Abstract
Research cannot be done by researchers alone. In most cases, additional resources are required, including human research participants, access to biodiversity for biological and genetic resources, or traditional knowledge. Benefit sharing has been part of global conventions and international ethics guidelines for over 25 years, predicated on the understanding that those who contribute to the research process and its outcomes should share in the benefits as a matter of fairness. This chapter explores the different understandings of benefit sharing in a historical context, from the “Grand Bargain” of the Convention on Biological Diversity in 1992 to the Global Code of Conduct for Research in Resource-Poor Settings in 2018, and examines the contemporary potential for the UN Sustainable Development Goals (Agenda 2030) to facilitate benefit sharing. The discussion provides guidance to researchers, through examples and short case studies, on how to discharge the obligations of benefit sharing effectively and fairly, in pursuit of research integrity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Andanda P, Schroeder D, Chaturvedi S, Mengesha E, Hodges T (2013) Legal frameworks for benefit sharing: from biodiversity to human genomics. In: Schroeder D, Cook Lucas J (eds) Benefit sharing – from biodiversity to human genetics. Springer, Berlin, pp 33–64
Aristotle (2004) In: Tredennick H, Barnes J (eds) Nicomachean ethics, 2nd edn. Penguin Classics, London
Bergel SD (2015) Ten years of the universal declaration on bioethics and. Human Rights 23(3):446–455
Briand SC (2016) Into the future: are we ready to face modern outbreaks? Wkly Epidemiol Rec 91(13):178–180
Burtscher W (2018) TRUST Global Code of Conduct to be a reference document applied by all research projects applying for H2020 funding. Editorial Trust Newsletter Issue 5. http://trust-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Newsletter-5-TRUST-final-final.pdf
Caplan AL, Curry DR (2007) Leveraging genetic resources or moral blackmail? Indonesia and avian flu virus sample sharing. Am J Bioeth 7(11):1–2
Carlson RV, Boyd KM, Webb DJ (2004) The revision of the declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future. Br J Clin Pharmacol 57(6):695–713
Carrington D (2018) What is biodiversity and why does it matter to us? Guardian, 12 Mar 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/12/what-is-biodiversity-and-why-does-it-matter-to-us
CBD (2018) Fact-finding and scoping study on digital sequence information on genetic resources in the context of the CBD and the Nagoya Protocol, CBD/DSI/AHTEG/2018/1/3. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/b39f/4faf/7668900e8539215e7c7710fe/dsi-ahteg-2018-01-03-en.pdf
Chaturvedi S, Crager S, Ladikas M, Muthuswamy V, Su Y, Yang H (2013) Promoting an inclusive approach to benefit sharing: expanding the scope of the CBD? In: Schroeder D, Cook Lucas J (eds) Benefit sharing – from biodiversity to human genetics. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–177
Chennells R (2016) Equitable access to human biological resources in developing countries: benefit sharing without undue inducement. Springer, Berlin
Chivian E, Bernstein A (eds) (2008) Sustaining life: how human health depends on biodiversity. Center for Health and the global environment. Oxford University Press, New York
Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf
Declaration of Helsinki (2013) https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
Global Code of Conduct for Research in Resource-Poor Setting (2018) http://www.globalcodeofconduct.org/
Gostin LO, Phelan A, Stoto MA, Kraemer JD, Reddy KS (2014) Virus sharing, genetic sequencing, and global health security. Science 345(6202):1295–1296
HUGO (2000) Human genome project’s ethics committee statement on benefit sharing. http://www.hugo-international.org/Resources/Documents/CELS_Statement-BenefitSharing_2000.pdf
Kelman A, Kang A, Crawford B (2018) Continued access to investigational medicinal
Langlois A (2008) The UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights: perspectives from Kenya and South Africa. Health Care Anal: J Health Philos Policy 16(1):39–51
Mayer R (2007) What’s wrong with exploitation. J Appl Philos 24(2):137–150
Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, short: Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (2010) https://www.cbd.int/abs/doc/protocol/nagoya-protocol-en.pdf
Nordling L (2018) Europe’s biggest research fund cracks down on ‘ethics dumping’. Nature 559(7712):17–18
OECD (2018) Main science and technology indicators database July 2018. http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/researchanddevelopmentstatisticsrds.htm
Prathapan KD, Pethiyagoda R, Bawa KS, Raven PHD, Rajan PD (2018) Science (New York, NY) 360(6396):1405–1406
Rabitz F (2015) Biopiracy after the Nagoya protocol: problem structure, regime design and implementation challenges. Braz Polit Sci Rev 9(2):30–53
Rawls J (1999) A theory of justice – revised edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Schroeder D (2008) Post-trial obligations. Reciis 2(Sup1):63–73
Schroeder D, Gefenas E (2012) Realising benefit sharing – the case of post-study obligations. Bioethics 26(6):305–314
Schroeder D, Cook J, Hirsch F, Fenet S, Muthuswamy V (eds) (2018) Ethics dumping – case studies from north south research collaborations. Springer, Berlin
Sedyaningsih ER, Isfandari S, Soendoro T, Supari SF (2008) Towards mutual trust, transparency and equity in virus sharing mechanism: the avian influenza case of Indonesia. Ann Acad Med 37(6):482–488
Shaffer DN et al (2006) Equitable treatment for HIV/AIDS clinical trial participants: a focus group study of patients, clinical researchers, and administrators in western Kenya. J Med Ethics 32:55–60
Shiva V (1991) The violence of the green revolution: third world agriculture, ecology, and politics. Zed Books, London
Stuart E, Samman E (2017) Defining ‘leave no one behind’. Briefing paper for ODI. Overseas Development Institute. https://www.odi.org/publications/10956-defining-leave-no-one-behind
ten Kate K, Laird SA (2000) Biodiversity and business: coming to terms with the ‘grand bargain’. Int Aff 76(2):241–264
UNESCO (2005) Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005). http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
United Nations (2015) Sustainable development goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
Watts J (2018) Destruction of nature as dangerous as climate change, scientists warn. Guardian: 23 Mar 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/mar/23/destruction-of-nature-as-dangerous-as-climate-change-scientists-warn
WHO (2007) Avian and pandemic influenza. Provisional agenda item 12.1, Sixtieth World Health Assembly. A60/INF.DOC./2, 22 March 2007. World Health Organization
WHO (2011a) Pandemic influenza preparedness framework for the sharing of influenza viruses and access to vaccines and other benefits. short PIP framework. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44796/9789241503082_eng.pdf;jsessionid=72C43E6E3890BEC48B855AB460D0755E?sequence=1
WHO (2011b) Pandemic influenza preparedness framework for the sharing of influenza viruses and access to vaccines and other benefits. PIP/OEWG/3/4. http://apps.who.int/gb/pip/pdf_files/OEWG3/A_PIP_OEWG_3_2-en.pdf
WHO (2017) Pandemic influenza preparedness framework, online Q&A. http://www.who.int/features/qa/pandemic-influenza-preparedness/en/
Wynberg R, Schroeder D, Chennells R (eds) (2009) Indigenous peoples, consent and benefit sharing–learning lessons from the san-hoodia case. Springer, Berlin
Acknowledgments
This work is based on research undertaken for the TRUST project, funded by the European Commission Horizon 2020 Program, agreement number 664771. Thanks to Julie Cook for comments on an earlier draft and editorial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Schroeder, D. (2019). Benefit Sharing. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_11-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_11-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities