this type of modified composite and nanocomposites is interesting candidate for cellulose-based hydrogel formulations for different specific industrial applications.

5.1.1 Modifications of Polymer Characteristics by the Incorporation of Cellulose Nanocrystals in Different Polymer-Based Composites and Nanocomposites and Their Uses in Hydrogel Formulations for Various Industrial Applications

Different ways can be used to modify the characteristics of composite or nanocomposites, for example, by incorporating cellulose nanocrystals in structural compositions of composites and nanocomposites, and these modified systems can then be used for the fabrication of hydrogels for various industrial applications. The interesting properties of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs), such as the high strength, high aspect ratio, and huge surface area, have the potential to significantly improve the mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low CNC filler loadings. Percolation theory has been used to state the surprising reinforcement effects observed at low loadings of fibrous elements. Mechanical properties (e.g., strength and modulus) are optimal at or above the percolation threshold, where each CNC is, on average, in close contact with two others and a rigid, 3D, hydrogen-bonded network is formed within the polymeric matrix [113]. As with all nanocomposite materials, the main challenges are (a) the uniform dispersion of CNCs and (b) achieving good interfacial adhesion between CNCs and matrix, particularly if hydrophobic. Generally, CNC nanocomposites are either processed into films, by solvent casting, or fibers/fibrous mats, by electrospinning. Electrospinning is very promising due to the alignment of CNCs in the fibers which can enhance axisymmetric properties. One of the most straightforward methods for the preparation of polymeric nanocomposites which contain CNCs is the direct addition of CNCs into either a pre-polymer or polymeric solution. In order for a successful approach in this method, the CNCs must show dispensability in the polymeric phase.

CNCs synthesized from sulfuric acid hydrolysis which show colloidal stability in water are suitable for direct addition to an aqueous system, for instance, some CNC-based nanocomposites (which depend on the aqueous stability inherent to sulfuric acid hydrolyzed samples) are (a) films cast from mixtures of CNCs and aqueous poly(oxyethylene) solutions, (b) films of oriented CNCs in a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) matrix prepared by application of a 7T magnetic field during solvent evaporation, (c) fibrous mats electrospun from CNCs dispersed in aqueous PVA, and (d) films cast from CNCs which were dispersed in aqueous polyurethane solutions. Different methods are often used to disperse CNCs in nonaqueous media (such as hydrophobic solvents and polymeric matrices), some of which are (a) vigorous sonication to disperse freeze and/or vacuum dried CNC powders in solvents (e.g., ethanol), furfuryl alcohol, formic acid, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) [76, 77, 78, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141], or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which are compatible with a pre-polymeric/polymeric matrix, (b) the use of a surfactant, (c) solvent exchange of water for organic media such as toluene or DMF, and (d) surface grafting reactions to improve CNC compatibility with hydrophobic polymers. Different research groups have achieved some degree of success with each of these methods. However, the drying of CNCs results in aggregation and is very difficult to obtain; a complete reversion on re-dispersal remains uncertain whether graded solvent exchanges are truly able to produce stable CNC dispersions in organic media. For example, the stability of freeze-dried CNCs re-dispersed in polar organic solvents (e.g., DMF, DMSO) was attributed to the presence of residual water (~0.1%). Besides this, the surface modification of the CNCs is challenging due to limited dispersibility of CNCs in organic reaction media which is required to be surface specific in order to retain the colloidal nature of the particles. Additionally, the characterization of the modified product is also challenging due to the limitation of the use of usual techniques to colloidal particles; otherwise they may not possess the degree of sensitivity required to detect changes in surface groups which represent a small fraction of total atoms. As a result, direct observation of surface-modified CNCs is rarely reported in the literature but is instead inferred from observed changes in fundamental characteristic properties (e.g., stability, dispersibility, charge, the presence or absence of LC ordering). Research in this area is still in the initial stage, and it is expected that in the near future, suitable techniques for reliable production of stable dispersions at the percolation threshold will be discovered, as they are essential to produce homogeneous CNC-reinforced hydrophobic nanomaterials [123, 124, 125, 126, 135, 136]. It is highly envisaged that cellulose nanocrystal can be used along with quantum dots, and this combination can be used to dope a range of natural and synthetic polymers and processed accordingly for producing electrospun fibers from these doped polymers for a variety of applications. Electrospun nanofibers are popular as fillers for both composite and nanocomposite systems which can be processed to be used in hydrogel formulations. Additionally, electrospinning technique can also be used for fiber formations from certain type of specially designed hydrogels. Co-electrospinning technique has the feasibility to produce different composite scaffolds from polymer mixtures containing both hydrogels and solution or dispersion of another polymer for producing special type of scaffolds with selective targeted applications. Besides this, ultrashort protein fibers or similar type of biological or particular type of polymer-based fibers produced by electrospinning can also be directly used as special type of component in hydrogel fabrications [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 255].

5.1.2 Future Trends in the Developments of Functional Material (Such as Quantum Dot-Doped Polymers) and Cellulose Composite- and Nanocomposite-Based Hydrogels for Specific High-Tech Applications

Cellulose composites and nanocomposites have an increasing tendency of functionalization using a wide variety of materials, and they can also be extended for hydrogel formulation for large-scale industrial explorations for many interesting properties. Some of these properties include (a) the natural abundance of raw materials, (b) renewability, (c) low cost, (d) biodegradability, (e) biocompatibility, (f) low density, (g) outstanding elastic modulus (of such polymers), and (h) environmentally benign in character. These are some of the most important characters from different industrial points of view. In terms of functionalization, new materials evolve by the day due to tremendous advancement in different areas of science and technology. For example, new generation of 2D layered materials and nanotubes, advanced fluorescent materials, stimuli-responsive materials and polymers, polymer dot, carbon dot, and quantum dot is being targeted for the future focused advanced use of these materials. For instance, different selective features of quantum dot-doped cellulose-based hydrogels and their future application trends are discussed here.

Many future materials and devices based on QDs require their incorporation and organization in polymeric matrices (such as synthetic polymers, natural polymers like cellulose, and cellulose composites as additives). As a result, there is a growing need for photonic materials and devices which provide the required encouragement to the development of many different strategies to produce polymer/QD hybrid structures. The appropriate selection of a strategy depends primarily on the final application of the hybrid materials. For example, if the material is targeted for biological applications, in addition to its luminescence efficiency, the compatibility of the material with the biological systems is very important (such as some cellulose products show biocompatibility and are suitable to be used in biological applications when incorporated with quantum dots). The fabrication methods which have been reported to date have many merits and demerits. As a result, the development of new routes for the production of QD/polymer nanohybrid materials (e.g., quantum dots doped in the composition of cellulose and another suitable polymer-based nanocomposite) is a very important research topic as the simultaneous control over the size and shape of the matrix and over the amount, spatial distribution/localization, separation, and orientation of the QDs within the matrix still remains a challenge to be solved. In this context, it is important to note that an important study on flexible luminescent CdSe/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite membranes has been reported [290]. They successfully fabricated flexible luminescent membranes based on bacterial cellulose (BC) by using the in situ synthesis of the CdSe nanoparticles on the BC nanofibers [297]. By using X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), they observed that CdSe nanoparticles were homogeneously dispersed on the BC nanofibers. They also observed that the thermal stability of BC was greatly increased with the inclusion of CdSe nanoparticles. In addition, they noted that the CdSe/BC nanocomposite exhibited good photoluminescent properties and excellent mechanical properties. This study provided an effective method for the construction of flexible BC membranes with photoluminescent properties, which have promising application potentials in the fields of security papers, sensors, and flexible luminescent membranes. Additionally, the introduction of colloidal quantum dots into cellulose and other suitable polymer-based nanocomposite structures using different techniques including electrospinning technique provides many opportunities due to their potential industrial application potentials. For example, colloidal quantum dots (QDs) have garnered much attention in the recent times due to their attractive spectral properties leading to a wide range of potential applications in bio-imaging/sensing, display, telecommunication, and quantum cryptography. The colloidal QDs allow spin-coating-based processing, possibility of self-assembly, compatibility with silicon platform, and tunability in absorption and emission spectra and have become one of the most attractive nanoscale fluorescent emitters. While colloidal QDs have become one of the most attractive nanoscale fluorescent emitters, they have still not found widespread application in practical photonic devices. This is in part due to the difficulty in incorporating these QDs into photonic structures. In addition, practical ultrafast all-optical switches, modulators, flexible emitters, and room temperature single-photon sources using these QDs can be realized if they can be patterned into waveguide or microcavity structures. Recently there have been several attempts to achieve this goal by embedding QDs in a variety of photonic structures and hosts [86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 127, 128, 129, 130]. A significant challenge here is the incorporation of QDs into transparent host matrices without affecting their optical properties [101, 102, 103, 127, 128, 129, 130]. The achievement of monodispersity, high fill factor, and efficient charge injection is highly desired. In addition, embedding photon emitters in microcavities alters their emission properties due to the ability of these structures to confine and enhance electromagnetic fields. Recently, there have been several attempts to achieve this goal in QDs by embedding them in poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) spheres, silica microspheres, one-dimensional microcavities, two- and three-dimensional photonic crystals, and microdisk structures [86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100]. Most of the one-dimensional microcavity structures reported to date have used sputtered or thermally evaporated distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) mirrors. While they do give good reflectivity, often they have undesirable effects on the optical properties of the QDs through surface defects. In addition, these techniques also require multiple deposition systems. Hence, it is highly attractive to develop a low-cost technique for the fabrication of the microcavities which is compatible with the solution processing of the colloidal QDs. In addition, solution processing allows the fabrication of the microcavity on a wide variety of substrates including flexible ones (such as cellulose, paper, and cellulose composites). Besides this, there are studies which report the realization of a one-dimensional microcavity laser using colloidal InGaP quantum dots as the gain medium fabricated using spin coating and the development of photonic integrated circuits using colloidal CdSe quantum dot composites fabricated through soft lithography. These studies also discuss the effect of the host matrix on the luminescent properties of the QDs using steady-state and time-resolved luminescence measurements. Currently, polymer composites based on natural fillers (such as cellulose, natural polymers, etc.) have been successful to attract active research interest as alternative materials to glass- or synthetic fiber-reinforced plastics in several applications, mostly for automotive, appliance, and packaging products. In this case, one of the major advantages of using natural fibers is that these are biodegradable and renewable and exhibit low cost, low density, and high toughness. However, the low compatibility between fibers and polymer matrix contributes to the weak mechanical performances which limit the use of these materials. Surface modification of the fibers and/or polymer functionalization, as well as addition of compatibilizers, is usually required to improve the interfacial interactions between the components. In addition, when a quantum dot is used in order to make composite materials for advanced applications, a special care is needed to ensure that the functional behaviors are properly retained after the incorporation of quantum dots into the nanocomposite structure and their use in hydrogel fabrications using appropriate steps and techniques. This type of materials can also be used for aerogel fabrications. For example, photoluminescent cellulose aerogels of variable shape containing homogeneously dispersed and surface-immobilized alloyed (ZnS)x(Cu-InS2)1-x/ZnS (core/shell) quantum dots (QDs) have been reported by using different techniques, some of which are (a) dissolution of hardwood pre-hydrolysis Kraft pulp in the ionic liquid 1-hexyl-3-methyl-1H-imidazolium chloride, (b) addition of a homogenous dispersion of quantum dots in the same solvent, (c) molding, (d) coagulation of cellulose using ethanol as antisolvent, and (e) supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) drying of the resulting composite aerogels [107]. Wang et al. achieved both compatibilization with the cellulose solvent and covalent attachment of the quantum dots onto the cellulose surface through replacement of 1-mercaptododecyl ligands typically used in synthesis of (ZnS)x(CuInS2)1-x/ZnS (core-shell) QDs by 1-mercapto-3-(trimethoxysilyl)-propyl ligands. They also obtained cellulose – quantum dot hybrid aerogels where apparent densities were from 37.9 to –57.2 mg cm−3. In addition, their BET surface areas range from 296 to 686 m2 g−1 comparable with non-luminescent cellulose aerogels obtained via the NMMO, TBAF/DMSO, or Ca(SCN)2 route. They also observed that depending mainly on the ratio of QD core constituents and to a minor extent on the cellulose/QD ratio, the emission wavelength of the novel aerogels could be controlled within a wide range of the visible-light spectra. They also observed that higher QD contents led to bathochromic PL shifts and a hypsochromic shift with an increase in the amount of cellulose at constant QD content. In addition, the reinforcement of the cellulose aerogels and hence significantly reduced shrinkage during scCO2 drying is a beneficial side effect when using α-mercapto-ω-(trialkoxysilyl) alkyl ligands for QD capping and covalent QD immobilization onto the cellulose surface [104]. This type of functionalized cellulose composites has the potentials for advanced hydrogel or aerogel fabrications for many high-tech applications. For example, when the respective QDs are furnished with suitable functional groups grafting QDs onto the large surface of aerogels, it is possible that they can form covalent linkages with the solid aerogel network structure. In addition, synthesis of QDs through thermolysis in high boiling solvents is commonly accomplished by simultaneous introduction of nonpolar, hydrophobic ligands to support surface deactivation for preventing QDs from agglomeration which would negatively impact their photoluminescent properties. Hence covalent immobilization of QDs on the surface of solids requires the introduction of moieties that carry respective anchor groups which can be achieved either by inclusion of hydrophobic QDs into amphiphilic micelles leading to an interdigitated bilayer or by ligand replacement [104]. This type of cellulose-based gels is envisaged that can be made suitable to produce quantum dot-doped electrospun nanofibers using proper adjustment of chemistry, rheology, and electrospinning methods [127, 128, 129, 130]. Moreover, cellulose-based quantum dot-doped electrospun nanofibers can be used in particular type of composite hydrogel fabrications which are useful for light-emitting purposes with potential use in lab-on-a-chip devices and also in optical sensing applications [6, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272].

Electrospun polymeric nanofibers and their incorporation in different composite systems including hydrogels are attracting burgeoning interest as innovative nanoscale structures, exhibiting peculiar, smart properties useful for many applications, including sensing, tissue engineering, optoelectronics, and photonics [255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272]. In addition, the interest toward this class of nanomaterials relies on their physicochemical properties, on their high-surface-to-volume ratio, and on the availability of low-cost production techniques. Among different techniques, electrospinning offers a valuable compromise between throughput and control of the nanostructure composition, shape, and size. Hence, the application of the use of this technique in different aspects of hydrogel fabrications has some real significance in different areas. For example, the high stretching of the liquid jet using the electrospinning process can lead to anisotropic physical properties of the collected nanofibers and to enhanced optical and electronic features because of the peculiar macromolecular packing within the electrospun fibers. As emerging field, the development of light-emitting electrospun nanofibers for optoelectronics and photonics can be employed by using either optically inert polymers doped with low-molar-mass fluorescent molecules (typically organic dyes), inorganic quantum dots, etc. or organic semiconducting polymers or particular type of composite- or nanocomposite-based hydrogel systems. Hydrogel systems doped with polymeric nanomaterials have potential applications as submicron light sources, as waveguides, as active components of lasers and transistor devices with electrooptical interplay, and as nanoscale sensing elements with potentials for different industrial applications [6, 118, 161, 182, 183, 184, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285].

6 Selected Industrial Applications of Cellulose-Based Hydrogels

Cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels have a wide range of industrial applications. Some of the products are commercially available in the market, while some others are in the process of making their way into the market. A good number of patents relating to cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels have been granted for a wide range of applications where the main applications include (a) personal hygiene products, (b) water reservoir for agriculture, (c) drug delivery and other biomedical applications, and (d) separation membrane (as many promising applications such as protective barriers for volatile organic compounds spilled in the environment and as absorbents for waste oil) [28]. Some of these uses are briefly presented in Fig. 1 in a diagram where several selected applications of cellulose-based hydrogels are illustrated.
Fig. 1

Diagrammatic presentation of selected applications of cellulose-based hydrogels

6.1 Applications in Agricultural Sector

Cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels have the capability to retain enormous quantity of water in their structure which can be a blessing to the agricultural sectors in different part of the world where there is a chronic shortage of water especially in the area of irrigation and other similar uses. Many studies focused on the uses of cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels for enhancing the conditions of soils and related other properties which include (a) the changes of water content, (b) microbial activity of soil, and (c) comparative study on the nature of the crop yield from the soil before and after treatment with biomass. For example, one of the similar investigations revealed that the use of cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels was useful to the physical properties of the soil that contributed in crop yield [29]. A separate study observed the impact of the controlled uses of water resources in agriculture where cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels were rigorously studied for their efficient storage and a sustained release of water to the soil and plant roots and illustrated the potential use of superabsorbent hydrogels as water reservoir for controlled applications in agriculture [30]. Cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels can be used as carriers for pesticides which have many economic and sustainable implications in agricultural sector due to the possibility to encapsulate herbicides into the structure of the hydrogels in order to have effective influence on the release of herbicides. It is one of the cost-effective ways to control pest and weed in agriculture to avoid potential adverse environmental impacts [31]. For example, similar other related studies also focused on the uses of cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels on agriculture [32, 33, 34].

6.2 Personal Healthcare

One of the most common uses of superabsorbent hydrogels is in the field of personal healthcare since they can absorb and contain large amounts of fluid (e.g., urine, blood, secreted fluid from wound). Some of the usually used hygiene products include (a) disposable diapers, (b) female napkins, and (c) special type of absorbing materials used in wound dressing [4]. Currently, most widely used superabsorbent hydrogels for producing sanitary napkins are mainly based on acrylic acid- or acrylamide-based products, but they have a number of limitations including (a) higher cost, (b) poor biodegradability, and (c) less environmentally friendly. However, there are quite a few reports to enhance the quality of hydrogels and also overcome the limitations. For example, Liu et al. incorporated flax yarn waste into the structure of superabsorbent hydrogels suitable to use and develop sanitary products (such as sanitary napkins) with relatively higher level of biodegradability, superabsorbency, and fluid retention capability [35]. Over the times, relatively more convenient and comfortable disposable healthcare products have been developed, and now some of them are commercially available [36, 37, 38]. However, no commercially developed products are available in the market which show complete biodegradability; thus, cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels may provide some future product which can overcome some of these limitations.

6.3 Water Treatments

Cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels provide the opportunity to be used in water purification by removing pollutants (such as heavy metals) from the water sources and also by separating certain elements of the contaminated water. In order to carry out this type of activities, hydrogels are usually functionalized, for example, Zhou et al. synthesized novel magnetic hydrogel beads by blending chitosan with amine functionalized magnetite nanoparticles, carboxylated cellulose nanofibrils, and polyvinyl alcohol using instantaneous gelation technique. The resultant magnetic hydrogel beads showed the capability to absorb lead ions from polluted water due to the presence of numerous carboxylate groups and abundant hydroxyl and amino groups in the composite functionalized hydrogel structure [39]. Many other reports also indicated the scope of water purification to some extent using cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels [40, 41, 42]. However, new strategies are still required to develop water treatment using cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels.

6.4 Biomedical Applications

Cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels are good candidate, when biodegradability of a hydrogel is required or recommended because of their interesting properties including (a) low cost, (b) availability in large quantity, (c) biocompatibility, and (d) stimuli-responsive behaviors of some cellulose and their derivatives (present in the hydrogel) when exposed to external stimuli. In fact, cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels are frequently used in different areas of biomedical field, some of which include in drug delivery, tissue engineering, cell bioreactors, and micropatterning neural cell cultures. For example, He et al. fabricated the onion-like, multilayered tubular cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels. This study showed that the L929 cell could survive and proliferate in the larger interior space of the multilayer cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels which proved a great potential biomedical application [34]. Many similar studies also showed the practical and potential biomedical applications [34, 49, 50, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84].

6.5 Miscellaneous Industrial Exploitations

Besides the usual applications of cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels in hygienic and bio-related and agricultural uses, they also have applications in other areas including (a) pharmaceutical dosage forms; (b) separation technology; (c) textile, leather, and paper industries (such as in wastewater treatment); (d) water-swelling rubbers; (e) soft actuators/valves; (f) electrical applications; (g) construction, packaging, and artificial snow; (h) sludge/coal dewatering; (i) fire extinguishing gels; and (j) sensoric materials. In addition, many new advanced technologies are surfacing by the day which have industrial application potentials [6, 35, 61, 62, 63, 64, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 297].

7 Future Trends and Perspectives in the Applications of Cellulose-Based Hydrogels

Different selected aspects of superabsorbent hydrogels based on cellulose have been briefly discussed within this chapter. Cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels show some attractive characters that include (a) hydrophilicity, (b) biodegradability, (c) biocompatibility, (d) transparency, (e) low cost, and (f) environmentally friendly. As a result, this type of hydrogels is popular for various industrial applications which include (a) biomedical applications, (b) applications in the human body, (c) water purification, (c) applications in agriculture and horticulture, (d) personal healthcare, (e) water treatment, and (f) biomedical applications. The trend in future research on cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels is mainly focused on the design of novel materials and product in order to cater demands for different desired properties and also to demonstrate new functionalities with higher performances. These functional characters are likely to enhance their capacity to make them suitable for various applications including electronics and catalysis and also as chemical and biomedical sensors. In industrial applications’ point of view, cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels provide a new extended field of research to design and realize enhanced cost-effective product performance with respect to a number of areas including (a) biocompatibility and biodegradation, (b) higher mechanical, and (c) environmentally benign characteristics. In addition, another current research trend is to develop cellulose-based environmentally friendly cost-effective products with a desired design capability to replace available petroleum-based products in the foreseeable future. Continuous active research activities relating to cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels will contribute to realize this type of products in the near future [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 131, 161, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289].

Hydrogels based on cellulose composite and nanocomposites have also seen a notable upsurge in continuous active research activities for a wide range of industrial application potentials. During the past several decades, hydrogels and nanoparticles have already exerted a dramatic impact in biological, biomedical, pharmaceutical, and diagnostic fields. However, their some intrinsic shortcomings severely restrict their practical applications. Significant efforts have been paid to improve the performance of hydrogels and NPs. The fabrication of composite materials by combining two or more components in a single entity can surmount individual shortcomings and give rise to synergistic functions that are absent in the individual components. The incorporation of NPs in three-dimensional polymeric hydrogel matrix as an innovative means to obtain nanocomposite hydrogels with improved properties and multiple functionalities has gained enormous attention in many areas. On the basis of this review, we can found that various types of NPs, such as carbon-based NPs, silicon-based NPs, metal NPs, and polymeric NPs, are combined with the polymeric hydrogel network to create multicomponent systems. The porous structure and free space within the hydrogel networks can not only provide an ideal hydrated environment for the stabilization of NPs without aggregations or disintegration and the protection of NPs from degradation or denaturation but also work as a reservoir to localize NPs at the target site. More importantly, the coatings of hydrogels around the NPs endow a hydration layer, which often is an essential prerequisite for the biomedical and biological applications of inorganic and metal NPs, as the hydration layer can significantly improve the biocompatibility and reduce the cytotoxicity [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 71, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269].

On the other hand, the incorporation of NPs into hydrogels can not only markedly improve their mechanical, elastic, and adhesive properties as well as physicochemical and thermal stability but also promote the cell attachment and proliferation and improve drug loading capacity and drug release profiles. More significantly, the encapsulation of carbon, metal colloidal particles or quantum dots into polymer hydrogel networks will impart them with exclusive thermal, sonic, optical, electrical, or magnetic properties, which are not achieved by individual polymeric systems and are highly appropriate for various applications, especially for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Apparently, the benefits of the combination of NPs and hydrogels have resulted in generation of a new class of advanced materials with unique properties that have a wide spectral range of biomedical applications, ranging from controlled drug delivery depots, cell and tissue adhesive matrices, wound dressing and tissue engineering scaffolds, stem cell engineering and regenerative medicines, biosensors, actuators, and other biomedical devices. However, despite the vast potential applications of nanocomposite hydrogels in biomedical fields, there are still lots of challenges to be overcome before they can be applied in clinical use. For example, the improved performance of the nanocomposite hydrogels is mainly ascribed to the enhanced interactions between the NPs and polymer chains. Therefore, apart from particle parameters, the quantity and homogeneity of NP integration are still a matter of concern. To obtain excellent performance, NPs should be abundantly and homogeneously dispersed within the hydrogel matrix. However, due to a large surface area, hydrophobic NPs physically embedded in the hydrophilic polymer matrix often tend to aggregate, leading to the failure of anticipative enhancement of properties. Therefore, there is still a need to elucidate the mechanisms and interactions between NPs and polymer chains inside the nanocomposite hydrogels, and the simple, cost-effective, scalable, and reproducible preparations of nanocomposite hydrogels with desirable properties need to be investigated thoroughly. Apparently, the nanocomposite hydrogels combining the individual functions of NPs and hydrogels are ideal candidates for multimodal drug delivery platform with simultaneous capabilities in drug encapsulation, targeting delivery, photothermal therapy, and in vivo imaging. This synergistic performance is usually not be achieved by an individual. However, the more detailed pharmacological studies need to demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy and biological responses. In addition, most of the nanocomposite hydrogels have been performed only in vitro. Therefore, in future studies, the detailed performances (gelation time, swelling, elastic modulus, responsivity and functionality), long-term toxicity and biodegradability, as well as the biological properties such as protein adsorption, cell adhesion, tissue compatibility, and whole-body effect of such hydrogels under in vivo conditions should be clearly addressed. In summary, there should be a coordinated and comprehensive research to establish fundamental interactions among nanoparticulate materials, hydrogel matrices, and biological systems, before hydrogels will become practical and useful in this exciting field. All these challenges will drive the effective collaboration of scientists from the fields of chemistry, materials, engineering, biology, medicine, and nanoscience. We look forward to seeing many exciting research accomplishments in this burgeoning field of bio-related nanocomposite hydrogels [161, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289]. In addition, electrospun cellulose nanofibers have many exciting potential applications as reinforcements in nanocomposites and their applications in cellulose-based hydrogel fabrications in association with other natural and synthetic polymers in hybrid systems. These types of hybrid systems have a great variety of application potentials as very important materials where some of which include (a) materials for robust structures, (b) hierarchical materials, (c) electronic display materials, and (d) materials for energy harvesting. The potential mechanical properties of cellulose nanofibers compete well with other engineering materials and have many useful high-end technological applications. Proper dispersion of cellulose or other components of the cellulose-based nanocomposites is one of the critical steps in the production of cellulose nanocomposites and their use in the hydrogel fabrication for desired applications. For example, the layer-by-layer deposition technique offers a facile route to overcoming this, with remarkable percolation of cellulose nanowhiskers interacting with each other, and with the surrounding matrix, in a way that greatly improves the mechanical properties of the resultant material (such as when quantum dot-doped cellulose is also used as one of the constituents in the cellulose nanocomposite structure). Additionally, there are also some issues with the toxicity of quantum dots. However, many pieces of active research are going on in order to overcome these drawbacks. Besides this, cellulose nanowhiskers have a high-surface-area-to-volume ratio where the surface plays a vital role in not only the mechanical efficiency of stress transfer in a nanocomposite but also the ability to modify the surface chemistry. By grafting quantum dots to the surface of cellulose nanowhiskers, it may be possible to utilize self-assembly methods to generate new forms of composite biomaterials for a variety of applications (including biosensing, security, electronic display, and sensitive membranes for wastewater treatments). When the surface of nanowhiskers is chemically coupled with chromophores, it provides a route for successive dispersion of cellulose nanowhiskers in nanocomposite materials, and TEMPO oxidation also proves a means for isolating nanofibers. Similar type of technique can be used for chemical coupling of the surface of nanowhiskers using suitable quantum dots for a wide range of applications. Bacterial cellulose (BC) nanofibers are useful for the generation of hierarchical composites which offers a way for long micrometer-sized fibers for an effective use in composites by improving coupling between the fiber surface and the surrounding resin. BC nanofibers have also been shown to be useful for the generation of optically transparent and flexible composite films with low thermal expansion coefficients. Additionally, by the combination of these high stiffness fibrils with a cellulose matrix, excellent mechanical properties can be achieved for all-cellulose nanocomposites which can be further functionalized with the use of functional materials such as quantum dots for high-tech applications. This chapter has attempted to provide some specific information on the behavior of quantum dots and their applications along with the scope of doping them into polymers using different techniques using a special emphasis electrospinning technique and the use of quantum dot and cellulose for many advanced uses. This chapter has provided some very useful information on the scope and uses for quantum dot-doped cellulose nanofibers and their potential advanced applications in both composite- and nanocomposite-based hydrogels or as active components of the hydrogel where active current research is going on to realize the practical industrial application potentials. So, in the near future, we will see quite a lot of new progresses in the use of quantum dot-doped cellulose nanofibers or similar other functional material-based advanced systems for their applications in composites, nanocomposites, and hydrogel fabrications which can effectively overcome many of the current practical difficulties [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259].

Lastly, cellulose-based hydrogels are biocompatible and biodegradable materials which show promise for a number of industrial uses, especially in cases where environmental issues are concerned, as well as biomedical applications. Several water-soluble cellulose derivatives can be used, singularly or in combination, to form hydrogel networks possessing specific properties in terms of swelling capability and sensitivity to external stimuli. The current trend in the design of cellulose hydrogels is related to the use of nontoxic cross-linking agents or cross-linking treatments, to further improve the safety of both the final product and the manufacturing process. The smart behavior of some cellulose derivatives in response to physiologically relevant variables makes the resulting hydrogels particularly appealing for in vivo applications. In spite of the non-bioresorbability of cellulose, the possibility to functionalize cellulose-based hydrogels with bioactive and biodegradable extracellular matrix domains suggests that in the near future, such hydrogels might be ideal platforms for the design of scaffolding biomaterials in the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247].

8 Conclusion

Different selected aspects of superabsorbent hydrogels based on cellulose have been briefly discussed within this chapter. Cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels show some very attractive characters suitable for a wide range of industrial exploitations. This chapter has selectively covered some of these most commonly used industrial applications of cellulose-based hydrogels. Due to the limitation of the scope of this current chapter, detailed discussions on various aspects of different industrial applications are carefully avoided. However, some updated information along with references have been provided on different aspects of these industrial uses of cellulose-based hydrogels in order to provide more detailed information for interested readers.


  1. 1.
    Cipriano BH, Banik SJ, Sharma R, Rumore D, Hwang W, Briber RM, Raghavan SR (2014) Superabsorbent hydrogels that are robust and highly stretchable. Macromolecules 47(13):4445–4452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang M, Cheng Z, Zhao T, Liu M, Hu, Li J (2014) Synthesis, characterization, and swelling behaviors of salt-sensitive maize bran–poly (acrylic acid) superabsorbent hydrogel. J Agric Food Chem 62(35):8867–8874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun JY, Zhao X, Illeperuma WR, Chaudhuri O, Oh KH, Mooney DJ, Vlassak JJ, Suo Z (2012) Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 489(7414):133–136PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zohuriaan-Mehr MJ, Kabiri K (2008) Superabsorbent polymer materials: a review. Iran Polym J 17:451–477Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ohmine I, Tanaka T (1982) Salt effects on the phase transition of ionic gels. J Chem Phys 77(11):5725–5729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang C, Zhang L (2011) Cellulose-based hydrogels: present status and application prospects. Carbohydr Polym 84(1):40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duan J, Zhang X, Jiang J, Han C, Yang J, Liu L, Lan H, Huang D (2014) The synthesis of a novel cellulose physical gel. J Nanomater. Article ID 312696, 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meng H, Zhao Y, Duan J, Wang Z, Chen Y, Zhang L (2014) Fast contact of solid-liquid interface created high strength multi-layered cellulose hydrogels with controllable size. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(3):1872–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee J, Halake KS (2014) Superporous thermo-responsive hydrogels by combination of cellulose fibers and aligned micropores. Carbohydr Polym 105(5):184–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sannino A, Demitri C, Madaghiele M (2009) Biodegradable cellulose-based hydrogels: design and applications. Materials 2:353–373PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Richter A, Howitz S, Kuckling D, Arndt KF (2004) Influence of volume phase transition phenomena on the behavior of hydrogel-based valves. Sensors Actuators B 99(2–3):451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mao L, Hu Y, Piao Y, Chen X, Xian W, Piao D (2005) Structure and character of artificial muscle model constructed from fibrous hydrogel. Curr Appl Phys 5(5):426–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peppas NA (1997) Hydrogels and drug delivery. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 2(5):531–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Qiu Y, Park K (2001) Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 53(3):321–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wichterle O, Lim D (1960) Hydrophilic gels for biological use. Nature 185(4706):117–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chambers DR, Fowler HH, Fujiura Y, Masuda F (1992) Super-absorbent polymer having improved absorbency properties. US Patent 5145906Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    (a) Ago M, Okajima K, Jakes JE, Park S, Rojas OJ (2012) Lignin-based electrospun nanofibers reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromol 13(3):918–926; (b) Crawford RL (1981) Lignin biodegradation and transformation. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    (a) Harris D, Bulone V, Ding S-Y, DeBolt S (2010) Tools for cellulose analysis in plant cell walls. Plant Physiol 153:420–426; (b) Payen A (1838) Mémoire sur la composition du tissu propre des plantes et du ligneux. Comptes Rendus 7:1052–1056Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    (a) Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsenf J, Youngblood, J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994; (b) Dorée C (1947) The methods of cellulose chemistry. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    (a) Ten E, Vermerris W (2013) Functionalized polymers from lignocellulosic biomass: state of the art. Polymers 5:600–642; (b) The Merck Index (1968) Merck & Co, Rahway, 8th ednGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    (a) Deng L, Young RJ, Kinloch IA, Abdelkader AM, Holmes SM, Rio DAD H-D, Eichhorn SJ (2013) Supercapacitance from cellulose and carbon nanotube nanocomposite fibers. ACS Appl Mater Interf 5:9983–9990; (b) Singh AV, Rahman A, Kumar NVGS, Aditi AS, Galluzzi M, Bovio SS, Barozzi S, Montani E, Parazzoli D (2012) Bio-inspired approaches to design smart fabrics. Mater Des 36:829–839
  22. 22.
    Visakh PM, Thomas S (2010) Preparation of bionanomaterials and their polymer nanocomposites from waste and biomass. Waste Biomass Valorization 1(1):121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Williams GI, Wool RP (2000) Composites from natural fibers and soy oil resins. Appl Compos Mater 7(5–6):421–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    (a) Torres FG, Diaz RM (2004) Morphological characterisation of natural fibre reinforced thermoplastics (NFRTP) processed by extrusion, compression and rotational moulding. Polym Polym Compos 12(8):705–718; (b) Rong MZ, Zhang MQ, Liu Y, Yang GC, Zeng HM (2001) The effect of fiber treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional sisal-reinforced epoxy composites. Compos Sci Tech 61:1437–1447Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S, Gindl W, Keckes VJ, Yano H, Abe K, Nogi M, Nakagaito AN, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight AS, Bismarck A, Berglund LA, Peijs T (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibers and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Baley C (2002) Analysis of the flax fibres tensile behaviour and analysis of the tensile stiffness increase. Compos Part A 33(7):939–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lamy B, Baley C (2000) Stiffness prediction of flax fibers-epoxy composite materials. J Mater Sci Lett 19(11):979–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ono T, Sugimoto T, Shinkai S, Sada K (2007) Lipophilic polyelectrolyte gels as super-absorbent polymers for nonpolar organic solvents. Nat Mater 6(6):429–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li X, He JZ, Hughes JM, Liu Y-R, Zheng Y-M (2014) Effects of superabsorbent polymers on a soil–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) system in the field. Appl Soil Ecol 73(2014):58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Demitri C, Scalera F, Madaghiele M, Sannino A, Maffezzoli A (2013) Potential of cellulose-based superabsorbent hydrogels as water reservoir in agriculture. Int J Polym Sci 2013:435073, 6 pagesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li J, Jiang M, Wu H, Li Y (2009) Addition of modified bentonites in polymer gel formulation of 2, 4-D for its controlled release in water and soil. J Agric Food Chem 57(7):2868–2874PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li J, Li Y, Dong H (2008) Controlled release of herbicide acetochlor from clay/carboxymethylcellulose gel formulations. J Agric Food Chem 56(4):1336–1342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lafah WA, Hashim S (2013) Preparation and possible agricultural applications of polymer hydrogel composite as soil conditioner. Adv Mater Res 626:6–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bortolin A, Aouada FA, Mattoso LH, Rebeiro C (2013) Nanocomposite PAAm/methyl cellulose/montmorillonite hydrogel: evidence of synergistic effects for the slow release of fertilizers. J Agric Food Chem 61(31):7431–7439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liu H, Zhang Y, Yao J (2014) Preparation and properties of an eco-friendly superabsorbent based on flax yarn waste for sanitary napkin applications. Fiber Polym 15(1):145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bissah K, Davies P, Hernandez FJV, Paque FW (2014) Absorbent article including an absorbent core layer having a material free zone and a transfer layer arranged below the absorbent core layer. US Patent 8,764,719, pp 7–1Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lavash BW (2014) Sanitary napkin for dynamic body fit. US Patent 8,808,264, pp 8–19Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Warren R, Hammons JL, Blevins JM (2014) Skin care compositions on a thin sanitary napkin. US Patent 8,795,716, pp 8–5Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhou Y, Fu S, Zhang L, Zhan H, Levit MV (2014) Use of carboxylated cellulose nanofibrils-filled magnetic chitosan hydrogel beads as adsorbents for Pb (II). Carbohydr Polym 101:75–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kamel S, Hassan EM, El-Sakhawy M (2006) Preparation and application of acrylonitrile-grafted cyanoethyl cellulose for the removal of copper (II) ions. J Appl Polym Sci 100(1):329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rohrbach K, Li Y, Zhu H, Liu Z, Dai J, Andreasen J, Hu L (2014) A cellulose based hydrophilic, oleophobic hydrated filter for water/oil separation. Chem Commun 50(87):13296–13299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Persin Z, Maver U, Pivec T, Vesel A, Mozetič M, Stana-Kleinschek K (2014) Novel cellulose based materials for safe and efficient wound treatment. Carbohydr Polym 100:55–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    He M, Zhao Y, Duan J, Duan J, Wang Z, Chen Y, Zhang L (2014) Fast contact of solid – liquid interface created high strength multi-layered cellulose hydrogels with controllable size. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(3):1872–1878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yang X, Bakaic E, Hoare T, Cranston ED (2013) Injectable polysaccharide hydrogels reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals: morphology, rheology, degradation, and cytotoxicity. Biomacromolecules 14(12):4447–4455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Eyholzer C, Borges de Couraca A, Duc F, Bourban PE, Tingaut P, Zimmermann T, Månson JAE, Oksman K (2011) Biocomposite hydrogels with carboxymethylated, nanofibrillated cellulose powder for replacement of the nucleus pulposus. Biomacromolecules 12(5):1419–1427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lin N, Dufresne A (2013) Supramolecular hydrogels from in situ host–guest inclusion between chemically modified cellulose nanocrystals and cyclodextrin. Biomacromolecules 14(3):871–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Oliveira VA, Veloso TC, Leao VA, dos Santos CG, Botaro VR (2013) Hydrogels of cellulose acetate crosslinked with pyromellitic dianhydride: part I: synthesis and swelling kinetics. Quim Nova 36(1):102–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Haque A, Morris ER (1993) Thermogelation of methylcellulose. Part I: molecular structures and processes. Carbohydr Polym 22(3):161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Joshi SC (2011) Sol-gel behavior of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) in ionic media including drug release. Materials 4(10):1861–1905PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jackson JK, Letchford K, Wasserman BZ, Ye L, Hamad WY, Burt HM (2011) The use of nanocrystalline cellulose for the binding and controlled release of drugs. Int J Nanomedicine 6:321–330PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zohuriaan-Mehr MJ, Omidian H, Doroudiani S, Kabiri K (2010) Advances in non-hygienic applications of superabsorbent hydrogel materials. J Mater Sci 45(21):5711–5735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ngwuluka NC, Choonara YE, Kumar P, Modi G, du Toit LC, Pillay V (2013) A hybrid methacrylate-sodium carboxymethylcellulose interpolyelectrolyte complex: rheometry and in silico disposition for controlled drug release. Materials 6(10):4284–4308PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sklenář Z, Vitková Z, Herdová P, Horáčková K, Šimunková V (2013) Formulation and release of alaptide from cellulose-based hydrogels. Acta Vet Brno 81(3):301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Appel EA, Forster RA, Rowland MJ, Scherman OA (2014) The control of cargo release from physically crosslinked hydrogels by crosslink dynamics. Biomaterials 35(37):9897–9903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Patenaude M, Hoare T (2012) Injectable, mixed natural synthetic polymer hydrogels with modular properties. Biomacromolecules 13(2):369–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Spagnol C, Rodrigues FHA, Neto AGV (2012) Nanocomposites based on poly (acrylamide-co-acrylate) and cellulose nanowhiskers. Eur Polym J 48(3):454–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Spagnol C, Rodrigues FHA, Pereira AGB, Fajardo A, Rubira A, Muniz E (2012) Superabsorbent hydrogel composite made of cellulose nanofibrils and chitosan-graft-poly (acrylic acid). Carbohydr Polym 87(3):2038–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wang Y, Shi X, Wang W, Wang A (2013) Synthesis, characterization, and swelling behaviors of a pH responsive CMC-g-poly (AA-co-AMPS) superabsorbent hydrogel. Turk J Chem 37(1):149–159Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hebeish A, Farag S, Sharaf S, Shaheen THI (2014) Thermal responsive hydrogels based on semi interpenetrating network of poly (NIPAm) and cellulose nanowhiskers. Carbohydr Polym 102:159–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tang H, Chen H, Duan B, Zhang L (2014) Swelling behaviors of superabsorbent chitin/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels. J Mater Sci 49(5):2235–2242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    De France KJ, Hoare T, Cranston ED (2017) Review of hydrogels and aerogels containing nanocellulose. Chem Mater 29(11):4609–4631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40(7):3941–3994PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50(24):5438–5466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    (a) Plackett DV, Letchford K, Jackson JK, Burt HMA (2014) Review of nanocellulose as a novel vehicle for drug delivery. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29(1):105–118; (b) Jorfi M, Foster EJ (2015) Recent advances in nanocellulose for biomedical applications. J Appl Polym Sci 132:41719–41737Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bissah K, Davies P, Hernandez FJV, Paques FW (2014) Absorbent article including an absorbent core layer having a material free zone and a transfer layer arranged below the absorbent core layer. US Patent 8,764,719, pp 7–1Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S, Gindl W, Veigel S, Keckes J, Yano H, Abe K, Nogi M, Nakagaito AN, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight AS, Bismarck A, Berglund LA, Peijs T (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45(1):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Koski A, Yim K, Shivkumar S (2004) Effect of molecular weight on fibrous PVA produced by electrospinning. Mater Lett 58:493–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Mbhele ZH, Salemane MG, van Sittert CGCE, Nedeljkovi JM, Djokovi V, Luyt AS (2003) Fabrication and characterization of silver-polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposites. Chem Mater 15:5019–5024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Li D, Xia Y (2004) Electrospinning of nanofibers: reinventing the wheel? Adv Mater 16:1151–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Agarwal S, Wendorff JH, Greiner A (2008) Use of electrospinning technique for biomedical applications. Polymer 49:5603–5621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Li D, Wang Y, Xia Y (2003) Electrospinning of polymeric and ceramic nanofibers as uniaxially aligned arrays. Nano Lett 3(8):1167–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Pinto NJ, Johnson JAT, McDiarmid AG, Mueller CH, Theofylaktos N, Robinson DC, Miranda FA (2003) Electrospun polyaniline/polyethylene oxide nanofiber field-effect transistor. Appl Phys Lett 83:4244–4246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Guo Z, Zhang D, Wei S, Wang Z, Karki AB, Li Y, Bernazzani P, Young DP, Gomes J, Cocke D, Ho TC (2010) Effects of iron oxide nanoparticles on polyvinyl alcohol: interfacial layer and bulk nanocomposites thin film. J Nanopart Res 12:2415–2426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Teo WE, Ramakrishna SA (2006) Review on electrospinning design and nanofibre assemblies. Nanotechnology 17:89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Doshi J, Reneker DH (1995) Electrospinning process and applications of electrospun fibers. J Electrost 35:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ramakrishna S, Fujihara K, Teo WE, Yong T, Ma Z, Ramaseshan R (2006) Electrospun nanofibers: solving global issues. Mater Today 9:40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Greiner A, Wendorff JH (2007) Electrospinning: a fascinating method for the preparation of ultrathin fibers. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:5670–5703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Zuo W, Zhu M, Yang W, Yu H, Chen Y, Zhang Y (2005) Experimental study on relationship between jet instability and formation of beaded fibers during electrospinning. Polym Eng Sci 45:704–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    (a) Deitzel JM, Kleinmeyer J, Harris D, Beck TNC (2001) The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles. Polymer 42:261–272; (b) Lin T, Wang H, Wang H, Wang X, Brenner MP (2004) The charge effect of cationic surfactants on the elimination of fibre beads in the electrospinning of polystyrene. Nanotechnology 15:1375–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Yang Z, Chen S, Hu W, Yin N, Zhang W, Xiang C, Wang H (2012) Flexible luminescent CdSe/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite membranes. Carbohydr Polym 88(1):173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Hohman MM, Shin M, Rutledge G, Brenner MP (2001) Electrospinning and electrically forced jets. I. Stability theory. Phys Fluids 13:2201–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Hohman MM, Shin M, Rutledge G (2001) Electrospinning and electrically forced jets. II. Appl Phys Fluid 13:2221–2236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Reneker DH, Yarin AL, Fong H, Koombhongse S (2000) Bending instability of electrically charged liquid jets of polymer solutions in electrospinning. J Appl Phys 87:4531–4547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Yarin AL, Koombhongse S, Reneker DH (2001) Bending instability in electrospinning of nanofibers. J Appl Phys 89:3018–3026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Kim GM, Lach R, Michler GH, Poetschke P, Albrecht K (2006) Relationships between phase morphology and deformation mechanisms in polymer nanocomposite nanofibres prepared by an electrospinning process. Nanotechnology 17:963–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Appell D (2002) Wired for success. Nature 419:553–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Law M, Sirbuly DJ, Johnson JC, Goldberger J, Saykally RJ, Yang P (2004) Nanoribbon waveguides for subwavelength photonics integration. Science 305:1269–1273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Xia Y, Yang P, Sun Y, Wu Y, Mayers B, Gates B, Yin Y, Kim F, Yan Y (2003) One dimensional nanostructures: synthesis, characterization, and applications. Adv Mater 15:353–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Huang Y, Duan X, Cui Y, Lauhon L, Kim KH, Lieber C (2001) Logic gates and computation from assembled nanowire building blocks. Science 294:1313–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Wang J, Gudiksen M, Duan X, Cui Y, Lieber C (2001) Highly polarized photoluminescence and photodetection from single indium phosphide nanowires. Science 293:1455–1457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Kind H, Yan H, Messer B, Law M, Yang P (2002) Nanowire ultraviolet photodetectors and optical switches. Adv Mater 14:158–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Law M, Kind H, Messer B, Kim H, Yang P (2002) Photochemical sensing of NO2 with SnO2 nanoribbon nanosensors at room temperature. Angew Chem Int Ed 41:2405–2408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Zhang JP, Chu DY, Wu SL, Ho ST, Bi WG, Tu CW, Tiberio RC (1995) Photonic wire laser. Phys Rev Lett 75:2678–2681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Duan X, Huang Y, Agarwal R, Lieber CM (2003) Single-nanowire electrically driven lasers. Nature 421:241–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Tong L, Gattass RR, Ashcom JB, He S, Lou J, Shen M, Maxwell I, Mazur E (2003) Subwavelength-diameter silica wires for low-loss optical wave guiding. Nature 426:816–819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Pyayt B, Wiley Y, Xia A, Chen T, Dalton L (2008) Integration of photonic and silver nanowire plasmonic waveguides. Nat Nanotechnol 3:660–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Brambilla G, Xu F, Feng X (2006) Fabrication of optical fiber nanowires and their optical and mechanical characterization. Electron Lett 42:517–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Tong L, Lou J, Gattass RR, He S, Chen X, Liu L, Mazur E (2005) Assembly of silica nanowires on silica aerogels for microphotonic devices. Nano Lett 5:259–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Li Y, Tong L (2008) Mach-Zehnder interferometers assembled with optical microfibers or nanofibers. Opt Lett 33:303–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Harfenist SA, Cambron SD, Nelson EW, Berry SM, Isham AW, Crain MM, Walsh KM, Keynton RS, Cohn RW (2004) Direct drawing of R. W. suspended filamentary micro- and nanostructures from liquid polymers. Nano Lett 4:1931–1937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Liu H, Edel JB, Bellan LM, Craighead HG (2006) Electrospun polymer nanofibers as subwavelength optical waveguides incorporating quantum dots. Small 2:495–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Xing XB, Wang YQ, Zhu H, Li BJ (2008) Nanofiber drawing and nanodevice assembly in poly(trimethylene terephthalate). Opt Express 16:10815–10822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Xing XB, Zhu H, Wang YQ, Li BJ (2008) Ultra compact photonic coupling splitters twisted by PTT nanowires. Nano Lett 8:2839–2843PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Wang H, Shao Z, Bacher M, Liebner F, Rosenau T (2013) Fluorescent cellulose aerogels containing covalently immobilized (ZnS)x(CuInS2)1-x/ZnS (core/shell) quantum dots. Cellulose 20:3007–3024PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Billah SMR, Thompson RL, Kimani SM, Hutchings LH, Wu J (2013) Influences of polyethylene functionalisation on silica nanocomposites. In: IUPAC 10th international conference on advanced polymers via macromolecular engineering, Durham, 18–22 Aug 2013Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Hassan ML, Ward AA, Eid MA (2010) Mechanical, optical, and electrical properties of cellulosic semiconductor nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 115:2847–2854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Ruan D, Huang Q, Zhang L (2005) Structure and properties of CdS/regenerated cellulose nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng 290(10):1017–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Small AC, Johnston JH (2008) Novel hybrid materials of cellulose fibres and doped ZnS nanocrystals. Curr Appl Phys 8(3–4):512–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Hassan ML, Ali AF (2008) Synthesis of nanostructured cadmium and zinc sulfides in aqueous solutions of hyperbranched polyethyleneimine. J Cryst Growth 310:5252–5258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Wang W, Wang A (2010) Nanocomposite of carboxymethyl cellulose and attapulgite as a novel pH-sensitive superabsorbent: synthesis, characterization and properties. Carbohydr Polym 82:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Nadagouda MN, Varma RS (2007) Synthesis of thermally stable carboxymethyl cellulose/metal biodegradable nanocomposites for potential biological applications. Biomacromolecules 8(9):2762–2767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Chang C, Han K, Zhang L (2011) Structure and properties of cellulose/poly(N- isopropylacrylamide) hydrogels prepared by IPN strategy. Polym Adv Technol 22(9):1329–1334Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Dong H, Strawheckera KE, Snydera JF, Orlicki JA, Reiner RS, Rudie AW (2012) Cellulose nanocrystals as a reinforcing material for electrospun poly(methyl methacrylate) fibers: formation, properties and nanomechanical characterization. Carbohydr Polym 87:2488–2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Domingues RMA, Gomes ME, Reis RL (2014) The potential of cellulose nanocrystals in tissue engineering strategies. Biomacromolecules 15(7):2327–2346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Salas C, Nypelö T, Rodriguez-Abreu C, Carrillo C, Rojas OJ (2014) Nanocellulose properties and applications in colloids and interfaces. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 19(5):383–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Peresin MS, Vesterinen A-H, Habibi Y, Johansson L-S, Pawlak JJ, Nevzorov AA, Rojas OJ (2014) Crosslinked PVA nanofibers reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals: water interactions and thermomechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 131(11):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Abitbol T, Wilson JT, Gray DG (2011) Electrospinning of fluorescent fibers from CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in cellulose triacetate. J Appl Polym Sci 119(2):803–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Smart CL, Zellner CNC (1971) Cellulose triacetate fibers. In: Bikales NM, Segal L (eds) Cellulose and cellulose derivatives, vol 5. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 1151–1167Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Iwamoto S, Lee S-H, Endo T (2014) Relationship between aspect ratio and suspension viscosity of wood cellulose nanofibers. Polym J 46:73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Steinmeier H (2004) 3. Acetate manufacturing, process and technology, 3.1 chemistry of cellulose acetylation. In: Rustemeyer P (ed) Cellulose acetates: properties and applications. Wiley-VCH, Heidelberg, pp 39–60Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Zugenmaier P (2004) Characteristics of cellulose acetates. In: Rustemeyer P (ed) Cellulose acetates: properties and applications. Wiley-VCH, Heidelberg, pp 81–166Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Hiatt GD, Rebel WJB (1971) Esters. In: Bikales NM, Segal L (eds) Cellulose and cellulose derivatives, vol V. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 741–784Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Abitbol T, Gray DG (2007) CdSe/ZnS quantum dots embedded in cellulose triacetate films with hydrophilic surfaces. Chem Mater 19(17):4270–4276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Abitbol T, Gray DG (2009) Incorporation into paper of cellulose triacetate films containing semiconductor nanoparticles. Cellulose 16(2):319–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Taajamaa L, Kontturi E, Lainea J, Rojas OJ (2012) Bicomponent fibre mats with adhesive ultra-hydrophobicity tailored with cellulose derivatives. J Mater Chem 22:12072–12082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Han SO, Son WK, Youk JH, Lee TS, Park WH (2005) Ultrafine porous fibers electrospun from cellulose triacetate. Mater Lett 59(24–25):2998–3001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Chu YC, Wang CC, Chen CY (2005) Synthesis of luminescent and rodlike CdS nanocrystals dispersed in polymer templates. Nanotechnology 16:58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Zhao X, Ding X, Deng Z, Zheng Z, Peng Y, Tian C, Long X (2006) A kind of smart gold nanoparticle–hydrogel composite with tunable thermo-switchable electrical properties. New J Chem 30:915–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Shimmin RG, Vajtai R, Siegel RW, Braun PV (2007) Room-temperature assembly of germanium photonic crystals through colloidal crystal templating. Chem Mater 19:2102–2107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Park JJ, Prabhakaran P, Jang KK, Lee YG, Lee J, Lee KH, Hur J, Kim JM, Cho N, Son Y, Yang DY, Lee KS (2010) Photopatternable quantum dots forming quasi-ordered arrays. Nano Lett 10(7):2310–2317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Kabiri K, Omidian H, Zohuriaan-Mehr MJ, Doroudiani S (2011) Superabsorbent hydrogel composites and nanocomposites: a review. Polym Compos 32(2):277–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Billah SMR, Cameron NR, Przyborski SA, Humphrey EH, Tams DH (2013) Photochromic dye-doped electrospun nanofibre-based scaffolds for cell culture, security and optical data storage applications. In: IUPAC 10th international conference on advanced polymers via macromolecular engineering, Durham, 18–22 Aug 2013Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Cha R, He Z, Ni Y (2012) Preparation and characterization of thermal/pH-sensitive hydrogel from carboxylated nanocrystalline cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 88:713–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Gorgieva S, Kokol V (2011) Synthesis and application of new temperature-responsive hydrogels based on carboxymethyl and hydroxyethyl cellulose derivatives for the functional finishing of cotton knitwear. Carbohydr Polym 85:664–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Sannino A, Pappadà S, Giotta L, Valli L, Maffezzoli A (2007) Spin coating cellulose derivatives on quartz crystal microbalance plates to obtain hydrogel-based fast sensors and actuators. J Appl Polym Sci 106:3040–3050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Chang C, He M, Zhou J, Zhang L (2011) Swelling behaviors of pH- and salt- responsive cellulose-based hydrogels. Macromolecules 44:1642–1648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Chang C, Duan B, Cai J, Zhang L (2010) Superabsorbent hydrogels based on cellulose for smart swelling and controllable delivery. Eur Polym J 46:92–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Pourjavadi A, Barzegar S, Mahdavinia GR (2006) MBA-crosslinked Na-Alg/CMC as a smart full-polysaccharide superabsorbent hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym 66:386–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Fang A, Cathala B (2011) Smart swelling biopolymer microparticles by a microfluidic approach, synthesis, in situ encapsulation and controlled release. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 82:81–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Salmawi KME, Ibrahim SM (2011) Characterization of superabsorbent carboxymethyl cellulose/clay hydrogel prepared by electron beam irradiation. Macromol Res 19:1029–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Liao Q, Shao Q, Qiu G, Lu X (2012) Methacrylic acid-triggered phase transition behavior of thermosensitive hydroxypropylcellulose. Carbohydr Polym 89:1301–1304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Chen Y, Ding D, Mao Z, He Y, Hu Y, Wu W, Jiang X (2008) Synthesis of hydroxypropylcellulose-poly(acrylic acid) particles with semi-interpenetrating polymer network structure. Biomacromolecules 9:2609–2614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Demirel GB, Caykara T, Demiray M, Guru M (2009) Effect of pore-forming agent type on swelling properties of macroporous poly(N-[3-(dimethylaminopropyl)]- methacrylamide-co-acrylamide) hydrogels. J Macromol Sci A Pure Appl Chem 46:58–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Chauhan GS, Mahajan S (2002) Structural aspects and nature of swelling medium as equilibrium swelling determinants of acrylamide and cellulosic based smart hydrogels. J Appl Polym Sci 85:1161–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Ma L, Liu R, Tan J, Wang D, Jin X, Kang H, Wu M, Huang Y (2010) Self- assembly and dual-stimuli sensitivities of hydroxypropylcellulose-graft-poly(N,N-dimethyl amino ethyl methacrylate) copolymers in aqueous solution. Langmuir 26:8697–8703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Ma L, Kang H, Liu R, Huang Y (2010) Smart assembly behaviours of hydroxypropylcellulose-graftpoly(4-vinyl pyridine) copolymers in aqueous solution by thermo and pH stimuli. Langmuir 26:18519–18525PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Xu FJ, Zhu Y, Liu FS, Nie J, Ma J, Yang WT (2010) Comb-shaped conjugates comprising hydroxypropyl cellulose backbones and low-molecular-weight poly(N- isopropylacrylamide) side chains for smart hydrogels, synthesis, characterization, and biomedical applications. Bioconjug Chem 21:456–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Marsano E, Bianchi E, Viscardi A (2004) Stimuli responsive gels based on interpenetrating network of hydroxypropylcellulose and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). Polymer 45:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Çaykara T, Şengül G, Birlik G (2006) Preparation and swelling properties of temperature-sensitive semi-interpenetrating polymer networks composed of poly[(N-tert-butylacrylamide)-co-acrylamide] and hydroxypropyl cellulose. Macromol Mater Eng 291:1044–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Tan J, Kang H, Liu R, Wang D, Jin X, Li Q, Huang Y (2011) Dual-stimuli sensitive nanogels fabricated by self-association of thiolated hydroxypropyl cellulose. Polym Chem 2:672–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Wan S, Jiang M, Zhang G (2007) Dual temperature- and pH-dependent self-assembly of cellulose-based copolymer with a pair of complementary grafts. Macromolecules 40:5552–5558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Peng Z, Chen F (2010) Synthesis and properties of temperature-sensitive hydrogel based on hydroxyethyl cellulose. Int J Polym Mater 59:450–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Kim B, Kang H, Kim J (2002) Thermo-sensitive microparticles of PNIPAM-grafted ethylcellulose by spray-drying method. J Microencapsul 19:661–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Yuan W, Zhang J, Zou H, Shen T, Ren J (2012) Amphiphilic ethyl cellulose brush polymers with mono and dual side chains, facile synthesis, self-assembly, and tunable temperature-pH responsivities. Polymer 53:956–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Estrada R, Rodríguez R, Castaño VM (2010) Smart polymeric membranes, pH- induced non-linear changes in pore size. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 99:723–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Cao S, Hu B, Liu H (2009) Synthesis of pH-responsive crosslinked poly[styrene-co- (maleic sodium anhydride)] and cellulose composite hydrogel nanofibers by electrospinning. Polym Int 58:545–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Liebert T (2010) Cellulose solvents – remarkable history, bright future. In: Liebert TF, Heinze TJ, Edgar KJ (eds) Cellulose solvents, for analysis, shaping and chemical modification. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 3–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Sui X, Yuan J, Zhou M, Zhang J, Yang H, Yuan W, Wei Y, Pan C (2008) Synthesis of cellulose-graft-poly(N,N-dimethylamino-2-ethyl methacrylate) copolymers via homogeneous ATRP and their aggregates in aqueous media. Biomacromolecules 9:2615–2620PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Wondraczek H, Pfeifer A, Heinze T (2012) Water soluble photoactive cellulose derivatives, synthesis and characterization of mixed 2-[(4-methyl-2-oxo-2H-chromen-7-yl) oxy] acetic acid-(3-carboxypropyl) trimethylammonium chloride esters of cellulose. Cellulose 19:1327–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Cai Z, Kim J (2008) Characteristics and performance of electroactive paper actuator made with cellulose/polyurethane semi-interpenetrating polymer networks. J Appl Polym Sci 109:3689–3695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals, chemistry, self- assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110(6):3479–3500PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Zoppe JO, Habibi Y, Rojas OJ, Venditti RA, Johansson L-S, Efimenko K, Österberg M, Laine J (2010) Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) brushes grafted from cellulose nanocrystals via surface-initiated single-electron transfer living radical polymerization. Biomacromolecules 11:2683–2691PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Azzam F, Heux L, Putaux J-L, Jean B (2010) Preparation by grafting onto, characterization, and properties of thermally responsive polymer-decorated cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 11:3652–3659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Way AE, Hsu L, Shanmuganathan K, Weder C, Rowan SJ (2012) pH- responsive cellulose nanocrystal gels and nanocomposites. ACS Macro Lett 1:1001–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Morandi G, Thielemans W (2012) Synthesis of cellulose nanocrystals bearing photocleavable grafts by ATRP. Polym Chem 3:1402–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Pan K, Zhang X, Ren R, Cao B (2010) Double stimuli-responsive membranes grafted with block copolymer by ATRP method. J Membr Sci 356:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Qiu X, Ren X, Hu S (2012) Fabrication of dual-responsive cellulose-based membrane via simplified surface-initiated ATRP. Carbohydr Polym 92:1887–1895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Gorey C, Escobar IC (2011) N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAM) modified cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 383:272–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Kubota H, Suka IG, Kuroda S-I, Kondo T (2001) Introduction of stimuli- responsive polymers into regenerated cellulose film by means of photo-grafting. Eur Polym J 37:1367–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Gorey C, Escobar IC, Gruden C, Coleman M, Mileyeva-Biebesheimer O (2008) Development of smart membrane filters for microbial sensing. Sep Sci Technol 43:4056–4074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Isaad J, Achari AE (2011) Colorimetric sensing of cyanide anions in aqueous media based on functional surface modification of natural cellulose materials. Tetrahedron 67:4939–4947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. 172.
    Karlsson JO, Andersson M, Berntsson P, Chihani T, Gatenholm P (1998) Swelling behavior of stimuli-responsive cellulose fibers. Polymer 39:3589–3596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Peng J, Liu Q, Xu Z, Masliyah J (2012) Synthesis of interfacially active and magnetically responsive nanoparticles for multiphase separation applications. Adv Funct Mater 22:1732–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. 174.
    Gaharwar AK, Wong JE, Müller-Schulte D, Bahadur D, Richtering W (2009) Magnetic nanoparticles encapsulated within a thermoresponsive polymer. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 9:5355–5361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications properties and applications. Polymers 2:728–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    Hubbe MA, Rojas OJ, Lucia LA, Sain M (2008) Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review. Bioresources 3:929–980Google Scholar
  177. 177.
    Khalil HPSA, Bhat AH, Yusra AFI (2012) Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym 87:963–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. 178.
    Yu L, Dean K, Li L (2006) Polymer blends and composites from renewable resources. Prog Polym Sci 31:576–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    Zhang K, Wu XY (2004) Temperature and pH-responsive polymeric composite membranes for controlled delivery of proteins and peptides. Biomaterials 25:5281–5291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. 180.
    Zhang K, Wu XY (2002) Modulated insulin permeation across a glucose-sensitive polymeric composite membrane. J Control Release 80:169–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Regmi BP, Monk J, El-Zahab B, Das S, Hung FR, Hayes DJ, Warner IM (2012) A novel composite film for detection and molecular weight determination of organic vapors. J Mater Chem 22:13732–13741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Lin Y-Y, Chen K-S, Lin S-Y (1996) Development and investigation of a thermo- responsive cholesteryl oleyl carbonate-embedded membrane. J Control Release 41:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Lin S-Y, Lin H-L, Li M-J (2003) Reproducibility of temperature response and long-term stability of thermo-responsive membrane prepared by adsorption of binary liquid crystals. J Membr Sci 225:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    Atyabi F, Khodaverdi E, Dinarvand R (2007) Temperature modulated drug permeation through liquid crystal embedded cellulose membranes. Int J Pharm 339:213–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Suedee R, Jantarat C, Lindner W, Viernstein H, Songkro S, Srichana T (2010) Development of a pH-responsive drug delivery system for enantioselective-controlled delivery of racemic drugs. J Control Release 142:122–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Waich K, Mayr T, Klimant I (2008) Fluorescence sensors for trace monitoring of dissolved ammonia. Talanta 77:66–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    Mahadeva SK, Yun S, Kim J (2011) Flexible humidity and temperature sensor based on cellulose-polypyrrole nanocomposite. Sens Actuators A Phys 166:194–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Ichinose I, Kunitake T (1999) Polymerization-induced adsorption: a preparative method of ultrathin polymer films. Adv Mater 11:413–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. 189.
    Csoka L, Hoeger IC, Rojas OJ, Peszlen I, Pawlak JJ, Peralta PN (2012) Piezoelectric effect of cellulose nanocrystals thin films. ACS Macro Lett 1:867–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Kim J, Yun S, Mahadeva SK, Yun K, Yang SY, Maniruzzaman M (2010) Paper actuators made with cellulose and hybrid materials. Sensors 10:1473–1485PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. 191.
    Pandey JK, Takagi H, Nakagaito AN, Saini DR, Ahn S-H (2012) An overview on the cellulose based conducting composites. Compos Part B Eng 43:2822–2826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. 192.
    Kim J, Wang N, Chen Y, Lee S-K, Yun G-Y (2007) Electroactive-paper actuator made with cellulose/NaOH/urea and sodium alginate. Cellulose 14:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Kim J, Yun S, Ounaies Z (2006) Discovery of cellulose as a smart material. Macromolecules 39:4202–4206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Li J, Vadahanambi S, Kee C-D, Oh I-K (2011) Electrospun fullerenol-cellulose biocompatible actuators. Biomacromolecules 12:2048–2054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. 195.
    Kunchornsup W, Sirivat A (2012) Physically cross-linked cellulosic gel via 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ionic liquid and its electromechanical responses. Sens Actuators A Phys 175:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    Kacmaz S, Ertekin K, Suslu A, Ergun Y, Celik E, Cocen U (2012) Sub- nanomolar sensing of ionic mercury with polymeric electrospun nanofibers. Mater Chem Phys 133:547–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    Ongun MZ, Ertekin K, Gocmenturk M, Ergun Y, Suslu A (2012) Copper ion sensing with fluorescent electrospun nanofibers. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 90:177–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. 198.
    Schueren LVD, Clerck KD, Brancatelli G, Rosace G, Damme EV, Vos WD (2012) Novel cellulose and polyamide halochromic textile sensors based on the encapsulation of methyl red into a sol-gel matrix. Sensors Actuators B Chem 162:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    Posey-Dowty JD, Watterson TL, Wilson AK, Edgar KJ, Shelton MC, Lingerfelt LR Jr (2007) Zero-order release formulations using a novel cellulose ester. Cellulose 14:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. 200.
    Karewicz A, Zasada K, Szczubiałka K, Zapotoczny S, Lach R, Nowakowska M (2010) Smart alginate–hydroxypropylcellulose microbeads for controlled release of heparin. Int J Pharm 385:163–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. 201.
    Tripathi GK, Singh S (2012) Formulation and in vitro evaluation of pH trigger polymeric blended buoyant beads of clarithromycin. Int J Pharm Tech Res 4:5–14Google Scholar
  202. 202.
    Tripathi G, Singh S (2010) Formulation and in vitro evaluation of pH sensitive oil entrapped polymeric blended gellan gum buoyant beads of clarithromycin. DARU J Pharm Sci 18:247–253Google Scholar
  203. 203.
    Ichikawa H, Fukumori Y (2000) A novel positively thermosensitive controlled- release microcapsule with membrane of nano-sized poly(nisopropylacrylamide) gel dispersed in ethylcellulose matrix. J Control Release 63:107–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. 204.
    Kettunen M, Silvennoinen RJ, Houbenov N, Nykänen A, Ruokolainen J, Sainio J, Pore V, Kemell M, Ankerfors M, Lindström T, Ritala M, Ras RHA, Ikkala O (2011) Photoswitchable superabsorbency based on nanocellulose aerogels. Adv Funct Mater 21:510–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. 205.
    Pääkk M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Linstrom T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8:1934–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. 206.
    Pääkkö M, Vapaavuori J, Silvennoinen R, Kosonen H, Ankerfors M, Lindström T, Berglund LA, Ikkala O (2008) Long and entangled native cellulose I nanofibers allow flexible aerogels and hierarchically porous templates for functionalities. Soft Matter 4:2492–2499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. 207.
    Katepetch C, Rujiravanit R (2011) Synthesis of magnetic nanoparticle into bacterial cellulose matrix by ammonia gas-enhancing in situ co-precipitation method. Carbohydr Polym 86:162–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. 208.
    Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink H-P, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose, fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:3358–3393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. 209.
    Shanmuganathan K, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C (2010) Biomimetic mechanically adaptive nanocomposites. Prog Polym Sci 35:212–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. 210.
    Lendlein A, Kelch S (2002) Shape-memory polymers. Angew Chem Int Ed 41:2034–2057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. 211.
    Behl M, Razzaq MY, Lendlein A (2010) Multifunctional shape-memory polymers. Adv Mater 22:3388–3410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. 212.
    Huang WM, Yang B, Zhao Y, Ding Z (2010) Thermo-moisture responsive polyurethane shape-memory polymer and composites: a review. J Mater Chem 20:3367–3381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Zhu Y, Hu J, Luo H, Young RJ, Deng L, Zhang S, Fan Y, Ye G (2012) Rapidly switchable water-sensitive shape-memory cellulose/elastomer nano-composites. Soft Matter 8:2509–2517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. 214.
    Han J, Zhu Y, Hu J, Luo H, Yeung L-Y, Li W, Meng Q, Ye G, Zhang S, Fan Y (2012) Morphology, reversible phase crystallization, and thermal sensitive shape memory effect of cellulose whisker/SMPU nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 123:749–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. 215.
    Luo H, Hu J, Zhu Y (2011) Polymeric shape memory nanocomposites with heterogeneous twin switches. Macromol Chem Phys 212:1981–1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. 216.
    Luo H, Hu J, Zhu Y (2011) Tunable shape recovery of polymeric nano-composites. Mater Lett 65:3583–3585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. 217.
    Auad ML, Contos VS, Nutt S, Aranguren MI, Marcovich NE (2008) Characterization of nanocellulose-reinforced shape memory polyurethanes. Polym Int 57:651–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. 218.
    Auad ML, Richardson T, Orts WJ, Medeiros E, Mattoso LHC, Mosiewicki MA, Marcovich NE, Aranguren MI (2011) Polyaniline-modified cellulose nanofibrils as reinforcement of a smart polyurethane. Polym Int 60:743–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. 219.
    Mendez J, Annamalai PK, Eichhorn SJ, Rusli R, Rowan SJ, Foster EJ, Weder C (2011) Bioinspired mechanically adaptive polymer nanocomposites with water- activated shape-memory effect. Macromolecules 44:6827–6835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. 220.
    Capadona JR, Shanmuganathan K, Tyler DJ, Rowan SJ, Weder C (2008) Stimuli-responsive polymer nanocomposites inspired by the sea cucumber dermis. Science 319:1370–1374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. 221.
    Shanmuganathan K, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C (2010) Bio-inspired mechanically-adaptive nanocomposites derived from cotton cellulose whiskers. J Mater Chem 20:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. 222.
    Shanmuganathan K, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C (2010) Stimuli- responsive mechanically adaptive polymer nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:165–174PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. 223.
    Dagnon KL, Shanmuganathan K, Weder C, Rowan SJ (2012) Water-triggered modulus changes of cellulose nanofiber nanocomposites with hydrophobic polymer matrices. Macromolecules 45:4707–4715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. 224.
    Spagnol C, Rodrigues FHA, Pereira AGB, Fajardo AR, Rubira AF, Muniz EC (2012) Superabsorbent hydrogel composite made of cellulose nanofibrils and chitosan- graft-poly(acrylic acid). Carbohydr Polym 87:2038–2045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. 225.
    Edgar KJ, Buchanan CM, Debenham JS, Rundquist PA, Seiler BD, Shelton MC, Tindall D (2001) Advances in cellulose ester performance and application. Prog Polym Sci 26:1605–1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. 226.
    Kamel S, Ali N, Jahangir K, Shah SM, El-Gendy AA (2008) Pharmaceutical significance of cellulose: a review. Express Polym Lett 2:758–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. 227.
    Edgar KJ (2007) Cellulose esters in drug delivery. Cellulose 14:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. 228.
    Murtaza G (2012) Ethylcellulose microparticles: a review. Acta Pol Pharm 69:11–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  229. 229.
    Rogers TL, Wallick D (2012) Reviewing the use of ethylcellulose, methylcellulose and hypromellose in microencapsulation. Part 1, materials used to formulate microcapsules. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 38:129–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. 230.
    Rogers TL, Wallick D (2011) Reviewing the use of ethylcellulose, methylcellulose and hypromellose in microencapsulation. Part 2, techniques used to make microcapsules. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 37:1259–1271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. 231.
    Rogers TL, Wallick D (2012) Reviewing the use of ethylcellulose, methylcellulose and hypromellose in microencapsulation. Part 3: applications for microcapsules. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 38:521–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. 232.
    Lecomte F, Siepmann J, Walther M, MacRae RJ, Bodmeier R (2005) pH- sensitive polymer blends used as coating materials to control drug release from spherical beads, importance of the type of core. Biomacromolecules 6:2074–2083PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. 233.
    Josephine LJJ, Yathish M, Wilson B, Premakumari KB (2012) Formulation and evaluation of microparticles containing curcumin for colorectal cancer. J Drug Deliv Ther 2:125–128Google Scholar
  234. 234.
    Wang J, Wu F-Q, Shi K-H, Wang X-H, Sun P-P (2004) Humidity sensitivity of composite material of lanthanum ferrite/polymer quaternary acrylic resin. Sensors Actuators B Chem 99:586–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. 235.
    Wang X, Guo Y, Li D, Chen H, Sun R-C (2012) Fluorescent amphiphilic cellulose nanoaggregates for sensing trace explosives in aqueous solution. Chem Commun 48:5569–5571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  236. 236.
    Arias JL, López-Viota M, Delgado ÁV, Ruiz MA (2010) Iron/ethylcellulose (core/shell) nanoplatform loaded with 5-fluorouracil for cancer targeting. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 77:111–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. 237.
    Cheng R, Feng F, Meng F, Deng C, Feijen J, Zhong Z (2011) Glutathione- responsive nano-vehicles as a promising platform for targeted intracellular drug and gene delivery. J Control Release 152:2–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  238. 238.
    Delcea M, Moehwald H, Skirtach AG (2011) Stimuli-responsive LbL capsules and nanoshells for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63:730–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  239. 239.
    Wohl BM, Engbersen JFJ (2012) Responsive layer-by-layer materials for drug delivery. J Control Release 158:2–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. 240.
    Manchun S, Dass CR, Sriamornsak P (2012) Targeted therapy for cancer using pH-responsive nanocarrier systems. Life Sci 90:381–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  241. 241.
    Fleige E, Quadir MA, Haag R (2012) Stimuli-responsive polymeric nanocarriers for the controlled transport of active compounds. Concepts and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:866–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  242. 242.
    Sanna R, Sanna D, Alzari V, Nuvoli D, Scognamillo S, Piccinini M, Lazzari M, Gioffredi E, Malucelli G, Mariani A (2012) Synthesis and characterization of graphene-containing thermoresponsive nanocomposite hydrogels of poly (N vinlcaprolactam) prepared by frontal polymerization. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 50:4110–4118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  243. 243.
    Zhang J, Li X, Li X (2012) Stimuli-triggered structural engineering of synthetic and biological polymeric assemblies. Prog Polym Sci 37:1130–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  244. 244.
    Felber AE, Dufresne M-H, Leroux J-C (2012) pH-sensitive vesicles, polymeric micelles, and nanospheres prepared with polycarboxylates. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:979–992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  245. 245.
    Zhang Q, Ko NR, Oh JK (2012) Recent advances in stimuli-responsive degradable block copolymer micelles, synthesis and controlled drug delivery applications. Chem Commun 48:7542–7552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  246. 246.
    Prabaharan M, Mano JF (2006) Stimuli-responsive hydrogels based on polysaccharides incorporated with thermo-responsive polymers as novel biomaterials. Macromol Biosci 6:991–1008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  247. 247.
    Estrada RF, Rodríguez R, Castaño VM (2003) Smart polymeric membranes with adjustable pore size. Int J Polym Mater 52:833–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  248. 248.
    Cabrera RQ, Meersman F, McMillan PF, Dmitriev V (2011) Nanomechanical and structural properties of native cellulose under compressive stress. Biomacromolecules 12:2178–2183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  249. 249.
    Lima MMDS, Borsali R (2004) Rodlike cellulose microcrystals, structure, properties, and applications. Macromol Rapid Commun 25:771–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  250. 250.
    Kim J, Seo YB (2002) Electro-active paper actuators. Smart Mater Struct 11:355–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  251. 251.
    Mahadeva SK, Yun K, Kim J, Kim J-H (2011) Highly durable, biomimetic electro-active paper actuator based on cellulose polypyrrole-ionic liquid (CPIL) nanocomposite. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 11:270–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  252. 252.
    Yun G-Y, Kim J, Kim J-H, Kim S-Y (2010) Fabrication and testing of cellulose EAPap actuators for haptic application. Sens Actuators A Phys A164:68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  253. 253.
    Gao Y, Kuang Y, Guo Z-F, Guo Z, Krauss IJ, Xu B (2009) Enzyme-instructed molecular self-assembly confers nanofibers and a supramolecular hydrogel of taxol derivative. J Am Chem Soc 131:13576–13577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  254. 254.
    Imran AB, Seki T, Takeoka Y (2010) Recent advances in hydrogels in terms of fast stimuli responsiveness and superior mechanical performance. Polym J 42:839–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  255. 255.
    Yetisen AK, Butt H, Volpatti LR, Pavlichenko I, Humar M, Kwok SSK, Koo K, Kim KS, Naydenova I, Khademhosseini A, Hahn SK, Yun SH (2016) Photonic hydrogel sensors. Biotechnol Adv 34(3):250–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  256. 256.
    Stuart MAC, Huck WT, Genzer J, Müller M, Ober C, Stamm M, Sukhorukow GB, Szleifer I, Tsukruk VV, Urban M, Winnik F, Zauscher S, Luzinov I, Minko S (2010) Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials. Nat Mater 9:101–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  257. 257.
    Buenger D, Topuz F, Groll J (2012) Hydrogels in sensing applications. Prog Polym Sci 37:1678–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  258. 258.
    Zhao Y, Wostyn K, de Schaetzen G, Schoonheydt RA (2003) The fabrication of photonic band gap materials with a two-dimensional defect. Appl Phys Lett 82:3764–3766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  259. 259.
    Zhao Y, Zhao X, Gu Z (2010) Photonic crystals in bioassays. Adv Funct Mater 20:2970–2988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  260. 260.
    Zhao Y, Zhao X, Tang B, Xu W, Gu Z (2010) Rapid and sensitive biomolecular screening with encoded macroporous hydrogel photonic beads. Langmuir 26:6111–6114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  261. 261.
    Zhao Y, Zhao X, Tang B, Xu W, Li J, Hu J, Gu Z (2010) Quantum-dot-tagged bioresponsive hydrogel suspension array for multiplex label-free DNA detection. Adv Funct Mater 20:976–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  262. 262.
    Zhao Y, Xie Z, Gu H, Zhu C, Gu Z (2012) Bio-inspired variable structural color materials. Chem Soc Rev 41:3297–3317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  263. 263.
    Zhao Y, Shang L, Cheng Y, Gu Z (2014) Spherical colloidal photonic crystals. Acc Chem Res 47:3632–3642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  264. 264.
    Zhao Q, Yetisen AK, Anthony CJ, Fowler WR, Yun SH, Butt H (2015) Printable ink holograms. Appl Phys Lett 107:041115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  265. 265.
    Zhao Q, Yetisen AK, Sabouri A, Yun SH, Butt H (2015) Printable nanophotonic devices via holographic laser ablation. ACS Nano 9:9062–9069PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  266. 266.
    Gerlach G, Arndt K-F (2009) Hydrogel sensors and actuators: engineering and technology. Springer Science & Business Media, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  267. 267.
    Naydenova I, Jallapuram R, Toal V, Martin S (2008) A visual indication of environmental humidity using a color changing hologram recorded in a self-developing photopolymer. Appl Phys Lett 92:031109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  268. 268.
    Naydenova I, Jallapuram R, Toal V, Martin S (2009) Characterisation of the humidity and temperature responses of a reflection hologram recorded in acrylamide-based photopolymer. Sensors Actuators B139:35–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  269. 269.
    Naydenova I, Jallapuram R, Martin S, Toal V (2011) Holographic humidity sensors. In: Okada CT (ed) Humidity sensors: types, nanomaterials and environmental monitoring. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, pp 117–142Google Scholar
  270. 270.
    Yetisen AK (2015) Fundamentals of holographic sensing. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 27–51Google Scholar
  271. 271.
    Yetisen AK (2015) Holographic glucose sensors. Holographic sensors. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 101–134Google Scholar
  272. 272.
    Yetisen AK (2015) Holographic metal ion sensors. Holographic sensors. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 85–99Google Scholar
  273. 273.
    Yetisen AK (2015) Holographic pH sensors. Holographic sensors. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 53–83Google Scholar
  274. 274.
    Yetisen AK (2015) Mobile medical applications. Holographic sensors. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 135–148Google Scholar
  275. 275.
    Yetisen AK (2015) Point-of-care diagnostics. Holographic sensors. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  276. 276.
    Yetisen AK (2015) The prospects for holographic sensors. Holographic sensors. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 149–162Google Scholar
  277. 277.
    Yetisen AK, Volpatti LR (2014) Patent protection and licensing in microfluidics. Lab Chip 14:2217–2225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  278. 278.
    Yetisen AK, Akram MS, Lowe CR (2013) Paper-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 13:2210–2251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  279. 279.
    Tian T, Li X, Cui J, Li J, Lan Y, Wang C, Zhang M, Wang H, Li G (2014) Highly sensitive assay for acetylcholinesterase activity and inhibition based on a specifically reactive photonic nanostructure. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:15456–15465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  280. 280.
    Cai Z, Liu YJ, Lu X, Teng J (2013) In situ “doping” inverse silica opals with size controllable gold nanoparticles for refractive index sensing. J Phys Chem C 117:9440–9445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  281. 281.
    Cai Z, Zhang J-T, Xue F, Hong Z, Punihaole D, Asher SA (2014) 2D photonic crystal protein hydrogel coulometer for sensing serum albumin ligand binding. Anal Chem 86:4840–4847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  282. 282.
    Cai Z, Smith NL, Zhang J-T, Asher SA (2015) Two-dimensional photonic crystal chemical and biomolecular sensors. Anal Chem 87:5013–5025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  283. 283.
    Baruah U, Chowdhury D (2016) Functionalized graphene oxide quantum dot–PVA hydrogel: a colorimetric sensor for Fe2+, Co2+ and Cu2+ ions. Nanotechnology 27(14):145501PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  284. 284.
    El-Salmawi KM (2007) Application of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) hydrogel produced by conventional crosslinking or by freezing and thawing. J Macromol Sci Part A Pure Appl Chem 44(6):619–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  285. 285.
    George J, Sabapathi SN (2015) Cellulose nanocrystals: synthesis, functional properties, and applications. Nanotechnol Sci Appl 8:45–54PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  286. 286.
    Xie X, Ma D, Zhang L-M (2015) Fabrication and properties of a supramolecular hybrid hydrogel doped with CdTe quantum dots. RSC Adv 5:58746–58754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  287. 287.
    Chang C, Peng J, Zhang L, Pang DW (2009) Strongly fluorescent hydrogels with quantum dots embedded in cellulose matrices. J Mater Chem 9:7771–7776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  288. 288.
    Palomero CR, Martínez SB, Soriano ML, Valcárcel M (2017) Fluorescent nanocellulosic hydrogels based on graphene quantum dots for sensing laccase. Anal Chim Acta 974(29):93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  289. 289.
    Palomero CR, Soriano ML, Martínez SB, Valcárcel M (2017) Photoluminescent sensing hydrogel platform based on the combination of nanocellulose and S,N-codoped graphene quantum dots. Sensors Actuators B Chem 245:946–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  290. 290.
    Thoniyot P, Tan MJ, Karim AA, Young D J, Loh X J (2015) Nanoparticle–Hydrogel Composites: Concept, Design, and Applications of These Promising, Multi-Functional Materials, Adv. Sci. 2(1400010):1–13PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shah M. Reduwan Billah
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Md. Ibrahim H. Mondal
    • 4
  • Sazzad H. Somoal
    • 5
  • M. Nahid Pervez
    • 3
  1. 1.CCIRA UK LimitedGalashielsUK
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryDurham UniversityDurhamUK
  3. 3.School of Textiles and DesignHeriot-Watt UniversityGalashielsUK
  4. 4.Polymer and Textiles Research Lab, Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringRajshahi UniversityRajshahiBangladesh
  5. 5.Institute for Environmental SciencesUniversity of Koblenz-LandauLandauGermany

Personalised recommendations