The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Global Security Studies

Living Edition
| Editors: Scott Romaniuk, Manish Thapa, Péter Marton

Biosecurity and Biodefense

  • Christopher LongEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74336-3_520-1
  • 146 Downloads

Introduction

There is no one agreed-upon definition of biosecurity, but generally it can be understood as society’s collective responsibility to safeguard the population from the dangers presented by pathogenic microbes (Fidler and Gostin 2008, p. 4). Crucially, these dangers can arise from natural sources such as the emergence of a novel influenza virus whose pandemic potential is increased as a result of intensified global circuits of circulation and exchange. Or they can be released in deliberate acts via biological weapons and biological terrorism. In response to these threats, biodefense efforts utilize tools such as vaccines, therapeutics, and detection methods in coordination with data collection, analysis, and intelligence gathering to prevent or mitigate biological attacks against people and agriculture (Ryan and Glarum 2008, p. 19). In recent years, a whole panoply of unique institutions and organizations have been developed, primarily in the USA, along these lines. This has...

Keywords

Bioterrorism Dual-use Biotechnology Medical countermeasures 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alibek, K., & Handelman, S. (1999). Biohazard. London: Random HouseGoogle Scholar
  2. Caplan, A. L., Parent, B., Shen, M., & Plunkett, C. (2015). No time to waste – the ethical challenges created by CRISPR. EMBO Reports, 16(11), 1421–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christopher, G. W., Cieslak, T. J., Pavlin, J. A., Eitzen, E., & Jr, M. (1997). Biological warfare a historical perspective. JAMA, 278(5), 412–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dando, M. (2007). The impact of scientific and technological change. In A. Wenger & R. Wollenmann (Eds.), Bioterrorism: Confronting a complex threat (pp. 77–92). Colorado: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  5. Elbe, S., Roemer-Mahler, A., & Long, C. (2015). Medical countermeasures for national security: A new government role in the pharmaceuticalization of society. Social Science & Medicine, 131, 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fidler, D. P., & Gostin, L. O. (2008). Biosecurity in the global age: Biological weapons, public health, and the rule of law. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Garrett, L. (2002). Betrayal of trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gottron, F. (2014). The project BioShield act: Issues for the 113th congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  9. Hoyt, K. (2012). Long shot: Vaccines for national defense. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Koblentz, G. D. (2017). The de novo synthesis of horsepox virus: Implications for biosecurity and recommendations for preventing the reemergence of smallpox. Health Security, 15(5), 1–9.Google Scholar
  11. Koplow, D. A. (2003). Smallpox: The fight to eradicate a global scourge. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Leitenberg, M. (2001). An assessment of biological weapons threat to the United States. In J. Rosen & C. Lucey (Eds.), Emerging technologies: Recommendations for counter-terrorism (pp. 132–155). Hanover: Institute for Security Technology Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Lentzos, F., & Silver, P. (2012). Synthesis of viral genomes. In J. B. Tucker (Ed.), Innovation, dual use, and security (pp. 133–146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Levy, S. B. (2002). The antibiotic paradox. Boston: Perseus Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Meselson, M., Guillemin, J., Hugh-Jones, M., Langmuir, A., Popova, I., Shelokov, A., et al. (1994). The Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak of 1979. Science, 266(5188), 1202–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller, J., Broad, W. J., & Engelberg, S. (2002). Germs: Biological weapons and America’s secret war. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  17. Petro, J. B., Plasse, T. R., & McNulty, J. A. (2003). Biotechnology: Impact on biological warfare and biodefense. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism, 1(3), 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Riedel, S. (2004). Biological warfare and bioterrorism: A historical review. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 17(4), 400–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ryan, J., & Glarum, J. (2008). Biosecurity and bioterrorism. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  20. Tucker, J. B. (2012). Introduction. In J. B. Tucker (Ed.), Innovation, dual use, and security (pp. 1–16). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Vogel, K. M. (2008). Biodefence: Considering the sociotechnical dimension. In S. J. Collier & A. Lakoff (Eds.), Biosecurity interventions: Global health and security in question (pp. 227–255). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Further Readings

  1. Elbe, S. (2010). Security and global health. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Enemark, C. (2017). Biosecurity dilemmas: Dreaded diseases, ethical responses, and the health of nations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Guillemin, J. (2005). Biological weapons: From the invention of state-sponsored programs to contemporary bioterrorism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hoyt, K. (2015). Medical countermeasures and security. In S. Rushton & J. Youde (Eds.), Routledge handbook of global health security (pp. 215–225). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Katona, P., Sullivan, J. P., & Intriligator, M. D. (Eds.). (2010). Global biosecurity. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Lakoff, A., & Collier, S. (Eds.). (2008). Biosecurity interventions: Global health and security in question. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Rushton, S., & Youde, J. (Eds.). (2015). Routledge handbook of global health security. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International Relations, School of Global Studies, University of SussexBrightonUK