- 37 Downloads
The notion of “biopolitics” is extremely popular in contemporary social science research. Popularity entails numerous rival conceptualizations and layers of meaning, as well as many exciting research agendas. This piece aims to introduce to readers the main areas in which the concept of “biopolitics” has been used in the past decades and to sketch the outlines of this diverse research agenda. In a more general sense, biopolitics refers to an intersectional field, at the frontier of biology and politics.
Biology means, according to its etymology, the study of life itself. This broad definition should first be narrowed, in this case, to the study of human life and more specifically the study of human life through the body. With the idea of biopolitics, an ancient question resurfaces: are humans inherently political? Aristotle, notably, imagined men as living beings with political capacities and treated questions of biological existence separately. This tradition then...
KeywordsBody Health Demography Migration
- Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception (K. Attell, Trans.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Ajana, B. (2017). Digital health and the biopolitics of the Quantified Self. Digital Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616689509.
- Antal, A. (2019). Kivételes állapotban. A modern politikai rendszerek biopolitikája. Budapest: Napvilág kiadó.Google Scholar
- Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Eckersley, R. (2007). Green Theory. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki & S. Smith (Eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Encyclopedia Britannica. Body politic. Written by Joëlle Rollo-Koster. https://www.britannica.com/topic/body-politic. Accessed 26 Sept 2019.
- Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge and the discourses on language (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1980). The history of sexuality, vol. 1: An introduction. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality (P. Pasquino, Trans.; pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (2003). The society must be defended. Lectures at the College de France, 1975–76 (D. Macey, Trans.). New York: Picador.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics. Lectures at the College de France, 1978–79 (G. Burchell, Trans.). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
- Lemke, T. (2011). Biopolitics. An advanced introduction (E. F. Trump, Trans.). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Merlingen, M. (2003). Governmentality. Towards a Foucauldian Framework for the Study of IGOs. Cooperation and Conflict, 38(4), 361–384.Google Scholar
- United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2019). World population prospects 2019. https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/world-population-prospects-2019-highlights.html. Accessed 30 April 2020.
- Zanotti, L., Stephenson, M., & Schnitzer, M. (2015). Biopolitical and Disciplinary Peacebuilding: Sport, Reforming Bodies and Rebuilding Societies. International Peacekeeping, 22(2), 186–201.Google Scholar