Skip to main content

Big Data

A Focus on Social Media Research Dilemmas


Big data research is an umbrella term that characterizes research in many fields. This chapter will focus specifically on big data research tied to the use of social media primarily with a focus on humanities and social science research. Social media as a data source provides opportunities to understand how people individually and collectively communicate, socialize, and critically scrutinize platform infrastructures, exposure, and interaction logic. However, the data and the subsequent processing are closely tied to important ethical issues especially concerning tensions between privacy on the one side and accountability/transparency on the other side. Through an illustrative big data case study of Facebook groups supplemented with existing literature, the chapter will explore ethical dilemmas that occur in connection with social media big data research. The chapter argues that we need to justify our research design balancing protection of the individuals and the aim of creating knowledge for the good of society.


  • Ethics
  • Social media
  • Big data
  • Privacy
  • Facebook

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  • Beauchamp TL (2011) Informed consent: its history, meaning, and present challenges. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 20(4):515–523

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechmann A (2014) Non-informed consent cultures: privacy policies and App contracts on Facebook. J Media Bus Stud 11(1):21–38.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bechmann A, Bowker GC (2019) Unsupervised by any other name: hidden layers of knowledge production in artificial intelligence on social media. Big Data Soc 6(1).

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bechmann A, Vahlstrup PB (2015) Studying Facebook and Instagram data: the digital Footprints software. First Monday 20(12):1–13.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns A, Bechmann A, Burgess J, Chadwick A, Clark LS, Dutton WH, … Howard P (2018) Facebook shuts the gate after the horse has bolted, and hurts real research in the process. Internet Policy Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive (EU) 2016/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ess C (2013) Digital media ethics. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ess C, The AoIR Ethics Working Committee (2002) Ethical decision-making and Internet Research: recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (IRE1.0). Retrieved from

  • Facebook for Developers – F8 2018 Day 1 Keynote (n.d.) Retrieved 2 Apr 2019, from Facebook for Developers website

  • Guidotti TL (2018) Scientific freedom and human rights. Arch Environ Occup Health 73(1):1–3.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann R, Tyson LD, Zahidi S (2012) The global gender gap report 2012. World Economic Forum, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiberger RH, Riebling JR (2016) Installing computational social science: facing the challenges of new information and communication technologies in social science. Methodological Innov 9:2059799115622763.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JY, Fusaroli R, Bechmann A (2019a) Systemic gendering in Facebook group participation. Presented at the International Association for Media and Communication Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JY, Park HW, Bechmann A (2019b) A typology on Facebook groups: a large-scale case study of measuring network age, network size, gender and topics. Presented at the XXXIX sunbelt social networks conference of the international network for social network analysis (INSNA), Montréal

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin R (2014) The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosinski M, Stillwell D, Graepel T (2013) Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(15):5802–5805.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer ADI, Guillory JE, Hancock JT (2014) Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(24):8788–8790.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Larson B (2017) Gender as a variable in natural-language processing: ethical considerations. In: Proceedings of the first ACL workshop on Ethics in natural language processing, 1–11.

  • Lomborg S, Bechmann A (2014) Using APIs for data collection on social media. Inf Soc 30(4):256–265.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Madrigal AC (2018) What took Facebook so long? The Atlantic. Retrieved from

  • Markham A, Buchanan E (2012) Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matzner T (2014) Why privacy is not enough privacy in the context of “ubiquitous computing” and “big data”. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc 12(2):93–106.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Schönberger V, Cukier K (2013) Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee HA, Porter JE (2012) The ethics of archival research. Coll Compos Commun 64(1):59–81. Retrieved from JSTOR

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum H (2009) Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Porsdam Mann S, Donders Y, Mitchell C, Bradley VJ, Chou MF, Mann M, … Porsdam H (2018) Opinion: advocating for science progress as a human right. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115(43):10820–10823.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Porter JE, McKee H (2009) The ethics of internet research: a rhetorical, case-based process (First printing edition). Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Proferes NJ, Zimmer M (2014) A topology of Twitter research: disciplines, methods, and ethics. Aslib J Inf Manag 66(3):250–261.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • The United States. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical, & Behavioral Research (1978). The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research (Vol. 2). Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci Z (2014) Engineering the public: big data, surveillance and computational politics. First Monday 19(7). Retrieved from

  • van Dijck J (2013) The culture of connectivity: a critical history of social media. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer N (2018) Article 4 EU general data protection regulation (EU-GDPR) [Text], September 5. Retrieved 1 Apr 2019, from

  • Zimmer M (2010) “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics Inf Technol 12(4):313–325.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer M, Kinder-Kurlanda K (eds) (2017) Internet research ethics for the social age: new challenges, cases, and contexts (New edition). Peter Lang Inc./International Academic Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja Bechmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bechmann, A., Kim, J.Y. (2019). Big Data. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences