Skip to main content

Disability Research Ethics

A Bedrock of Disability Rights

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity
  • 157 Accesses

Abstract

The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD 2006) has the potential to transform ethical practice in disability research across the globe. This chapter outlines the current knowledge base in the field of ethics in disability research, especially with regard to the UN Convention, its contents and their implementation. The chapter concludes with some proposals on ways to ensure that the Convention’s potential is fully realized.

It is not always the case that research which investigates the lives of disabled people is conducted in accordance with normal ethical principles and the Convention explicitly addresses this problem. Disability research often presents particular challenges when aiming to achieve full operationalization in this field, of the normal core research principles with regard to ethics, such as informed consent, confidentiality, privacy, respect, and equality. These requirements are not always met since researchers, along with research funders and managers, may not be well trained or informed in the field. Indeed, some practitioners overtly avoid ethical requirements because of their resource implications. When these principles are inadequately addressed, the resulting research is of reduced quality and can damage trust in the research process among disabled people. There is a danger that poor-quality research conducted without careful attention to ethical practice leads to a poor knowledge base underpinning changes in policy and service provision for disabled people.

This chapter discusses the impact of the UNCRPD on ethics in disability research, both in terms of its potential and the progress to date. Strategies for increasing the scope and pace of change are also proposed. The author has several decades of active disability research experience focusing on global, European, and national levels. This work has included contributing to the development of guidelines for good ethical practice in disability research, with the WHO ICF FDRG and the UN Washington City Group on Disability Statistics during the period 2003–2015, as well as for the European Union and the Irish government (2002–2007). Lessons have been drawn from this work, and general principles are accompanied by proposals for future development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bickenbach J (2011) The world report on disability. Disabil Soc 26(5):655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady G, Good A (2005) Methodological preparations for an Irish post census national disability survey in 2006. Paper presented at Washington Group on Disability Statistics 5th meeting, Rio de Janeiro, September 2005. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/otheract/citygroup/products/citygroup5/WG5_Good_Brady.doc. Accessed 4 July 2019

  • Dench S, Iphofen R, Huws U (2004) An EU Code of Ethics for Socio-Economic Research. Report 412. Institute for Employment Studies: Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Good A (2002) Ethical guidelines for disability research. National Disability Authority, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Good A, McAnaney D (2003) Methodological preparations for the first Irish national disability survey. NDA, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Canada (2015) Research ethics boards: guidelines for researchers. www.pre.ethics.gc.ca

  • Hirst R (2000) The international disability rights movement. www.leeds.ac.uk

  • International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (2001) World Health Orgaisation: Geneva. www.who.int

  • Iphofen R (2009) Ethical decision making in social research: a practical guide. Palgrave, Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen R (2000) The researched opinions on research: disabled people and disability research. Disabil Soc 15(1):25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostansjek N (2011) The use of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health. BMC Public Health 11(4):S3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostansjek N, Good A, Madden RM, Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Matteus CD, Officer AM (2013) Counting disability global and national estimation. Disabil Rehabil 35(13):1065–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmy Nuwagaba E, Rule P (2015) Navigating the ethical maze in disability research: ethical contestations in an African context. Disabil Soc 30(2):255–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi M, Bickenbach J, Ustun TB, Kostansjek N, Chatterji S (2006) The definition of disability: what’s in a name. Lancet 368(9543):1219–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi M, Chatterji S, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Hollenweger J, Üstün TB, Kostanjsek N, Newton A, Björck-Åkesson E, Francescutti C, Alonso J, Matucci M, Samoilescu A, Good A, Cieza A, Svestkova O, Bullinger M, Marincek C, Burger H, Raggi A, Bickenbach J (2010) Integrating research into policy planning: MHADIE policy recommendations. Disabil Rehabil 32(Suppl 1):S139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madans J, Loeb ME, Altman BA (2011) Measuring disability and monitoring the UN convention on the rights of persons with disability: the work of the Washington group on disability statistics. BMC Public Health 11(Suppl 4):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane J, Hughes RB, Nosek MA (2001) Abuse assessment screen disability (AAS-D); measuring frequency, type and perpetrator of abuse towards women with physical disabilities. J Women’s Health Gender Based Med 10(9):861–866. Pubmed PMID 11747680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mont D (2017) Training on how to ask “disability” questions on censuses and surveys, in www.washingtongroup-disability.com/washington-group-blog/. Date 13 October 2017. Accessed Oct 2017

  • O’Donovan M, Good A (2010) Towards comparability of data: using the ICF to map the contrasting definitions of disability in Irish surveys and census, 2000–2006. Disabil Rehabil 32(Suppl 1):S9–S16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver M (2013) The social model of disability: thirty years on. Disabil Soc 28(7):1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riddle C (2016) Human rights, disability and capabilities. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider M, Hurst R, Miller J, Ustun TB (2003) The role of the environment in the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 25(11–12):588–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare T (2013) Disability rights and wrongs revisited. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation. (UPIAS) and The Disability Aliance (1976) Available inNational Disability Arts Collection and Archive the-NDACA.org

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2006. UN New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2017) WHO code of ethics and professional conduct. https://www.who.int/

  • WHO (2018) How to use the ICF: draft practical manual for using the ICF. https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/

  • WHO Research Ethics Review Committee (2018) Informed consent template for research involving children, qualitative studies. https://www.who.int/

Key Resources

  • These comprehensive websites include advice on improving research ethics in their respective research aspects

    Google Scholar 

United Nations

    UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Monitoring and Evaluation of Disability Inclusive Development (DESA)

    UN Statistics Division

    World Health Organization (WHO)

      Classifications: ICF

      Download references

      Author information

      Authors and Affiliations

      Authors

      Corresponding author

      Correspondence to Anne Good .

      Editor information

      Editors and Affiliations

      Rights and permissions

      Reprints and permissions

      Copyright information

      © 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

      About this entry

      Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

      Cite this entry

      Good, A. (2020). Disability Research Ethics. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_30-1

      Download citation

      • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_30-1

      • Received:

      • Accepted:

      • Published:

      • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

      • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7

      • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7

      • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

      Publish with us

      Policies and ethics