Abstract
The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD 2006) has the potential to transform ethical practice in disability research across the globe. This chapter outlines the current knowledge base in the field of ethics in disability research, especially with regard to the UN Convention, its contents and their implementation. The chapter concludes with some proposals on ways to ensure that the Convention’s potential is fully realized.
It is not always the case that research which investigates the lives of disabled people is conducted in accordance with normal ethical principles and the Convention explicitly addresses this problem. Disability research often presents particular challenges when aiming to achieve full operationalization in this field, of the normal core research principles with regard to ethics, such as informed consent, confidentiality, privacy, respect, and equality. These requirements are not always met since researchers, along with research funders and managers, may not be well trained or informed in the field. Indeed, some practitioners overtly avoid ethical requirements because of their resource implications. When these principles are inadequately addressed, the resulting research is of reduced quality and can damage trust in the research process among disabled people. There is a danger that poor-quality research conducted without careful attention to ethical practice leads to a poor knowledge base underpinning changes in policy and service provision for disabled people.
This chapter discusses the impact of the UNCRPD on ethics in disability research, both in terms of its potential and the progress to date. Strategies for increasing the scope and pace of change are also proposed. The author has several decades of active disability research experience focusing on global, European, and national levels. This work has included contributing to the development of guidelines for good ethical practice in disability research, with the WHO ICF FDRG and the UN Washington City Group on Disability Statistics during the period 2003–2015, as well as for the European Union and the Irish government (2002–2007). Lessons have been drawn from this work, and general principles are accompanied by proposals for future development.
References
Bickenbach J (2011) The world report on disability. Disabil Soc 26(5):655
Brady G, Good A (2005) Methodological preparations for an Irish post census national disability survey in 2006. Paper presented at Washington Group on Disability Statistics 5th meeting, Rio de Janeiro, September 2005. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/otheract/citygroup/products/citygroup5/WG5_Good_Brady.doc. Accessed 4 July 2019
Dench S, Iphofen R, Huws U (2004) An EU Code of Ethics for Socio-Economic Research. Report 412. Institute for Employment Studies: Brighton
Good A (2002) Ethical guidelines for disability research. National Disability Authority, Dublin
Good A, McAnaney D (2003) Methodological preparations for the first Irish national disability survey. NDA, Dublin
Government of Canada (2015) Research ethics boards: guidelines for researchers. www.pre.ethics.gc.ca
Hirst R (2000) The international disability rights movement. www.leeds.ac.uk
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (2001) World Health Orgaisation: Geneva. www.who.int
Iphofen R (2009) Ethical decision making in social research: a practical guide. Palgrave, Hampshire
Kitchen R (2000) The researched opinions on research: disabled people and disability research. Disabil Soc 15(1):25
Kostansjek N (2011) The use of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health. BMC Public Health 11(4):S3
Kostansjek N, Good A, Madden RM, Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Matteus CD, Officer AM (2013) Counting disability global and national estimation. Disabil Rehabil 35(13):1065–1069
Lemmy Nuwagaba E, Rule P (2015) Navigating the ethical maze in disability research: ethical contestations in an African context. Disabil Soc 30(2):255–269
Leonardi M, Bickenbach J, Ustun TB, Kostansjek N, Chatterji S (2006) The definition of disability: what’s in a name. Lancet 368(9543):1219–1221
Leonardi M, Chatterji S, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Hollenweger J, Üstün TB, Kostanjsek N, Newton A, Björck-Åkesson E, Francescutti C, Alonso J, Matucci M, Samoilescu A, Good A, Cieza A, Svestkova O, Bullinger M, Marincek C, Burger H, Raggi A, Bickenbach J (2010) Integrating research into policy planning: MHADIE policy recommendations. Disabil Rehabil 32(Suppl 1):S139
Madans J, Loeb ME, Altman BA (2011) Measuring disability and monitoring the UN convention on the rights of persons with disability: the work of the Washington group on disability statistics. BMC Public Health 11(Suppl 4):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S4
McFarlane J, Hughes RB, Nosek MA (2001) Abuse assessment screen disability (AAS-D); measuring frequency, type and perpetrator of abuse towards women with physical disabilities. J Women’s Health Gender Based Med 10(9):861–866. Pubmed PMID 11747680
Mont D (2017) Training on how to ask “disability” questions on censuses and surveys, in www.washingtongroup-disability.com/washington-group-blog/. Date 13 October 2017. Accessed Oct 2017
O’Donovan M, Good A (2010) Towards comparability of data: using the ICF to map the contrasting definitions of disability in Irish surveys and census, 2000–2006. Disabil Rehabil 32(Suppl 1):S9–S16
Oliver M (2013) The social model of disability: thirty years on. Disabil Soc 28(7):1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
Riddle C (2016) Human rights, disability and capabilities. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Schneider M, Hurst R, Miller J, Ustun TB (2003) The role of the environment in the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil 25(11–12):588–595
Shakespeare T (2013) Disability rights and wrongs revisited. Routledge, London
Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation. (UPIAS) and The Disability Aliance (1976) Available inNational Disability Arts Collection and Archive the-NDACA.org
United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2006. UN New York.
WHO (2017) WHO code of ethics and professional conduct. https://www.who.int/
WHO (2018) How to use the ICF: draft practical manual for using the ICF. https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
WHO Research Ethics Review Committee (2018) Informed consent template for research involving children, qualitative studies. https://www.who.int/
Key Resources
These comprehensive websites include advice on improving research ethics in their respective research aspects
United Nations
UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Monitoring and Evaluation of Disability Inclusive Development (DESA)
UN Statistics Division
World Health Organization (WHO)
Classifications: ICF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Good, A. (2020). Disability Research Ethics. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_30-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_30-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities