Skip to main content

Feminist Research Ethics

From Theory to Practice

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity
  • 475 Accesses

Abstract

Feminists endeavor to conduct research through a gender conscious prism while challenging patriarchal structures in society. The topic “feminist ethics” is well documented in the literature; however, “feminist research ethics” is less so. The empirical practice of applying a feminist ethics in research has hitherto not received large attention from feminist scholars as the debate instead tends to focus on underpinning philosophical theories. Some feminists argue that it is unethical not to apply a gender perspective in all research regardless of discipline. This standpoint may suggest that all feminist researchers, by virtue of claiming to be feminists, consider themselves adhering to a feminist research ethics while conducting their research. There is, however, a myriad of feminisms and subsequent research methods which challenges the notion of a uniform feminist research ethics. This chapter attempts to address some key aspects on the topic, by firstly introducing the reader to some of the feminist theories which underpin a feminist ethical approach to social scientific research. I will then continue to discuss examples of practices of feminist ethics in research internationally. There is growing concern among contemporary feminists about how research is conducted, who is involved, and most importantly who benefits from research results. To illustrate these ethical dilemmas, I will also discuss my own PhD research, a feminist ethnography documenting the experiences of 18 mothers of children with special needs in the Republic of Ireland. Finally, drawing from these documented practical experiences, I will summarize suggested recommendations for researchers who aim to pursue research that adheres to feminist research ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barad K (2007) Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess-Proctor A (2015) Methodological and ethical issues in feminist research with abused women: reflections on participants’ vulnerability and empowerment. Women’s Stud Int Forum 48:124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deveaux M (1999) Feminism and empowerment: a critical reading of Foucault. In: Hesse-Biber S, Gilmartin C, Lydenberg R (eds) Feminist approaches to theory and methodology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 236–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncombe J, Jessop J (2012) ‘Doing rapport’ and the ethics of ‘faking friendship’. In T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner, & J. Jessop (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards R, Mauthner M (2002) Ethics and feminist research: theory and practice. In: Mauthner M, Birch M, Jessop J, Miller T (eds) Ethics in qualitative research. Sage, London, pp 14–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P (2000 [1970]) Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th Anniversary Edition). New York: Continuum

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganote C, Longo P (2015) Education for social transformation: infusing feminist ethics and critical pedagogy into community-based research. Crit Sociol 41(7–8):1065–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C (1982) In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard university press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C (2011) Joining the resistance. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies V, Alldred P (2012) The ethics of intention: Research as a political tool. In T. Miller, M. Birch,M. Mautner, & J. Jessop (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 43–60) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson DL, Brunger F (2014) Ethics, “vulnerability,” and feminist participatory action research with a disability community. Qual Health Res 24(7):997–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halse C, Honey A (2005) Unraveling ethics: illuminating the moral dilemmas of research ethics. Signs J Women Cult Soc 30(4):2141–2162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway D (2004) The Haraway reader. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding S (1987) Introduction: is there a feminist method? In: Harding S (ed) Feminism and methodology. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding S (1991) Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy PL (eds) (2007) Feminist research practice. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggart L (2017) Collaboration or collusion? Involving research users in applied social research. Women’s Stud Int Forum 61:100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman K (2008) “Does this mean you’re not going to come visit me anymore?” An inquiry into an ethics of reciprocity and positionality in feminist ethnographic research. Sociol Inq 78(3):372–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly L, Burton S, Regan L (1994) Researching women’s lives or studying women’s oppression? Reflections on what constitutes feminist research. In: Maynard M, Purvis P (eds) Researching women’s lives from feminist perspective. Taylor & Francis, Portsmouth, pp 27–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston AK (2007) Mothering special needs: a different maternal journey. Jessica Kingsley Publisher, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittay EF (1999) “Not my way, Sesha, your way, slowly”: “Maternal thinking” in the raising of a child with profound intellectual disabilities. In: Hanigsberg JE, Ruddick S (eds) Mother troubles. Rethinking contemporary maternal dilemmas. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Langan D, Morton M (2009) Reflecting on community/academic ‘collaboration’: the challenge of ‘doing’ feminist participatory action research. Action Res 7(2):165–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy PL (2007) The practice of feminist oral history and focus group interviews. In: Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy PL (eds) Feminist research practice. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan T, Walker R, Shannon L, Cole J (2008) Combining ethical considerations with recruitment and follow-up strategies for partner violence victimization research. Violence Against Women 14(11):1226–1251

    Google Scholar 

  • Malacrida C (2003) Cold comfort: mothers, professionals and attention deficit (hyperactivity) disorder. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manzo LC, Brightbill N (2007) Towards a participatory ethics. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place (pp 33–40). New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauthner N (2018) A posthumanist ethics of mattering: new materialisms and the ethical practice of inquiry. In: Iphofen R, Tolich M (eds) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research ethics. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard M (1994) Methods, practice and epistemology: the debate about feminism and research. In: Maynard M, Purvis J (eds) Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath F (2017) Minister of State for disability issues homepage. http://www.finianmcgrath.ie/?p=14176. Accessed 8 Oct 2018

  • Miller T (2017) Telling the difficult things: creating spaces for disclosure, rapport and ‘collusion’ in qualitative interviews. Women’s Stud Int Forum 61:81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller T, Bell L (2002) Consenting to what? Issues of access, gate-keeping and ‘informed’ consent. In Mauthner M, Birch M, Jessop J, Miller T (Eds.) Ethics in Qualitative Research. London: SAGE

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazneen S, Darkwah A, Sultan M (2014) Researching women’s empowerment: reflections on methodology by southern feminists. Women’s Stud Int Forum 45:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings N (1984) Caring: a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly A (2006) Rocking the cradle: thoughts on motherhood, feminism and the possibility of empowered mothering. Demeter Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley A (2016) Interviewing women again: power, time and the gift. Sociology 50(1):1195–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opie A (1992) Qualitative research, appropriation of the ‘Other’ and empowerment. Fem Rev 40:52–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parnis D, DuMont J, Gombay B (2005) Cooperation or co-optation? Assessing the methodological benefits and barriers involved in conducting qualitative research through medical institutional settings. Qualitative Health Research 15(5):686–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Philip G, Bell L (2017) Thinking critically about rapport and collusion in feminist research: relationships, contexts and ethical practice. Women’s Stud Int Forum 61:71–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preissle J (2007) Feminist research ethics. In: Hesse-Biber S (ed) Handbook of feminist research: theory and praxis. Sage Publications, London, pp 515–532

    Google Scholar 

  • RTE (Raidió Teilifís Éireann) Prime Time – Carers in Crisis. Broadcasted 5 Dec 2017. https://www.rte.ie/news/player/prime-time/2017/1205/. Accessed 8 Oct 2018

  • Ruddick S (1989) Maternal thinking: toward a politics of peace. Ballantine Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Spalter-Roth R, Hartmann H (1999) Small happiness: the feminist struggle to integrate social research with social activism. In: Hesse-Biber S, Gilmartin C, Lydenberg R (eds) Feminist approaches to theory and methodology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 333–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, Judith (1988) “Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography?” Women’s Studies International Forum 11:21–7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Karin Kingston .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kingston, A.K. (2019). Feminist Research Ethics. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_64-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_64-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics